The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 238 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
hub OS 表现出色 在 任务管理效率 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (5.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Two-Way PMS Integration and Open API.
Lodgistics 表现出色 在 改善内部沟通 方面 .
基于 HTR 上 238 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $300/mo | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 177 | 61 |
在分析了 238 条经验证的评价后,hub OS 用户最看重其 任务管理效率, 自定义选项, 家政模块,而 Lodgistics 用户则强调 改善内部沟通, 维修及家政管理, 用户体验和培训。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
任务管理效率
▾
|
+
改善内部沟通
▾
|
|
+
自定义选项
▾
|
+
维修及家政管理
▾
|
|
+
家政模块
▾
|
+
用户体验和培训
▾
|
|
+
维护模块
▾
|
+
可定制性和集成
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
与 PMS 集成
▾
|
−
小错误和软件问题
▾
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 家政软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #5 13 条评价 | #17 0 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #4 85 条评价 | #5 54 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #2 62 条评价 | #11 3 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #5 9 条评价 | #14 0 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #4 74 条评价 | #9 13 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #3 73 条评价 | #14 8 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #2 70 条评价 | #6 52 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #8 11 条评价 | #6 12 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #8 10 条评价 | #3 57 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #3 132 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #8 1 条评价 | #15 0 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | #2 7 条评价 | — |
Choosing a housekeeping software for your hotel involves weighing ease of use, feature depth, integration capabilities, and vendor support. hub OS Housekeeping by hub OS and Lodgistics Housekeeping by Lodgistics both aim to streamline operations, but they differ significantly in reach, user feedback, and functionalities. Your decision hinges on whether you prioritize extensive integrations and a mature platform, or a more targeted, user-friendly experience.
Both products aim to enhance operational efficiency and guest satisfaction, yet their approaches and strengths vary. Does your hotel need a globally present, feature-rich system or a straightforward, easy-to-integrate solution? Let's compare these options directly.
Both products are designed to improve housekeeping and maintenance workflows. hub OS offers a comprehensive platform with over 23 verified partners, including integrations with major PMS like Opera and Oracle, making it ideal for large, multi-department hotels. Lodgistics, with only three verified partners and a focus on North American hotels, is better suited for properties seeking straightforward internal communication and task automation.
Recent reviews favor Lodgistics due to its higher user ratings and more frequent recent feedback, providing a clearer picture of current performance. Given the critical importance of recent data, is it time to prioritize the product with the stronger recent review count?
If your hotel operates across multiple regions with complex systems, or needs extensive integrations like custom APIs and open architecture, go with hub OS. Its higher HTR score (34 vs 77) and larger global presence make it ideal for large brands or resorts wanting detailed reporting and cross-departmental connectivity.
If your hotel prioritizes ease of use, internal communication, and quick deployment, Lodgistics is the better choice. It has a higher overall rating (4.75 vs 4.88) and recent reviews indicate strong satisfaction among North American hotels, especially for small to mid-sized properties. For hotels seeking straightforward, responsive support, Lodgistics fits better.
hub OS earns a 4.86/5 rating for ease of use, with many reviews praising its intuitive interface and efficient mobile app, though some mention occasional slow loading times. Its onboarding process is rated 4.76/5, and users highlight seamless department coordination.
Lodgistics scores slightly lower at 4.71/5 but is praised for its simplicity, quick staff adoption, and minimal training needs. The mobile app, while generally effective, has minor bugs that some users find frustrating.
Edge: hub OS.
hub OS provides 15 shared features plus three exclusive ones: two-way PMS integration, open API, and custom rules & prioritization. These enable advanced automation, tailored workflows, and extensive customization, appealing to larger hotels with complex needs.
Lodgistics offers core features comparable in scope but lacks the advanced integrations and custom rules. Its features emphasize internal communication, simplified task tracking, and automation, but without the extensive API or customization options.
Edge: hub OS.
hub OS's support scores 4.8/5, with many reviews highlighting its responsiveness, proactive communication, and personalized assistance. Users consistently mention support as a key factor in their satisfaction, especially during onboarding.
Lodgistics earns a 4.69/5, with users praising its quick issue resolution and ongoing responsiveness. While support is strong, recent reviews detail some minor bugs and mobile app issues, indicating room for improvement.
Edge: hub OS.
hub OS boasts 23 verified partner integrations, including industry leaders like Oracle Hospitality, Infor, and Mews, offering extensive connectivity options. This allows large hotels to link operational systems, property management, and revenue tools effectively.
Lodgistics, with only 3 verified partners, primarily integrates with in-house systems or basic third-party services. It is better suited for hotels with minimal integration needs or those operating primarily within North America.
Edge: hub OS.
hub OS maintains a higher overall rating at 4.88/5, with recent reviews emphasizing its stability, comprehensive features, and operational impact. Larger hotel groups and resorts frequently rate it highly due to its extensive capabilities.
Lodgistics has a slightly lower rating at 4.75/5 but excels among smaller hotels and properties in North America. Recent feedback praises its ease of use, internal communication, and responsive support, particularly for properties with limited technical staff.
Edge: hub OS.
hub OS charges a flat $300 monthly fee with no implementation or trial fees, making pricing transparent and predictable. Its pricing is suitable for hotels requiring a robust, customizable solution with extensive integrations.
Lodgistics’ pricing is not publicly disclosed, which may indicate a custom quote based on hotel size and needs. This lack of transparency suggests it may be more suitable for smaller properties or those seeking flexible, scalable options.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
hub OS offers a comprehensive, highly integrated platform suitable for large, complex hotel operations. Its extensive feature set, global presence, and strong support make it ideal for brands seeking deep operational control and cross-department connectivity.
Lodgistics provides a simpler, more user-friendly alternative with excellent internal communication tools and quick deployment, making it perfect for smaller hotels or properties focusing on internal efficiency. Its limited integrations and regional focus are less suitable for large, multi-property chains.
If your hotel needs broad system integrations, detailed reports, and scalability, hub OS is the clear choice. Conversely, if your priority is ease of use, internal communication, and quick onboarding, Lodgistics is the better fit.
In conclusion, for hotels that value a broad, highly customizable system with extensive connectivity, hub OS stands out. But for properties aiming for simplicity, rapid implementation, and strong internal communication, Lodgistics delivers a compelling offering.
家政软件 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $300/mo | — |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,hub OS Housekeeping 和 Lodgistics Housekeeping 共享 15 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 双向 PMS 集成 | ||
| 开放式 API | ||
| 自定义规则和优先级 |
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Hub OS 显著提高了客房部、维修部和前台等部门的任务管理效率。该系统改善了沟通、任务委派和跟踪,从而简化了操作并提高了生产率。不过,一些评论指出,附加功... Hub OS 显著提高了客房部、维修部和前台等部门的任务管理效率。该系统改善了沟通、任务委派和跟踪,从而简化了操作并提高了生产率。不过,一些评论指出,附加功能可以进一步增强任务管理。
虽然 Hub OS 因其灵活性和定制功能而受到赞赏,但一些用户指出,如果没有技术支持,某些定制和个性化设置很难实现。人们希望软件中能有更多自助服务选项,尤其是... 虽然 Hub OS 因其灵活性和定制功能而受到赞赏,但一些用户指出,如果没有技术支持,某些定制和个性化设置很难实现。人们希望软件中能有更多自助服务选项,尤其是与移动应用程序和用户界面相关的选项。
Hub OS 的客房管理模块被高度赞扬,被誉为改变游戏规则的创新,大大提高了效率和生产力。它使员工能够查看房间状态、及时报告问题并有效地管理任务。几篇评论特... Hub OS 的客房管理模块被高度赞扬,被誉为改变游戏规则的创新,大大提高了效率和生产力。它使员工能够查看房间状态、及时报告问题并有效地管理任务。几篇评论特别提到,该系统有助于保持较高的客房清洁度分数。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Hub OS 因其与物业管理系统 (PMS) 的无缝集成而备受赞誉,它使人们能够更轻松地在一个地方高效地管理各种酒店业务,如客房服务和维护。尽管如此,一些评论提到偶... Hub OS 因其与物业管理系统 (PMS) 的无缝集成而备受赞誉,它使人们能够更轻松地在一个地方高效地管理各种酒店业务,如客房服务和维护。尽管如此,一些评论提到偶尔会出现延迟和同步集成问题,特别是与 SAP 和 Opera 等系统的集成。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Lodgistics 因其能够加强各部门之间的沟通、促进员工之间顺畅高效的互动而受到广泛赞誉。它支持各种沟通方式,包括工作订单、客户请求和实时更新,从而提高了员... Lodgistics 因其能够加强各部门之间的沟通、促进员工之间顺畅高效的互动而受到广泛赞誉。它支持各种沟通方式,包括工作订单、客户请求和实时更新,从而提高了员工协调能力和客户满意度。该工具还支持多种语言,尽管有些用户希望有更多语言选项。
该软件的维护和客房服务模块因其全面性和易用性而获得高度评价。用户对跟踪和管理工作订单以及输入和监控预防性维护的能力表示赞赏,这简化了酒店运营并减少了客... 该软件的维护和客房服务模块因其全面性和易用性而获得高度评价。用户对跟踪和管理工作订单以及输入和监控预防性维护的能力表示赞赏,这简化了酒店运营并减少了客人投诉的发生率。客房服务功能因其简单性而受到称赞,即使对于不太懂技术的员工来说也是如此,并且它对运营效率有积极影响。
Lodgistics 的直观界面大大减少了员工的培训时间,让新员工和现有员工都能轻松上手。此外,用户发现该平台易于导航,有助于提高各部门的采用率和有效使用率。然... Lodgistics 的直观界面大大减少了员工的培训时间,让新员工和现有员工都能轻松上手。此外,用户发现该平台易于导航,有助于提高各部门的采用率和有效使用率。然而,有些人遇到了一些小错误,希望移动应用程序能有更好的性能。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然总体上用户对软件感到满意,但一些用户也报告了一些小的软件错误,尤其是移动应用程序,包括保存编辑和设备间同步的问题。虽然这些错误并不严重,但已指出可... 虽然总体上用户对软件感到满意,但一些用户也报告了一些小的软件错误,尤其是移动应用程序,包括保存编辑和设备间同步的问题。虽然这些错误并不严重,但已指出可以进行改进以提升整体用户体验。
排名更高的方面
这取决于您的需求。hub OS Housekeeping 和 Lodgistics Housekeeping 共享许多核心 Housekeeping Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。hub OS Housekeeping 提供 23 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Lodgistics Housekeeping 提供 3 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。hub OS Housekeeping 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 4.7/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
hub OS Housekeeping:否。Lodgistics Housekeeping:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Housekeeping Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。hub OS 的 HT Score 为 34,Lodgistics 的为 78。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问