The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 39 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
IRIS Systems 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Housekeeping requests.
Toast 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 Cross Venue Payment Splitting.
基于 HTR 上 39 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 39 | 0 |
在分析了 39 条经验证的评价后,IRIS Systems 用户最看重其 客户支持, 用户友好界面, 定制和灵活性,而 Toast 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
|
|
+
用户友好界面
▾
|
|
|
+
定制和灵活性
▾
|
|
|
+
菜单管理
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
技术问题和改进
▾
|
|
|
−
集成与同步
▾
|
|
|
−
培训和文档
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 手机点餐和客房送餐服务 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) | #6 2 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #7 7 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #4 18 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #4 10 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #5 14 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #3 23 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #6 19 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 | #9 1 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #3 17 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #6 6 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #4 3 条评价 | — |
| 中东 ▾ | #3 6 条评价 | — |
Choosing between IRIS by IRIS Systems and Toast Digital Ordering hinges on your hotel’s specific needs, particularly around mobile guest services and F&B revenue. IRIS focuses on contactless, in-room, and guest-facing digital solutions that integrate with property management and point-of-sale systems, notably enhancing F&B and guest experience for smaller independents and luxury hotels. Toast, on the other hand, is primarily a restaurant-oriented platform designed to optimize order and payment processes within food service settings, with no recent reviews or ratings for hotel use.
Given the significant difference in focus—IRIS for hotel guest-facing service and Toast for restaurant service—the decision should be based on your operational priorities. Are you seeking to elevate your guest experience with streamlined mobile interactions and integrations? Or are you focusing on improving dine-in efficiency and order management in your F&B outlets? The choice becomes clearer when considering your hotel type and operational scope.
IRIS truly aims to serve hotels directly, providing features like digital directories, digital menus, and in-room dining, alongside integrations with PMS, POS, and local city guides—features that facilitate a full hotel guest experience. Toast, however, is built for restaurants, with a focus on order management, contactless payments, and server efficiency, but it lacks hotel-specific features or recent hotel reviews.
IRIS’s user ratings — a 5/5 overall and an HT Score of 80.48 — far surpass Toast’s zero ratings and reviews. IRIS’s recent feedback emphasizes its ease of use, support, and ability to boost F&B revenue, making it a clear choice for hotels aiming to upgrade their mobile services.
So, if your hotel needs a dedicated guest experience platform that integrates with your property systems, IRIS is the more appropriate choice. Are you prepared to implement a hotel-specific digital solution that enhances guest engagement and operational efficiency?
If your hotel requires a mobile platform that enhances guest communication, digital concierge services, and in-room F&B ordering, IRIS is the better option. It’s especially suitable if you operate a small independent, boutique, or luxury property looking to elevate guest satisfaction and increase F&B revenue, supported by high ratings and a strong review count.
If your hotel’s primary focus is on restaurant dine-in and delivery operations, or you already use Toast for restaurant management, Toast’s platform might seem appealing. However, with no hotel-specific reviews or recent activity, it’s clear IRIS’s targeted hotel solutions and recent positive feedback make it the more reliable choice for your property.
In summary, for holistic hotel guest engagement and F&B growth, IRIS leads. For restaurant-centric operations with no hotel-specific needs, Toast might suffice—but it’s not designed for the full hotel environment.
IRIS’s interface is highly rated at 4.62/5, with a straightforward onboarding process and positive reviews highlighting its user-friendly nature. Support during implementation is praised, with reviewers mentioning dedicated help from team members like Miguel and Catalina, making staff adoption smoother.
Toast, lacking recent hotel reviews, has an unknown usability rating in this context. Its platform is designed to be simple for restaurant staff but has no recent hotel-specific onboarding or usability feedback.
Given IRIS’s strong recent user ratings and support reviews, edge goes to IRIS for ease of use in a hotel setting.
IRIS offers 18 unique hotel-centric features—digital directories, menus, housekeep requests, restaurant reservations, POS and PMS integration, digital concierge, bell services, in-room dining, spa modules, and multi-lingual support. Its integrations with leading PMS and POS systems make it highly adaptable for property operations.
Toast’s three unique features—Near Field Contact (NFC), cross-venue payment splitting, and loyalty programs—are valuable in restaurant contexts but irrelevant for hotel guest services. It lacks hotel-specific functionalities like digital guest directories or in-room dining.
Edge: IRIS Systems, with a wide array of hotel-focused features and integrations.
IRIS’s customer support scores are notably high at 4.73/5, with reviews praising their responsiveness and professionalism. Reviewers commend the onboarding process and ongoing support, especially from team members like Miguel, who are dedicated to smooth implementation.
Toast’s support and onboarding ratings are not available for recent hotel use, making it impossible to compare directly. Given IRIS’s consistently high support scores and recent reviews, the edge goes to IRIS.
IRIS boasts 17 verified partners, including major PMS providers like Oracle Hospitality, Unifocus, and Infor, along with POS systems, guestware, and vendor management tools. Its extensive integrations facilitate smooth operations across hotel departments.
Toast has 13 verified partners, mainly focusing on restaurant and delivery platforms like Bbot, Olo, and Mews, but lacks many hotel-specific integrations. While suitable for restaurant settings, it’s less comprehensive for hotel needs.
Edge: IRIS Systems.
IRIS’s average rating of 5/5 from 37 reviews over the past six months—more recent and numerous—reflects strong user satisfaction. Hotels across segments, especially independents and luxury properties, praise its ease of use, support, and revenue impact.
Toast has no recent hotel reviews or ratings available, making it impossible to gauge hotel user satisfaction. Given the recent, positive feedback for IRIS, it is clearly rated higher by hoteliers.
IRIS does not disclose specific pricing but offers a free trial—details on pricing models are not publicly available. Toast’s pricing is similarly undisclosed, with no clear subscription or licensing information.
Both products likely require customized quotes based on hotel size and complexity. For budgeting purposes, expect IRIS to be a premium, hotel-focused investment, while Toast’s costs will depend on restaurant volume.
Not ideal if your hotel relies solely on restaurant operations, or if you prefer a platform without extensive integrations.
Not ideal if your hotel desires a full guest-facing digital platform or multi-department integration.
IRIS’s core advantage is its hotel-specific focus, integrating directly with PMS and POS, and offering features that elevate guest experiences. It’s designed to serve small to luxury hotels that want to modernize and personalize their guest interactions.
If your hotel’s top priority is improving guest engagement, increasing F&B revenues, and integrating with existing hotel systems, IRIS is the clear choice. Its strong recent reviews, high ratings, and extensive feature set make it the more reliable and capable solution.
However, if your hotel’s focus is on restaurant operations, delivery, and contactless dine-in, and you are already using Toast in your food service outlets, Toast may be suitable. But with no recent hotel reviews, it lacks the proven hotel-specific capabilities IRIS offers.
In conclusion, for a comprehensive hotel guest experience platform that drives revenue and supports operational efficiency, IRIS stands out as the more effective product.
手机点餐和客房送餐服务 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|---|
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,IRIS 和 Toast Digital Ordering 共享 16 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| POS 和 PMS 集成 | ||
| 客房清洁要求 | ||
| 当地城市指南 | ||
| 忠诚度计划集成 | ||
| 数字目录 | ||
| 数字菜单 | ||
| 跨场所支付拆分 | ||
| 近场接触 (NFC) | ||
| 餐厅预订 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 9 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 3 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"The app gives our guests a seamless means of communicating with us and a digital platform on which they can order their favourite food and drink items direct to their room. Additio..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Room service options through IRIS is one of the best features, the ability to swap and change menus as we wish is excellent. The app enriches our guest’s stay by giving them the a..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We want to provide our guests with a sustainable, digital experience that will enhance their stay and give them everything they need - and the IRIS app does exactly this. The app..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
IRIS 团队提供的客户支持水平,尤其是在入职和故障排除期间,获得了高度赞誉。特别提到了 Catalina、Miguel 等团队成员,强调了他们的帮助所产生的积极影响。然... IRIS 团队提供的客户支持水平,尤其是在入职和故障排除期间,获得了高度赞誉。特别提到了 Catalina、Miguel 等团队成员,强调了他们的帮助所产生的积极影响。然而,一些评论强调需要更好的支持文档和材料。
许多评论者都强调了 IRIS 平台的用户友好性,让员工和客人都能轻松导航。用户欣赏直观的设计,它缩短了学习曲线,并提升了不同技术水平用户的整体体验。
该平台提供大量定制选项,允许酒店根据其特定需求定制系统。这包括调整菜单显示、视觉辅助以及工作时间和语言选项等操作设置。但是,一些用户寻求更高级的定制功... 该平台提供大量定制选项,允许酒店根据其特定需求定制系统。这包括调整菜单显示、视觉辅助以及工作时间和语言选项等操作设置。但是,一些用户寻求更高级的定制功能。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然总体评价是正面的,但一些评论指出了 IRIS 的技术问题,包括同步时间缓慢以及暂时移除缺货商品的困难。这些方面被标记为有待改进,以确保在繁忙时段更顺畅地... 虽然总体评价是正面的,但一些评论指出了 IRIS 的技术问题,包括同步时间缓慢以及暂时移除缺货商品的困难。这些方面被标记为有待改进,以确保在繁忙时段更顺畅地运营。
IRIS 的集成能力经常受到称赞,尤其是它与 POS 系统的无缝连接。然而,一些用户表示,同步(尤其是菜单项和库存计数)可能很慢且繁琐,这凸显了对更好的自动化和... IRIS 的集成能力经常受到称赞,尤其是它与 POS 系统的无缝连接。然而,一些用户表示,同步(尤其是菜单项和库存计数)可能很慢且繁琐,这凸显了对更好的自动化和更快的同步流程的需求。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。IRIS 和 Toast Digital Ordering 共享许多核心 Mobile Ordering & Room Service 功能,但各有独特的能力。IRIS 提供 17 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Toast Digital Ordering 提供 13 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。IRIS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
IRIS:否。Toast Digital Ordering:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Mobile Ordering & Room Service 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。IRIS Systems 的 HT Score 为 80,Toast 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问