The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 105 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
planet / Hoist 表现出色 .
Sirvoy 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) and Guest Communication (SMS Messaging).
基于 HTR 上 105 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $200/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 105 |
在分析了 105 条经验证的评价后,planet / Hoist 用户最看重其 ,而 Sirvoy 用户则强调 customer support, ease of use, 预订管理。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Customer Support
▾
|
|
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
预订管理
▾
|
|
|
+
用户界面和设计
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
功能限制
▾
|
|
|
−
定制化和适应性
▾
|
|
|
−
性价比
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #22 36 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #48 3 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | — | #46 1 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #27 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #29 21 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #37 7 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | — | #42 4 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | — | #35 3 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #23 16 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #16 31 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | — | #13 6 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #27 0 条评价 |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is critical for your hotel’s efficiency and guest satisfaction. While Planet / Hoist claims to serve the hospitality industry since 1994, it currently holds a zero-star rating across all metrics, with no reviews or recent data, suggesting it’s not a reliable option. Conversely, Sirvoy has amassed 95 reviews, with 32 in the last six months, and a high overall score of 83.93, making it the more credible choice for your hotel.
Given the stark contrast in engagement and recent feedback, the decision seems straightforward: Sirvoy’s active user base and recent positive reviews make it the safer, more proven option for your hotel’s needs. Are you ready to explore how these two solutions compare in detail?
Planet / Hoist is a PMS designed with an unclear feature set and no recent user feedback, which raises questions about its current viability. On the other hand, Sirvoy is a cloud-based system with 43 features, including booking management, channel integration, and guest communication, supported by recent reviews praising its ease of use and support quality. The user feedback for Sirvoy emphasizes its straightforward interface, quick onboarding, and responsive customer service, while Planet / Hoist offers no recent reviews or evidence of ongoing support.
This comparison suggests that for hotels seeking a reliable, well-supported PMS, Sirvoy is the more practical choice. Do you want a tool with proven performance and active community support, or are you comfortable risking an unverified solution?
If your hotel needs an easy-to-use, feature-rich platform that handles reservations, guest communication, and channel management, go with Sirvoy. Its 95 reviews and recent ratings show a high level of satisfaction among small to medium-sized properties, making it a safe bet for streamlined operations. Conversely, if your team prefers a system with a long history but no recent activity or verification, Planet / Hoist might seem appealing—though its lack of recent reviews diminishes confidence in its current capabilities.
For a hotel that prioritizes user-friendliness, quick onboarding, and ongoing support, Sirvoy clearly stands out. If you need advanced features like multi-lingual support or integrated payment processing, Sirvoy’s 43 features will serve you better.
Sirvoy’s UI scores 4.64 out of 5, with reviews highlighting its intuitive design and simple navigation, making onboarding smooth for staff new to property management software. Support is rated at 4.85, with users describing the team as prompt, helpful, and knowledgeable, which reduces operational friction. In contrast, Planet / Hoist’s UI and support ratings are both 0 out of 5, with no recent reviews to gauge ease of use or customer service.
Edge: Sirvoy.
Sirvoy offers 43 features, including booking management, channel management, guest messaging, online check-in, payment processing, and automated reminders—many of which are absent from Planet / Hoist, which provides no detailed feature list. Unique to Sirvoy are functionalities like multi-lingual support, guest CRM, integrated ID scanners, and a native website builder, making it a versatile system for various hotel types. Planet / Hoist lacks documented features, making it difficult to assess its capabilities.
Edge: Sirvoy.
Customer support ratings favor Sirvoy with a 4.85 out of 5, based on recent reviews praising prompt, friendly, and effective assistance. Reviewers describe support as “superlative,” with one noting, “When we needed help, support responded quickly and clearly.” Planet / Hoist’s ratings are nonexistent, with no reviews available to determine its support quality or responsiveness.
Edge: Sirvoy.
Sirvoy integrates with 21 verified partners, including major booking channels like Booking.com, Expedia, and GDS systems, along with marketing tools like TrustYou and Revinate. Planet / Hoist only reports two verified partners—dailypoint™ and RoomPriceGenie—limiting its ability to connect with essential third-party services. This limited integration scope constrains your hotel’s flexibility and growth potential.
Edge: Sirvoy.
With 95 reviews, Sirvoy’s recent user feedback reflects a 94% likelihood to recommend, with high ratings across support, ease of use, and value. Hoteliers in diverse segments such as hostels, boutique hotels, and resorts rate Sirvoy favorably, often citing its straightforward interface and responsive customer service. Planet / Hoist has no reviews, making it impossible to gauge user satisfaction or segment-specific ratings.
Edge: Sirvoy.
Planet / Hoist’s pricing information is unavailable, and it does not offer a trial or subscription details. Sirvoy charges a $200 base price, with no indication of additional monthly fees or implementation costs. Its transparent pricing is complemented by a 30-day trial, allowing hotels to test the system before committing.
In summary, Sirvoy provides clear, predictable costs, while Planet / Hoist’s pricing remains uncertain.
Hotels that:
Not ideal if:
Given the lack of recent data, Planet / Hoist is best suited for small, low-complexity properties with minimal growth plans.
Hotels that:
Not ideal if:
Sirvoy’s user-friendly design and active support make it a solid choice for small to medium-sized accommodation providers.
Planet / Hoist presents itself as a long-established PMS but offers no recent reviews, no detailed feature list, and no recent activity, making it an unreliable choice in today’s market. Its lack of support and integration options further diminish its appeal for modern hotels seeking growth and efficiency.
Sirvoy, by contrast, has a proven track record with active users, recent positive reviews, and a comprehensive feature set tailored for small to medium properties. Its high support ratings and ease of use are backed by recent feedback, ensuring your team can onboard quickly and operate smoothly.
If your hotel values a straightforward, reliable PMS with active community support and rich features, Sirvoy is the clear winner. Only consider Planet / Hoist if you’re comfortable with an outdated, unverified system that lacks recent updates or community validation.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $200/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,hotsoft by planet 和 Sirvoy 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 集中的用户和角色管理 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 31 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Sirvoy receives high praise for its excellent customer support, noted for being responsive, helpful, and timely. Users appreciate the prompt assistanc... Sirvoy receives high praise for its excellent customer support, noted for being responsive, helpful, and timely. Users appreciate the prompt assistance, which facilitates problem resolution effectively.
Most users find Sirvoy highly intuitive and easy to navigate, which is particularly beneficial for those new to the hospitality industry. This simplic... Most users find Sirvoy highly intuitive and easy to navigate, which is particularly beneficial for those new to the hospitality industry. This simplicity allows for a smooth onboarding process without the need for extensive training.
用户称赞该系统在管理预订和宾客信息方面的高效性。然而,某些功能,例如将房间组合成套房或提供套餐优惠,则被认为需要改进。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
部分用户对 Sirvoy 的报告功能不足表示不满,特别是缺少每日销售报告,以及财务和发票功能亟待改进。此外,还有用户反馈缺乏高级客户关系管理 (CRM) 选项,以及... 部分用户对 Sirvoy 的报告功能不足表示不满,特别是缺少每日销售报告,以及财务和发票功能亟待改进。此外,还有用户反馈缺乏高级客户关系管理 (CRM) 选项,以及集成追加销售功能存在困难。
Sirvoy 提供一定程度的自定义功能,用户认为这有助于根据自身物业的具体需求调整系统。然而,部分用户希望在发票自定义和动态计费选项方面拥有更大的灵活性。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。hotsoft by planet 和 Sirvoy 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。hotsoft by planet 提供 2 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Sirvoy 提供 21 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Sirvoy 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
hotsoft by planet:否。Sirvoy:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。planet / Hoist 的 HT Score 为 0,Sirvoy 的为 85。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问