The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 37 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
planet / Hoist 表现出色 .
Slope 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) and Native Email Marketing.
基于 HTR 上 37 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $600/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 37 |
在分析了 37 条经验证的评价后,planet / Hoist 用户最看重其 ,而 Slope 用户则强调 user-friendly interface, 通知和数据集成, 客房管理和客房清洁。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
|
|
+
通知和数据集成
▾
|
|
|
+
客房管理和客房清洁
▾
|
|
|
+
在线预订集成
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
图形改进
▾
|
|
|
−
估算计算器模块
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #35 14 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #30 15 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | — | #33 2 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #41 10 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 | — | #48 3 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #35 5 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | — | #46 1 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | — | #59 1 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #15 34 条评价 |
When choosing a property management system (PMS), your priority is to find a solution that simplifies operations, improves guest experiences, and delivers reliable support. Both Hotsoft by Planet (Hoist) and Slope aim to address these needs, but they diverge significantly in their market presence, user feedback, and feature sets. Hotsoft’s limited recent reviews and zero ratings suggest it’s falling behind in the current hotel tech landscape. Conversely, Slope’s more recent, numerous reviews and high ratings indicate a more mature, well-regarded platform. Which one will truly support your hotel’s growth?
Hotsoft by Planet (Hoist) has been in the industry since 1994 but has not garnered recent reviews or high ratings, making its current effectiveness questionable. Slope, founded in 2016, boasts 35 reviews in the last six months with a 77.8 rating on the HT Score and 99% likelihood to recommend, signaling active, satisfied users. The stark contrast in recent feedback indicates that Slope likely offers more current, reliable support and a better user experience. Given the data, Slope clearly outperforms Hotsoft for modern hotel needs.
While Hotsoft’s long history might suggest stability, the absence of recent reviews and zero ratings imply it hasn’t kept pace with evolving hotel technology. Slope’s recent reviews praise its intuitive interface, seamless online booking integration, and real-time analytics, making it the more trustworthy choice today. Are you willing to rely on a system with no recent engagement, or do you prefer a platform actively supported and improved?
If your hotel needs a modern, easy-to-use PMS that integrates seamlessly with online channels and supports guest management, Slope is the clear choice. It offers 49 unique features, including booking engine, channel manager, CRM, revenue management, and mobile apps, all appreciated by users for their simplicity and effectiveness. Hotsoft, with no recent reviews and no notable features listed, appears outdated and unlikely to meet current hotel operational demands.
If your hotel requires a system with strong support, frequent updates, and a broad ecosystem of integrations, Slope’s 11 verified partners and recent positive reviews make it the right fit. Hotsoft’s lack of recent reviews and zero ratings suggest it may struggle to support your hotel’s dynamic needs or keep pace with modern integrations. For active, growth-oriented hotels, Slope is the safer, more comprehensive choice.
Slope’s user ratings reflect an exceptional ease of use, with a 4.94/5 score based on recent feedback. Users describe its interface as “super intuitive,” “modern,” and “simple,” requiring minimal training and reducing operational stress. The onboarding process is rated highly, with recent reviews indicating quick adaptation and confidence-building among staff.
Hotsoft, on the other hand, has a zero/5 overall rating, indicating no current positive user feedback on usability. Its lack of recent reviews prevents assessing its UI or onboarding quality, but the absence of support signals possible difficulties in staff adoption. Edge: Slope.
Slope’s platform includes 49 features, such as direct billing, multi-currency support, guest profiles, integrated booking engine, digital registration, guest CRM, and automated night audits, many of which are highly rated by users. Hotsoft lists no features or recent updates, raising doubts about its capability to handle complex, modern hotel operations.
Hotsoft’s feature set is effectively unknown, and its lack of recent activity suggests it’s not innovating or expanding. Slope’s comprehensive suite provides everything needed for hotel management today, with features continuously improved based on user feedback. Edge: Slope.
Slope’s recent reviews praise its customer support, giving it a 4.97/5 score and describing the team as “incredibly quick,” “friendly,” and “supportive,” with prompt responses to issues. Hotsoft’s support, with a zero/5 rating, likely lacks recent engagement, leaving hoteliers uncertain about its responsiveness.
The modern hotel environment demands responsive, reliable support. With Slope, your team can expect assistance that’s both prompt and helpful, as reflected in recent positive reviews. Edge: Slope.
Slope integrates with 11 verified partners, including major systems like SiteMinder, Guestnet, and Lybra Tech, offering extensive options for channel management, revenue, and guest engagement. Hotsoft’s two verified partners, dailypoint™ and RoomPriceGenie, suggest limited integration capabilities, which may hinder your ability to connect with other hotel systems.
The breadth of Slope’s integrations enables smoother operations and data sharing across platforms, reducing manual work and errors. Hotsoft’s limited integrations could restrict your hotel’s technological flexibility. Edge: Slope.
Hotsoft’s ratings are all zero, indicating no recent feedback or ratings, rendering it impossible to gauge user satisfaction. Slope’s recent reviews and a 77.8/100 HT Score with a 99% likelihood to recommend clearly show that hoteliers find it highly effective and valuable.
Property types such as boutique hotels, city center hotels, and inns have rated Slope highly, citing its ease of use and support. Hotsoft’s lack of recent reviews leaves its user satisfaction unverified. Edge: Slope.
Hotsoft’s pricing details are unavailable, which suggests it may be outdated or not transparently marketed. Slope charges a starting price of $600 per month, with a 30-day trial period, making it transparent and accessible for hotels considering an upgrade.
Given Slope’s clear pricing structure, your team can better evaluate ROI and plan budgets. The absence of Hotsoft’s cost info makes it less appealing for hotels seeking predictable, upfront investment decisions.
Given its lack of recent reviews and features, Hotsoft isn’t recommended for hotels aiming to stay competitive or scale efficiently.
Slope’s broad feature set and active support make it suitable for most contemporary hotel operations.
The core difference is that Slope is an active, feature-rich, highly-rated platform, while Hotsoft remains largely unreviewed and outdated. For hotels that need an efficient, modern PMS with strong support, Slope is the clear choice. Hotsoft’s lack of recent engagement and limited features make it unsuitable for hotels aiming to compete in today’s fast-paced environment.
Choose Slope if you value ongoing innovation, robust integrations, and trusted support. Opt for Hotsoft only if your hotel operates with minimal tech reliance and doesn’t require current system updates. For most hotels, Slope is the recommendation that aligns with their growth and operational needs.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $600/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,hotsoft by planet 和 Slope 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 集中的用户和角色管理 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 37 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Users praise the intuitive and modern interface that facilitates quick learning and reduces training efforts, as reflected in reviews 76199 and 76154.... Users praise the intuitive and modern interface that facilitates quick learning and reduces training efforts, as reflected in reviews 76199 and 76154. This eases operations and reduces stress during peak periods.
正如评论 76207 中指出的,通过 SDI 通知导入客人登记数据和拒绝发票等自动化功能可提高运营效率。
模块有助于房间和任务的安排、简化客房服务任务和房间清洁组织,详见评论 76189。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
建议的改进包括升级预订引擎图形(在评论 76199 中提到),以提升用户体验。
一些用户(例如评论 76189 中的用户)提到需要更新估算计算器模块,表明它与其他软件元素相比落后。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。hotsoft by planet 和 Slope 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。hotsoft by planet 提供 2 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Slope 提供 11 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Slope 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
hotsoft by planet:否。Slope:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。planet / Hoist 的 HT Score 为 0,Slope 的为 78。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问