Jaras vs. Shiji Daylight PMS: 哪个更适合您?

更新于 May 16, 2026  ·  已分析 34 条经验证的评价

摘要

我们分析了 34 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:

Jaras 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 On premise and Revenue management module.

Shiji Group 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Guest profiles and Tablet/Kiosk Check-in.

查看下方完整分析 ↓

Jaras 与 Shiji Daylight PMS 相比如何?

基于 HTR 上 34 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。

HTScore
0
75
推荐可能性
0%
90%
易用性
0.0/5
4.6/5
客户支持
0.0/5
4.6/5
性价比
0.0/5
4.5/5
起始价格 From $1,000/mo From $1,200/mo
经验证的评价 0 34

Jaras 与 Shiji Daylight PMS 的优缺点是什么?

在分析了 34 条经验证的评价后,Jaras 用户最看重其 ,而 Shiji Group 用户则强调 易于使用, 支持团队, 执行。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。

Jaras Jaras Shiji Group Shiji Group
优点
+ 易于使用
+ 支持团队
+ 执行
+ 培训材料
缺点
报告和分析
系统速度
集成能力

Jaras 对比 Shiji Group:按酒店细分市场排名

各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。

按酒店规模

细分市场 Jaras Jaras Shiji Group Shiji Group
小型(10-24 间客房) #53 2 条评价
中型(25-74 间客房) #31 17 条评价
大型(75-199 间客房) #11 13 条评价
超大型(200+ 间客房) #22 2 条评价

按物业类型

细分市场 Jaras Jaras Shiji Group Shiji Group
精品酒店 #33 17 条评价
豪华酒店 #24 25 条评价
品牌/连锁酒店 #22 19 条评价
长住酒店 #45 2 条评价

按区域

细分市场 Jaras Jaras Shiji Group Shiji Group
北美 #33 4 条评价
欧洲 #30 8 条评价
亚太 #14 5 条评价
中东 #5 14 条评价

The Decision

Choosing between Jaras by Jaras and Shiji Daylight PMS hinges on your hotel's specific needs, operational scale, and budget. Both products aim to streamline property management, but they diverge significantly in maturity, feature set, and market presence. Jaras promises a modern, cloud-native platform with an emphasis on automation and simplicity, yet it lacks recent reviews and an established track record. Conversely, Shiji Daylight PMS boasts a robust user base, extensive features, and recent positive feedback, making it the more proven choice for most hoteliers.

Are you seeking a newer system with innovative potential or an established platform with comprehensive functionality? Your decision should reflect your operational priorities and the maturity of your technology stack.

Is Jaras or Shiji Daylight PMS Better for Hotels?

Jaras is a newcomer founded in 2023, designed to provide a centralized, cloud-based platform for various accommodation providers like hotels, resorts, and serviced apartments. Its core strengths lie in unit management, reservations, and automation, especially with integrations to over 150 booking channels. However, with zero reviews and no recent customer feedback, there’s limited insight into its real-world performance.

Shiji Daylight PMS, founded in 1998, is a well-established cloud-native system with 32 recent reviews, a high NPS score of 8.94, and an overall rating of 74.68. It excels across multiple hotel segments, especially in luxury and branded properties, and has a proven track record of improving operational efficiency and guest experiences.

Given these facts, your choice depends on whether you prioritize a fresh, innovative system or a trusted, feature-rich platform backed by recent user feedback. Are you ready to gamble on a new vendor, or do you prefer a solution with a strong market presence and ongoing support?

Jaras vs Shiji Daylight PMS: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?

If your hotel needs an easily deployable, modern, and intuitive management system with a focus on automation and distribution, Jaras might be appealing. It’s ideal for properties looking to modernize operations with a sleek interface, though its lack of reviews makes it uncertain how well it will meet your expectations long-term.

If your hotel requires a mature, extensively tested PMS with a broad feature set—including guest profiles, online check-in/out, integrated CRS, and automation—Shiji Daylight PMS is the clear winner. Its robust support network, proven results in reducing workload, and recent positive reviews make it the safer choice for mid-sized to large hotels seeking operational stability and scalability.

In summary, opt for Jaras if innovation and a fresh platform drive your decision; choose Shiji if proven reliability, feature depth, and recent user satisfaction matter most.

Is Jaras or Shiji Daylight PMS Easier to Use?

Shiji Daylight PMS has a user rating of 4.63 out of 5, with recent reviews praising its intuitive interface, comprehensive training materials, and ease of onboarding. Users highlight that new staff can learn the system quickly, reducing training time and operational disruptions. Support is rated at 4.53, with many reviews noting the responsiveness and helpfulness of their support team.

Jaras, on the other hand, has a 0/5 rating and no reviews, leaving its usability unverified. Its claim as a modern, cloud-native platform suggests a clean interface, but without user feedback, it’s impossible to assess how easily your staff would adopt it.

Edge: Shiji Daylight PMS.

Which Has Better Features: Jaras or Shiji Daylight PMS?

Jaras offers only 2 unique features: on-premise deployment and a revenue management module. These are relatively limited compared to its competitor’s extensive feature set, which totals 84 exclusive features.

Shiji Daylight PMS includes features like guest profiles, multi-lingual support, online check-in/out, integrated CRS, guest messaging, housekeeping modules, automated night audits, channel management, and more. It provides a comprehensive suite designed to meet the needs of large, multi-property groups.

Edge: Shiji Daylight PMS.

Which Has Better Customer Support: Jaras or Shiji Daylight PMS?

Shiji Group’s customer support is highly rated at 4.53/5, with reviews emphasizing their responsiveness and professionalism. Guests appreciate their 24/7 availability and proactive support, which helps minimize operational downtime.

Jaras’s support score is unavailable, and with no recent reviews, its support quality remains unverified. Given Shiji’s established presence and positive feedback, it clearly offers more reliable and accessible support.

Edge: Shiji Daylight PMS.

Which Has More Integrations: Jaras or Shiji Daylight PMS?

Jaras does not currently list verified integration partners, indicating limited or no third-party integrations. This can be a significant limitation for hotels relying on connected systems.

Shiji Group boasts 64 verified partners, including major players like SiteMinder, Revinate, Amadeus, and Oaky. Its extensive integration ecosystem allows seamless connection with PMS, POS, revenue management, and marketing tools, essential for more complex operations.

Edge: Shiji Daylight PMS.

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: Jaras or Shiji Daylight PMS?

With 32 recent reviews and a high NPS score of 8.94, Shiji Daylight PMS is the more favorably rated platform. Hoteliers across various segments praise its ease of use, support, and feature breadth, especially in luxury and branded hotels.

Jaras has no reviews, making it impossible to gauge user satisfaction. Until real-world feedback emerges, Shiji’s established reputation gives it a clear advantage.

Edge: Shiji Daylight PMS.

How Much Do Jaras and Shiji Daylight PMS Cost?

Jaras’s pricing starts at $1,000, but there is no mention of a free trial or monthly fees. Its pricing structure remains unclear due to the lack of publicly available details.

Shiji Daylight PMS costs $1,200, with no trial offered. Its pricing likely reflects the extensive features, integrations, and support included, aligning with its comprehensive offering.

In conclusion, Shiji’s slightly higher price is justified by its proven feature set and support; Jaras’s cost remains uncertain but potentially attractive for early-stage or small properties.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Jaras?

  • Hotels seeking a modern, cloud-native platform with automation features.
  • Property managers looking for a centralized dashboard for reservations, distribution, and reporting.
  • Teams that want to integrate with over 150 booking channels easily.
  • New hotels or resorts aiming for quick deployment with a user-friendly interface.

Not ideal if your hotel requires extensive customization, proven stability, or a broad ecosystem of integrations.

Jaras is suitable for properties that prioritize innovation and automation and are comfortable with a newer, less-tested platform.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Shiji Daylight PMS?

  • Hotels of all sizes, from boutique to global chains, needing a scalable solution.
  • Properties that prioritize detailed guest profiles, automation, and integrations.
  • Hotels requiring multi-lingual support, multi-currency, and advanced reporting.
  • Operators seeking a system with a proven track record and extensive features.

Not ideal if your hotel has very limited technical needs, or if you prefer a very lightweight or niche system.

Shiji Daylight PMS is best suited for hotels looking for a comprehensive, reliable system with proven support and broad integrations.

Shiji Daylight PMS vs Jaras: The Bottom Line for Hotels

The core difference lies in maturity and feature breadth. Shiji Daylight PMS is a long-standing, feature-rich platform with recent positive reviews, extensive integrations, and high customer satisfaction.

Choose Jaras if your hotel is a tech-forward, innovative property ready to test a new system, or if you value automation and channel distribution above all. Its lack of reviews and limited feature disclosures make it a risky choice for critical operations.

For most hotels, especially those seeking stability, support, and proven results, Shiji Daylight PMS offers a safer, more comprehensive solution. If your hotel’s growth or operational complexity increases, it’s the more flexible and reliable system that will grow with you.

Jaras 和 Shiji Daylight PMS 的价格是多少?

物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。

Jaras Jaras Shiji Group Shiji Group
Starting Price From $1,000/mo From $1,200/mo

Jaras 有哪些 Shiji Daylight PMS 没有的功能(反之亦然)?

根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Jaras 和 Shiji Daylight PMS 共享 14 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。

功能 Jaras Jaras Shiji Group Shiji Group
任务管理
在前提
多种语言
宾客资料
平板电脑/自助值机
收益管理模块
网上值机
集中用户和角色管理

显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 74 项功能存在差异。

实际成果:Jaras 对比 Shiji Group(按业务目标)

我们分析了 4 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。

提高运营效率
Jaras Jaras

该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。

Shiji Group Ruby Hotels 中型
+ Successfully went live with 21 hotels across Europe, with additional hotel openings planned in the near future.
+ Equipped with the level of API connectivity they needed to create connections between disparate data sets that would be impossible to achieve manually.
+ Mentions of Technology have increased by 2.5 points, Reception by 3 points and Service by 3.5 points.

"All the big players don't offer the level of API connectivity we need, but Shiji does. From the early stages of our design process, we were confident that Shiji could provide us wi..."

Lucas Höfer
Lucas Höfer
Group Director of Systems and Innovation...
改善宾客体验
Jaras Jaras

该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。

Shiji Group Sunborn London 小型
+ �s fully integrated tech stack, the team unified their data, simplified workflows, and elevated every touchpoint of the guest journey.
+ From seamless check-in and instant mobile ordering to real-time housekeeping updates, everything now runs faster, smoother, and with less effort.
+ Most importantly, technology now works in the background, freeing up staff to focus on what really matters: delivering memorable, personalized experiences that live up to Sunborn

"We reduced check-in time by over 80%, from up to eight minutes to just about one minute with the new system."

V
Vasilis Giannios
Operations Manager, Sunborn London

Jaras 对比 Shiji Group:总结

Jaras
Jaras
0.0/5 来自 0 条评价

独特功能

在前提 收益管理模块
0.0/5 易用性 0.0/5 客户支持 0 个集成
查看资料
Shiji Group
Shiji Group
4.5/5 来自 34 条评价

酒店从业者喜爱的方面

易于使用 97% 正面

用户经常称赞石基 PMS 的用户界面友好,简化了日常操作,降低了新用户的学习难度。评论中强调了其易用性,指出其培训材料易懂、设计直观、任务执行高效。

支持团队 83% 正面

石基PMS支持团队的支持和响应能力一直受到好评。用户赞赏支持人员的专业性和乐于助人的精神,这对更顺利地运营有很大帮助。

执行 83% 正面

一些评论者认为石基 PMS 的实施过程流畅高效,他们赞赏知识渊博、积极主动的实施团队。不过,一些用户建议缩短实施时间以进一步改善体验。

酒店从业者提出异议的方面

报告和分析 62% 负面

尽管石基 PMS 的详细报告功能广受好评,但一些用户仍希望获得更先进、更快速的报告工具。具体要求包括增强的汇总报告、详细的账单和更快的报告生成流程。

系统速度 57% 负面

与系统速度和一致性相关的性能问题是用户普遍关心的问题,一些用户指出在高峰操作期间响应时间很慢。用户敦促提高系统速度以提高整体效率。

独特功能

宾客资料 多种语言 集中用户和角色管理 任务管理 平板电脑/自助值机
4.6/5 易用性 4.5/5 客户支持 64 个集成
访问官网

评分差异最大的方面

易用性 Shiji Group 4.6 vs 0.0 (+4.6)
客户支持 Shiji Group 4.5 vs 0.0 (+4.5)
性价比 Shiji Group 4.5 vs 0.0 (+4.5)
入职培训 Shiji Group 4.4 vs 0.0 (+4.4)

关于 Jaras 与 Shiji Daylight PMS 的常见问题

Jaras 能否替代 Shiji Daylight PMS?

这取决于您的需求。Jaras 和 Shiji Daylight PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Jaras 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Shiji Daylight PMS 提供 64 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。

哪个更适合小型或独立酒店?

小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Shiji Daylight PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。

Jaras 或 Shiji Daylight PMS 是否提供免费方案?

Jaras:否。Shiji Daylight PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。

HTR 如何评估和排名 Jaras 和 Shiji Daylight PMS?

HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Jaras 的 HT Score 为 0,Shiji Group 的为 75。以下是评分的计算方式。

标准组 权重 衡量内容
客户评分与评价

用户对该产品的推荐度如何?

评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例

权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。

合作伙伴生态系统

技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何?

合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量

评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。

以客户为中心

该组织以客户为中心的程度如何?

认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性

评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。

覆盖范围、持久力与资源

该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛?

地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分

衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。

客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →

获取个性化的产品推荐

产品推荐顾问

Ghostel icon

让我们查找您的酒店信息