The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 渠道经理 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
Levart |
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #3 572 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #5 171 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #4 42 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #11 4 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
Levart |
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #2 484 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #4 213 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #4 108 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #2 92 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
Levart |
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #1 405 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #4 183 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 ▾ | #4 231 条评价 | — |
| 中东 ▾ | #6 14 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Cloudbeds’ MyAllocator and Levart’s Channel Control hinges on your hotel’s specific needs. Both address the challenge of distributing rooms across multiple OTAs, but Cloudbeds offers a more integrated, feature-rich experience with broad regional presence, while Levart excels in connectivity with over 100 interfaces and a straightforward approach.
Your decision should consider the scale of your property, the channels you prioritize, and your desire for an all-in-one platform versus specialized connectivity. Are you seeking a comprehensive management system, or is a focus on channel connections enough?
Cloudbeds’ MyAllocator is designed as part of a broader hospitality management ecosystem, offering features like centralized user management, inventory grid, integrated payment processing, and support for weekly and monthly rates. Its 190 verified integrations, including partners like Tripadvisor, Airbnb, and OTAs, make it highly adaptable for properties that want an all-in-one solution.
Levart’s Channel Control, by contrast, focuses solely on channel management, connecting your property to over 100 platforms for rate and availability synchronization. While Levart’s interface might be simpler, it lacks the extensive feature set of Cloudbeds and is best suited for hotels that need reliable OTA connectivity without additional management tools.
Given these differences, if your hotel wants an integrated platform that combines operations, reservations, and distribution, Cloudbeds is the clear choice. If your main priority is expanding OTA reach with maximum channel availability, Levart’s extensive connectivity could suffice.
Edge: Cloudbeds
If your hotel needs a unified platform to streamline operations, manage reservations, and optimize distribution, Cloudbeds is the better fit. Its broad feature set, including centralized management, comprehensive reporting, and automation, appeals to hotels aiming for efficiency and growth, especially those managing multiple properties or diverse segments.
If your hotel’s primary goal is to maximize exposure across numerous OTAs, GDS, and metasearch engines with minimal management fuss, Levart’s connectivity excels. Its 100+ interfaces facilitate continuous updates and rate parity, ideal for properties that rely heavily on online channels but don’t require an integrated management solution.
For hotels seeking a full management toolkit, Cloudbeds provides more value. For those focused solely on channel connectivity, Levart’s specialized platform is sufficient.
Edge: Cloudbeds
Cloudbeds’ user interface receives a 4.6/5 rating, praised for its intuitive dashboard and straightforward onboarding process, making staff adoption easier. Users highlight its clean design and ease of training, which reduces operational disruptions during setup.
Levart’s interface is less documented in reviews but is described as a simple, dedicated channel management system. Given the lack of detailed user feedback and absence of recent reviews, it’s difficult to confirm how user-friendly Levart truly is.
Considering the detailed positive feedback, Cloudbeds’ ease of use is well-established. Levart’s simplicity may appeal for straightforward channel management, but it doesn’t match Cloudbeds’ comprehensive usability.
Edge: Cloudbeds
Cloudbeds’ platform includes 17 features, with key functionalities like centralized user & role management, inventory grid, integrated payments, and support for flexible rates. These features support a broad scope of hotel management needs, beyond just distribution.
Levart offers a single core feature: extensive OTA connectivity with over 100 interfaces. While this is a significant advantage for distribution, it lacks the additional management tools present in Cloudbeds.
For a hotel seeking an all-in-one management solution, Cloudbeds’ feature set far exceeds Levart’s. If your focus is only on connectivity, Levart’s specialization might suffice.
Edge: Cloudbeds
Cloudbeds’ support is rated 4.41/5, with reviews praising its responsiveness and helpfulness. Customers frequently mention “excellent customer service,” with some stating, “I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It’s miles ahead.”
Levart’s support data is unavailable, and customer reviews are absent. Without recent feedback, it’s impossible to judge Levart’s support quality, but the lack of public reviews suggests less proven support infrastructure.
Given Cloudbeds’ strong recent review count and high support rating, it clearly leads in customer service.
Edge: Cloudbeds
Cloudbeds’ 1062 reviews, with a recent 74 in the last six months, yield a 4.64/5 rating and a 91% likelihood to recommend, reflecting widespread satisfaction across diverse hotel types. Review highlights include ease of use, comprehensive features, and reliable support.
Levart’s reviews are nonexistent, making it impossible to gauge user satisfaction. Its lack of recent or detailed feedback suggests it’s a less proven solution at scale.
For proven hotel management satisfaction, Cloudbeds is the clear winner.
Edge: Cloudbeds
Cloudbeds’ Channel Manager is priced at $200 per month, with no free tier or trial, offering a straightforward monthly fee. Its pricing reflects its broad feature set and integration capabilities.
Levart’s pricing details are unavailable, and it offers no trial or free tier, suggesting a potentially less flexible or transparent pricing model.
Given the transparency and clarity of Cloudbeds’ pricing, it provides better value for hotels seeking a predictable investment.
Edge: Cloudbeds
Not ideal if:
Cloudbeds suits hotels looking for a comprehensive management system, especially those managing multiple assets or seeking AI-driven insights.
Not ideal if:
Levart is best for properties that need reliable OTA connectivity with minimal management complexity.
Cloudbeds’ MyAllocator is a full-featured, all-in-one solution designed to streamline hotel operations and expand distribution. Its broad integration ecosystem, recent positive reviews, and high user satisfaction make it well-suited for hotels seeking growth and operational efficiency.
Levart offers an extensive number of OTA interfaces, making it an excellent choice if channel connectivity is your primary concern. However, the lack of recent reviews and limited feature scope suggest it’s less suited for hotels wanting a comprehensive management system.
If your hotel values a proven, scalable platform with robust support, Cloudbeds is the definitive choice. If OTA reach alone is your priority, Levart provides reliable connectivity at a lower complexity level, but with less evidence of overall support and usability.
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Cloudbeds直观的界面受到许多用户的好评,他们认为该界面对各级员工都非常友好。这一优势缩短了培训时间,提高了操作的一致性,但部分用户仍然认为高级功能导航... Cloudbeds直观的界面受到许多用户的好评,他们认为该界面对各级员工都非常友好。这一优势缩短了培训时间,提高了操作的一致性,但部分用户仍然认为高级功能导航方面还有改进空间。
该平台跨渠道的实时同步功能被誉为一项关键特性。这为用户提供了最新的库存信息,显著减少了超额预订的情况。评论者强调了其在保持OTA和直接预订等平台间信息一... 该平台跨渠道的实时同步功能被誉为一项关键特性。这为用户提供了最新的库存信息,显著减少了超额预订的情况。评论者强调了其在保持OTA和直接预订等平台间信息一致性方面的重要性。
许多用户称赞 Cloudbeds 将酒店管理系统 (PMS)、渠道管理和预订引擎无缝集成,减少了对多个系统的需求,从而简化了操作。这种集成有助于员工集中高效地管理预订... 许多用户称赞 Cloudbeds 将酒店管理系统 (PMS)、渠道管理和预订引擎无缝集成,减少了对多个系统的需求,从而简化了操作。这种集成有助于员工集中高效地管理预订、房价和宾客互动,提高工作效率并减少错误。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然 Cloudbeds 支持基本功能,但其在网站设计、消息传递和报告等方面的自定义选项一直备受诟病。用户希望在定制这些功能方面拥有更大的灵活性和控制权,以便更... 虽然 Cloudbeds 支持基本功能,但其在网站设计、消息传递和报告等方面的自定义选项一直备受诟病。用户希望在定制这些功能方面拥有更大的灵活性和控制权,以便更好地满足特定的业务需求并改善宾客体验。
尽管该平台总体运行良好,但部分用户反映在高峰时段偶尔会出现速度瓶颈和延迟,这会影响工作效率。因此,我们希望在高峰时段加快加载速度并提高系统响应速度。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Cloudbeds Channel Manager (myallocator) 和 Levart Channel Control 共享许多核心 Channel Managers 功能,但各有独特的能力。Cloudbeds Channel Manager (myallocator) 提供 189 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Levart Channel Control 提供 13 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Cloudbeds Channel Manager (myallocator) 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Cloudbeds Channel Manager (myallocator):否。Levart Channel Control:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Channel Managers 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Cloudbeds 的 HT Score 为 99,Levart 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问