The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 100 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Integrated Design & Build SDN BHD 表现出色 .
roommaster 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (5.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Revenue management module and Payment processing.
基于 HTR 上 100 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $500/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 100 |
在分析了 100 条经验证的评价后,Integrated Design & Build SDN BHD 用户最看重其 ,而 roommaster 用户则强调 客户支持, 预订管理, 集中式数据管理。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
| Integrated Design & Build SDN BHD |
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
|
|
+
预订管理
▾
|
|
|
+
集中式数据管理
▾
|
|
|
+
云和移动访问
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
报告生成
▾
|
|
|
−
用户界面体验
▾
|
|
|
−
团体预订功能
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 | Integrated Design & Build SDN BHD |
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #30 26 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #13 54 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | — | #31 3 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #32 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 | Integrated Design & Build SDN BHD |
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #22 35 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #34 8 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #24 15 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #27 6 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 | Integrated Design & Build SDN BHD |
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #10 62 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #29 11 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #27 0 条评价 |
When choosing a property management system (PMS), your hotel aims for a solution that simplifies operations, improves guest experiences, and offers reliable support—all at a fair price. Both IDB PMS by Integrated Design & Build SDN BHD and roommaster PMS claim to meet these needs but differ significantly in their market presence, features, and user feedback. Your decision hinges on whether you prioritize recent reviews and extensive integrations or a more bespoke, feature-limited platform.
IDB PMS is largely unreviewed, with no recent user feedback publicly available, making it difficult to gauge its real-world performance. Conversely, roommaster PMS boasts over 83 reviews, with 17 recent ones in the last six months, providing a more current picture of user satisfaction and operational effectiveness. The question is: which system truly aligns with your hotel’s specific needs?
IDB PMS’s lack of reviews and user feedback makes it challenging to assess its performance in real hotel environments. In contrast, roommaster PMS has a well-documented reputation for streamlining operations, with recent reviews emphasizing its ease of use, comprehensive reporting, and strong customer support.
IDB PMS aims to serve a broad range of real estate and hospitality businesses, offering tools for bookings, guest relations, and maintenance management. However, it lacks the extensive feature set that roommaster provides, such as integrated revenue management, channel management, or guest engagement tools. Does this mean IDB PMS is less capable, or simply less proven?
Given the more recent and numerous reviews of roommaster, it’s clear that it’s a more reliable choice for hotels seeking proven performance and ongoing support. So, is this sufficient reason to lean toward roommaster?
If your hotel needs a mature, scalable PMS with extensive integrations, automation features, and a proven track record, go with roommaster PMS. It’s well-suited for hotels ranging from boutique properties to multi-property chains, especially those in need of real-time, data-driven decision-making.
If your hotel is an emerging property or a niche operation with unique requirements that might benefit from a customizable or less-structured platform, IDB PMS could be worth exploring. However, given the absence of recent reviews and user feedback, you'll need to verify its capabilities thoroughly before committing.
For hotels prioritizing reliability, proven features, and ongoing support, roommaster PMS is the clear choice. Meanwhile, IDB PMS might appeal if you want a system that’s less tested but potentially tailored to specific real estate needs.
Roommaster PMS receives a high ease-of-use rating of 4.22/5, based on reviews praising its intuitive interface, straightforward workflows, and cloud accessibility. Users highlight its drag-and-drop reservation management and real-time reporting as key strengths, with support staff often commended for responsiveness.
IDB PMS, however, has a 0/5 rating for ease of use, with no recent reviews to determine its usability or user experience. This lack of feedback suggests it may not have been adopted widely or tested thoroughly by actual hotel staff.
Edge: roommaster PMS.
roommaster PMS offers a feature set of over 60 capabilities, including channel management, revenue management, integrated payment processing, booking engine, guest profiles, guest messaging, digital registration, online check-in and checkout, mobile app, automated reminders, group booking functionalities, and extensive reporting tools. These features target operational automation and guest engagement.
IDB PMS lacks publicly available feature details or a comparable feature count, making it difficult to assess its capabilities. It appears to be a more basic or less developed platform, without the extensive modules found in roommaster.
Given the feature-rich nature of roommaster and the absence of detailed features from IDB PMS, the edge clearly goes to roommaster PMS.
roommaster PMS has an average customer support rating of 4.25/5, with reviews citing quick responses, problem-solving efficiency, and support for both hotel and restaurant needs. Some users have described its customer service as “excellent” and “responsive,” crucial for operational stability.
IDB PMS, lacking recent reviews, provides no publicly available data on support quality. The absence of feedback makes it impossible to determine whether their support is as reliable or responsive as roommaster’s.
Edge: roommaster PMS.
roommaster PMS integrates with 56 verified partners, including major channel managers, POS systems, CRS, and marketing tools. Shared integrations include popular systems like Sage, Volo, GuestCentric, and Otelier, enabling seamless data flow across various platforms.
IDB PMS has zero verified partners listed, indicating limited or no integrations at this time. This restricts its adaptability within complex hotel tech stacks, unlike roommaster’s extensive and proven integration network.
Edge: roommaster PMS.
roommaster PMS has a high overall rating of 4.33/5 from 83 reviews, with recent feedback from multiple hotel types including boutique hotels, motels, resorts, and city hotels. Hoteliers praise its operational efficiency, report generation, and customer support.
IDB PMS’s rating is 0/5, with no recent reviews or detailed feedback available, making it impossible to determine how actual users perceive its value or performance.
Therefore, the clear winner is roommaster PMS, especially given its extensive review base and recent positive feedback.
IDB PMS does not publicly disclose pricing, and it appears to be custom or unclear. On the other hand, roommaster PMS is priced at a flat $500 per month without an implementation fee, making it transparent and predictable for your budgeting.
This clarity favors roommaster, especially if you seek a known investment without hidden costs or complex pricing models.
Given limited data and reviews, IDB PMS may suit smaller or specialized operations but carries inherent risk due to its untested market presence.
Generally, roommaster suits properties looking for operational robustness, scalability, and ongoing support.
The core difference is that roommaster delivers a proven, feature-packed platform with extensive integration, recent positive reviews, and high user satisfaction. IDB PMS remains largely unreviewed, with no recent feedback or openly available features, making it a risky choice.
If your hotel prioritizes a dependable, well-supported system with proven capabilities, go with roommaster. If you have very niche needs or are comfortable with an untested system, IDB PMS might be worth exploring, but proceed cautiously.
In summary, for most hotels seeking operational peace of mind, scalable features, and current support, roommaster PMS is the clear winner.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
| Integrated Design & Build SDN BHD |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $500/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,IDB PMS 和 roommaster PMS 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 | Integrated Design & Build SDN BHD |
|
|---|---|---|
| EPoS | ||
| 交付过程 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 管家模块 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 频道管理员 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 48 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 4 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"From my point of view as an asset manager that has the responsibility to tell the owners about their investment, roommaster gives me all that information. It's easy to report and e..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We’re an independent hotel surrounded by giants, but roomMaster gave us the tools we needed to stand tall alongside them."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
虽然有些用户体验到了优质的客户支持,但也有一些用户反映服务存在不一致之处。他们认为,需要提升客服人员的专业水平和对用户问题的理解,才能提供更令人满意的... 虽然有些用户体验到了优质的客户支持,但也有一些用户反映服务存在不一致之处。他们认为,需要提升客服人员的专业水平和对用户问题的理解,才能提供更令人满意的服务体验。
预订管理被认为是RoomMaster的一大优势,用户普遍认为它操作简便、高效,能够妥善管理包括团体预订在内的各种预订。然而,部分用户也指出,RoomMaster在房间分配... 预订管理被认为是RoomMaster的一大优势,用户普遍认为它操作简便、高效,能够妥善管理包括团体预订在内的各种预订。然而,部分用户也指出,RoomMaster在房间分配列表和团体入住登记方面仍有改进空间。
RoomMaster从分散的人工操作方式转向集中式数据管理,因其减少错误、提高酒店运营可靠性而备受赞誉。用户非常欣赏将所有预订、宾客信息和财务数据集中在一个安全... RoomMaster从分散的人工操作方式转向集中式数据管理,因其减少错误、提高酒店运营可靠性而备受赞誉。用户非常欣赏将所有预订、宾客信息和财务数据集中在一个安全平台上的做法,这显著提升了工作流程效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
RoomMaster的报告生成功能虽然实用,但仍被认为有待改进。用户希望在创建和导出报告方面获得更高的效率和效果,这表明改进功能可以简化分析任务。
一些用户指出需要改进用户体验,尤其强调需要消除重复性任务,例如频繁登录,这会影响日常使用该软件的流畅性。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。IDB PMS 和 roommaster PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。IDB PMS 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 roommaster PMS 提供 56 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。roommaster PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.1/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
IDB PMS:否。roommaster PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Integrated Design & Build SDN BHD 的 HT Score 为 0,roommaster 的为 83。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问