The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 425 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
MISTER BOOKING 表现出色 在 支持质量 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Payment Requests and Revenue management module.
ThinkReservations 表现出色 在 客户支持 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (0.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Mobile App and Integrated Payment Terminal & Card Reader.
基于 HTR 上 425 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $500/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 30 | 395 |
在分析了 425 条经验证的评价后,MISTER BOOKING 用户最看重其 支持质量, 可定制的功能, 人体工程学和设计,而 ThinkReservations 用户则强调 客户支持, 数据和报告, 与 ota 集成。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
支持质量
▾
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
|
+
可定制的功能
▾
|
+
数据和报告
▾
|
|
+
人体工程学和设计
▾
|
+
与 OTA 集成
▾
|
|
+
与预订渠道整合
▾
|
+
自动追加销售
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
报告生成
▾
|
−
定价和费用
▾
|
|
−
预订引擎
▾
|
−
安全功能
▾
|
|
−
连接问题
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #33 14 条评价 | #4 145 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #45 4 条评价 | #9 25 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | — | #6 3 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #5 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #40 10 条评价 | #7 100 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #35 7 条评价 | #7 70 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #46 3 条评价 | #7 24 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #11 8 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #1 386 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #19 25 条评价 | #57 0 条评价 |
| 亚太 | #36 1 条评价 | #32 0 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #32 0 条评价 |
Choosing a property management system (PMS) can feel overwhelming, especially when your hotel needs are evolving. Both Misterbooking and ThinkReservations aim to streamline operations and boost profitability, but they do so differently. Misterbooking emphasizes customization and integration, while ThinkReservations focuses on ease of use and automation. Your decision hinges on which features and support models align best with your hotel's size and goals.
Both Misterbooking and ThinkReservations address core hotel management tasks—reservation handling, channel distribution, and guest services. Misterbooking, with its customizable interface and extensive integrations, caters to hotels seeking tailored solutions and control. Conversely, ThinkReservations offers a more intuitive experience with automated functions designed for hotels prioritizing simplicity and speed. Which aligns more with your operational style: flexibility or straightforward automation?
If your hotel operates primarily in North America, values automation, and prefers a user-friendly interface, ThinkReservations is the stronger choice. It boasts 356 reviews with a 4.88/5 overall rating and recent activity—more recent reviews than Misterbooking. However, if your property is in Europe or you require deep customization, Misterbooking's more extensive feature set and regional presence may appeal. For hotels that prioritize rapid onboarding and high guest satisfaction, ThinkReservations stands out; for those needing tailored integrations and advanced pricing modules, Misterbooking is better suited.
ThinkReservations has a slight edge in usability, with a 4.82/5 ease-of-use rating based on over 350 reviews, most mentioning its straightforward interface and quick staff onboarding. Misterbooking, rated 4.71/5, is praised for its flexibility but noted to have a slightly steeper learning curve and ergonomic improvements needed. Recent reviews highlight ThinkReservations' intuitive design as a key factor in quick adoption. Edge: ThinkReservations.
Misterbooking offers 33 unique features, including revenue management, employee messaging, and automated assignments—features that support complex, multi-property management. ThinkReservations, with 29 shared features plus 10 unique ones like EPoS, digital registration, and integrated payment terminals, emphasizes automation and guest engagement tools. ThinkReservations' additional features focus on operational speed and guest experience, making it more suitable for small to mid-sized hotels. Edge: Misterbooking.
Both products rate highly for support, with Misterbooking at 4.79/5 and ThinkReservations at 4.82/5, and recent reviews praise their accessibility. Users of ThinkReservations often mention its responsive and helpful team, especially during onboarding. Misterbooking’s support is similarly lauded for responsiveness, though less recent feedback makes it harder to gauge current support quality. Given the latest reviews, ThinkReservations has a slight advantage. Edge: ThinkReservations.
Misterbooking connects to 26 verified partners, including a diverse array of booking channels and management tools like SiteMinder and RoomChecking. ThinkReservations offers 16 verified integrations, including major OTAs like Airbnb, Expedia, and TripAdvisor, along with a few unique partners like TrustYou and OpenKey. While Misterbooking’s broader partner list might appeal to complex multi-channel setups, ThinkReservations’ reliable OTA integrations cater well to small and medium properties. Edge: Misterbooking.
ThinkReservations receives a higher overall rating of 4.88/5 from 343 recent reviews, predominantly from small to boutique hotels and inns. It earns high marks for guest satisfaction and operational ease. Misterbooking’s 4.78/5 rating, based on 29 reviews, is strong, but its smaller review base and less recent activity mean less current feedback. For hoteliers seeking proven satisfaction, ThinkReservations is the clear favorite. Edge: ThinkReservations.
Misterbooking does not publicly specify pricing, but it’s known for its competitive, custom quotes based on hotel size and features. ThinkReservations costs $500 per month, with no setup fees or additional charges. The transparent monthly fee of ThinkReservations simplifies budgeting, whereas Misterbooking’s pricing negotiations could vary widely based on your hotel’s needs.
Not ideal if you prioritize quick onboarding or are based primarily in North America.
Not ideal if you require extensive customization or advanced revenue management features.
Misterbooking offers a highly customizable, regionally focused PMS with a broad array of integrations and features tailored for complex hotel operations. It’s best suited for hotels seeking control, flexibility, and advanced management tools, often in Europe or multi-property environments. Its strengths lie in its customization options, revenue management, and extensive partner network.
ThinkReservations, on the other hand, excels in ease of use, automation, and guest engagement, making it ideal for small to mid-sized hotels in North America. Its high user satisfaction, recent reviews, and focus on operational speed make it a reliable choice for properties prioritizing simplicity and guest experience.
If your hotel needs a scalable, feature-rich PMS with regional support, Misterbooking is the logical choice. For hotels seeking an intuitive, quick-to-implement platform that emphasizes automation and guest satisfaction, ThinkReservations clearly leads. Either way, your decision should align with your operational complexity, regional presence, and growth ambitions.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $500/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Misterbooking (PMS) 和 ThinkReservations PMS 共享 29 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| EPoS | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
| 任务管理 | ||
| 员工信息 | ||
| 拖放磁带图 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 税务配置 | ||
| 自动分配 | ||
| 自动夜间审计 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 2 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"I became aware of ThinkReservations at a trade show in the US, and I could see right away that it would help Blue Tang Inn streamline our operations, increase our booking and upsel..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"ThinkReservations Digital Registration has streamlined our check in process, making my job so much easier. Being able to ask guests for their ID and credit card ahead of time, agre..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We try to take care of all the needs of our guests so that they have an experience rather than just a stay"
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
支持团队的响应能力和效率一再被强调。无论是通过电话还是其他方式,他们的可用性和快速解决问题的能力对用户来说都是一大优势。
用户看重的是能够根据特定需求定制自己的账户。这种灵活性使 Misterbooking 能够很好地适应各种酒店运营,并提高了用户满意度。
虽然该软件功能强大、效率高,但用户指出其设计和人体工程学方面还有待改进。建议包括让布局更加人性化,以及更新一些过时的页面。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
提到需要更高效、更详细的统计工具或报告。用户认为改进这些功能可以带来更好的运营洞察力和决策能力。
预订引擎存在一些批评,例如照片上传选项不足和限制管理。用户建议在这些方面进行改进,以进一步完善系统。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
尽管许多人已经认为它很优秀,但一些评论表示希望在周末提供额外支持,以便更好地处理紧急询问。
ThinkReservations 通过数字注册、夜间审计以及轻松管理预订和入住流程来帮助简化运营,使员工能够更加专注于与客人的互动。
该系统提供全面的数据和报告功能,使酒店经营者能够就定价、客人满意度和战略规划做出明智的决策。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些评论强调了定价结构的问题,包括对渠道经理费用的不满以及 ThinkMessenger 等功能的高价格。
强制的两步验证对于一些用户来说是一个令人沮丧的地方,他们觉得它很麻烦并且希望降低安全设置。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
这取决于您的需求。Misterbooking (PMS) 和 ThinkReservations PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Misterbooking (PMS) 提供 26 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 ThinkReservations PMS 提供 16 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。ThinkReservations PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 4.7/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Misterbooking (PMS):否。ThinkReservations PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。MISTER BOOKING 的 HT Score 为 14,ThinkReservations 的为 89。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问