项目面板是一款免费工具,仅向已认证的酒店从业者开放。它通过简化调研流程和沟通环节,让采用新技术变得更轻松。
各产品在不同酒店规模、类型和区域的 客房服务软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店经营者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #16 0 条评价 | #6 14 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #17 1 条评价 | #4 85 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #14 2 条评价 | #2 66 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #13 0 条评价 | #5 9 条评价 |
按酒店类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #16 1 条评价 | #4 79 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #16 1 条评价 | #4 77 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #17 1 条评价 | #6 72 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #19 0 条评价 | #9 11 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #11 2 条评价 | #8 10 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #14 0 条评价 | #3 133 条评价 |
| 亚太 | #12 0 条评价 | #7 3 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | — | #2 7 条评价 |
Choosing between Amadeus - HotSOS® Housekeeping by Amadeus and hub OS Housekeeping hinges on your hotel’s specific needs for automation, integration, and user experience. Both products aim to streamline housekeeping and operational workflows, but they diverge significantly in maturity, feature sets, and customer feedback. Your team must consider what aspects matter most—whether it’s comprehensive features, ease of use, or support—when making this decision.
Amadeus offers a well-established solution with a broad feature set and a global presence, while hub OS provides a more modern, highly-rated platform with a focus on connectivity and user friendliness. Which one aligns better with your hotel’s operational priorities?
Amadeus’ HotSOS® Housekeeping is a longstanding player in the hotel operations space, with a 4/5 overall rating based on 3 reviews, though it has a limited review count. Its strengths include a strong suite of advanced modules like real-time task tracking, preventative maintenance, and a deep cleaning module, catering well to hotels that want deep control over operations. However, customer support ratings are low at 1.83/5, with reviews citing slow response times and difficulty in issue resolution.
In contrast, hub OS boasts a near-perfect 4.88/5 rating from 161 reviews, reflecting recent, robust customer feedback. The platform excels in ease of use, communication, and task management, making it ideal for hotels prioritizing quick onboarding and mobile-friendly workflows. The core question: do you need a mature, feature-rich system or a highly-rated, user-centric platform?
If your hotel operates on a large scale with complex needs such as multi-property monitoring, real-time task tracking, or deep cleaning modules, Amadeus fits better. It is suited for hotels that value detailed analytics, API access, and modules like lost & found or case management.
Conversely, if your hotel values a straightforward, highly-rated interface that enhances team communication and task efficiency, go with hub OS. Its quick onboarding, extensive reviews, and simple integration with departments make it ideal for hotels that seek operational connectivity and high staff adoption. Your decision should align with your priority for comprehensive features versus superior usability and support.
Amadeus scores a perfect 5/5 for ease of use based on available ratings, and its user reviews praise its straightforward management and fast onboarding. However, some reviews highlight challenges with support responsiveness and difficulty in resolving issues, which could affect staff adoption in the long run.
hub OS also scores highly at 4.86/5, with reviews emphasizing its intuitive interface, mobile accessibility, and seamless communication features. Users find it straightforward to train staff and manage tasks efficiently. Edge: hub OS.
Amadeus offers 17 unique features, such as a lost & found module, real-time task tracking, preventative maintenance, and deep cleaning, providing a comprehensive toolkit for complex hotel operations. Its open API and analytics dashboard enable deep customization and data-driven management.
hub OS has 18 shared features, including dynamic task allocation, instant guest requests, and detailed reporting, with the added benefit of a highly-rated mobile app interface. It also integrates well with other departments, driving operational transparency. Edge: Amadeus, for its extensive modules and advanced automation.
Customer support ratings tell a clear story: Amadeus’ support scores just 1.83/5, with reviews highlighting slow responses and difficulty in issue resolution. Hoteliers mention that support is inconsistent, impacting overall satisfaction.
hub OS excels with a 4.8/5 rating, and reviews praise its responsiveness, helpfulness, and proactive attitude. Many users appreciate the dedicated support team and quick problem resolution. Edge: hub OS.
Amadeus boasts 104 verified partners, including major PMS and hotel tech solutions like Oracle Hospitality, Mews, and Infor, making it highly adaptable to existing hotel systems. Its extensive API capabilities support complex integrations for large hotel groups.
hub OS has 23 verified partners, including Stayntouch, Oracle, and Mews, with strong focus on mobile and departmental integrations. While its partner count is lower, reviews suggest that its integration with PMS and operational tools is effective, albeit with room for speed improvements.
Edge: Amadeus, for its broader integration ecosystem and industry presence.
Review data is heavily skewed in favor of hub OS, with a 4.88/5 rating from 161 reviews, mostly recent, and consistent positive feedback across multiple hotel segments. Hotels in luxury, boutique, and city-center categories praise its ease of use and productivity gains.
Amadeus has a limited review base with only 3 reviews, giving it a 4/5 overall rating but with recent reviews not available. Its older, fewer reviews indicate less current satisfaction but reinforce its established reputation.
Edge: hub OS.
Amadeus does not publicly list pricing details; it likely offers customized quotes based on hotel size and needs, typical for enterprise solutions. Its high implementation and licensing costs may be a barrier for smaller hotels.
hub OS charges a flat $300 monthly fee, with no additional implementation or setup costs listed. Its transparent pricing makes it accessible for mid-sized hotels seeking value and straightforward budgeting.
Not ideal if your hotel seeks a simple, highly-rated interface or prioritizes rapid onboarding without deep customization.
Not ideal if your hotel needs extensive modules like preventative maintenance or deep analytics beyond core reporting.
Amadeus offers a deeply integrated, feature-heavy solution suitable for larger, complex hotel operations. Its modules support detailed control but come with a higher learning curve and lower support ratings.
hub OS excels in user experience, recent positive reviews, and customer support, making it a compelling choice for hotels prioritizing staff efficiency and ease of use. It’s ideal for properties that want quick onboarding and reliable, modern workflows.
For most hotels, especially those seeking high satisfaction and ease of implementation, hub OS stands out as the more suitable choice. Its high review count and recent positive feedback give it a clear edge in current market effectiveness.
If your hotel needs advanced automation, multi-property oversight, and extensive customization, Amadeus remains a strong contender. However, for daily operational simplicity and staff productivity, hub OS is the clearer winner.
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
检查和清单
|
|
|
| 检查模块 | ||
| 深度清洁计划 | ||
| 拖放房间分配 | ||
| 自动通知 | ||
| 定制检验清单 | ||
|
▾
调度
|
|
|
| 深度清洁计划 | ||
| 自动房间分配 | ||
|
▾
工作流程自动化
|
|
|
| 自定义规则和优先级 | ||
| 拖放房间分配 | ||
| 双向 PMS 集成 | ||
| 自动通知 | ||
| 自动任务路由 | ||
| 移动请求调度 | ||
| 自动房间分配 | ||
| 失物招领 | ||
| 开放式 API | ||
|
▾
消息传递与协作
|
|
|
| 聊天 | ||
| 自动通知 | ||
| 移动请求调度 | ||
| 客人要求 | ||
|
▾
分析和报告
|
|
|
| 性能分析仪表板 | ||
| 进度跟踪仪表板 | ||
|
▾
可用性
|
|
|
| 移动访问 | ||
| 多语言用户界面支持 | ||
| 自动通知 |
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
许多评价者表示该平台改善了客房服务、前台、维修、工程及其他团队之间的沟通。这有助于酒店更快解决客房问题,更轻松共享运营更新,并确保所有人对客房状态和客... 许多评价者表示该平台改善了客房服务、前台、维修、工程及其他团队之间的沟通。这有助于酒店更快解决客房问题,更轻松共享运营更新,并确保所有人对客房状态和客人需求保持一致。
一个主要主题是使用Hub OS在一个平台上分配、跟踪和跟进客房服务及维护工作。评论者重视能够更高效地跨部门管理房间清洁、缺陷追踪、维修进度和预防性维护。
用户重视报告工具,用于审查清洁时间、生产力、缺陷趋势和运营绩效。多条评论表示这些报告帮助管理者做出更好的决策,而一条详细评论则希望生产力定义能更全面,... 用户重视报告工具,用于审查清洁时间、生产力、缺陷趋势和运营绩效。多条评论表示这些报告帮助管理者做出更好的决策,而一条详细评论则希望生产力定义能更全面,不仅仅局限于任务完成。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
大量评论指出操作上的摩擦:更新缓慢、同步延迟、聊天问题、设备兼容性有限,以及部分功能设置后难以更改。用户依然喜欢该产品,但希望性能更快,配置更灵活,以... 大量评论指出操作上的摩擦:更新缓慢、同步延迟、聊天问题、设备兼容性有限,以及部分功能设置后难以更改。用户依然喜欢该产品,但希望性能更快,配置更灵活,以避免瓶颈。
评论者经常提到使用 Hub OS 来监控房间状态,如清洁、脏房、准备好、已检查、停用或待维护。他们喜欢这种对日常运营的控制,尽管有些人指出当状态更新过晚或无法... 评论者经常提到使用 Hub OS 来监控房间状态,如清洁、脏房、准备好、已检查、停用或待维护。他们喜欢这种对日常运营的控制,尽管有些人指出当状态更新过晚或无法轻松更正时会出现问题。
排名更高的方面
这取决于您的需求。Amadeus - HotSOS® Housekeeping 和 hub OS Housekeeping 共享许多核心 Housekeeping Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Amadeus - HotSOS® Housekeeping 提供 107 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 hub OS Housekeeping 提供 24 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速上手。Amadeus - HotSOS® Housekeeping 在易用性方面领先,评分为 5.0/5 对比 4.9/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按酒店规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Amadeus - HotSOS® Housekeeping:否。hub OS Housekeeping:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Housekeeping Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店经营者客观比较酒店科技产品。Amadeus 的 HT Score 为 0,hub OS 的为 93。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您酒店的情况量身定制的推荐