The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 1,242 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Cloudbeds 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的物业 (4.6/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Revenue management module and Payment processing.
KrossBooking 表现出色 .
基于 HTR 上 1,242 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $600/mo | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 1,242 | 0 |
在分析了 1,242 条经验证的评价后,Cloudbeds 用户最看重其 用户友好界面, 实施与支持, 一体化生态系统,而 KrossBooking 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
KrossBooking |
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
用户友好界面
▾
|
|
|
+
实施与支持
▾
|
|
|
+
一体化生态系统
▾
|
|
|
+
渠道管理
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
预订管理
▾
|
|
|
−
报表定制
▾
|
|
|
−
系统速度
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
KrossBooking |
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #1 592 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #4 212 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #5 42 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #13 4 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
KrossBooking |
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #2 473 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #4 228 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #6 116 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #2 93 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
KrossBooking |
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #2 435 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #7 163 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 ▾ | #3 226 条评价 | — |
| 中东 ▾ | #7 11 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Cloudbeds PMS and KrossBooking hinges on your hotel’s specific needs, operations, and growth plans. Both systems aim to streamline property management, but Cloudbeds offers an all-in-one platform with extensive integrations and a proven track record, while KrossBooking emphasizes simplicity and AI-driven insights. Your decision should reflect your hotel’s size, complexity, and desire for scalability versus ease of use.
Cloudbeds provides a comprehensive, feature-rich environment trusted by thousands of hoteliers globally, making it the more established choice. KrossBooking, with its streamlined approach and focus on automation, may suit smaller or more digitally-minded properties. Which system aligns better with your strategic priorities?
Cloudbeds is a property management system built to serve a broad range of hotel types—from boutique hotels to large resorts—and is backed by over a thousand recent reviews, with a high score of 4.63/5. It offers 64 exclusive features, including channel management, revenue tools, and extensive integrations, designed for properties seeking growth and operational efficiency.
KrossBooking, by contrast, has no reviews or ratings available and offers a simplified platform aimed at streamlining operations through automation and AI insights. Its minimal feature set suggests a focus on ease and quick deployment rather than deep customization or extensive connectivity.
Given Cloudbeds’ large review count, recent positive feedback, and proven scalability, it clearly holds a stronger position for hotels seeking a robust system. Is your hotel ready for an ecosystem that supports complex growth, or would a simpler, AI-focused system suffice?
If your hotel needs a fully integrated platform that manages reservations, distribution, revenue, and operations at scale, Cloudbeds is the right pick. Its extensive features, high user ratings, and global presence make it ideal for properties aiming to expand, improve efficiency, and offer contactless guest experiences.
If simplicity, quick setup, and AI-driven insights are your priority, especially for smaller or tech-savvy properties, KrossBooking might appeal. However, without available reviews or proven track record, it’s less suitable for hotels looking for reliability and extensive customization.
For most hotels aiming to grow and optimize, Cloudbeds offers the clear advantage due to its proven performance, comprehensive features, and active support.
Cloudbeds scores a 4.61/5 for ease of use, reflecting its intuitive interface, mobile access, and smooth onboarding process, supported by over 1,000 recent reviews praising its user-friendliness. Its onboarding rating of 4.45/5 indicates most users find it straightforward to implement with dedicated support.
KrossBooking, with no current reviews or ratings, cannot be evaluated on usability. However, its focus on automation and AI suggests a simplified experience once set up, but without user feedback, certainty on ease remains limited.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds boasts 64 exclusive features, including a channel manager, revenue management, online check-in, integrated booking engine, housekeeping, guest communication, and more. Its platform supports multi-lingual, multi-currency operations, and provides extensive reporting and automation tools.
KrossBooking offers core reservation management with automation and AI insights, but has no publicly listed features beyond basic operational automation. The lack of additional features or integrations makes Cloudbeds the more comprehensive choice for properties needing scalability.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds has a 4.41/5 support rating based on recent reviews, with many users praising its responsive, knowledgeable support team that responds promptly to issues. Customers frequently highlight positive experiences with onboarding and ongoing assistance, which is vital for complex property operations.
KrossBooking offers no publicly available support ratings or recent reviews, making it impossible to compare support quality. The absence of support data suggests it may lack the extensive customer service infrastructure that Cloudbeds has established.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds integrates with 190 verified partners, including major channels and systems like AdsHotel, Trevo, and ManCloud, enabling properties to connect with a wide array of tools. Its open marketplace and channel self-mapping provide flexibility and scalability.
KrossBooking has no listed integrations or verified partners, limiting its ability to connect with third-party systems. For hotels that rely on diverse integrations for operations, Cloudbeds clearly leads.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds enjoys a 4.63/5 rating from 1,071 reviews, with recent feedback citing ease of use, robust features, and excellent support. Hotels across segments—boutique, hostel, independent—rate it highly, with many noting improved revenue and operational clarity.
KrossBooking has no reviews or ratings, making it impossible to gauge user satisfaction. The lack of publicly available feedback indicates that Cloudbeds is the more trusted and proven platform among hoteliers.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’ pricing starts at $600/month for its base platform, with no free trial or freemium options. Its transparent pricing caters to mid-sized and larger properties seeking a full-featured system.
KrossBooking’s pricing details are unavailable, with no indication of whether it charges monthly or per property, or if there are setup fees. This lack of clear pricing information complicates cost comparison, but the absence of detailed data favors Cloudbeds for budget planning.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Cloudbeds offers a comprehensive, reliable platform trusted by thousands worldwide, with a proven track record of boosting revenue and simplifying operations. Its extensive feature set, support network, and integrations make it the ideal choice for hotels aiming to scale and improve efficiency.
KrossBooking’s focus on automation and AI insights provides a simplified experience with less emphasis on integrations or customization. It might suit smaller, tech-savvy properties interested in automation but doesn’t match Cloudbeds’ proven track record or extensive capabilities.
For most hotels wanting a trusted, scalable PMS, Cloudbeds stands out as the clear winner. Choose KrossBooking only if you prioritize simplicity and AI-driven insights over comprehensive features and support.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
KrossBooking | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | — |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Cloudbeds PMS 和 KrossBooking 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
KrossBooking |
|---|---|---|
| 2路实时集成 | ||
| PMS 连接性 | ||
| 分析仪表板 | ||
| 库存管理 | ||
| 集中的用户和角色管理 | ||
| 频道管理员 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 52 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Cloudbeds 因其直观且布局清晰的界面而备受赞誉,所有员工均可轻松上手,从而减少了对大量培训的需求。这种易用性对于日常运营尤为有利,例如管理预订和执行入住... Cloudbeds 因其直观且布局清晰的界面而备受赞誉,所有员工均可轻松上手,从而减少了对大量培训的需求。这种易用性对于日常运营尤为有利,例如管理预订和执行入住/退房流程。
Cloudbeds 的实施流程和后续支持褒贬不一。虽然其客户服务通常因其响应速度和协助性而获得高分,但要实现移动端和集成功能的完全一致,还需要更全面的支持才能更... Cloudbeds 的实施流程和后续支持褒贬不一。虽然其客户服务通常因其响应速度和协助性而获得高分,但要实现移动端和集成功能的完全一致,还需要更全面的支持才能更顺利地过渡。
Cloudbeds 通过将酒店管理系统 (PMS)、渠道管理和预订引擎集成于同一平台,提供了一套全面的解决方案。这减少了对多个系统的需求,最大限度地减少了人工操作,并... Cloudbeds 通过将酒店管理系统 (PMS)、渠道管理和预订引擎集成于同一平台,提供了一套全面的解决方案。这减少了对多个系统的需求,最大限度地减少了人工操作,并实现了实时同步运营。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Cloudbeds的预订流程简单高效,尤其是在入住和退房方面。这一特性大大减轻了管理负担,减少了错误,并提高了整体运营效率。系统的拖放功能尤其值得一提,因为它... Cloudbeds的预订流程简单高效,尤其是在入住和退房方面。这一特性大大减轻了管理负担,减少了错误,并提高了整体运营效率。系统的拖放功能尤其值得一提,因为它非常实用。
尽管 Cloudbeds 提供了强大的报表功能,但用户指出,其定制化程度不够高,因为量身定制的管理洞察对于战略决策至关重要。这在寻求更深入的分析和可视化功能的用... 尽管 Cloudbeds 提供了强大的报表功能,但用户指出,其定制化程度不够高,因为量身定制的管理洞察对于战略决策至关重要。这在寻求更深入的分析和可视化功能的用户中是一个普遍存在的问题。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Cloudbeds PMS 和 KrossBooking 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Cloudbeds PMS 提供 189 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 KrossBooking 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Cloudbeds PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Cloudbeds PMS:否。KrossBooking:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Cloudbeds 的 HT Score 为 100,KrossBooking 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问