The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 28 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Huazhu 表现出色 .
Vertical Booking 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Call center functionality and Geotargeted pricing module.
基于 HTR 上 28 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 28 |
在分析了 28 条经验证的评价后,Huazhu 用户最看重其 ,而 Vertical Booking 用户则强调 客户服务, 渠道管理, 无缝集成。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
| Huazhu |
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
客户服务
▾
|
|
|
+
渠道管理
▾
|
|
|
+
无缝集成
▾
|
|
|
+
评价购物
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
方便使用的
▾
|
|
|
−
预订引擎
▾
|
|
|
−
集成问题
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店预订软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 | Huazhu |
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #5 9 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #8 11 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #6 5 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #10 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 | Huazhu |
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #8 13 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #8 11 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #8 5 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | — | #9 2 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 | Huazhu |
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #4 17 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #8 6 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #6 1 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #4 4 条评价 |
Choosing the right hotel reservations software can significantly impact your property's revenue, operational efficiency, and guest experience. Both Hub+ by Huazhu and Vertical Booking aim to streamline these processes, but they serve different needs and hotel profiles. While Hub+ is a property management-focused system, Vertical Booking emphasizes multi-channel distribution and booking engine capabilities. Which product aligns best with your hotel’s priorities and operational scale?
In this comparison, Vertical Booking outshines in user reviews, features, and recent updates, making it the more reliable choice for most hoteliers today. Are you ready to see which system will better serve your specific hotel needs?
Hub+ by Huazhu is designed primarily as a property management system that consolidates operations like rental management, tenant info, and maintenance tracking. Its core strengths lie in efficiency for property managers and tenant relations, but it lacks dedicated features for distribution and booking management.
Vertical Booking, on the other hand, offers a comprehensive CRS with channels, booking engine, and revenue tools. It is built to manage reservations, rates, and distribution channels from a single interface, supporting hotel groups and independents alike. Do your hotel’s success depend more on internal operational management or on distribution and booking conversion?
Vertical Booking’s review count (27 reviews in the last 6 months) and higher recent ratings suggest it is more trusted and actively used by hoteliers for reservations. Does your hotel need an integrated booking platform or a management tool?
Edge: Vertical Booking.
If your hotel needs a reservation system with strong multi-channel distribution, dynamic pricing, and a user-friendly booking engine, go with Vertical Booking. Its broad integration, automation features, and recent high review scores (4.61/5, NPS 9.15/5) make it a smarter choice for increasing direct bookings and revenue.
If your focus is on property management, tenant relations, or internal operations without complex distribution needs, Hub+ might seem appealing. However, its lack of reviews, features, and recent activity makes it less compelling in today’s competitive hotel tech landscape.
For hotels aiming to boost direct reservations and streamline multi-channel management, Vertical Booking holds the clear edge.
Edge: Vertical Booking.
Vertical Booking’s user reviews rate its ease of use at 4.41/5, with users praising its interface and functionality. Customers also highlight quick onboarding and responsiveness, despite some mentions of interface improvements needed for the booking engine.
Hub+ by Huazhu scores a 0/5 in ease of use, with no recent reviews or ratings available to gauge its user experience. With no recent user feedback, it’s impossible to determine how intuitive or adoption-friendly the platform is.
Given the clarity and positive feedback around Vertical Booking’s user experience, it’s the more dependable choice.
Edge: Vertical Booking.
Vertical Booking offers eight unique features absent in Hub+, such as geotargeted pricing, support for weekly/monthly rates, dynamic pricing, and TMC management. These tools are essential for hotels looking to optimize revenue, customize guest offers, and efficiently manage availability across multiple channels.
Hub+ lacks any listed features outside of property management basics, limiting its value for reservations or distribution-focused needs. For hotels prioritizing advanced revenue tools and flexible booking options, Vertical Booking’s feature set is far superior.
Edge: Vertical Booking.
Vertical Booking’s reviews praise its support team (rated 4.5/5), with comments like “quick responses” and “helpful staff” that resolve issues efficiently. While some reviews mention support could improve in speed, overall, hotel staff are satisfied with the responsiveness.
Hub+ has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to evaluate its support quality. The lack of feedback indicates limited market presence or recent customer engagement.
Vertical Booking’s consistently positive support ratings make it the safer choice for hotels requiring reliable assistance.
Edge: Vertical Booking.
Vertical Booking boasts 69 verified integrations, including industry leaders like Duetto, RateBoard, and WebRezPro, giving your hotel more flexibility in connecting systems. Its broad ecosystem supports seamless rate, inventory, and reservation management across diverse platforms.
Hub+ has only 1 verified partner, with no details on integration scope. For hotels that rely on multiple systems or plan to expand their tech stack, Vertical Booking’s extensive integration options are a decisive advantage.
Edge: Vertical Booking.
Vertical Booking’s recent reviews reflect a high rating of 4.61/5, with many hoteliers emphasizing its ease of use, support, and functionality. Its recent reviews and high NPS score (9.15/5) demonstrate strong customer satisfaction and ongoing product relevance.
Hub+ has no recent feedback or reviews, indicating limited user engagement. Without current ratings or recent reviews, its reputation among hoteliers remains uncertain.
Given recent positive reviews, Vertical Booking is clearly the higher-rated system by hoteliers today.
Edge: Vertical Booking.
Both products do not publicly disclose specific pricing, suggesting they offer custom quotes based on hotel size and needs. Vertical Booking’s pricing model is based on a monthly fee without implementation or setup charges, but detailed costs are not listed.
Hub+ pricing is unavailable, which complicates direct comparison. For hotels seeking transparent pricing, Vertical Booking’s model provides some clarity, but overall costs are likely tied to individual quotes.
Hub+ suits property managers of long-term rentals or tenants but falls short for hotels aiming to optimize reservations and revenue.
Vertical Booking is best suited for hotels that want to expand their reach and optimize booking conversions.
Vertical Booking delivers a reservation system that is more aligned with modern hotel needs, especially for increasing direct bookings and managing multiple channels. Its high review scores, extensive features, and strong support make it a more reliable choice.
Choose Vertical Booking if your hotel depends on multi-channel distribution, revenue management, and a user-friendly booking engine. It’s the better fit for hotels seeking growth and operational efficiency.
Hub+ might be suitable for property managers focused solely on internal tenant or rental management, but it’s not designed to meet the demands of a competitive hotel reservation environment today.
In conclusion, Vertical Booking offers a proven, feature-rich, and well-supported platform that can help your hotel grow and streamline operations effectively. It’s the choice that aligns with the needs of most hotels aiming to stay competitive in a digital-first world.
酒店预订软件 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
| Huazhu |
|
|---|
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 | Huazhu |
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
内容管理
|
|
|
| 内容管理 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
|
▾
定价规则
|
|
|
| 地理定位定价模块 | ||
| 支持每周和每月费率 | ||
| 动态定价 | ||
| 可用性管理 | ||
| 预订规则 | ||
| 取消政策 | ||
| TMC管理 | ||
| 移动应用程序 | ||
|
▾
分配
|
|
|
| 元搜索连接 | ||
| 渠道管理和OTA分销 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| TMC管理 | ||
|
▾
电子商务
|
|
|
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 退款凭证 | ||
|
▾
集成
|
|
|
| RMS 连接性 | ||
| PMS 连接性 | ||
| 元搜索连接 | ||
|
▾
报告
|
|
|
| 多物业管理 | ||
| 报告仪表板 | ||
| 报告仪表板 | ||
| 移动应用程序 | ||
|
▾
行政
|
|
|
| 集中的用户和角色管理 | ||
| 多物业管理 | ||
| 移动应用程序 | ||
|
▾
呼叫中心
|
|
|
| 呼叫中心功能 |
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
虽然许多用户称赞 Vertical Booking 的客户服务的响应能力和解决问题的有效性,但一些评论指出,其速度和一致性方面需要改进,特别是针对美国市场。
Vertical Booking 的渠道管理功能因其易用性和处理多个分销渠道的效率而获得了积极的反馈。用户指出,它简化了流程,并有助于在所有连接渠道上保持最新的价格和... Vertical Booking 的渠道管理功能因其易用性和处理多个分销渠道的效率而获得了积极的反馈。用户指出,它简化了流程,并有助于在所有连接渠道上保持最新的价格和可用性。
许多用户都赞赏 Vertical Booking 与其他系统的无缝集成,从而可以顺利同步价格、库存和预订。这种集成提高了效率并节省了时间,尤其是对于从单个界面管理多个平... 许多用户都赞赏 Vertical Booking 与其他系统的无缝集成,从而可以顺利同步价格、库存和预订。这种集成提高了效率并节省了时间,尤其是对于从单个界面管理多个平台而言。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Vertical Booking 经常被描述为用户友好且直观,让酒店员工无需经过大量培训即可轻松管理预订和房价。尽管如此,一些用户仍提到某些功能可以更直观和更简化。
该预订引擎的功能普遍受到好评,但一些评论认为其界面可以更加可定制和现代化。用户特别提到需要在移动设备上提供更好的用户体验,并在设置折扣和促销时提供更大... 该预订引擎的功能普遍受到好评,但一些评论认为其界面可以更加可定制和现代化。用户特别提到需要在移动设备上提供更好的用户体验,并在设置折扣和促销时提供更大的灵活性。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Hub+ 和 Vertical Booking (CRS) 共享许多核心 Hotel Reservations Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Hub+ 提供 1 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Vertical Booking (CRS) 提供 69 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Vertical Booking (CRS) 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.4/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Hub+:否。Vertical Booking (CRS):否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Reservations Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Huazhu 的 HT Score 为 0,Vertical Booking 的为 29。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您的房产情况量身定制的推荐方案