The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 61 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
HotelRunner 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Confirmation emails and Referral Reporting.
eRevMax 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 Urgency messaging.
基于 HTR 上 61 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $100/mo | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 41 | 20 |
在分析了 61 条经验证的评价后,HotelRunner 用户最看重其 客户支持, 易于使用, 渠道管理,而 eRevMax 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
|
|
+
易于使用
▾
|
|
|
+
渠道管理
▾
|
|
|
+
与 OTA 集成
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
预订引擎
▾
|
|
|
−
报告功能
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 预订引擎 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #19 16 条评价 | #34 4 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #29 9 条评价 | #30 10 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #31 0 条评价 | #25 2 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #25 1 条评价 | #19 2 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #18 22 条评价 | #31 11 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #28 9 条评价 | #27 11 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | #31 3 条评价 | #33 3 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | #33 1 条评价 | #29 3 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | #26 1 条评价 | #28 1 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #22 12 条评价 | #42 0 条评价 |
| 亚太 | #20 3 条评价 | #19 4 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | #1 16 条评价 | #4 10 条评价 |
Choosing the right booking engine is critical to your hotel’s success in capturing direct bookings, enhancing guest experience, and maximizing revenue. HotelRunner’s Booking Engine and RateTiger Booking Engine by eRevMax both aim to streamline your online reservations; however, they differ significantly in features, user feedback, and market presence. Your decision hinges on your hotel’s specific needs, size, and operational focus.
HotelRunner boasts a higher overall rating, more recent reviews, and a broader user base, making it a more reliable choice at present. But how do these two solutions truly compare on key aspects that matter most to your team?
HotelRunner and RateTiger both serve as online booking tools designed to help hoteliers increase direct reservations and reduce dependency on OTAs. HotelRunner’s platform emphasizes customization, integrated marketing tools, and extensive channel management capabilities, while RateTiger focuses on real-time rate and inventory synchronization, ease of use, and ancillary revenue options.
While RateTiger has a long-standing reputation and a comprehensive global partner network, its latest reviews and user ratings are less recent, making HotelRunner’s data more current and reflective of ongoing support quality. Does your hotel need a platform with proven recent support and high user approval?
If your hotel primarily targets boutique, B&B, or city-center properties with an emphasis on direct bookings, HotelRunner’s extensive customization options, website builder, and marketing tools make it the better choice. Hotels that value a user-friendly, well-rated platform with recent reviews and a high likelihood to recommend should lean toward HotelRunner.
Conversely, if your hotel operates across multiple regions, relies heavily on global OTAs, or requires a solution with a broad partner network and strong channel connectivity, RateTiger’s deeper integrations and focus on rate synchronization are advantageous. Hotels with larger portfolios or a need for ancillary revenue management may benefit more from RateTiger’s offerings.
HotelRunner scores a 4.73/5 for ease of use, with intuitive navigation, simple onboarding, and high staff adoption rates. Users frequently mention how straightforward it is to manage rates, availability, and promotions, with many praising the platform’s user-friendly interface and fast setup.
RateTiger’s ease of use is rated at 4.29/5, emphasizing its simplicity and quick learning curve, though some reviews mention the interface could be more modern and streamlined. However, RateTiger’s solid support and functional design make it accessible for most hotel teams.
Edge: HotelRunner
HotelRunner offers 19 unique features not available in RateTiger, including Google Hotel Ads bookings, GDPR compliance, customizable add-ons, referral reporting, and built-in payment options like PayPal, Stripe, and Google Pay. Its feature set supports direct bookings, multi-currency management, and comprehensive marketing tools.
RateTiger provides essential channel management, rate synchronization, and ancillary revenue management but lacks many of HotelRunner’s advanced marketing and customization features. With 21 shared features, HotelRunner’s additional offerings give it a notable edge for flexibility and marketing.
Edge: HotelRunner
HotelRunner’s support is highly rated at 4.8/5, with recent reviews praising prompt, personalized assistance via multiple channels, including WhatsApp. Users highlight its responsiveness and high NPS score of 9.33/10, indicating strong customer satisfaction.
RateTiger’s support, rated at 4.47/5, is also well-regarded, with users appreciating its responsiveness and dedicated training, though some mention the need for improved onboarding and interface updates. Overall, HotelRunner’s support is more recent and consistently praised.
Edge: HotelRunner
RateTiger boasts 70 verified partners, including major OTAs and GDS channels, with a notable presence in North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific. It supports integrations with popular PMS systems and metasearch engines, giving it a broader reach.
HotelRunner features 17 verified partners, including key channels like Airbnb, Expedia, and Agoda, but fewer than RateTiger. While HotelRunner’s integrations cover essential channels, RateTiger’s larger partner network provides more options for extensive distribution.
Edge: RateTiger
HotelRunner’s latest reviews are more recent and overwhelmingly positive, with a 4.5/5 overall rating, 96% likelihood to recommend, and a high NPS score. Hotels across segments, especially boutique and B&B properties, praise its ease of use and customization.
RateTiger’s older reviews reflect consistent satisfaction but lack recent feedback to confirm ongoing performance. The consistent ratings favor HotelRunner, especially given recent positive trends.
Edge: HotelRunner
HotelRunner’s pricing starts at $100/month, with no freemium or implementation fees, providing straightforward costs. RateTiger’s pricing details are not publicly available, but it typically involves customized quotes based on hotel size and needs, which may include setup fees.
HotelRunner’s transparent pricing makes budgeting easier, while RateTiger’s costs can vary significantly depending on your property’s scale and integration requirements.
Not ideal if your hotel relies heavily on global OTAs or has complex rate parity needs that require extensive partner integrations.
Not ideal if your hotel is small or requires a highly customizable marketing-focused booking engine, as RateTiger’s strength lies in connectivity rather than marketing features.
The core difference hinges on recent reviews and feature sets. HotelRunner’s platform, with higher scores, more recent user feedback, and a broader suite of marketing tools, stands out as the more reliable option today.
Choose HotelRunner if your hotel values an easy-to-use, feature-rich platform with strong support and recent customer praise. It’s particularly suited for boutique, B&B, and city hotels seeking direct control.
Opt for RateTiger if your hotel portfolio demands extensive OTA integrations, rate synchronization, and ancillary revenue features, especially for larger or multi-region properties.
In summary, for most hoteliers evaluating current options, HotelRunner offers a more compelling, well-reviewed, and versatile solution. RateTiger remains valuable for larger operations with complex distribution needs, but its older reviews and narrower feature set make it less attractive at this moment.
Note: This comparison is based on the latest available reviews, feature data, and ratings, emphasizing current user satisfaction and recent feedback to guide your decision confidently.
预订引擎 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $100/mo | — |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Booking Engine by HotelRunner 和 RateTiger Booking Engine (by eRevMax) 共享 21 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Google 酒店广告预订 | ||
| Tripadvisor 预订 | ||
| 忠诚度计划整合 | ||
| 灵活日期 | ||
| 紧急信息 | ||
| 表单自动填充 | ||
| 费率计划比较 | ||
| 转化率报告 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 9 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 2 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"With RateTiger, we have managed to take our occupancy to 90%. Their 2-way integration between our PMS and multiple global and regional OTAs has ensured that we sell on the proper c..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We are working with RateTiger for the last 2 years. When I saw the features and functionalities of RateTiger Channel Manager, I was really impressed. RateTiger Channel Manager help..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
客户支持因其响应迅速和高效而受到赞誉。用户对通过各种沟通渠道(包括 WhatsApp)提供的及时帮助表示赞赏。
该平台以其用户友好的界面和易于导航而闻名,使得具有不同技术专长的酒店经营者可以轻松进行设置和管理。
用户称赞 Hotelrunner 拥有强大的渠道管理功能,可与众多 OTA 无缝同步。这可消除重复预订并简化库存管理。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
集成预订引擎因推动直接预订和允许定制套餐而备受好评。许多用户欣赏创建 OTA 列表的便捷性,这有助于提高入住率和收入。
用户强调需要更加强大和可定制的报告工具来帮助制定利率策略决策,这反映了未来改进的一个关键领域。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Booking Engine by HotelRunner 和 RateTiger Booking Engine (by eRevMax) 共享许多核心 Booking Engine 功能,但各有独特的能力。Booking Engine by HotelRunner 提供 17 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 RateTiger Booking Engine (by eRevMax) 提供 70 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Booking Engine by HotelRunner 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 4.4/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Booking Engine by HotelRunner:否。RateTiger Booking Engine (by eRevMax):否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Booking Engine 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。HotelRunner 的 HT Score 为 74,eRevMax 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问