The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 预订引擎 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 | jetstar |
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #29 8 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #22 18 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #14 9 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #10 6 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 | jetstar |
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #24 15 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #23 15 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #18 13 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | — | #19 4 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 | jetstar |
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | — | #18 4 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #20 12 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | — | #10 14 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #14 3 条评价 |
Choosing the right booking engine for your hotel hinges on your specific needs, budget, and the importance you place on customer support and features. While Jetstar offers a basic, AI-driven platform primarily designed for airline revenue management, Roiback delivers a comprehensive, hotel-focused booking engine with extensive features and proven results. Both products aim to boost direct bookings, but their approaches and capabilities diverge significantly. Which aligns better with your hotel’s goals?
Jetstar is a niche system rooted in airline revenue management, utilizing AI algorithms to optimize ticket sales and seat inventory. It hasn't been reviewed in recent months, and its ratings are zero across all metrics, indicating no current customer feedback or proven hotel application. Conversely, Roiback is a dedicated hotel booking platform with over 43 recent reviews, a high NPS score of 9/5, and a stellar overall rating of 72.06, making it a more reliable choice for hoteliers.
Roiback’s platform is optimized for hotel direct sales, offering a suite of features like multi-language support, flexible booking options, and detailed analytics. Jetstar’s focus on airline profitability doesn’t translate to the hotel industry, and the absence of recent reviews or user ratings suggests it’s not actively serving hoteliers. Are you looking for a proven, hotel-specific solution with recent customer validation?
If your hotel needs a feature-rich, easy-to-use booking engine with extensive integrations, Roiback is the clear winner. Its platform is designed for hoteliers aiming to increase direct sales, offering tools like multi-lingual support, abandonment recovery, loyalty integrations, and detailed reporting—features Jetstar cannot match.
On the other hand, Jetstar might be suitable if your team is seeking a revenue management solution tailored for airlines and not focused on direct hotel bookings. Jetstar’s AI-driven approach, though impressive in aviation, lacks hotel-specific features and recent reviews, making it unsuitable for hotels looking to grow their online direct channels.
Roiback’s platform scores 4.49/5 for ease of use, thanks to its intuitive, mobile-optimized interface, clear rate grids, and user-friendly booking flow. Its onboarding process is rated 4.34/5, with many reviews praising its straightforward integration and helpful support team, which often responds quickly and effectively.
Jetstar, meanwhile, has a 0/5 score for ease of use, with no recent reviews or user feedback to gauge its interface or onboarding experience. Given the absence of detailed user ratings or recent customer interactions, Roiback’s user-friendliness is clearly superior.
Edge: Roiback
Roiback offers 36 features designed specifically for hotel bookings, including mobile responsiveness, urgency messaging, special offers, multi-room bookings, loyalty integration, and multiple payment options like Apple Pay, Google Pay, and Stripe. It also provides tools for rate comparison, booking abandonment recovery, multi-currency support, and detailed conversion reports.
Jetstar offers no features or integrations tailored to hotels, focusing solely on airline revenue management. The absence of hotel-specific functionalities makes Jetstar less suitable for your hotel’s booking needs.
Edge: Roiback
Roiback’s support score is 4.72/5, with many reviewers highlighting the responsiveness, expertise, and personalized consulting provided by their support team. Hotels appreciate the ongoing advice, detailed onboarding, and proactive communication that help maximize their investment.
Jetstar, with a support score of 0/5 and no recent reviews, provides no evidence of active customer service or support tailored to hotel clients. Without recent feedback, it’s clear Roiback offers a more reliable support experience for hoteliers.
Edge: Roiback
Roiback boasts 27 verified integrations, including major channel managers, PMS systems, and hotel tech providers like RoomRaccoon, GuestCentric, Triptease, and more. This extensive partner network simplifies connectivity and streamlines hotel operations.
Jetstar, however, lists no verified integrations or partnerships, limiting its potential for seamless operation within a hotel’s existing tech stack. For hotels that rely on multiple systems, Roiback’s integration capabilities are a significant advantage.
Edge: Roiback
Roiback, with 43 recent reviews in the last six months, enjoys a high NPS score of 9/5 and a 90% likelihood to recommend. Hotels across segments—luxury, boutique, city center, resorts—rate it highly for features, support, and overall value.
Jetstar has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to gauge customer satisfaction. Given the recent positive feedback on Roiback, it’s the superior choice for most hotels.
Edge: Roiback
Jetstar offers no pricing information or trial options, suggesting it may not be actively marketed or suited for hotel use. Roiback’s pricing starts at $500/month, with no implementation or setup fees, offering a transparent, subscription-based model.
For hotels seeking a clear cost structure aligned with hotel industry standards, Roiback’s pricing is straightforward, while Jetstar’s lack of publicly available pricing indicates it may not be an option for hoteliers.
Not ideal if:
Edge: N/A (Jetstar not suitable for hotel use)
Not ideal if:
Edge: N/A (Roiback is ideal for most hotel segments)
The core difference lies in their target markets: Jetstar is an airline revenue management system with no recent hotel reviews or hotel-specific features, making it unsuitable for hotel use. Roiback is a hotel-specific booking engine with recent reviews, high customer satisfaction, and extensive features designed to increase direct sales.
If your goal is to grow direct bookings, improve user experience, and integrate with existing hotel systems, Roiback is the clear winner. Its proven track record, recent positive reviews, and extensive feature set make it the better choice for most hotels.
Choose Roiback if you value a dedicated hotel booking platform with comprehensive support and proven performance. Jetstar, primarily an airline-focused system, should only be considered if your hotel operates within a niche that aligns with its airline revenue management roots—something very few hotels need.
This comprehensive comparison should help you confidently select the booking engine that best aligns with your hotel’s strategic goals. Based on recent reviews, industry focus, and feature availability, Roiback stands out as the more capable and reliable option for hoteliers today.
我们分析了 1 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Partnering with Roiback has been a game-changer, as their innovative solutions and close support by our Direct Channel Specialist have empowered Jasmine City Group to reach new h..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Roiback 的专业支持团队(包括客户经理和直接渠道专家)获得了高度赞誉。用户对他们的响应能力、专业知识和个性化咨询表示赞赏,这些都对实现业务目标起到了重要... Roiback 的专业支持团队(包括客户经理和直接渠道专家)获得了高度赞誉。用户对他们的响应能力、专业知识和个性化咨询表示赞赏,这些都对实现业务目标起到了重要作用。
Roiback 通过用户友好的预订引擎、创新的直销策略以及忠诚度计划和促销套餐等工具来提高直接预订量。酒店运营商报告称,在线销售量大幅增长,直接渠道可见度也有... Roiback 通过用户友好的预订引擎、创新的直销策略以及忠诚度计划和促销套餐等工具来提高直接预订量。酒店运营商报告称,在线销售量大幅增长,直接渠道可见度也有所提高。
关键反馈包括要求加快系统响应速度、减少重复和 404 错误等技术故障以及统一平台以简化流程。这些技术改进对于实现无缝用户体验至关重要。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
该平台的用户友好型和直观预订引擎受到好评,并提到其流畅的多语言支持和易用性。然而,一些用户要求改进默认语言设置和界面设计,以提供更好的用户体验。
虽然该平台支持多种支付网关,但用户建议需要扩展支付选项,特别是整合更多的本地和国际网关,以避免连接问题。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。jetstar 和 Roiback | Booking Engine 共享许多核心 Booking Engine 功能,但各有独特的能力。jetstar 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Roiback | Booking Engine 提供 27 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Roiback | Booking Engine 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.5/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
jetstar:否。Roiback | Booking Engine:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Booking Engine 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。jetstar 的 HT Score 为 0,ROIBACK 的为 72。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问