The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 55 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Infor 表现出色 在 客户支持 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (4.6/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Contact Management/CRM and Mobile App.
Zen Hospitality Solutions 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 "What-if" scenario analysis and Future Market Demand Data.
基于 HTR 上 55 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 40 | 15 |
在分析了 55 条经验证的评价后,Infor 用户最看重其 客户支持, 报告功能, 预测支持,而 Zen Hospitality Solutions 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
|
|
+
报告功能
▾
|
|
|
+
预测支持
▾
|
|
|
+
用户友好界面
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
费率建议
▾
|
|
|
−
预测准确度
▾
|
|
|
−
PMS 集成
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 收益管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #43 1 条评价 | #22 10 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #24 11 条评价 | #40 3 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #7 19 条评价 | #35 0 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #11 5 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #24 19 条评价 | #34 5 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #18 23 条评价 | #41 1 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #15 19 条评价 | #40 1 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #35 1 条评价 | #13 5 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | #22 2 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #28 6 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 ▾ | #7 21 条评价 | #8 14 条评价 |
| 中东 | #16 1 条评价 | — |
Choosing a revenue management system (RMS) isn’t just about features; it’s about selecting a tool that aligns with your hotel’s size, complexity, and strategic goals. Infor EzRMS and ZEN eManager both aim to optimize your pricing, but they approach this goal differently. Infor EzRMS is a deeply analytical platform with a broad feature set and extensive integrations, while ZEN eManager offers a streamlined, AI-powered solution with a focus on automation and ease of use. Which one best fits your hotel’s needs?
Both products seek to increase your revenue through smarter pricing, but they diverge in complexity, data depth, and integrations. Infor EzRMS has a longer legacy, with over 39 reviews, and is favored for its detailed data and multi-property management, making it ideal for larger, multi-location hotels or chains. ZEN eManager, with only 14 reviews but a higher recent rating, emphasizes simplicity, automation, and quick implementation, suited for smaller hotels or properties seeking an easy-to-operate solution. Are you looking for a feature-rich system or a straightforward, automated one?
If your hotel needs a comprehensive, highly customizable revenue system with extensive reporting and multi-property management, Infor EzRMS is the clear choice. It’s well-suited for larger hotels, chains, and properties with advanced analytical needs, especially given its 113 verified integrations and broad regional presence.
If your hotel prioritizes ease of use, automation, and integrated services like Channel Management and PMS, ZEN eManager is the better pick. It’s especially designed for small to mid-sized properties, offering built-in tools that simplify revenue management without requiring deep technical expertise. For a hotel that values automation and simplicity over detailed customization, ZEN eManager is the more appropriate choice.
Infor EzRMS boasts a user rating of 4.49/5 for ease of use, with some users noting that it requires specific knowledge and training to maximize its potential. Its interface, while functional, can be complex, especially for teams without prior revenue management experience, and some users report that data extraction and report generation can be unclear or cumbersome.
ZEN eManager excels in ease of use, with a 4.93/5 rating. Its interface is described as clean, dynamic, and intuitive, making it accessible even to teams with limited technical backgrounds. The platform’s built-in automation and training tools further streamline adoption.
Edge: ZEN eManager.
Infor EzRMS offers 13 features exclusive to its platform, including Contact Management/CRM, Task Management, Client Communication portals, and Mobile App access—features that support detailed, multi-layered revenue strategies. It also provides advanced forecasting and enterprise guidelines but requires manual setup for workflows.
ZEN eManager includes 3 unique features like "What-if" scenario analysis, Future Market Demand Data, and Price Explanation, emphasizing automation over manual detail. Its features are designed for straightforward, real-time decision-making and simplicity.
Edge: Infor EzRMS.
Infor EzRMS’s support scores at 4.04/5, with reviews highlighting responsiveness but also noting occasional delays, especially when system updates break functionalities. Users appreciate its support team’s professionalism but suggest that support hours could be expanded for better coverage.
ZEN eManager’s support ratings are higher at 4.82/5, with reviews emphasizing its personalized, flexible, and proactive approach. Customers frequently praise the team’s quick assistance and ongoing platform improvements.
Edge: ZEN eManager.
Infor EzRMS stands out with 113 verified integrations, including major partners like Priority Software, Trevo, and Fairmas, enabling extensive connectivity across PMS, distribution, and financial systems. Its broad integration network supports large, multi-property operations with complex needs.
ZEN eManager has only 1 verified partner, Yanolja Cloud Solution, signifying a more limited but focused integration scope. However, this may suffice for smaller properties or those seeking a simplified, all-in-one platform.
Edge: Infor EzRMS.
Infor EzRMS has an overall rating of 4.46/5, with a strong 4.6/5 from brand hotels, but only 3 reviews in the last 6 months, indicating less recent feedback. Larger hotels and chains tend to rate it higher, appreciating its depth and data richness.
ZEN eManager scores slightly higher at 4.93/5 overall, with recent reviews emphasizing its user-friendliness and automation. Given the lack of recent EzRMS reviews, ZEN eManager currently enjoys stronger recent feedback.
Edge: ZEN eManager.
Both products do not publicly disclose pricing details, which suggests customized quotes based on hotel size and needs. Typically, Infor EzRMS’s implementation and module costs tend to be higher due to its extensive features, while ZEN eManager’s simpler setup may result in lower total costs.
Your hotel should request tailored quotes to compare total investment, considering ongoing value and support.
Not ideal if your hotel is small, with limited budget, or prefers a plug-and-play solution without extensive customization.
Not ideal if your hotel requires extensive data analysis, custom workflows, or complex multi-property management.
Infor EzRMS offers a comprehensive, feature-rich revenue management platform favored by larger hotels and chains with complex needs. Its broad integrations and detailed analytics support sophisticated strategies but come with higher costs and a steeper learning curve.
ZEN eManager provides a streamlined, AI-powered solution that excels in automation and user-friendliness, making it suitable for smaller hotels or properties wanting quick, effective revenue optimization. Its simpler setup and high recent ratings make it the more attractive choice for properties prioritizing ease of use.
If your hotel demands depth, extensive integrations, and detailed control, go with Infor EzRMS. Its proven track record and broad feature set make it ideal for larger, multi-property management.
If your hotel needs a straightforward, automated system that saves time and reduces complexity, ZEN eManager is the better option. Its ease of use and recent positive reviews make it the best choice for properties seeking simplicity and efficiency.
Final recommendation: For most hotels, especially those valuing recent support and user reviews, ZEN eManager is the stronger contender. Its high scores in customer support, ease of use, and recent ratings underscore its suitability for today’s hotel environment.
收益管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|---|
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Infor EzRMS 和 ZEN eManager 共享 19 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| “假设”情景分析 | ||
| 价格说明 | ||
| 任务管理(任务和提醒) | ||
| 内容和文件管理 | ||
| 客户沟通门户 | ||
| 座位管理 | ||
| 未来市场需求数据 | ||
| 联系人管理/CRM | ||
| 行程打印输出 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 4 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
EzRMS 的客户支持因其响应能力和效率而受到高度赞扬,特别是在快速解决技术问题方面。不过,有人建议延长支持时间,并针对特定市场设立专门的团队。
EzRMS 的报告套件因其灵活性和深度而受到称赞,可进行全面的数据比较和趋势分析。它对于回顾性和预测性业务监控都很有效,有助于更好地进行战略规划和决策。
该系统为预测提供了广泛的支持,减少了收益经理的手动输入,并提供了可操作的见解。然而,一些用户认为系统的预测有时不准确,需要进一步改进以提高可靠性。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
EzRMS 提供详细的费率建议,用户认为这有助于优化收入。但是,一些用户报告称,费率上传的准确性和自动化程度存在困难,并且与其他系统的同步仍有改进空间,以防... EzRMS 提供详细的费率建议,用户认为这有助于优化收入。但是,一些用户报告称,费率上传的准确性和自动化程度存在困难,并且与其他系统的同步仍有改进空间,以防止出现费率差异等问题。
尽管最近算法更新后有所改善,但许多用户仍反映 EzRMS 的预测准确性存在问题。人们普遍认为,尽管该工具功能强大,但预测有时会与实际结果存在很大差异,尤其是... 尽管最近算法更新后有所改善,但许多用户仍反映 EzRMS 的预测准确性存在问题。人们普遍认为,尽管该工具功能强大,但预测有时会与实际结果存在很大差异,尤其是在 COVID-19 疫情等动态条件下。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Infor EzRMS 和 ZEN eManager 共享许多核心 Revenue Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Infor EzRMS 提供 113 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 ZEN eManager 提供 1 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。ZEN eManager 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 4.5/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Infor EzRMS:否。ZEN eManager:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Revenue Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Infor 的 HT Score 为 25,Zen Hospitality Solutions 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问