The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 30 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
planet / Hoist 表现出色 .
MISTER BOOKING 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Payment processing and Housekeeping module.
基于 HTR 上 30 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 30 |
在分析了 30 条经验证的评价后,planet / Hoist 用户最看重其 ,而 MISTER BOOKING 用户则强调 支持质量, 可定制的功能, 人体工程学和设计。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
支持质量
▾
|
|
|
+
可定制的功能
▾
|
|
|
+
人体工程学和设计
▾
|
|
|
+
运营效率
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
报告生成
▾
|
|
|
−
预订引擎
▾
|
|
|
−
连接问题
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #33 14 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) | — | #45 4 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #40 10 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #35 7 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | — | #46 3 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #19 25 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #36 1 条评价 |
Choosing between hotsoft by planet / Hoist and Misterbooking hinges on your hotel’s specific needs, size, and operational priorities. Both platforms aim to streamline hotel management, but their core strengths differ dramatically. While planet / Hoist is a long-established system with minimal recent user feedback, Misterbooking offers a feature-rich, cloud-based solution with a substantial review base and recent positive feedback. Your decision should align with the level of support, features, and usability your team requires.
planet / Hoist has been around since 1994, focusing on traditional hotel management needs with limited modern features and a negligible review footprint. Conversely, Misterbooking, founded in 2003, has amassed 29 reviews in the last six months alone, with a high 4.78/5 overall rating and a 93% likelihood to recommend. Given the recent reviews and higher engagement, Misterbooking demonstrates stronger user satisfaction and ongoing relevance.
Both products claim to address hotel operations, but Misterbooking’s extensive feature set and recent user feedback suggest it caters more effectively to contemporary hotel management challenges. While planet / Hoist’s minimal recent data makes it hard to assess current user sentiment, Misterbooking’s active reviews and high scores imply a more aligned solution for today’s hotel teams.
Do you prioritize a longstanding legacy or a modern, actively supported platform?
If your hotel needs a comprehensive, cloud-based PMS with integrated booking, channel management, and guest communication tools, Misterbooking is the clear choice. It’s suited for hotels seeking scalability, frequent updates, and a proven support team, especially in regions where it has market presence.
On the other hand, if your hotel favors a more traditional, perhaps locally hosted system with minimal ongoing support and updates, planet / Hoist might seem appealing. However, the lack of recent reviews and user feedback makes it difficult to gauge its current effectiveness. For most modern hotels needing active support and feature-rich automation, Misterbooking is strongly recommended.
Misterbooking scores a 4.71/5 for ease of use, with users praising its intuitive interface, straightforward reservation management, and quick onboarding, reflected in a 4.67/5 onboarding rating. Reviewers highlight its "easy and flexible" operation, with specific praise for the visual reservation layout.
In contrast, planet / Hoist’s UI and onboarding experience are not rated or reviewed recently, making it hard to determine its usability today. Given the active reviews and high usability scores for Misterbooking, it clearly offers a more user-friendly experience.
Edge: Misterbooking.
Misterbooking boasts 33 features, including channel management, online booking engine, guest profiles, automated communication, real-time reporting, and a dedicated housekeeping module—features that planet / Hoist does not list or offer. Users appreciate its extensive customization options, multi-currency handling, and integrated support tools.
planet / Hoist’s offering appears limited in comparison, with no unique features detailed and an absence of recent feature updates or user feedback. For a hotel seeking a feature-rich platform that covers modern operational needs, Misterbooking’s extensive capabilities provide a significant advantage.
Edge: Misterbooking.
Misterbooking’s recent reviews highlight a highly responsive, supportive team with a 4.79/5 customer support score. Users mention the support as “always very helpful,” praising their quick response and problem-solving abilities.
Planet / Hoist’s support ratings are unavailable, and its aged review data suggest limited recent engagement. When support quality can make or break a PMS decision, Misterbooking’s current positive feedback gives it a decisive edge.
Edge: Misterbooking.
Misterbooking integrates with 26 verified partners, including major OTAs, GDS, and revenue management tools, with many unique integrations like Spotpilot, RevControl, and Lybra Tech. Shared integrations include RoomPriceGenie, providing broad connectivity for diverse hotel operations.
planet / Hoist only lists 2 verified partners, with one shared partner. This limited integration ecosystem restricts flexibility and scalability for hotels relying on third-party tools. For extensive connectivity, Misterbooking is clearly superior.
Edge: Misterbooking.
Misterbooking’s recent reviews show a 4.78/5 rating, with a 93% likelihood to recommend, especially among small to medium hotels, B&Bs, and hostels. Hotels in these segments find it "easy to use" and "very scalable."
Planet / Hoist has no recent ratings, reviews, or segment-specific feedback. The active, high ratings for Misterbooking indicate it’s the preferred choice for hotels seeking a highly-rated, user-approved PMS.
Edge: Misterbooking.
Pricing details for planet / Hoist are unavailable, indicating a possible lack of transparent or current pricing information. Misterbooking does not list specific prices but emphasizes its competitive, high-value offering without additional implementation fees or hidden costs.
Without concrete numbers, it’s safe to assume Misterbooking offers a clear, predictable pricing model aligned with its SaaS platform, making budgeting easier. Planet / Hoist’s vague pricing further supports choosing Misterbooking for clarity and value.
Not ideal if your hotel requires frequent updates, modern features, or active support.
Not ideal if your property has minimal digital operations or prefers traditional, self-hosted solutions.
The core difference lies in their market readiness: Misterbooking is a modern, feature-rich, cloud-based system with active user feedback and high satisfaction scores, while planet / Hoist remains a less transparent, less recent option with limited data. For hotels looking to stay current and maximize operational efficiency, Misterbooking’s active reviews, extensive features, and strong support make it the obvious choice.
Choose Misterbooking if you want a flexible, well-supported platform with proven success in diverse hotel segments. If your hotel is content with a legacy system and minimal technical updates, planet / Hoist might suffice—but the lack of recent data suggests it’s not keeping pace with current hotel management needs.
In summary, for most hotels aiming for modern, reliable, and well-supported PMS, Misterbooking is the clear winner. It offers the features, support, and user satisfaction you need to manage your hotel effectively today and tomorrow.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|---|
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,hotsoft by planet 和 Misterbooking (PMS) 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 交付过程 | ||
| 在线 24/7 支持 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 管家模块 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 频道管理员 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 21 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
支持团队的响应能力和效率一再被强调。无论是通过电话还是其他方式,他们的可用性和快速解决问题的能力对用户来说都是一大优势。
用户看重的是能够根据特定需求定制自己的账户。这种灵活性使 Misterbooking 能够很好地适应各种酒店运营,并提高了用户满意度。
虽然该软件功能强大、效率高,但用户指出其设计和人体工程学方面还有待改进。建议包括让布局更加人性化,以及更新一些过时的页面。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
提到需要更高效、更详细的统计工具或报告。用户认为改进这些功能可以带来更好的运营洞察力和决策能力。
预订引擎存在一些批评,例如照片上传选项不足和限制管理。用户建议在这些方面进行改进,以进一步完善系统。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。hotsoft by planet 和 Misterbooking (PMS) 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。hotsoft by planet 提供 2 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Misterbooking (PMS) 提供 26 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Misterbooking (PMS) 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
hotsoft by planet:否。Misterbooking (PMS):否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。planet / Hoist 的 HT Score 为 0,MISTER BOOKING 的为 14。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问