The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 29 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
hostellers 表现出色 .
Reguest 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Messaging Guest Surveys and Team Messaging.
基于 HTR 上 29 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 29 |
在分析了 29 条经验证的评价后,hostellers 用户最看重其 ,而 Reguest 用户则强调 沟通效率, 用户友好界面, 定制化和灵活性。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
| hostellers |
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
沟通效率
▾
|
|
|
+
用户友好界面
▾
|
|
|
+
定制化和灵活性
▾
|
|
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
统计与报告
▾
|
|
|
−
模块化和模板的局限性
▾
|
|
|
−
移动设备无障碍访问
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 访客留言软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 | hostellers |
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #9 11 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #16 13 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 | hostellers |
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #15 11 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #15 10 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | — | #23 4 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #12 5 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 | hostellers |
|
|---|---|---|
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #6 28 条评价 |
When choosing guest communication software, your hotel needs a tool that enhances guest engagement, simplifies workflows, and integrates with your existing systems. Hostellers by hostellers, built primarily for hostels, focuses on hostel-specific operations but offers limited features and a small review base. ReGuest by Reguest, on the other hand, provides a feature-rich, AI-powered CRM with a broad hotel segment reach and a strong recent review presence. Which product better aligns with your hotel's needs?
Hostellers is tailored to hostel operations, emphasizing AI-generated summaries and recommendations to streamline hostel management. ReGuest’s platform, with a comprehensive guest communication system and over 20 integrations, covers a wider range of hotel types, including luxury hotels, resorts, and boutique properties. The core difference lies in their target audiences: Hostellers is designed specifically for hostel environments, while ReGuest aims to serve a broad hotel market.
ReGuest boasts 29 recent reviews and a high NPS score of 9.69, reflecting substantial user satisfaction and recent engagement. Hostellers has no reviews or ratings, making it impossible to gauge current user sentiment or reliability. Given the recent reviews and high scores, ReGuest currently offers more trustworthy insights into user experience.
Both platforms aim to improve guest communication, but ReGuest offers a more extensive feature set and a broader market presence. Hostellers’s AI features for summaries and tailored recommendations are useful for hostel operators but are limited compared to ReGuest’s suite of automation, analytics, and omnichannel communication capabilities. For now, your decision hinges on whether you prioritize a niche hostel solution or a versatile hotel CRM.
If your hotel needs a robust guest communication system with extensive automation, integration options, and a proven track record, ReGuest is the clear choice. Its broad feature set—38 unique capabilities including chatbots, workflows, surveys, and multilingual support—addresses complex operational needs, especially for properties with diverse guest profiles.
If your hotel is a hostel or small property seeking a simple, AI-driven management tool with minimal requirements, Hostellers might seem appealing. However, given its lack of recent reviews, limited features, and no clear customer feedback, it’s difficult to recommend over a solution with a proven track record like ReGuest. Larger or more segmented hotels will benefit more from ReGuest’s capabilities.
ReGuest scores 4.83/5 for ease of use, with a highly intuitive interface, quick onboarding, and staff that find it easy to adopt. Its user-friendly design and comprehensive onboarding process contribute to high user satisfaction, supported by a recent review rating of 4.85/5 and an NPS of 9.69.
Hostellers, with no available reviews or ratings, provides no data to assess usability or onboarding. Without user feedback, it’s impossible to judge how quickly your team could adapt or how effective the user experience is. Edge: ReGuest.
ReGuest offers 38 distinct features, including guest surveys, automated workflows, omnichannel messaging, chatbots, digital check-in, and analytics dashboards. Hostellers provides no documented features or capabilities, limiting its appeal to niche hostel management needs.
ReGuest’s feature set is designed for comprehensive communication, automation, and guest relationship management, making it suitable for properties that want to improve guest engagement at every stage. Its open API, multi-property management, and integrations with third-party booking platforms add significant value. Edge: ReGuest.
ReGuest excels with a customer support rating of 4.97/5, with many reviews praising prompt, helpful, and dedicated support staff. Users mention that support helps quickly resolve issues, ensuring smooth operation, which is critical for hotel staff.
Hostellers, with no reviews or support ratings available, provides no evidence of its support quality. Without user feedback, you risk uncertain support experiences. Given the positive recent reviews, ReGuest is the safer option for reliable customer service. Edge: ReGuest.
ReGuest offers 20 verified integrations, including popular systems like Mews, Flexipass, and Vertical Booking, along with numerous third-party tools. Hostellers has only a single verified partner, Cloudbeds, which limits its ability to connect with other hotel systems.
If your hotel relies on multiple platforms or plans to expand, ReGuest’s extensive integration options will streamline operations and data flow. Hostellers’s limited integrations restrict its adaptability to your existing tech stack. Edge: ReGuest.
ReGuest’s recent reviews reflect high satisfaction, with a 97% likelihood to recommend and a score of 9.69/10. Users across varied hotel segments, including luxury and resorts, praise its interface, automation, and support.
Hostellers lacks reviews and ratings entirely, making it impossible to determine user satisfaction or segment-specific ratings. In the current landscape, ReGuest’s proven reputation makes it the better-rated choice. Edge: ReGuest.
Both products do not publicly disclose detailed pricing, suggesting a custom quote model based on property size and features. However, ReGuest’s pricing approach is consistent across users, with no mention of a free tier or trial, indicating a potentially higher investment.
Hostellers’s lack of pricing info and reviews makes it difficult to assess value, but its limited feature set and market presence imply a lower-cost but also less capable solution. For comprehensive functionality, expect ReGuest to be priced accordingly.
ReGuest offers a broad, feature-rich platform with 38 capabilities, extensive integrations, and high user satisfaction, making it suitable for most hotels looking for advanced guest communication. Its recent review base and high ratings reinforce its reliability and usability, especially for properties with complex needs or multiple channels.
Hostellers, built for hostels, provides AI summaries and recommendations but lacks recent reviews, features, and integration options. Its narrow focus limits its appeal for larger or more segmented hotels. If you want a proven, scalable, and well-supported system, ReGuest is your best choice.
If your hotel is a hostel or small property with minimal automation needs, and budget constraints are critical, Hostellers might suffice, but the lack of recent feedback and features makes it less attractive overall.
Final Recommendation: For most hotels seeking a dependable, feature-rich guest communication tool, ReGuest outperforms Hostellers in recent reviews, usability, and functionality. Choose ReGuest if you want a scalable solution that can grow with your property and support your operational complexity.
访客留言软件 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
| hostellers |
|
|---|
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Hostellers 和 ReGuest Guest Communication 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 | hostellers |
|
|---|---|---|
| 安全数据保护 | ||
| 开放式 API | ||
| 消息客人调查 | ||
| 聊天机器人 | ||
| 自动回复 | ||
| 自动选择加入/同意收集 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 26 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
ReGuest 的突出特点是其高效的聊天功能,可实现快速直观的宾客沟通,从而简化操作并提高宾客满意度。
该平台因其用户友好的界面、快速直观的操作以及激励人心的设计而备受赞誉,并受到众多用户的喜爱。
ReGuest 的模块化系统提供了灵活性和个性化,但增加了成本,这引起了一些用户的担忧。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
该系统提供清晰快捷的统计数据,但有些用户希望获得更详细的分析,特别是针对特定消息的分析。
虽然该平台提供了一些可定制的选项,但其自助实施功能有限,且新模板的设置不够直观。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Hostellers 和 ReGuest Guest Communication 共享许多核心 Guest Messaging Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Hostellers 提供 1 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 ReGuest Guest Communication 提供 20 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。ReGuest Guest Communication 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Hostellers:否。ReGuest Guest Communication:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Guest Messaging Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。hostellers 的 HT Score 为 0,Reguest 的为 74。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您的房产情况量身定制的推荐方案