Hoxell vs. Quore (Cleanings Plus): 哪个更适合您?

更新于 May 16, 2026  ·  已分析 77 条经验证的评价

摘要

我们分析了 77 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:

Hoxell 表现出色 在 customer support and ROI 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Mobile Access.

Quore 表现出色 在 任务管理 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (4.7/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Mobile App.

查看下方完整分析 ↓

Hoxell 与 Quore (Cleanings Plus) 相比如何?

基于 HTR 上 77 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。

HTScore
74
22
推荐可能性
98%
96%
易用性
4.9/5
4.6/5
客户支持
5.0/5
4.6/5
性价比
4.8/5
4.5/5
起始价格 From $300/mo Contact sales
经验证的评价 30 47

Hoxell 与 Quore (Cleanings Plus) 的优缺点是什么?

在分析了 77 条经验证的评价后,Hoxell 用户最看重其 运营效率, 质量控制和客户服务, 用户友好界面,而 Quore 用户则强调 任务管理, 跨部门沟通, 嘉宾互动。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。

Hoxell Hoxell Quore Quore
优点
+ 运营效率
+ 任务管理
+ 质量控制和客户服务
+ 跨部门沟通
+ 用户友好界面
+ 嘉宾互动
+ 部门整合与沟通
+ 培训资源
缺点
PMS 集成
用户界面和体验
报告和追踪
功能请求和改进
应用程序性能

Hoxell 对比 Quore:按酒店细分市场排名

各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 家政软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。

按酒店规模

细分市场 Hoxell Hoxell Quore Quore
小型(10-24 间客房) #12 2 条评价 #13 1 条评价
中型(25-74 间客房) #11 23 条评价 #7 28 条评价
大型(75-199 间客房) #12 4 条评价 #6 12 条评价
超大型(200+ 间客房) #13 1 条评价 #7 4 条评价

按物业类型

细分市场 Hoxell Hoxell Quore Quore
精品酒店 #11 12 条评价 #7 14 条评价
豪华酒店 #11 13 条评价 #8 12 条评价
品牌/连锁酒店 #12 11 条评价 #5 41 条评价
长住酒店 #17 1 条评价 #5 9 条评价

按区域

细分市场 Hoxell Hoxell Quore Quore
北美 #22 3 条评价 #2 42 条评价
欧洲 #7 27 条评价 #16 0 条评价
亚太 #10 0 条评价

The Decision

Choosing between Hoxell by Hoxell and Quore (Cleanings Plus) hinges on your hotel's specific needs for housekeeping and operational management. Both solutions aim to streamline communication, task management, and operational efficiency, but they diverge in scope, user experience, and feature depth. Hoxell offers a broader platform with a strong focus on department integration, while Quore specializes in housekeeping and task automation. Which of these aligns best with your hotel’s priorities?

Is Hoxell or Quore Better for Hotels?

Hoxell and Quore both target hotel operations but serve different niches within the industry. Hoxell's strength lies in its comprehensive departmental integration, real-time status updates, and scalable features, making it suitable for properties seeking a unified management platform. Quore, on the other hand, focuses tightly on housekeeping automation and guest interaction, excelling in tasks like room readiness notifications and performance tracking.

Hoxell boasts a higher overall rating (4.94/5 vs. Quore’s 4.59/5) and more recent reviews, indicating a more active and satisfied user base. Its larger review count (28 vs. Quore’s 46) combined with recent feedback suggests more current product stability and customer satisfaction. Are you looking for a solution that covers more operational bases or one that excels specifically in housekeeping?

Hoxell vs Quore: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?

If your hotel needs a platform that integrates front desk, housekeeping, maintenance, and revenue tools into one system, Hoxell is the way to go. Its suite of 24 shared features plus 10 exclusive ones supports multi-department coordination, making it ideal for larger or more complex properties.

Conversely, if your primary focus is optimizing housekeeping workflows, managing tasks, and improving guest communication, Quore offers a more targeted solution. Its suite of 12 exclusive features—such as work orders, recurring tasks, and guest messaging—are designed for efficient room turnover and staff accountability. Consider your hotel’s operational focus: broad management or specialized housekeeping?

Is Hoxell or Quore Easier to Use?

Hoxell's user interface is consistently praised for its clarity, scoring 4.89/5 in ease of use, with many users citing its intuitive design that makes onboarding straightforward. Quore’s interface is also rated highly at 4.6/5, with users appreciating its simplicity, but some mention that certain functions can be confusing and need refinement.

Training and onboarding are slightly better with Hoxell (4.68/5 vs. Quore’s 4.55/5), reflecting its more modern and user-friendly design. Staff adoption tends to be smoother with Hoxell’s interface, especially for teams already familiar with integrated hotel systems. Edge: Hoxell.

Which Has Better Features: Hoxell or Quore?

Hoxell offers 10 features exclusive to its platform, including late checkouts, team goal setting, an open API, and multi-language support—features that support a comprehensive hotel management approach. Its shared features total 24, covering essential housekeeping and maintenance functions.

Quore provides 12 features exclusive to its system, such as CapEX budgeting, work orders, preventative maintenance plans, and notifications, catering specifically to operational and maintenance workflows. Its shared features total 24, but it lacks some of Hoxell’s broader departmental tools.

Overall, Hoxell’s greater feature depth and variety give it an edge for hotels seeking extensive operational coverage. Edge: Hoxell.

Which Has Better Customer Support: Hoxell or Quore?

Hoxell’s support scores 4.98/5, with users consistently praising its quick, effective responses and proactive assistance. Hoteliers highlight that support teams resolve issues promptly, minimizing operational downtime and ensuring smooth adoption.

Quore’s support, while rated at 4.58/5, has some mixed reviews, with users mentioning occasional delays and the need for more training resources. Review quotes indicate support is generally good but less responsive compared to Hoxell.

Edge: Hoxell.

Which Has More Integrations: Hoxell or Quore?

Hoxell supports 12 verified partners, including major PMS and booking systems like Oracle Hospitality, Mews, and Elina PMS, with an open API for further customization. It also connects to industry staples like Vertical Booking and GP Dati Hotel Service, providing broad connectivity.

Quore has 8 verified partners, including Zingle, Revinate, and Canary Technologies, focusing on guest communication and reputation management. It lacks some of the extensive PMS integrations Hoxell offers.

Hoxell’s broader integration footprint makes it preferable for hotels that require seamless connectivity across multiple systems. Edge: Hoxell.

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: Hoxell or Quore?

Hoxell’s stellar ratings (4.94/5 overall, 9.75/10 NPS) are supported by its extensive positive reviews from various hotel segments, especially city center and boutique hotels. Recent reviews emphasize its ease of use, support, and operational efficiency.

Quore also scores highly (4.59/5 overall, 9.35/10 NPS), with many reviews praising its task management and communication tools. However, their reviews tend to be more mixed regarding stability and integration.

Given the higher rating, more recent reviews, and stronger NPS score, Hoxell has the edge in user satisfaction. Edge: Hoxell.

How Much Do Hoxell and Quore Cost?

Hoxell’s pricing is straightforward at $300 per month, with no hidden implementation or setup fees, making it predictable for budgeting. Quore’s pricing is not publicly disclosed, but no trial or subscription details are available, which may suggest customized quotes or higher costs.

The transparent pricing model of Hoxell provides clarity and ease of decision-making. Without clear Quore pricing, Hoxell's value proposition appears more accessible for hotels seeking a predictable investment.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Hoxell?

  • Hotels that need broad operational management across multiple departments, especially those aiming for real-time communication and task tracking.
  • Properties with complex maintenance needs, benefiting from Hoxell’s integrated maintenance module.
  • Hotels seeking scalable solutions that can grow with their operations.
  • Hotels that prioritize seamless PMS integrations with systems like Opera or Mews.
  • Teams wanting an intuitive interface for rapid staff training.

Not ideal if your hotel operates on a very limited budget or only needs basic housekeeping management without broader operational tools.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Quore?

  • Hotels that focus heavily on housekeeping efficiency, room turnover, and guest satisfaction via direct communication.
  • Properties that want to automate task tracking, recurring inspections, and guest messaging.
  • Hotels with smaller operational teams, where targeted housekeeping tools can improve productivity.
  • Properties seeking integrated guest messaging and lost & found management.
  • Hotels that prefer cloud-based, mobile-friendly apps for staff mobility.

Not ideal if your hotel requires extensive departmental integration beyond housekeeping or needs advanced budgeting and asset management features.

Hoxell vs Quore: The Bottom Line for Hotels

Hoxell stands out as the more comprehensive solution, especially for hotels that need an all-in-one platform to manage multiple departments seamlessly. Its higher ratings, broader feature set, and stronger recent reviews make it a more reliable choice for larger or more complex properties.

If your priority is a unified management experience that improves internal communication, reduces costs, and offers extensive integrations, Hoxell is the clear winner. It’s ideal for properties that want operational control, scalability, and a user-friendly interface.

Conversely, Quore is highly effective if your hotel’s primary goal is optimizing housekeeping and guest communication within a simpler, task-focused environment. Its targeted features support quick room turnover and staff accountability but lack the broader management tools found in Hoxell.

Choose Hoxell if you need a full-spectrum hotel operations platform. Opt for Quore if your hotel’s focus is on housekeeping efficiency and guest interaction, and your operational scope is narrower.

Hoxell 和 Quore (Cleanings Plus) 的价格是多少?

家政软件 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。

Hoxell Hoxell Quore Quore
Starting Price From $300/mo

Hoxell 有哪些 Quore (Cleanings Plus) 没有的功能(反之亦然)?

根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Hoxell 和 Quore (Cleanings Plus) 共享 24 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。

功能 Hoxell Hoxell Quore Quore
团队目标设定(例如奖励注册、满意度)
工作优先级
工单和票务
库存趋势分析
延迟退房
开放式 API
文件库支持(图像、文档和视频)
移动应用
聊天
资产维护日志
资本支出预算和预测
重复任务

显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 10 项功能存在差异。

Hoxell 对比 Quore:总结

Hoxell
Hoxell
4.9/5 来自 30 条评价

酒店从业者喜爱的方面

运营效率 100% 正面

用户经常提到 Hoxell 如何简化日常运营并提高生产力。该工具有助于管理工作班次、实时跟踪任务并协调维护,最终节省时间并使运营更加顺畅。

质量控制和客户服务 78% 正面

Hoxell 通过高效的任务跟踪和简化的内部沟通帮助酒店保持高质量标准,这直接影响了客人的满意度。该工具还通过快速解决维护问题和保持客房服务协调一致来增强客... Hoxell 通过高效的任务跟踪和简化的内部沟通帮助酒店保持高质量标准,这直接影响了客人的满意度。该工具还通过快速解决维护问题和保持客房服务协调一致来增强客户服务能力。

用户友好界面 80% 正面

该工具的直观界面因其易于操作而广受好评,简化了培训和日常使用。即使是技术经验最少的员工也觉得它易于操作,从而促进了部门间更顺利的采用和使用。

酒店从业者提出异议的方面

PMS 集成 50% 负面

虽然许多用户欣赏 Hoxell 的集成能力,但有些用户指出该软件与他们的物业管理系统 (PMS) 集成存在挑战,特别是在客人推荐和沟通错误方面。

报告和追踪 50% 负面

Hoxell 提供了强大的报告功能,但一些用户提到需要更多可定制的选项和改进与其他系统的集成,以实现更好的报告下载和编辑功能。

排名更高的方面

其他 #6 vs #8
CH #2 vs #9
欧洲 #7 vs #16

独特功能

延迟退房 团队目标设定(例如奖励注册、满意度) 开放式 API 文件库支持(图像、文档和视频) 工作优先级
4.9/5 易用性 5.0/5 客户支持 12 个集成
查看资料
Quore
Quore
4.8/5 来自 47 条评价

酒店从业者喜爱的方面

任务管理 87% 正面

用户强调 Quore 有效的任务管理功能,例如记录深度清洁和 PM 房间、设置自动工作订单以及组织待办事项列表。这些功能有助于确保员工按时完成检查目标,并确保不... 用户强调 Quore 有效的任务管理功能,例如记录深度清洁和 PM 房间、设置自动工作订单以及组织待办事项列表。这些功能有助于确保员工按时完成检查目标,并确保不会忘记任务。

跨部门沟通 91% 正面

许多酒店经营者都对 Quore 简化部门间沟通的能力表示赞赏,它使客户服务更加高效,减少了对对讲机等实体工具的需求。这种效率可以缩短响应时间,提高客人满意度... 许多酒店经营者都对 Quore 简化部门间沟通的能力表示赞赏,它使客户服务更加高效,减少了对对讲机等实体工具的需求。这种效率可以缩短响应时间,提高客人满意度,确保客房部、维护部和前台等部门能够无缝协调。

嘉宾互动 83% 正面

一些评论指出了 Quore 的客户消息平台的优势,该平台允许酒店经营者通过短信与客人互动。此功能不仅符合现代通信标准,而且还通过更快的响应时间提高了客人满意... 一些评论指出了 Quore 的客户消息平台的优势,该平台允许酒店经营者通过短信与客人互动。此功能不仅符合现代通信标准,而且还通过更快的响应时间提高了客人满意度。

酒店从业者提出异议的方面

用户界面和体验 50% 负面

虽然许多人认为 Quore 易于使用,但一些评论指出某些功能令人困惑或多余。改进界面可以提升整体用户体验,尤其是对于桌面用户而言。

功能请求和改进 67% 负面

酒店经营者经常提到他们希望增加和改进的功能,例如更频繁的更新、集成库存管理和增强的推送通知。这些建议表明,参与的用户群希望从软件中获得更多价值。

排名更高的方面

大型(75-199 间客房) #6 vs #12
中型(25-74 间客房) #7 vs #11
超大型(200+ 间客房) #7 vs #13
住宿加早餐与客栈 #5 vs #15

独特功能

资本支出预算和预测 工单和票务 重复任务 移动应用 资产维护日志
4.6/5 易用性 4.6/5 客户支持 8 个集成
访问官网

评分差异最大的方面

综合评分 Hoxell 4.9 vs 4.6 (+0.4)
客户支持 Hoxell 5.0 vs 4.6 (+0.4)
性价比 Hoxell 4.8 vs 4.4 (+0.3)

关于 Hoxell 与 Quore (Cleanings Plus) 的常见问题

Hoxell 能否替代 Quore (Cleanings Plus)?

这取决于您的需求。Hoxell 和 Quore (Cleanings Plus) 共享许多核心 Housekeeping Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Hoxell 提供 12 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Quore (Cleanings Plus) 提供 8 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。

哪个更适合小型或独立酒店?

小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Hoxell 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 4.6/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。

Hoxell 或 Quore (Cleanings Plus) 是否提供免费方案?

Hoxell:否。Quore (Cleanings Plus):否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Housekeeping Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。

HTR 如何评估和排名 Hoxell 和 Quore (Cleanings Plus)?

HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Hoxell 的 HT Score 为 74,Quore 的为 22。以下是评分的计算方式。

标准组 权重 衡量内容
客户评分与评价

用户对该产品的推荐度如何?

评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例

权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。

合作伙伴生态系统

技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何?

合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量

评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。

以客户为中心

该组织以客户为中心的程度如何?

认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性

评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。

覆盖范围、持久力与资源

该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛?

地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分

衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。

客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →

获取个性化的产品推荐

产品推荐顾问

Ghostel icon

让我们查找您的酒店信息