The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 43 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
HotelRunner 表现出色 在 客户支持 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Pre-stay emails and Post-stay emails.
Journey 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 Urgency messaging.
基于 HTR 上 43 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $100/mo | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 41 | 2 |
在分析了 43 条经验证的评价后,HotelRunner 用户最看重其 客户支持, 易于使用, 渠道管理,而 Journey 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
|
|
+
易于使用
▾
|
|
|
+
渠道管理
▾
|
|
|
+
与 OTA 集成
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
预订引擎
▾
|
|
|
−
报告功能
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 预订引擎 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #19 16 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #29 9 条评价 | #38 2 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #31 0 条评价 | #42 0 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #25 1 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #18 22 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #28 9 条评价 | #42 1 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | #31 3 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 | #33 1 条评价 | #40 0 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | #26 1 条评价 | #36 0 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #22 12 条评价 | #35 2 条评价 |
| 亚太 | #20 3 条评价 | — |
| 中东 ▾ | #1 16 条评价 | — |
Choosing a booking engine is critical to your hotel's revenue and guest experience. Both HotelRunner and Journey aim to streamline bookings, but they tackle different aspects of the process. HotelRunner offers a broad suite of features with extensive OTA integrations, while Journey emphasizes ease of use and conversion-focused design. Which platform aligns best with your hotel's priorities?
HotelRunner and Journey both serve as booking engines, but they differ in scope and focus. HotelRunner provides a comprehensive platform with advanced channel management, multi-channel distribution, and extensive integrations, making it a solid choice for hotels seeking operational control. Conversely, Journey is designed to convert browsing into bookings through a sleek, mobile-first interface that emphasizes guest experience. Do you prioritize broad feature sets or simplicity and conversion?
If your hotel needs a feature-rich platform with multiple integrations, extensive customization, and robust channel management, HotelRunner is the clear choice. It boasts 40 reviews in the last six months, with a 4.5/5 overall rating, indicating strong recent performance. For hotels that value control over rates, content, and distribution, HotelRunner's detailed tools and broad regional presence make it well-suited.
If your focus is on increasing direct bookings through an intuitive, fast interface with high guest engagement, Journey is tempting, especially given its 2 reviews and perfect 5/5 usability score. However, the limited recent reviews make it less reliable for long-term planning. For smaller properties or teams prioritizing simplicity, Journey could work, but HotelRunner’s larger user base and active feedback loop provide more confidence.
HotelRunner scores 4.73/5 for ease of use, with many users praising its user-friendly interface and straightforward onboarding process. Reviewers mention that setup is quick, and ongoing management is intuitive, even for less tech-savvy teams. Support is highly rated at 4.8/5, with clients citing prompt responses and helpful guidance.
Journey, on the other hand, boasts a perfect 5/5 rating for ease of use, emphasizing its mobile-first, simplified approach. Reviewers highlight its straightforward design, which makes browsing and booking quick. Still, with only 2 reviews, it’s hard to gauge long-term usability or onboarding experience comprehensively.
Edge: HotelRunner.
HotelRunner offers 23 shared features plus 17 exclusive to it, including tariffs, pooled inventory, pre- and post-stay emails, gift vouchers, and ADA compliance. It also supports more advanced capabilities like custom booking modules, tripadvisor integration, and extensive reporting tools.
Journey provides only 3 unique features—urgency messaging, Apple Pay, and Facebook conversion tracking—focusing on conversion tactics rather than broad operational tools. While Journey’s features support a fast booking process, HotelRunner’s vast feature set offers more control and customization options.
Edge: HotelRunner.
HotelRunner’s support reviews rate at 4.8/5, with hoteliers praising its responsiveness and helpfulness. One reviewer notes, “Customer support is quick and efficient, resolving issues in minutes,” reflecting a reliable support system.
Journey’s support is rated a perfect 5/5, with reviewers describing it as “excellent,” noting prompt responses and attentive service. However, with only 2 recent reviews, the data lacks breadth. HotelRunner’s larger, more active user base and detailed feedback indicate more consistent support quality.
Edge: HotelRunner.
HotelRunner integrates with 17 verified partners, including major OTAs like Expedia, Agoda, and Airbnb, as well as hotel management systems like protel and Hotelogix. Notably, it supports extensive third-party integrations, making distribution easier.
Journey lists only 5 verified partners, with a focus on core integrations such as Stripe and Access Hospitality. While suitable for basic connectivity, its limited partner network restricts potential distribution channels compared to HotelRunner’s extensive ecosystem.
Edge: HotelRunner.
HotelRunner’s recent reviews indicate a 4.5/5 overall rating from 40 reviews, with 96% likelihood to recommend. Its strongest segments include boutique hotels and inns, with many praising its channel management and customization.
Journey, with only 2 reviews, has a perfect 5/5 rating and a 100% likelihood to recommend. However, the limited review data and recency imply less reliability. For broader hotel segments, HotelRunner’s extensive feedback provides a more accurate picture of overall satisfaction.
Edge: HotelRunner.
HotelRunner charges a base price of $100/month without additional implementation fees or trial options. Pricing is straightforward, but it doesn’t include a free tier, which might be a consideration for smaller hotels.
Journey’s pricing details are unavailable, suggesting it may have a customized quote approach. The absence of clear pricing could make budgeting and comparison difficult, but it also indicates potential flexibility based on your hotel’s needs.
Not ideal if you prefer a simple, minimal setup or a platform with fewer integrations.
Not ideal if your hotel needs broad distribution, advanced management features, or detailed reporting.
HotelRunner offers a comprehensive, feature-rich platform backed by a large support network and extensive integrations. It’s best suited for hotels that need control, customization, and broad distribution, particularly in regions like North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific.
Journey excels at conversion, providing a sleek, mobile-first booking experience that simplifies the guest journey. It’s ideal for smaller properties or teams focused on direct bookings, upselling, and a fast, straightforward booking process.
If your hotel needs a proven, well-rounded platform with extensive capabilities, HotelRunner is the clear choice. For hotels prioritizing ease of use and booking conversion, Journey may be appealing, but its limited recent reviews and features suggest it’s less suitable for larger or more complex operations.
In summary, HotelRunner’s larger review base, recent positive feedback, and feature set make it the more reliable, versatile choice for most hotels. Journey’s simplicity and focus on conversions might serve niche markets well but lack the depth needed for broader hotel management.
预订引擎 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $100/mo | — |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Booking Engine by HotelRunner 和 Journey - Booking Engine 共享 23 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Facebook 转化跟踪 | ||
| 入住前电子邮件 | ||
| 入住后电子邮件 | ||
| 关税 | ||
| 合并库存 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 符合 ADA 标准 | ||
| 紧急信息 | ||
| 苹果支付 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 8 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
客户支持因其响应迅速和高效而受到赞誉。用户对通过各种沟通渠道(包括 WhatsApp)提供的及时帮助表示赞赏。
该平台以其用户友好的界面和易于导航而闻名,使得具有不同技术专长的酒店经营者可以轻松进行设置和管理。
用户称赞 Hotelrunner 拥有强大的渠道管理功能,可与众多 OTA 无缝同步。这可消除重复预订并简化库存管理。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
集成预订引擎因推动直接预订和允许定制套餐而备受好评。许多用户欣赏创建 OTA 列表的便捷性,这有助于提高入住率和收入。
用户强调需要更加强大和可定制的报告工具来帮助制定利率策略决策,这反映了未来改进的一个关键领域。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Booking Engine by HotelRunner 和 Journey - Booking Engine 共享许多核心 Booking Engine 功能,但各有独特的能力。Booking Engine by HotelRunner 提供 17 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Journey - Booking Engine 提供 5 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Journey - Booking Engine 在易用性方面领先,评分为 5.0/5 对比 4.7/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Booking Engine by HotelRunner:否。Journey - Booking Engine:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Booking Engine 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。HotelRunner 的 HT Score 为 74,Journey 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问