The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 48 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
HUGO Hotelsoftware GmbH 表现出色 .
Infor 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Housekeeping module and Guest profiles.
基于 HTR 上 48 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 1 | 47 |
在分析了 48 条经验证的评价后,HUGO Hotelsoftware GmbH 用户最看重其 ,而 Infor 用户则强调 易于使用, 报告, 一体化。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
易于使用
▾
|
|
|
+
报告
▾
|
|
|
+
一体化
▾
|
|
|
+
家政模块
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
支持
▾
|
|
|
−
易于使用
▾
|
|
|
−
更新问题
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #57 1 条评价 | #44 8 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #69 0 条评价 | #25 24 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #19 9 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #24 2 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #28 24 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #23 26 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #29 8 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #55 0 条评价 | #31 6 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #22 20 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #44 1 条评价 | #24 17 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #28 1 条评价 |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) depends on your hotel’s specific needs and priorities. HUGO by HUGO Hotelsoftware GmbH aims to simplify hotel management through its minimalistic approach, but it offers very limited features and has no recent reviews, making it difficult to assess its current suitability. In contrast, Infor HMS provides a broad array of features and recent, detailed feedback, positioning it as a more reliable choice for most hotels.
Both products address core hotel management functions, but they diverge sharply in development maturity, feature set, and user feedback. Are you seeking a straightforward, lightweight PMS or a comprehensive, feature-rich platform? The answer will influence which solution better serves your team.
HUGO is a very new system founded in 2020 with no reviews in the past six months, and its overall rating is 0/5. Its limited feature count and lack of recent user feedback make it hard to evaluate, especially for hotels that rely on proven, supported software. Conversely, Infor boasts 46 reviews, a strong 4.04/5 overall rating, and a recent NPS score of 7.15/5, demonstrating active usage and ongoing customer engagement.
Infor’s extensive feature set—spanning housekeeping, guest profiles, revenue management, and automation—appears well-suited for hotels seeking deep operational integration. HUGO, with essentially no features or reviews, seems more like a prototype or niche tool rather than a mature PMS. Is your hotel prepared to adopt an untested platform, or do you prefer a system with proven stability and support?
If your hotel needs a mature, feature-packed PMS capable of handling complex operations and integrations, Infor is the clear choice. Its 20 unique features—including online support, guest CRM, automated night audits, and revenue tracking—are unmatched by HUGO’s minimal offering. For hotels that prioritize operational flexibility and scalability, Infor’s extensive capabilities are essential.
Should your hotel be a smaller operation or testing new software without critical operational needs, HUGO might seem appealing due to its simplicity. However, given its lack of recent reviews and features, it’s unlikely to meet the demands of a busy or growing property. Therefore, for most hotels, Infor’s mature platform provides peace of mind and comprehensive support—making it the more pragmatic option.
HUGO’s user experience cannot be assessed due to the absence of reviews or ratings. Its interface, onboarding, and staff adoption are entirely unknown, suggesting a high risk of usability issues or steep learning curves. Infor, meanwhile, scores 3.88/5 in ease of use, with many users describing it as accessible and straightforward once familiarized.
Reviews praise Infor’s short onboarding times and intuitive navigation, supported by a 4.04/5 customer support rating. Support responsiveness and helpful training make it easier for your team to adopt the system with minimal disruption. Edge: Infor.
Infor offers 20 distinct features, including housekeping modules, guest profiles, cloud deployment, multi-lingual support, and automation tools like night audits and revenue reports. These features cover nearly every core operational need for mid-to-large hotels, especially those requiring customization and deep integration.
HUGO, with zero listed features and no recent updates or reviews, lacks any comparable functionality. Its minimalistic approach might suit very small or niche properties, but it doesn’t provide the advanced features necessary for modern, competitive hotels. Edge: Infor.
HUGO’s support ratings are unavailable, and with no recent reviews, assessing support quality is impossible. This lack of data introduces risk, especially if technical issues arise. Infor’s support scores over 4/5, with reviews highlighting promptness, professionalism, and helpful guidance during onboarding and troubleshooting.
Users note that Infor’s support team guides them through issues efficiently, which is critical for minimizing downtime. If reliable support is essential for your property’s operations, Infor clearly leads here. Edge: Infor.
Infor integrates with over 113 partners, including major booking channels, revenue management, and payment providers, covering a broad ecosystem. HUGO’s integration count is just 7, sharing only one partner with Infor, which suggests a much more limited ability to connect with other systems.
For hotels that rely on multiple third-party solutions, Infor’s extensive partner network ensures smoother workflows and less manual work. If integrations are a priority, Infor is the obvious choice. Edge: Infor.
With 46 recent reviews, Infor’s average rating is 4.04/5, and it is favored across multiple hotel segments, including boutique, city center, and resort hotels. Many reviews highlight its feature richness, flexibility, and support, especially for hotels seeking automation and operational insights.
HUGO’s rating is 0/5 with no reviews in the last six months, making it impossible to determine user satisfaction or performance. Given the active user feedback and higher ratings, Infor clearly resonates more positively with hoteliers. Edge: Infor.
Pricing details for both systems are not publicly available. Typically, both products are offered as custom quotes based on property size, features, and implementation complexity. Expect Infor to be priced higher due to its extensive feature set and enterprise focus, while HUGO’s minimal offering suggests a lower or more basic pricing model—if any.
Not ideal if your hotel:
Not ideal if your hotel:
At its core, Infor offers a full-featured, well-supported PMS designed for hotels that want operational efficiency and growth potential. Its extensive feature suite and active user community make it suitable for properties that need more than basic management.
HUGO, with no recent data or features, appears more like an embryonic product unlikely to meet the demands of most hotels today. If your hotel requires proven stability, integrations, and support, Infor remains the strong choice.
Choose Infor if you want a reliable, scalable, and feature-rich PMS with proven customer satisfaction. Opt for HUGO only if your hotel operates on a very small scale or as a test project—and even then, proceed cautiously.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|---|
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,HUGO 和 Infor HMS 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 在线 24/7 支持 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 管家模块 | ||
| 集中的用户和角色管理 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 8 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Infor HMS 普遍被认为易于导航,具有直观的多方面搜索选项。然而,一些用户发现用户界面缺乏美感,并认为它可以更直观。
报告功能经常被强调。用户喜欢标准报告和创建自定义报告的功能,这有助于进行详细的性能跟踪。然而,有些人发现更新会破坏报告格式和功能。
Infor HMS 因其与 Booking.com、HRS 和 Expedia 等预订平台的无缝集成而受到称赞。这大大减少了手动输入错误并提高了管理预订的效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Infor HMS 的支持团队因其响应能力和专业性而备受赞誉,这对于快速解决问题至关重要。用户对支持代表如何指导他们解决问题表示赞赏。
Infor HMS 普遍被认为易于导航,具有直观的多方面搜索选项。然而,一些用户发现用户界面缺乏美感,并认为它可以更直观。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。HUGO 和 Infor HMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。HUGO 提供 7 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Infor HMS 提供 113 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Infor HMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 3.9/5 对比 3.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
HUGO:否。Infor HMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。HUGO Hotelsoftware GmbH 的 HT Score 为 0,Infor 的为 22。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问