GuestRevu (Surveys) vs. Loopon Post Stay: 哪个更适合您?

更新于 May 20, 2026  ·  已分析 598 条经验证的评价

摘要

我们分析了 598 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:

GuestRevu 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的物业 (4.8/5) .

Loopon 表现出色 在 易于使用 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Guest room TV or tablets.

查看下方完整分析 ↓

GuestRevu (Surveys) 与 Loopon Post Stay 相比如何?

基于 HTR 上 598 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。

HTScore
100
23
推荐可能性
95%
87%
易用性
4.7/5
4.4/5
客户支持
4.8/5
4.5/5
性价比
4.7/5
4.4/5
起始价格 From $100/mo From $100/mo
经验证的评价 573 25

GuestRevu (Surveys) 与 Loopon Post Stay 的优缺点是什么?

在分析了 598 条经验证的评价后,GuestRevu 用户最看重其 调查覆盖范围和效率, dashboard and analytics, automated reporting,而 Loopon 用户则强调 易于使用, 反馈收集与分析, 客户支持。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。

GuestRevu GuestRevu Loopon Loopon
优点
+ 调查覆盖范围和效率
+ 易于使用
+ Dashboard and Analytics
+ 反馈收集与分析
+ Automated Reporting
+ 客户支持
+ Customization Options
+ 通知和警报
缺点
集成能力
报告定制
Mobile Experience
用户管理
比较指标

GuestRevu 对比 Loopon:按酒店细分市场排名

各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 客户调查软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。

按酒店规模

细分市场 GuestRevu GuestRevu Loopon Loopon
小型(10-24 间客房) #1 203 条评价 #4 3 条评价
中型(25-74 间客房) #1 246 条评价 #4 10 条评价
大型(75-199 间客房) #2 31 条评价 #3 7 条评价
超大型(200+ 间客房) #1 22 条评价 #4 3 条评价

按物业类型

细分市场 GuestRevu GuestRevu Loopon Loopon
精品酒店 #1 254 条评价 #4 10 条评价
豪华酒店 #1 281 条评价 #4 6 条评价
品牌/连锁酒店 #1 119 条评价 #4 7 条评价
长住酒店 #1 51 条评价 #6 0 条评价

按区域

细分市场 GuestRevu GuestRevu Loopon Loopon
北美 #2 45 条评价 #5 3 条评价
欧洲 #1 120 条评价 #4 19 条评价
亚太 #1 23 条评价 #3 0 条评价
中东 #1 5 条评价 #4 0 条评价

The Decision

Choosing guest feedback software can significantly impact your hotel's reputation and operational efficiency. GuestRevu and Loopon Post Stay both aim to simplify collecting, analyzing, and acting on guest feedback, but they serve different needs and hotel profiles. GuestRevu is a more established platform with a larger user base and more recent reviews, making it the more reliable choice for most hoteliers. But which one aligns better with your specific goals?

Is GuestRevu or Loopon Post Stay Better for Hotels?

GuestRevu offers a comprehensive guest survey solution with customizable, dynamic surveys and integrations that help hotels manage reputation and improve services. Loopon Post Stay emphasizes quick, straightforward feedback collection through single-page surveys sent automatically after check-out, focusing on internal communication and operational metrics.

GuestRevu has over 490 reviews, with 91 in the last six months, reflecting current user experiences and high satisfaction levels. Loopon’s fewer reviews—just 25—are older and less recent, which makes its data less reliable for current performance. Given this, GuestRevu’s stronger review count and recency give it an edge for hotels seeking proven, active software.

GuestRevu vs Loopon Post Stay: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?

If your hotel needs deep reputation management, customizable survey options, and integrations with multiple PMS systems, GuestRevu is the better pick. Its advanced analytics, sentiment analysis, and automation features suit hotels focused on guest satisfaction and online reputation.

If your team prioritizes straightforward, post-stay feedback with quick internal benchmarking—especially if you operate multiple properties—Loopon simplifies data collection and provides clear department-level metrics. However, its limited integrations and fewer recent reviews make it less ideal for hotels requiring sophisticated analysis or active reputation management.

Is GuestRevu or Loopon Post Stay Easier to Use?

GuestRevu’s user interface scores 4.68/5, with many users praising its intuitive dashboards, customizable surveys, and seamless integrations. The onboarding process is rated 4.63/5, though some users mention minor complexities during setup, often mitigated by its responsive support team.

Loopon scores 4.38/5 for ease of use, with reviews highlighting its simple, single-page surveys and straightforward feedback collection. Users find its interface intuitive, but some wish for improved mobile usability and self-service options.

Edge: GuestRevu.

Which Has Better Features: GuestRevu or Loopon Post Stay?

GuestRevu offers a broader set of features, with 19 shared features and additional AI-driven analytics, reputation management, and customizable surveys. Loopon adds five unique features, such as in-app callbacks, review routing, and SMS-based surveys, focusing on operational insights.

GuestRevu’s advanced analytics, sentiment analysis, and automation tools give it a significant edge in actionable data. Loopon’s in-app call-back and SMS features are valuable but less comprehensive overall.

Edge: GuestRevu.

Which Has Better Customer Support: GuestRevu or Loopon Post Stay?

GuestRevu maintains a stellar support rating of 4.76/5, with reviewers describing its team as highly responsive and proactive. Support often receives praise for quick resolution and helpful onboarding assistance.

Loopon’s support rating is 4.34/5, with users highlighting its speed and effectiveness but noting occasional delays or limitations in self-service. Customers appreciate Loopon’s responsiveness but find GuestRevu’s support more comprehensive.

Edge: GuestRevu.

Which Has More Integrations: GuestRevu or Loopon Post Stay?

GuestRevu boasts 40 verified integration partners, including major PMS providers like Mews, Oracle Hospitality, and Criton—plus a range of OTA and review platforms. Loopon has 11 verified integrations, with key partners like Protel and Sirvoy, and fewer options for connecting with other hotel systems.

The wider integration network of GuestRevu facilitates smoother workflows and data management. Loopon’s integrations are sufficient for basic feedback collection but limit advanced automation.

Edge: GuestRevu.

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: GuestRevu or Loopon Post Stay?

GuestRevu outperforms in overall ratings—4.62/5 compared to Loopon’s 4.46/5—and has a higher number of recent reviews, adding confidence to its score. Hoteliers across segments, especially boutique hotels and resorts, rate GuestRevu more favorably for its extensive features and support.

Loopon’s ratings are stable but less recent, which means hotelier experiences may not reflect current capabilities or support levels. Given the recency and volume, GuestRevu’s higher ratings are a better indicator of ongoing satisfaction.

Edge: GuestRevu.

How Much Do GuestRevu and Loopon Cost?

Both platforms are priced at a base rate of $100 per month, with no trial, freemium, or implementation fees reported. This flat pricing makes it straightforward for hotels to compare costs directly without hidden charges.

The similar pricing structure indicates that cost is not a differentiator—your decision should rely on features, support, and fit.

What Type of Hotel Should Use GuestRevu?

  • Hotels that prioritize reputation management, online review consolidation, and guest sentiment analysis.
  • Hotels seeking customizable surveys to reflect their brand and specific service areas.
  • Properties that want AI-driven insights for continuous improvement.
  • Hotels with larger or more diverse guest bases across multiple channels.

Not ideal if:

  • You operate a small property with limited feedback needs.
  • Your team prefers a simple, low-tech feedback approach.
  • You don’t require extensive integrations or advanced analytics.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Loopon Post Stay?

  • Hotels that value quick, post-stay feedback collection with departmental benchmarking.
  • Teams looking for a simple, single-page survey that can be quickly deployed.
  • Hotels operating multiple properties seeking uniform internal reporting.
  • Those prioritizing internal operational improvements over online reputation.

Not ideal if:

  • You need detailed reputation management or review site monitoring.
  • Your hotel requires deep analytics or sentiment analysis.
  • You want extensive PMS integrations or advanced customization.

GuestRevu vs Loopon Post Stay: The Bottom Line for Hotels

GuestRevu is a well-established, feature-rich platform with a substantial user base and recent reviews, making it the more current and reliable solution for most hotels. Its extensive integrations, AI insights, and reputation management capabilities are key advantages for hotels focused on guest experience and online visibility.

Loopon Post Stay offers simplicity and ease of use with core feedback collection and departmental benchmarking, suited for hotels that prefer straightforward internal metrics without the need for extensive customization or reputation management. However, its smaller, older review base and limited features reduce its appeal for growth-oriented hotels.

If your priority is active reputation management, deeper analytics, and future-proof integrations, GuestRevu is the definitive choice. For hotels focused solely on internal operational feedback with minimal complexity, Loopon can suffice but may fall short as your needs evolve.

GuestRevu (Surveys) 和 Loopon Post Stay 的价格是多少?

客户调查软件 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。

GuestRevu GuestRevu Loopon Loopon
Starting Price From $100/mo From $100/mo

GuestRevu (Surveys) 有哪些 Loopon Post Stay 没有的功能(反之亦然)?

根据 HTR 的产品数据库,GuestRevu (Surveys) 和 Loopon Post Stay 共享 19 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。

功能 GuestRevu GuestRevu Loopon Loopon
基于 SMS 文本的调查
审查路由
客房电视或平板电脑
应用内回调
短信文本评论集锦

实际成果:GuestRevu 对比 Loopon(按业务目标)

我们分析了 7 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。

提高运营效率
GuestRevu Pamarah Lodge 小型
+ Through GuestRevu
+ �s surveys, Pamarah Lodge discovered that complaints about location were often linked to external activity providers not meeting expectations. This insight enabled the team to refine their recommendations to guests.
+ By addressing specific guest concerns uncovered through detailed feedback, Pamarah Lodge saw a noticeable improvement in satisfaction ratings and received more positive online reviews.

"GuestRevu has helped us so much over the past two years as we see our small business growing – the reviews from guests are like gold, and most of our bookings have been made becaus..."

Loopon Loopon

该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。

改善宾客体验
GuestRevu MINT Hotels 小型
+ A reduction in guest complaints, and a better understanding of guest sentiments, allowing the group to grow rapidly and diversify their product offering in accordance with what their guests are actually asking for, (rather than what management thinks the guests are interested in).
+ Quick and easily digestible data from guest feedback, that can be used in summary format by management at head office, and explored more in-depth by teams on the ground to ensure any issues are tackled quickly and effectively.
+ Between the customised questionnaires tailored to each hotel type, and consolidated information on one easy-to-use dashboard

"Since implementing GuestRevu, our complaints have actually come down, because of the fact that we have so many repeat guests and now we can interact with them in much more detail...."

Adriaan Liebetrau
Adriaan Liebetrau
Head of Hospitality for MINT
Loopon Loopon

该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。

GuestRevu 对比 Loopon:总结

GuestRevu
GuestRevu
4.8/5 来自 573 条评价

酒店从业者喜爱的方面

调查覆盖范围和效率 95% 正面

GuestRevu 的调查问卷通过多个渠道发送,能够有效地收集顾客反馈。用户指出,该工具有助于保持较高的回复率,并能根据反馈定制问题以收集有价值的见解,但建议在... GuestRevu 的调查问卷通过多个渠道发送,能够有效地收集顾客反馈。用户指出,该工具有助于保持较高的回复率,并能根据反馈定制问题以收集有价值的见解,但建议在问卷设计功能方面进一步改进。

Dashboard and Analytics 77% 正面

The platform's user-friendly dashboards offer clear visual insights, helping hotels track performance and identify service improvement areas. Users ap... The platform's user-friendly dashboards offer clear visual insights, helping hotels track performance and identify service improvement areas. Users appreciate the ease of navigation, although deeper analytical features could provide even richer data insights.

Automated Reporting 82% 正面

GuestRevu's automated reporting feature is highly valued for providing clear, actionable insights that aid in decision-making and efficiency. The syst... GuestRevu's automated reporting feature is highly valued for providing clear, actionable insights that aid in decision-making and efficiency. The system generates comprehensive reports that help hotels identify trends and areas needing attention, saving time in data interpretation to improve guest experiences.

酒店从业者提出异议的方面

集成能力 58% 负面

用户赞赏 GuestRevu 与现有系统(如 PMS 和 CRM)的集成,这简化了反馈管理流程。然而,用户呼吁 GuestRevu 与更多 PMS/OTA 系统建立合作关系,并提供更深入的集... 用户赞赏 GuestRevu 与现有系统(如 PMS 和 CRM)的集成,这简化了反馈管理流程。然而,用户呼吁 GuestRevu 与更多 PMS/OTA 系统建立合作关系,并提供更深入的集成选项,以扩大兼容性并改进工作流程,这凸显了其当前产品存在的不足。

Mobile Experience 60% 负面

The lack of a dedicated mobile app is noted by users looking for real-time, on-the-go access to feedback and reporting. While the desktop experience i... The lack of a dedicated mobile app is noted by users looking for real-time, on-the-go access to feedback and reporting. While the desktop experience is praised, improvements in mobile functionality are desired to enhance convenience.

排名更高的方面

中型(25-74 间客房) #1 vs #4
小型(10-24 间客房) #1 vs #4
超大型(200+ 间客房) #1 vs #4
超小型(少于 10 间客房) #1 vs #4
4.7/5 易用性 4.8/5 客户支持 40 个集成
查看资料
Loopon
Loopon
4.4/5 来自 25 条评价

酒店从业者喜爱的方面

易于使用 85% 正面

用户一致称赞 Loopon 的直观设计和易用性,简化了用户管理,让新用户可以轻松上手。这种易用性既适用于台式机,也适用于移动设备,不过有些人希望进一步改进移动... 用户一致称赞 Loopon 的直观设计和易用性,简化了用户管理,让新用户可以轻松上手。这种易用性既适用于台式机,也适用于移动设备,不过有些人希望进一步改进移动可用性。

反馈收集与分析 69% 正面

酒店发现该系统非常适合从多个渠道收集和分析客人反馈。Loopon 能够提供详细的报告和相关统计数据,有助于确定优势和劣势、提高服务质量并做出明智的决策。

客户支持 93% 正面

Loopon 的客户支持因其速度和效率而备受赞誉。用户非常欣赏其快速而有用的响应,这使得解决问题和实施更改变得更加容易。

酒店从业者提出异议的方面

报告定制 43% 负面

用户注意到报告创建需要更多的灵活性。目前,他们严重依赖客户支持来生成自定义报告和统计数据,这可能会造成阻碍。

用户管理 75% 负面

该系统的用户管理功能因其简单性而受到重视。然而,有人要求提供更好的自助服务功能,以便无需支持人员干预即可进行小的更改。

独特功能

应用内回调 审查路由 短信文本评论集锦 基于 SMS 文本的调查 客房电视或平板电脑
4.4/5 易用性 4.3/5 客户支持 11 个集成
查看资料

评分差异最大的方面

客户支持 GuestRevu 4.8 vs 4.3 (+0.4)
性价比 GuestRevu 4.6 vs 4.2 (+0.5)
入职培训 GuestRevu 4.6 vs 4.3 (+0.3)

关于 GuestRevu (Surveys) 与 Loopon Post Stay 的常见问题

GuestRevu (Surveys) 能否替代 Loopon Post Stay?

这取决于您的需求。GuestRevu (Surveys) 和 Loopon Post Stay 共享许多核心 Guest Survey Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。GuestRevu (Surveys) 提供 40 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Loopon Post Stay 提供 11 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。

哪个更适合小型或独立酒店?

小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。GuestRevu (Surveys) 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 4.4/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。

GuestRevu (Surveys) 或 Loopon Post Stay 是否提供免费方案?

GuestRevu (Surveys):否。Loopon Post Stay:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Guest Survey Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。

HTR 如何评估和排名 GuestRevu (Surveys) 和 Loopon Post Stay?

HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。GuestRevu 的 HT Score 为 100,Loopon 的为 23。以下是评分的计算方式。

标准组 权重 衡量内容
客户评分与评价

用户对该产品的推荐度如何?

评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例

权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。

合作伙伴生态系统

技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何?

合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量

评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。

以客户为中心

该组织以客户为中心的程度如何?

认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性

评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。

覆盖范围、持久力与资源

该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛?

地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分

衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。

客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →

获取个性化的产品推荐

产品推荐顾问

Ghostel icon

让我们查找您的酒店信息