The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 83 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
ICG Software 表现出色 .
straiv 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Mobile Checkin and Mobile Checkout.
基于 HTR 上 83 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $500/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 83 |
在分析了 83 条经验证的评价后,ICG Software 用户最看重其 ,而 straiv 用户则强调 数字化办理入住和退房, 宾客沟通与定制, 易于实施和使用。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
| ICG Software |
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
数字化办理入住和退房
▾
|
|
|
+
宾客沟通与定制
▾
|
|
|
+
易于实施和使用
▾
|
|
|
+
持续改进和更新
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
付款流程问题
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 非接触式办理入住 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 | ICG Software |
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #3 27 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #3 41 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #5 8 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #5 5 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 | ICG Software |
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #3 28 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #9 8 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #3 19 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #4 18 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 | ICG Software |
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | — | #16 2 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #2 79 条评价 |
Choosing the right contactless check-in solution for your hotel depends heavily on your specific operational needs and the importance you place on user feedback and recent reviews. ICG Check-in Online by ICG Software aims to automate guest registration and reduce front desk interactions but has no publicly available reviews or ratings to gauge real-world performance. Conversely, straiv by straiv, with over 81 recent reviews, offers a comprehensive contactless platform that’s praised for its ease of use and extensive feature set.
The core challenge lies in whether your hotel prioritizes a well-reviewed, feature-rich platform with proven customer satisfaction or is comfortable with a less transparent, less-reviewed option that might require more internal testing and validation.
ICG Check-in Online is designed to streamline check-in procedures and automate guest management, primarily focusing on reducing manual workload and human error via online registration, ID verification, and room assignment. However, the absence of recent reviews and the lack of a visible overall rating make it difficult to evaluate its current effectiveness.
straiv, on the other hand, is a contactless platform with a 4.81/5 overall rating based on 81 recent reviews, and a high NPS score of 9.51/10. Hotels appreciate straiv’s ability to reduce check-in times, improve guest satisfaction, and streamline internal processes through features like mobile check-in and PMS integration. Do you want a platform with proven client happiness and an active user base?
If your hotel needs a feature-rich, proven solution with a track record of customer satisfaction and ongoing development, straiv is the clear choice. Its extensive feature set, including mobile check-in, guest messaging, digital concierge, and integrations with leading PMS systems like Oracle and Protel, makes it suitable for mid-sized to large properties prioritizing operational efficiency.
However, if your hotel is seeking a basic, potentially simpler solution solely focused on online check-in without extensive feature requirements, ICG Check-in Online might be considered—though the lack of recent user feedback raises questions about its current performance and support.
straiv’s user interface scores highly with a 4.69/5 ease of use rating, praised for its intuitive design, quick onboarding, and minimal IT knowledge required. Reviews detail how staff and guests find the platform straightforward, with some noting the system’s ability to handle complex tasks without complications.
ICG Check-in Online, with no available usability ratings or recent reviews, leaves its ease of use unverified. The absence of customer feedback makes it difficult to assess if your team would find it equally simple to operate.
Edge: straiv
straiv leads significantly in features, with 19 unique modules like mobile check-in/out, guest messaging, room service orders, digital concierge, PMS integration, ID verification, and device-agnostic access. These features support a holistic guest journey and operational automation, with many praised in reviews for their flexibility and depth.
ICG Check-in Online offers only the core check-in functionality, with no detailed feature list or differentiation points. Without additional modules or integrations, it’s unlikely to support broader operational needs.
Edge: straiv
straiv enjoys a 4.72/5 support rating, with reviews emphasizing quick, helpful responses and proactive development efforts. Customers highlight that support teams are responsive, ensuring smooth implementation and ongoing problem resolution.
ICG Check-in Online provides no public support ratings or recent reviews, making it impossible to gauge support quality or responsiveness. Given the importance of support in technical platforms, straiv’s proven track record is a decisive advantage.
Edge: straiv
straiv boasts 36 verified integrations, including PMS systems like Oracle and Protel, and external solutions such as hotelkit and SALTO Systems, enabling a seamless operational flow. Users appreciate these integrations for automating tasks and reducing redundant data entry, despite occasional interface hiccups.
ICG Check-in Online currently reports no verified integrations or third-party partner connections, limiting its ability to connect with existing hotel systems or automate broader processes.
Edge: straiv
straiv’s recent reviews consistently rate it at 4.81/5, with high praise across hotel segments like boutique hotels, city-center properties, and serviced apartments. Hotels emphasize its ability to reduce check-in times, improve guest experience, and streamline internal workflows.
ICG Check-in Online has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to determine user sentiment or property-specific satisfaction. Given the volume and recency of reviews for straiv, it clearly has the edge here.
Edge: straiv
ICG Check-in Online does not provide publicly available pricing or subscription details, which suggests a need for direct inquiry for accurate quotes. Meanwhile, straiv charges a base fee of $500, with no monthly flat or per-room charges, making the pricing transparent and predictable.
Without concrete data on ICG’s pricing, it’s safer to assume straiv offers clearer value for money, especially considering its extensive feature set and support.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
ICG Check-in Online offers a basic, contactless check-in option for properties that need minimal automation, but it lacks recent reviews, a detailed feature set, and proven customer satisfaction. Its suitability is uncertain without more reliable data.
straiv is a well-reviewed, feature-rich platform with a strong focus on streamlining the entire guest journey through digital check-in, messaging, and integrations. It’s ideal for hotels seeking a scalable, supported solution with proven user satisfaction.
For properties valuing extensive features, recent positive feedback, and reliable support, straiv emerges as the safer, more effective choice. If your hotel needs only simple online check-in without additional capabilities, ICG might suffice—but proceed cautiously given the lack of recent reviews.
非接触式办理入住 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
| ICG Software |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $500/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,ICG Check-in Online 和 straiv 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 | ICG Software |
|
|---|---|---|
| 客房服务订购 | ||
| 当地推荐 | ||
| 手机值机 | ||
| 移动结帐 | ||
| 网络应用 | ||
| 酒店目录 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 7 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
数字化入住和退房受到称赞,因为它大大减少了客人的等待时间和员工的行政负担。评论强调了非接触式流程的好处,尤其是在 COVID-19 时期,它为客人提供了无缝灵活... 数字化入住和退房受到称赞,因为它大大减少了客人的等待时间和员工的行政负担。评论强调了非接触式流程的好处,尤其是在 COVID-19 时期,它为客人提供了无缝灵活的入住和退房服务,同时确保遵守健康安全协议。
用户对通过旅程邮件和其他可定制模块直接与客人沟通的能力表示赞赏。这有助于及时交换信息、提供促销优惠并提高整体客人满意度。评论称赞了根据酒店个人需求设计... 用户对通过旅程邮件和其他可定制模块直接与客人沟通的能力表示赞赏。这有助于及时交换信息、提供促销优惠并提高整体客人满意度。评论称赞了根据酒店个人需求设计客人互动的灵活性。
Straiv 因其系统易于实施而获得高度评价,无需高级 IT 技能。评论一致提到该工具的直观用户界面,使员工和客人都可以轻松地与系统交互。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些用户报告了支付处理功能存在的问题,例如延迟和数据传输不完整。建议改进集成多个支付网关的功能,以提高效率和可靠性。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。ICG Check-in Online 和 straiv 共享许多核心 Contactless Check-in 功能,但各有独特的能力。ICG Check-in Online 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 straiv 提供 37 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。straiv 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
ICG Check-in Online:否。straiv:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Contactless Check-in 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。ICG Software 的 HT Score 为 0,straiv 的为 73。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问