The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
Choosing between HS/3 (acq Mews) and Noovy PMS hinges on what your hotel needs most. HS/3 is a less common name in the market, with no recent reviews or ratings, suggesting limited ongoing support or user feedback. Noovy, by contrast, boasts a solid presence with 19 reviews in the last six months, high ratings, and nearly 100% likelihood to recommend, making it the more reliable choice for most hoteliers.
Both products aim to improve hotel operations, but their approaches and maturity levels differ significantly. HS/3 offers a basic, somewhat isolated system with no verified integrations or recent user feedback, while Noovy presents a comprehensive, well-reviewed platform with multiple features and active users. Which solution better fits your hotel depends on your operational complexity and support expectations.
HS/3 is a property management system designed to streamline reservations, room management, and basic operations. Its core weakness is the lack of recent reviews or active support, which raises questions about its ongoing development and reliability. Noovy, on the other hand, provides a complete set of hotel management tools, including channel management, booking engine, payments, and guest communication, backed by recent positive reviews.
The key divergence lies in support and feature set: HS/3 has no verified integrations or active community, while Noovy offers 40 verified partners, including OTA integrations, online check-in, and revenue management. Your team should consider if a simple or more integrated system aligns with your hotel’s growth plans. Is a basic PMS enough, or do you need a full-stack management suite?
If your hotel requires a modern, cloud-based system with high user satisfaction, Noovy is the clear choice. It’s favored by hotels across segments, especially boutique and city-center properties, with recent reviews praising its ease of use, support, and feature richness.
HS/3 might appeal for niche or legacy operations, but with no recent reviews or active support, it’s less suited for hotels aiming for growth or technological enhancement. If operational reliability, active user feedback, and feature depth matter, go with Noovy. If your hotel’s needs are minimal and support is less critical, HS/3 might suffice — but risks remain.
Noovy earns a high ease-of-use rating of 4.84 out of 5, with recent reviews highlighting its intuitive interface and quick onboarding. Users appreciate how fast and friendly the system is, with many mentioning that staff adoption is straightforward. Support is rated at 4.89, emphasizing prompt, helpful assistance.
HS/3, on the other hand, has no current ratings or recent reviews, leaving its usability unverified. Its older, less modern interface could pose onboarding challenges and slow staff adoption if support or updates are lacking.
Edge: Noovy.
Noovy offers an extensive suite of features—48 in total—including a channel manager, booking engine, revenue management, guest CRM, online check-in/out, and more. These features are designed to cover nearly every aspect of hotel operation, reducing the need for external tools.
HS/3, with no verified features or integrations, provides only basic reservation and room management functions—far fewer than Noovy. For a hotel seeking efficiency and automation, Noovy’s feature set is the clear advantage, offering greater flexibility and control.
Edge: Noovy.
Noovy’s support scores near perfect at 4.89 out of 5, with recent reviews describing it as “very good,” “friendly,” and “reliable.” Users highlight quick responses and helpful guidance, which enhances overall satisfaction.
HS/3 has no recent reviews or support ratings, making it difficult to assess its customer service. Given the active feedback and high ratings for Noovy, it’s evident that support quality favors Noovy significantly.
Edge: Noovy.
Noovy integrates with 40 verified partners, including major OTAs like Booking.com and Expedia, as well as revenue and guest communication tools. This broad ecosystem allows hotels to connect seamlessly with their preferred third-party services.
HS/3 has no verified integrations, limiting its ability to adapt to modern hotel operations that depend on external systems. For hotels prioritizing connectivity and automation, Noovy’s integrations are a decisive benefit.
Edge: Noovy.
Since HS/3 has no recent reviews, it lacks a rating or user feedback to gauge satisfaction. Noovy, with 19 recent reviews, maintains a high overall rating of 71.29 out of 100, and a 99% likelihood to recommend among users.
Hoteliers across segments, especially boutique and city-center hotels, rate Noovy highly for usability, support, and feature completeness. This consistent positive feedback solidifies Noovy’s standing.
Edge: Noovy.
HS/3 does not publicly list pricing, leaving potential buyers uncertain about costs and value. Noovy charges €£$5 per room per month, a transparent and competitive rate for an all-in-one management system.
The lack of clear pricing for HS/3 makes it difficult to assess its ROI, whereas Noovy’s straightforward model allows easier budgeting and comparison.
Not ideal if your hotel values automation, active support, and a broad feature set.
Not ideal if your hotel has very basic needs or operates in regions where Noovy lacks support.
The core difference is that Noovy offers a full-featured, actively supported system with recent reviews, while HS/3 remains a less visible, unreviewed platform. If your hotel needs a modern, connected solution, Noovy’s capabilities and user feedback outweigh HS/3’s limited presence.
Choose HS/3 only if your hotel’s operational scope is very narrow and you prefer a simple, possibly legacy system. Otherwise, Noovy’s proven track record, extensive features, and strong support make it the better choice for growing, modern hotels.
For most hoteliers seeking reliability, automation, and growth potential, Noovy clearly stands out as the top recommendation.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
许多评论称赞该系统的易用性,指出其用户友好的设计和直观的界面可以快速培训新员工并减少操作错误。
优质的客户服务经常被提及,用户欣赏快速的响应和有效的解决方案,这有助于对产品的整体满意度。
该系统支持自动付款请求和处理,大大简化了计费流程并降低了错误率。此功能还因其在处理不可退款预订方面的效率而受到好评。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户很欣赏该软件的功能,但注意到其设计略显过时,但预计重新设计将解决这个问题。
该软件提供强大的报告工具,可以深入了解酒店运营的各个方面,帮助做出更好的管理决策。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。HS/3 (acq Mews) 和 Noovy PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。HS/3 (acq Mews) 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Noovy PMS 提供 40 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Noovy PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
HS/3 (acq Mews):否。Noovy PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。HS/3 的 HT Score 为 0,Noovy 的为 71。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您的房产情况量身定制的推荐方案