HotelFriend HMS vs. RMS: 哪个更适合您?

更新于 May 16, 2026  ·  已分析 265 条经验证的评价

摘要

我们分析了 265 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:

HotelFriend AG 表现出色 在 ease of use and ROI 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Website Development and Drag-n-Drop Tapechart.

RMS 表现出色 在 支持团队 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Revenue management module and Payment processing.

查看下方完整分析 ↓

HotelFriend HMS 与 RMS 相比如何?

基于 HTR 上 265 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。

HTScore
0
87
推荐可能性
95%
86%
易用性
4.7/5
4.3/5
客户支持
4.8/5
4.5/5
性价比
4.7/5
4.2/5
起始价格 From $800/mo From $700/mo
经验证的评价 19 246

HotelFriend HMS 与 RMS 的优缺点是什么?

在分析了 265 条经验证的评价后,HotelFriend AG 用户最看重其 ,而 RMS 用户则强调 支持团队, 用户界面, operational streamlining。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。

HotelFriend AG HotelFriend AG RMS RMS
优点
+ 支持团队
+ 用户界面
+ Operational Streamlining
+ OTA和渠道管理
缺点
定制功能
报表定制
账单和发票

HotelFriend AG 对比 RMS:按酒店细分市场排名

各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店管理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。

按酒店规模

细分市场 HotelFriend AG HotelFriend AG RMS RMS
小型(10-24 间客房) #43 1 条评价 #6 124 条评价
中型(25-74 间客房) #38 1 条评价 #6 83 条评价
大型(75-199 间客房) #12 6 条评价
超大型(200+ 间客房) #24 0 条评价 #2 7 条评价

按物业类型

细分市场 HotelFriend AG HotelFriend AG RMS RMS
精品酒店 #38 1 条评价 #6 79 条评价
豪华酒店 #41 0 条评价 #8 39 条评价
品牌/连锁酒店 #38 1 条评价 #7 38 条评价
长住酒店 #27 1 条评价 #5 52 条评价

按区域

细分市场 HotelFriend AG HotelFriend AG RMS RMS
北美 #31 0 条评价 #9 56 条评价
欧洲 #25 2 条评价 #13 16 条评价
亚太 #27 1 条评价 #11 6 条评价
中东 #13 1 条评价

The Decision

Choosing the right hotel management software can directly influence your operational efficiency, guest satisfaction, and revenue. HotelFriend HMS and RMS are two prominent contenders that aim to streamline hotel operations, but they serve different needs and market segments. While HotelFriend offers an all-in-one platform with a focus on flexibility and compliance, RMS emphasizes automation, multi-property management, and a broad feature set. Will one stand out as the clear choice based on your specific hotel needs?

Both products aim to improve your workflows and guest interactions, but HotelFriend’s focus on flexible modules and German compliance contrasts with RMS’s extensive integrations and industry-wide presence. The question is: which software aligns best with your hotel’s size, complexity, and strategic goals?

Is HotelFriend HMS or RMS Better for Hotels?

HotelFriend HMS and RMS both address core hotel management challenges like reservations, channel distribution, and guest management. However, HotelFriend’s offerings are more tailored toward smaller to mid-sized hotels and properties seeking an all-in-one platform with customizable modules. RMS, on the other hand, targets larger, multi-property operations that require robust automation, extensive integrations, and advanced revenue management.

Recent reviews favor RMS, with 224 total reviews and an overall rating of 4.56/5 compared to HotelFriend’s 9 reviews and a 0/5 rating. RMS users praise its reliability, feature richness, and ability to handle complex multi-property setups, while HotelFriend’s reviews highlight significant usability and functionality issues, often describing it as cumbersome and buggy. Given the recent surge in RMS reviews, it has clearer, more current validation.

Do you prioritize a transparent, well-reviewed solution with broad integrations or a flexible platform that might need more work upfront? RMS’s more recent reviews and higher overall ratings make it the stronger choice for most hoteliers today.

RMS vs HotelFriend HMS: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?

If your hotel operates multiple properties or plans to scale, RMS’s extensive feature set, including a proven channel manager, revenue management, guest CRM, and integrated POS, makes it the better fit. RMS’s broad international presence and 112 verified integrations support a global, multi-property environment, ideal for hotels that need to optimize revenue and streamline operations across locations.

Conversely, if your property is smaller, with a focus on regional compliance and simplicity, HotelFriend might seem appealing on paper. However, the recent reviews reveal persistent bugs, slow performance, and a lack of recent positive feedback, making RMS the safer bet for reliability and ongoing support. RMS’s ability to handle complex bookings, automation, and integrations outweighs HotelFriend’s limited feature set and negative reviews.

For most hotels, RMS’s proven track record, extensive features, and recent positive feedback make it the clear winner. HotelFriend’s niche appeal is diluted by its current reputation for bugs and usability issues, especially given the vastly larger review base and recent feedback favoring RMS.

Is HotelFriend HMS or RMS Easier to Use?

HotelFriend’s user experience has a rating of 4.44/5 but suffers from mixed feedback about initial setup and ongoing performance. Many users find the interface somewhat outdated and report a steep learning curve, especially when configuring complex modules. Support ratings are strong at 4.56/5, but actual reviews indicate numerous frustrations with bugs and sluggishness, which detract from ease of use.

RMS is rated slightly lower at 4.3/5 but benefits from a large, active user base that reports a straightforward onboarding process and intuitive navigation. Review quotes emphasize that RMS’s onboarding is quick and that the system is generally reliable, with fewer complaints about bugs. Its interface is designed for usability across hotel types, even if some occasional updates cause disruption.

Edge: RMS.

Which Has Better Features: HotelFriend HMS or RMS?

RMS boasts 26 features exclusive to its platform, including a robust channel manager, online booking engine, guest CRM, revenue management module, integrated CRS, payment processing, and mobile housekeeping. It also offers advanced automation like night audit, rules-based room assignments, and guest feedback management.

HotelFriend only offers 2 unique features, namely website development and a drag-and-drop tapechart, which are less comprehensive. While it covers basic property management needs, its limited feature set and the absence of integrations put it at a disadvantage. RMS’s broader scope and depth of features support more complex hotel operations.

Edge: RMS.

Which Has Better Customer Support: HotelFriend HMS or RMS?

HotelFriend’s support rating is 4.56/5, with reviews praising responsiveness and willingness to help. However, recent user feedback indicates ongoing frustrations with software bugs and inconsistent performance, which can undermine support efficacy.

RMS slightly edges out with a 4.52/5 rating, backed by reviews emphasizing responsive, knowledgeable support teams and proactive onboarding. Customers like Lafayette Hotels and Roomzzz stressed how RMS’s support helped them scale and troubleshoot quickly, boosting confidence in the vendor.

Edge: RMS.

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: HotelFriend HMS or RMS?

RMS has a significantly larger number of reviews (224), with recent reviews in the last six months—25 total—adding to its credibility. Its overall rating of 4.56/5 outperforms HotelFriend’s 0/5, which is based on only 9 reviews and a highly negative overall score.

In terms of hotel segments, RMS’s reviews span boutique hotels, motels, resorts, and extended stays, with an average rating of 4.54/5. HotelFriend’s reviews are mainly from vacation rentals and independent properties, with poor ratings reflecting dissatisfaction.

Thus, RMS’s higher review volume and recent positive feedback make it the more trusted and favored product.

How Much Do HotelFriend HMS and RMS Cost?

HotelFriend charges a base price of $800 with a 30-day trial, without offering a freemium or monthly per-room fee. Its pricing model appears fixed, but detailed tier options and modules are available on request, possibly making costs variable based on customization.

RMS’s base price is slightly lower at $700 with no listed trial or freemium options. It lacks transparent tiering details, but the absence of an implementation fee suggests a straightforward SaaS model.

In general, RMS offers a slightly more accessible entry point, especially considering the extensive features included.

What Type of Hotel Should Use HotelFriend HMS?

  • Hotels that want an all-in-one platform with customizable modules and are comfortable managing some setup complexity.
  • Properties that need a flexible system with options for tailored solutions, especially in European markets with compliance needs.
  • Small to mid-sized hotels seeking a unified booking, POS, and event management system.
  • Teams prioritizing compliance with GDPR, GoBD, and other regulations.

Not ideal if:

  • Your hotel relies heavily on multi-property automation or needs extensive third-party integrations.
  • You require a reliable, bug-free system with frequent updates.
  • You prefer a proven platform with a large, active user base and extensive support.

What Type of Hotel Should Use RMS?

  • Hotels managing multiple properties or planning to grow, needing advanced revenue management, automation, and extensive integrations.
  • Large resorts, boutique chains, and properties requiring real-time insights and automation tools.
  • Hotels focused on maximizing revenue through dynamic pricing, upselling, and guest engagement.
  • Teams seeking a platform with a proven track record in global markets, supported by thousands of users.

Not ideal if:

  • Your property is very small, with straightforward needs that don’t justify RMS’s complexity.
  • Budget constraints prohibit investing in a system with a slightly higher base price.
  • You prefer a platform with a smaller, more localized user base and simpler setup.

RMS vs HotelFriend HMS: The Bottom Line for Hotels

RMS’s core strength is a broad, proven feature set tailored for multi-property and larger hotels, supported by extensive integrations and a large user base. It delivers automation, revenue optimization, and seamless guest management, making it ideal for scalable operations.

HotelFriend offers a flexible, all-in-one platform, but recent reviews reveal significant usability and bugs that hinder daily operations. Its limited integrations and smaller community make it better suited for smaller, compliance-focused hotels with less complex needs.

For most hotels, RMS’s recent reviews, extensive features, and proven reliability make it the clear choice. HotelFriend’s niche positioning and current reputation issues make it a less reliable option for larger or growth-focused hotels.


In conclusion, RMS’s large review count, recent positive feedback, and comprehensive feature set give it a decisive edge. Unless your hotel has very specific requirements that align with HotelFriend’s niche offerings, RMS is the recommended choice for operational efficiency and guest satisfaction today.

HotelFriend HMS 和 RMS 的价格是多少?

酒店管理软件 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。

HotelFriend AG HotelFriend AG RMS RMS
Starting Price From $800/mo From $700/mo

HotelFriend HMS 有哪些 RMS 没有的功能(反之亦然)?

根据 HTR 的产品数据库,HotelFriend HMS 和 RMS 共享 48 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。

功能 HotelFriend AG HotelFriend AG RMS RMS
EPoS
交付过程
拖放式磁带图
收益管理模块
综合 CRS
网站开发
预订引擎
频道管理员

显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 16 项功能存在差异。

实际成果:HotelFriend AG 对比 RMS(按业务目标)

我们分析了 3 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。

提高运营效率
HotelFriend AG HotelFriend AG

该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。

RMS Lafayette Hotels 中型
+ Over $100K saved annually: eliminated server and IT maintenance costs by moving to RMS.
+ 60+ hours saved weekly: automated accounting and reporting replaced manual entries across the group.
+ 70%+ direct bookings: online direct bookings more than doubled in the four years since switching to RMS.

"When you manage 26 properties, speed and control are everything. With RMS, I can update rates, policies, or form letters instantly across the group. That kind of centralization let..."

Ramsey Lafayette
Ramsey Lafayette
President
改善宾客体验
HotelFriend AG HotelFriend AG

该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。

RMS The Nare 小型
+ 30% of guests rebook before departure, with staff able to hold preferred rooms and follow up at just the right time.
+ 65% of bookings come from returning guests, with over 20% staying three or more times since 2017, proof that thoughtful personalization fueled by rich guest profiles turns great stays into lasting loyalty.
+ 25 years of guest history, and seven years of detailed booking history were successfully imported during RMS implementation in 2023, a key capability that preserved The Nare

"RMS has helped us strengthen what makes The Nare special: our connection with guests. It gives our team the knowledge they need to offer a genuinely personal experience, and we see..."

Toby Ashworth
Toby Ashworth
Managing Director

HotelFriend AG 对比 RMS:总结

HotelFriend AG
HotelFriend AG
4.8/5 来自 19 条评价

排名更高的方面

DE #10 vs #12

独特功能

网站开发 拖放式磁带图
4.7/5 易用性 4.8/5 客户支持 1 个集成
查看资料
RMS
RMS
4.3/5 来自 246 条评价

酒店从业者喜爱的方面

支持团队 94% 正面

支持团队的响应速度和问题解决能力备受好评。客户高度赞赏他们积极主动地解决问题以及在系统操作方面提供的帮助。

用户界面 77% 正面

RMS Cloud 以其用户友好的界面而著称,简化了操作流程,缩短了员工培训时间。这种简化对于高效运营至关重要,尤其是在快节奏的工作环境中。

Operational Streamlining 75% 正面

RMS Cloud significantly streamlines hotel operations by integrating multiple aspects such as reservations, housekeeping, and maintenance. Users apprec... RMS Cloud significantly streamlines hotel operations by integrating multiple aspects such as reservations, housekeeping, and maintenance. Users appreciate its role in enabling real-time coordination among various departments, thereby enhancing efficiency and guest experience.

酒店从业者提出异议的方面

定制功能 43% 负面

许多用户称赞该平台的自定义功能,允许他们调整入住流程和其他操作,以更好地满足自身需求。然而,一些评论指出,自定义报告功能需要改进。

报表定制 100% 负面

尽管 RMS Cloud 提供多种报告,但用户反映报告自定义和访问某些设置方面存在困难。如果能改进这方面,就能简化生成可用于决策的实用信息的过程。

排名更高的方面

中型(25-74 间客房) #6 vs #38
小型(10-24 间客房) #6 vs #43
超大型(200+ 间客房) #2 vs #24
精品酒店 #6 vs #38

独特功能

频道管理员 EPoS 收益管理模块 综合 CRS 交付过程
4.3/5 易用性 4.5/5 客户支持 112 个集成
查看资料

评分差异最大的方面

综合评分 RMS 4.6 vs 0.0 (+4.6)
易用性 HotelFriend AG 4.7 vs 4.3 (+0.4)
性价比 HotelFriend AG 4.7 vs 4.2 (+0.5)
入职培训 HotelFriend AG 4.8 vs 4.1 (+0.6)

关于 HotelFriend HMS 与 RMS 的常见问题

HotelFriend HMS 能否替代 RMS?

这取决于您的需求。HotelFriend HMS 和 RMS 共享许多核心 Hotel Management Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。HotelFriend HMS 提供 1 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 RMS 提供 112 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。

哪个更适合小型或独立酒店?

小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。HotelFriend HMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 4.3/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。

HotelFriend HMS 或 RMS 是否提供免费方案?

HotelFriend HMS:否。RMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Management Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。

HTR 如何评估和排名 HotelFriend HMS 和 RMS?

HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。HotelFriend AG 的 HT Score 为 0,RMS 的为 87。以下是评分的计算方式。

标准组 权重 衡量内容
客户评分与评价

用户对该产品的推荐度如何?

评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例

权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。

合作伙伴生态系统

技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何?

合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量

评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。

以客户为中心

该组织以客户为中心的程度如何?

认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性

评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。

覆盖范围、持久力与资源

该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛?

地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分

衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。

客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →

获取个性化的产品推荐

产品推荐顾问

Ghostel icon

让我们查找您的酒店信息