The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 256 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
eviivo 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 Vacation Rentals & Villas 类型的物业 (0.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Integrated Payment Processing and Booking Performance and Pace Reporting.
Levart 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 Unlimited Channels (no additional cost).
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 渠道经理 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
Levart |
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #7 66 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #14 21 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #13 5 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #14 2 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
Levart |
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #9 38 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #8 42 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #9 24 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #6 25 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
Levart |
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #6 21 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #3 194 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #25 1 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #20 2 条评价 | — |
When choosing a channel manager, your hotel needs solutions that maximize visibility, streamline operations, and reduce manual work. Both eviivo Suite™ CM and Levart Channel Control connect your property to online booking channels, but their strengths and coverage differ significantly. Your decision hinges on your hotel’s size, target markets, and the features most critical to your team.
eviivo Suite™ CM is the more established, review-backed option with a broad global presence. Levart offers deep connectivity, especially in Asia-Pacific, but lacks recent reviews or user feedback. Which platform will truly meet your hotel’s needs?
Both products aim to simplify distribution by connecting your property to multiple OTAs, GDS, and metasearch engines. eviivo Suite™ CM excels with its extensive feature set, high user ratings, and recent reviews that validate its performance. Levart, meanwhile, claims to connect to over 100 channels but has no recent reviews to confirm its real-world effectiveness.
eviivo's 231 reviews and 25 recent ones in the last six months give it a clear edge in reliability and user satisfaction. Levart’s lack of recent feedback makes it harder to gauge whether it truly delivers on its promises.
Do you prioritize proven, review-validated solutions or are you comfortable testing a less-reviewed platform?
If your hotel needs reliable, well-supported channel management with proven results, go with eviivo Suite™. Its extensive integrations, solid support, and positive user feedback make it the safer choice for most properties, especially those managing multiple listings or seeking growth.
If your hotel primarily operates in Asia-Pacific or requires connections to niche channels not covered by eviivo, Levart might be worth exploring. However, without recent reviews or demonstrated performance, its suitability remains uncertain.
For hotels looking for a trusted, all-around solution, eviivo is the clearer choice. Levart could serve specialized needs but lacks the backing evidence.
eviivo Suite™ scores a 4.65/5 for ease of use, with many users praising its intuitive interface and straightforward setup. Onboarding is typically rated highly, with users noting the support team’s helpful guidance, especially in the early stages.
Levart’s user experience remains undocumented, with no recent reviews to assess its interface or ease of onboarding. This absence of feedback suggests uncertainty about its user-friendliness.
Edge: eviivo Suite™ CM.
eviivo Suite™ offers 11 shared features with Levart and adds four exclusive ones, including support for weekly and monthly rates, an inventory grid, integrated payment processing, and booking performance reports. These add-ons enhance control and operational insight.
Levart provides the ability to connect to over 100 channels and has some unique integrations, but it lacks the advanced features available in eviivo, such as rate management and detailed reporting.
Edge: eviivo Suite™ CM.
eviivo boasts a 4.78/5 support rating, with reviewers highlighting their quick, empathetic assistance and onboarding process. One review mentions Mohamed’s helpful support as a standout.
Levart’s customer support data is unavailable, making it difficult to judge their responsiveness or quality. The lack of recent reviews further diminishes confidence in their support effectiveness.
Edge: eviivo Suite™ CM.
eviivo integrates with 32 verified partners, including major OTAs like Expedia, Booking.com, and niche providers such as Hotelchamp and RateGain. It offers more comprehensive and tested integrations.
Levart connects to 13 verified partners, including key channels like Airbnb, Agoda, and GDS systems like RMS. While sufficient for some, it offers fewer options than eviivo, especially in niche or regional channels.
Edge: eviivo Suite™ CM.
eviivo’s reviews are predominantly positive, with a 97% likelihood to recommend and a 9.72/10 NPS score, reflecting strong user satisfaction. Hotels across segments, including vacation rentals and B&Bs, praise its ease of use, support, and feature set.
Levart has no recent reviews or ratings, so hotel feedback cannot be reliably assessed. Its lack of documented customer satisfaction suggests it might not yet have proven itself in real-world use.
Edge: eviivo Suite™ CM.
eviivo Suite™ charges a base fee of $700 per month, with no freemium or trial options listed. Its pricing includes a comprehensive feature set, making it a predictable investment for most hotels.
Levart’s pricing details are not publicly available, and no trial or freemium options are mentioned. Without transparent costs, budgeting and ROI evaluation are challenging.
eviivo Suite™ CM stands out as the more tested, trusted, and feature-rich platform, with a strong track record backed by hundreds of recent reviews. Its extensive integrations, support, and proven performance make it suitable for a wide range of hotel types, especially those seeking growth.
Levart offers deep connectivity and a large channel list, but its lack of recent reviews and user feedback diminishes its appeal. It might serve specific regional needs but lacks the reassurance of proven, recent user satisfaction.
Choose eviivo if you want a reliable, well-supported solution with a proven track record. Consider Levart only if your property operates primarily in Asia-Pacific and you have specific channel needs that it uniquely covers.
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"Because of the automation from the eviivo Suite, it saves me a huge amount of time. This time I can use on growing the business; working on the business instead of in the business...."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Auf eviivo könnte ich heut gar nicht mehr drauf verzichten. Das Hotel ohne dieses Programm zu führen, scheint mir fast unmöglich, weil die Zeit, die ich jetzt erspart habe, die ich..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Aujourd’hui on a la possibilité de gérer l’ensemble de notre parc, que ce soit la tarification, le calendrier, la communication en un seul clic pour gérer plus de 50 appartements,..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
许多评论都强调了Eviivo提供的卓越支持和新用户引导体验,尤其赞扬了客服人员在简化过渡和设置流程方面所发挥的作用。支持团队以其快速、清晰的帮助而著称,这对... 许多评论都强调了Eviivo提供的卓越支持和新用户引导体验,尤其赞扬了客服人员在简化过渡和设置流程方面所发挥的作用。支持团队以其快速、清晰的帮助而著称,这对于确保运营顺畅至关重要。
用户对Eviivo直观易用的平台赞不绝口,该平台简化了预订和渠道管理,即使是不懂技术的用户也能轻松上手。预订、渠道和设置方面的便捷导航显著减少了管理工作。
Eviivo的多种功能,例如多物业管理和集中运营控制,备受好评。用户表示这些功能节省了时间并优化了日常管理,但也有一些用户希望获得更多自定义选项。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然该平台在桌面端的使用体验备受好评,但一些评论批评其移动网站操作繁琐,应用程序缺乏直观性,导致用户在移动中管理预订时面临诸多挑战。
部分用户最初遇到了一些技术问题,例如显示错误,但他们表示这些问题在获得技术支持后很快就得到了解决。用户认为持续的技术改进将有利于整个平台的提升。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。eviivo Suite™ CM 和 Levart Channel Control 共享许多核心 Channel Managers 功能,但各有独特的能力。eviivo Suite™ CM 提供 32 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Levart Channel Control 提供 13 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。eviivo Suite™ CM 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
eviivo Suite™ CM:否。Levart Channel Control:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Channel Managers 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。eviivo 的 HT Score 为 85,Levart 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问