The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 访客留言软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 | Loopon AB |
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #12 8 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #11 25 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #3 42 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #4 25 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 | Loopon AB |
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #10 44 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #8 47 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #8 48 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #11 7 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 | Loopon AB |
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #5 103 条评价 |
| 欧洲 | — | #18 1 条评价 |
Choosing between Loopon by Loopon AB and Medallia Zingle hinges on your hotel’s specific needs. Both products aim to streamline guest communication, but they differ significantly in features, support, and market presence. Loopon offers a basic, AI-driven feedback system, while Zingle provides a full-scale guest messaging platform with extensive integration options. Which solution aligns best with your operational goals?
Your decision should consider whether you prioritize advanced messaging capabilities or a focus on customer feedback analysis. Are you looking for a simple feedback tool or a comprehensive communication platform that reduces staff workload? Let’s compare them directly.
Loopon AB and Zingle both aim to enhance guest experience through communication—Loopon primarily focuses on feedback management, while Zingle emphasizes two-way messaging. Loopon’s AI analyzes customer reviews to generate insights, but it lacks the live messaging features Zingle offers. Conversely, Zingle's real-time messaging supports multiple channels, which helps your team respond quickly and personally.
Loopon’s review score of 0/5 on HotelTechReport reflects a lack of recent, high-volume feedback, whereas Zingle scores 4.68/5 with recent reviews confirming its ease of use and support quality. Do you need a tool that actively engages guests in real time, or are you more interested in analyzing feedback data?
If your hotel needs an all-in-one guest engagement platform with multi-channel messaging, Zingle is the clear choice. Its extensive features like SMS, Facebook Messenger, WhatsApp, automated replies, and integrations with major PMS systems serve larger or contactless-focused properties well.
If your priority is gathering and analyzing customer feedback without real-time messaging, Loopon offers a centralized feedback system with AI-generated insights. But with no recent reviews and a zero-star rating on HotelTechReport, it doesn't provide the active guest engagement tools you may require. For most hotels seeking practical engagement, Zingle is the more suitable option.
Zingle boasts a 4.73/5 ease of use rating based on recent reviews, with users praising its intuitive interface and quick staff onboarding. Hotel staff find the platform friendly, with many saying it’s simple to manage conversations on a single screen, reducing workload.
Loopon’s rating stands at 0/5, indicating no recent user data or reviews to assess usability. Its limited feature set suggests it’s not designed for active daily use, unlike Zingle’s user-centered messaging system.
Edge: Zingle.
Zingle offers 21 unique features, including guest history, photo sharing, secured data, SMS, Facebook Messenger, WhatsApp, analytics dashboards, chatbots, and automation tools—features that Loopon lacks entirely. These capabilities support dynamic guest engagement and operational automation, particularly valuable for larger hotels or properties aiming to automate workflows.
Loopon provides basic feedback collection and AI summaries, but it has no additional features beyond that. For hotels seeking comprehensive messaging and automation, Zingle’s feature set clearly outperforms Loopon.
Edge: Zingle.
Zingle’s support ratings are high at 4.58/5, with recent reviews praising its responsiveness and customer success team. Users report quick answers and effective onboarding, especially appreciated during deployment or troubleshooting.
Loopon shows no recent reviews or data on customer support. Without such feedback, it’s impossible to judge its responsiveness, but the absence of recent reviews suggests it may not be as actively supported as Zingle.
Edge: Zingle.
Zingle integrates with 16 verified partners, including leading PMS and property management systems like Opera, Stayntouch, and SiteMinder. This extensive integration portfolio supports seamless workflows across hotel operations.
Loopon offers no verified integrations, limiting its applicability in a tech-driven environment. For properties relying on multiple systems, Zingle’s integrations are a significant advantage.
Edge: Zingle.
With 107 reviews in the past six months, Zingle’s recent feedback reflects a high rating of 4.68/5, especially among resort, independent, and branded hotels. Hoteliers emphasize its ease of use, support, and positive guest interaction.
Loopon’s score of 0/5 is based on no recent reviews, indicating a lack of current user feedback. Its absence of recent data weakens its credibility compared to Zingle’s active, positive ratings.
Edge: Zingle.
Both products do not publicly disclose detailed pricing, likely offering customized quotes based on hotel size and needs. Loopon’s lack of pricing information suggests a less flexible or less transparent model, while Zingle’s pricing is often tailored but accessible through direct inquiry.
In most cases, expect Zingle’s pricing to include setup and per-room or per-message fees, typical in guest messaging platforms. Loopon’s unlisted costs make it less predictable for budgeting.
Not ideal if your hotel needs real-time communication, automation, or multi-channel messaging.
Not ideal if your hotel’s focus is solely on feedback analysis without active guest interaction.
Zingle is a comprehensive messaging platform with features that support real-time guest engagement, automation, and integrations, backed by recent, positive reviews. It suits larger, contactless, or tech-forward hotels seeking to boost guest satisfaction and operational efficiency.
Loopon, while AI-driven for feedback analysis, offers limited features and no recent user feedback, making it suitable only for very simple feedback collection. It’s less capable of supporting active guest engagement or automation.
Choose Zingle if you want a proven, well-supported messaging solution with a broad feature set. Opt for Loopon only if your hotel’s needs are strictly feedback-focused, and you prefer a basic, AI-driven review analysis tool.
This comparison should help you decide which platform aligns best with your hotel’s operational priorities, guest engagement goals, and technical ecosystem.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
用户发现 Zingle 擅长与客人轻松快速地沟通,可以在问题升级之前解决问题。这种适应性提高了客人满意度并减轻了员工的工作量。同时处理多个客人查询和发送大量消... 用户发现 Zingle 擅长与客人轻松快速地沟通,可以在问题升级之前解决问题。这种适应性提高了客人满意度并减轻了员工的工作量。同时处理多个客人查询和发送大量消息的能力被视为一项重要优势。
Zingle 的用户友好界面广受好评,让酒店员工能够轻松了解并高效处理客人消息。这种易用性既适用于网络平台,也适用于移动应用程序。
自动消息传递功能因处理日常通信和缩短响应时间而受到好评。然而,有人批评自动回复并不总是准确反映当前状态,这可能会让客人感到困惑。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户普遍对 Zingle 的消息和平台本身的自定义选项表示赞赏。然而,一些新用户发现自定义某些功能以满足他们的特定需求具有挑战性,这表明灵活性还有待提高。
虽然大多数用户对 Zingle 感到满意,但也有部分用户指出其存在系统崩溃、消息延迟、与 PMS 同步问题等技术问题,影响了整体效率和用户体验。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Loopon 和 Medallia Zingle 共享许多核心 Guest Messaging Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Loopon 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Medallia Zingle 提供 16 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Medallia Zingle 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Loopon:否。Medallia Zingle:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Guest Messaging Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Loopon AB 的 HT Score 为 0,Zingle 的为 19。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问