The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 访客留言软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #12 8 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #11 25 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #3 42 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #4 25 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #10 44 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #8 47 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #8 48 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #11 7 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #5 103 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 | #18 1 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Medallia Zingle by Zingle and Quiq for your hotel’s guest communication needs hinges on your specific priorities. Both aim to streamline guest messaging, but Zingle dominates in hotel-focused features, integrations, and industry reputation. Quiq focuses on broader customer service channels and may suit non-hospitality businesses better. Which platform aligns with your hotel’s size, guest engagement goals, and existing systems?
Both Zingle and Quiq facilitate real-time messaging, but Zingle is built explicitly for hospitality, offering 21 industry-specific features compared to no unique features in Quiq. Zingle’s extensive integrations with PMS and channel partners make it better suited for hotels aiming for contactless check-in or personalized guest interactions. Quiq’s messaging channels (SMS, Facebook Messenger, Live Chat, Kik) are more general, serving various sectors. Do you prioritize hotel-specific tools and integrations?
If your hotel needs a dedicated guest messaging system with hotel-centric features, go with Zingle. It has over 107 reviews, a 4.68/5 overall rating, and a recent surge in positive feedback for ease of use and support. If your team prioritizes multi-channel customer service across industries without specific hotel features, Quiq might seem attractive, but its lack of hotel-focused integrations and reviews makes it less proven for hospitality. Which features are non-negotiable for your property?
Zingle’s intuitive interface scores 4.73/5 for ease of use, with many reviews highlighting its user-friendly design and quick onboarding. Users praise its ability to manage conversations on a single screen, making staff adoption straightforward. Quiq offers a similar messaging experience but has no publicly available ratings or recent reviews to assess ease of use. Based on available data, Zingle clearly leads here. Edge: Zingle.
Zingle outperforms with 21 hotel-specific features such as mobile friendliness, guest history, photo sharing, secured data, SMS messaging, Facebook Messenger, WhatsApp, analytics dashboards, automated replies, chatbots, and more. Quiq offers no unique features tailored to hospitality and lacks documented functionalities beyond basic messaging. For a hotel seeking extensive guest engagement tools, Zingle’s feature set is unmatched. Edge: Zingle.
Zingle’s reviews emphasize its excellent support and onboarding, rating 4.58/5, with hoteliers describing their support team as “legendary” and “responsive.” Several reviews mention quick response times and dedicated customer success managers. Quiq has no recent reviews or ratings publicly available, so it’s impossible to compare support quality. Based on current data, Zingle’s support is clearly superior. Edge: Zingle.
Zingle boasts 16 verified partners, including property management systems like Opera, HotSOS, and channel managers like SiteMinder, Quore, and Oracle Hospitality. Quiq has no verified integrations listed, limiting its ability to connect with hotel systems. If seamless property management integration is critical, Zingle’s ecosystem makes it a more versatile choice. Edge: Zingle.
Zingle enjoys a 4.68/5 overall rating from 107 reviews, with recent feedback praising its user-friendly interface and effective communication capabilities. Hotel segments like independent, branded, and resort properties rate it highly, with an overall likelihood to recommend at 95%. Quiq has no reviews or ratings in the hotel industry, making it impossible to gauge hoteliers’ satisfaction. Clearly, Zingle is the preferred choice among hotel operators. Edge: Zingle.
Both platforms do not publicly disclose their pricing models, but Zingle is known for its custom pricing based on property size and needs, typically involving a monthly fee per room or user. Quiq also offers customized pricing without a trial or freemium model. Given the lack of transparent prices, your hotel should request quotes directly. Which budget considerations are most important for your decision?
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Zingle is a messaging platform explicitly designed for the hospitality industry, offering hotel-centric features, integrations, and a proven track record backed by over 107 recent reviews. It’s tailored for hotels aiming to deliver contactless experiences, automate guest interactions, and improve operational efficiency.
Choose Zingle if your hotel wants a robust, hotel-focused system with extensive integrations and support, especially if you value recent positive feedback. Its high satisfaction ratings and industry-specific tools make it the safer, more proven choice.
Quiq may appear versatile and CRM-agnostic, but its lack of hotel-specific features, reviews, and integrations makes it less suited for most hotel environments. It might serve other industries better but falls short in delivering hospitality-specific solutions.
In conclusion, if your hotel seeks a dedicated guest messaging platform with proven success, Zingle stands out as the clear leader. For broader customer service needs outside hospitality, explore Quiq, but for hotels, Zingle’s specialization and recent review momentum make it the recommended choice.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
用户发现 Zingle 擅长与客人轻松快速地沟通,可以在问题升级之前解决问题。这种适应性提高了客人满意度并减轻了员工的工作量。同时处理多个客人查询和发送大量消... 用户发现 Zingle 擅长与客人轻松快速地沟通,可以在问题升级之前解决问题。这种适应性提高了客人满意度并减轻了员工的工作量。同时处理多个客人查询和发送大量消息的能力被视为一项重要优势。
Zingle 的用户友好界面广受好评,让酒店员工能够轻松了解并高效处理客人消息。这种易用性既适用于网络平台,也适用于移动应用程序。
自动消息传递功能因处理日常通信和缩短响应时间而受到好评。然而,有人批评自动回复并不总是准确反映当前状态,这可能会让客人感到困惑。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户普遍对 Zingle 的消息和平台本身的自定义选项表示赞赏。然而,一些新用户发现自定义某些功能以满足他们的特定需求具有挑战性,这表明灵活性还有待提高。
虽然大多数用户对 Zingle 感到满意,但也有部分用户指出其存在系统崩溃、消息延迟、与 PMS 同步问题等技术问题,影响了整体效率和用户体验。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Medallia Zingle 和 Quiq 共享许多核心 Guest Messaging Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Medallia Zingle 提供 16 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Quiq 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Medallia Zingle 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Medallia Zingle:否。Quiq:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Guest Messaging Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Zingle 的 HT Score 为 19,Quiq 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问