The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 33 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Amadeus 表现出色 在 onboarding 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Virtual logbook and Service Recovery/Escalation.
Hoxell 表现出色 在 customer support and ROI 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Team goal setting (e.g. rewards sign-ups, satisfaction) and File Library Support (images, documents and videos).
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 家政软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) | #16 0 条评价 | #12 2 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #17 1 条评价 | #11 23 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #15 2 条评价 | #12 4 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #12 0 条评价 | #13 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #17 1 条评价 | #11 12 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #16 1 条评价 | #11 13 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #17 1 条评价 | #12 11 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | #18 0 条评价 | #17 1 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | #11 2 条评价 | #22 3 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #14 0 条评价 | #7 27 条评价 |
| 亚太 | #13 0 条评价 | — |
Choosing between HotSOS® Housekeeping by Amadeus and Hoxell hinges on what your hotel prioritizes. Both streamline housekeeping tasks and internal communication, but they approach these goals differently. Amadeus focuses on automation and real-time PMS integration rooted in large-scale hotel operations, while Hoxell emphasizes departmental integration, ease of use, and real-time task management for a broader range of property types.
If your hotel needs a well-established platform with extensive integrations and automation, Amadeus may be ideal. However, if you prioritize a more modern, user-friendly interface with strong departmental connectivity, Hoxell’s recent reviews suggest it’s a more reliable choice. Which features and support qualities matter most for your team?
If your hotel requires a proven, scalable solution with numerous integrations and advanced automation tools, go with Amadeus. Its platform is supported by over 104 verified partners and is suited for large resorts or multi-property groups aiming to optimize housekeeping workflows through automation and PMS synchronization.
Conversely, if your hotel values a highly rated user experience with quick onboarding and departmental communication, Hoxell is the superior choice. With 28 reviews—significantly more recent—hotels across Europe and North America praise its ease of use, real-time updates, and departmental coordination. It’s ideal for boutique hotels, city center properties, or hotels seeking a flexible, scalable platform.
Amadeus scores a perfect 5/5 for ease of use, with reviews highlighting its simple interface, quick onboarding, and minimal staff training needs. Its user-friendly design is reinforced by a high onboarding rating of 5/5, with hotels enjoying immediate staff adoption and positive feedback about managing employee productivity.
Hoxell, with a 4.89/5 ease-of-use rating, is also highly rated but slightly behind Amadeus. Users emphasize its intuitive graphic interface, which makes task management straightforward, and praise its fast support team. It’s praised for its ease of onboarding, with a rating of 4.68/5, though some note PMS integration complexities.
Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus offers four features exclusive to its platform: Virtual Logbook, Service Recovery/Escalation, Compensation Tracking, and an Open API—tools that enhance automation, accountability, and customization. Its overall feature count sits at 35, ensuring a comprehensive housekeeping management system.
Hoxell, with three unique features—Team Goal Setting, File Library Support, and Work Prioritization—focuses on departmental engagement and task prioritization. Its total feature count is 31, emphasizing integrated communication, task management, and guest feedback tools.
Edge: Amadeus, due to its wider feature set and advanced automation capabilities.
Hoxell’s customer support earns a near-perfect 4.98/5, with recent reviews calling support “fast,” “responsive,” and “indispensable.” Users praise the team for quick resolution times and proactive assistance, which minimizes operational downtime.
Amadeus, with a support rating of 1.83/5, faces frequent criticism. Reviewers report slow response times, unreturned calls, and frustration over unresolved issues, with some describing the help desk as “great” but support from account managers as “lacking.” This support gap is a significant consideration.
Edge: Hoxell.
Amadeus’s platform boasts 104 verified partners, including major property management systems like Oracle Hospitality, Mews, and RevControl. Its extensive partner network supports broad customization and automation options for large hotels and chains.
Hoxell integrates with 12 partners, including PMS providers like Vertical Booking and hotelcube. Common integrations with Amadeus include Mews and Host Hotel Systems, but its smaller ecosystem limits extensive automation.
Edge: Amadeus.
Hoxell’s 28 recent reviews average a 4.94/5 rating, reflecting high satisfaction among diverse hotel types—especially city center and boutique hotels. Guests praise its user-friendly interface, quick support, and departmental coordination.
Amadeus, with only 3 reviews, carries a 4/5 rating, with some praise for speed and communication but notable criticism about support responsiveness. The limited recent feedback makes it less reliable as a current choice.
Edge: Hoxell.
Amadeus does not publicly disclose its pricing, suggesting a bespoke quote based on hotel size and needs. Its pricing model appears to be enterprise-level, potentially involving implementation fees and ongoing costs.
Hoxell charges a flat $300 monthly fee, with no setup or implementation fees, and offers transparent pricing suitable for hotels of various sizes. This straightforward pricing makes budgeting easier.
Note: Both platforms do not offer free trials, so verify detailed costs before committing.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
The core difference lies in their approach: Amadeus is a broader, automation-heavy system built for large-scale hotels, while Hoxell excels in departmental communication and ease of use for a wider range of properties.
Choose Amadeus if your hotel needs extensive integrations, automation, and a proven track record in large operations. Its feature set and partner ecosystem support complex workflows, making it suitable for resorts and multi-property groups.
Opt for Hoxell if your hotel values real-time communication, quick onboarding, and strong support—especially if you operate in Europe or North America and prefer a user-friendly platform. Its high reviewer ratings and recent data suggest it’s the more reliable choice for smaller and mid-sized hotels.
If you seek advanced automation and extensive integration, Amadeus is the clear choice. For departmental coordination, ease of use, and excellent support, Hoxell stands out as the better option for most hotels today.
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
用户经常提到 Hoxell 如何简化日常运营并提高生产力。该工具有助于管理工作班次、实时跟踪任务并协调维护,最终节省时间并使运营更加顺畅。
Hoxell 通过高效的任务跟踪和简化的内部沟通帮助酒店保持高质量标准,这直接影响了客人的满意度。该工具还通过快速解决维护问题和保持客房服务协调一致来增强客... Hoxell 通过高效的任务跟踪和简化的内部沟通帮助酒店保持高质量标准,这直接影响了客人的满意度。该工具还通过快速解决维护问题和保持客房服务协调一致来增强客户服务能力。
该工具的直观界面因其易于操作而广受好评,简化了培训和日常使用。即使是技术经验最少的员工也觉得它易于操作,从而促进了部门间更顺利的采用和使用。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然许多用户欣赏 Hoxell 的集成能力,但有些用户指出该软件与他们的物业管理系统 (PMS) 集成存在挑战,特别是在客人推荐和沟通错误方面。
Hoxell 提供了强大的报告功能,但一些用户提到需要更多可定制的选项和改进与其他系统的集成,以实现更好的报告下载和编辑功能。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Amadeus - HotSOS® Housekeeping 和 Hoxell 共享许多核心 Housekeeping Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Amadeus - HotSOS® Housekeeping 提供 104 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Hoxell 提供 12 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Amadeus - HotSOS® Housekeeping 在易用性方面领先,评分为 5.0/5 对比 4.9/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Amadeus - HotSOS® Housekeeping:否。Hoxell:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Housekeeping Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Amadeus 的 HT Score 为 0,Hoxell 的为 74。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问