The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 访客留言软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #12 8 条评价 | #25 0 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #11 25 条评价 | #10 12 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #3 42 条评价 | #10 4 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #4 25 条评价 | #11 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #10 44 条评价 | #11 5 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #8 47 条评价 | #14 5 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #8 48 条评价 | #9 14 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #11 7 条评价 | #10 3 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #5 103 条评价 | #7 17 条评价 |
| 欧洲 | #18 1 条评价 | #19 0 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #13 0 条评价 |
Choosing the right guest messaging software is critical for enhancing guest interactions and operational efficiency. Both Medallia Zingle and Quore offer solutions to facilitate direct communication between guests and staff, but their offerings diverge in features, user experience, and market presence. Your decision hinges on whether you prioritize a platform with extensive integrations, more features, and recent reviews, or a simpler, more streamlined system. Which platform aligns better with your hotel’s needs?
Medallia Zingle, with 107 reviews and a recent review count of zero, dominates in market presence and user feedback. It offers a broader set of features—17 unique functionalities—compared to Quore’s zero exclusive features—and has a slightly higher overall rating of 4.68/5. Conversely, Quore’s ratings are slightly lower, and its review count is significantly less recent, which diminishes confidence in its current performance.
Both platforms aim to streamline guest communication, but Zingle’s extensive integrations, including Facebook Messenger and WhatsApp, and its AI-driven automation make it more adaptable for larger, tech-savvy hotels. Quore, with fewer features and integrations, may be better suited for properties seeking a straightforward, SMS-based communication tool. Which one better addresses your hotel’s specific communication needs?
If your hotel needs a comprehensive communication platform that integrates with PMS systems like Opera and HotSOS and supports multiple channels—SMS, Facebook Messenger, WhatsApp—Zingle is the clear choice. It’s ideal for larger resorts or hotel groups that want automation, detailed analytics, and a high level of customization.
If your hotel prioritizes simple, direct SMS communication and faster onboarding with a smaller team, Quore’s streamlined approach might suit you better. It’s more suitable for boutique hotels or properties that want a straightforward guest interaction tool without extensive integrations or automation.
In summary, choose Zingle if your hotel values a feature-rich, multi-channel platform with proven scalability. Opt for Quore if you prefer a user-friendly, SMS-only solution focused on ease of use and quick adoption.
Medallia Zingle scores 4.73/5 for ease of use, with reviews praising its intuitive interface and the ability for staff to manage conversations on one screen. Onboarding is rated 4.56/5, and users report that staff adoption is generally smooth, with many noting how quickly they integrated Zingle into daily operations.
Quore, with a 4.38/5 rating for ease of use, is still considered user-friendly but receives fewer positive comments on onboarding and staff adoption. Some users mention that certain functionalities require desktop access, which can slightly complicate daily workflows.
Edge: Zingle.
Zingle offers 17 features, including photo sharing, Facebook Messenger and WhatsApp integration, automated replies, message routing, guest history, analytics dashboards, open API, and chatbot booking agents—features not available in Quore. Quore provides only four shared features, which limits its functionality for more complex guest engagement strategies.
This extensive feature set in Zingle allows your team to automate personalized guest interactions, analyze communication trends, and support rich media messaging—capabilities that significantly enhance guest satisfaction and operational efficiency. Quore’s simplicity might limit its usefulness for hotels seeking advanced automation or multi-channel messaging.
Edge: Zingle.
Zingle’s customer support is rated 4.58/5, with reviews highlighting its legendary responsiveness and the helpfulness of its customer success team. Users often mention how support helps resolve issues quickly, ensuring minimal disruption.
Quore’s support scores 4.31/5, with some reviewers finding it generally helpful but noting room for improvement, especially in resolving technical issues promptly. Several users expressed a desire for more responsive and proactive support.
Edge: Zingle.
Zingle boasts 16 verified integration partners, including major systems like Opera, HotSOS, SiteMinder, Oracle Hospitality, and Maestro PMS. Quore has 8 verified integrations, with some overlap, including Quore itself, Revinate, and Kipsu.
More integrations mean smoother workflows between your PMS, revenue management, and guest engagement tools. Zingle’s wider array of partners enables easier automation and data sharing, making it preferable for hotels with complex tech stacks.
Edge: Zingle.
Zingle’s overall rating of 4.68/5 benefits from 107 reviews, with many praising its ease of use and customer service. Independent hotels rate Zingle at 4.75/5, with resort properties giving high marks for its automation capabilities.
Quore’s rating of 4.56/5 comes from only 17 reviews, with some property types—such as boutique hotels and independent properties—rating it slightly lower. Recent reviews for Zingle reinforce its position as the more trusted platform among hoteliers.
Edge: Zingle.
Pricing details for both platforms are not publicly available, but neither offers free versions or clear subscription models, suggesting they are custom-quoted based on hotel size and needs. Typically, platforms with extensive features like Zingle tend to be priced higher, reflecting its broader capabilities.
Your hotel should contact both vendors for precise quotes, but expect Zingle to be more premium due to its feature set and integrations.
Not ideal if your hotel is small or prefers a simple SMS-only system; Zingle might be overly complex for minimal needs.
Not ideal if your hotel requires advanced automation, rich media messaging, or extensive third-party integrations.
Medallia Zingle is a feature-rich, multi-channel guest messaging platform with a vast array of integrations, earning it the title of the more established and reviewed product. It excels in automating guest interactions, improving operational efficiency, and scaling for larger hotels or groups.
If your hotel needs a comprehensive, highly customizable communication system with advanced automation and integrations, Zingle is the clear choice. It’s best suited for resorts, large hotels, or brands that prioritize automation and data-driven guest engagement.
Quore, with its simpler interface and limited features, is better suited for small hotels or properties that prefer a straightforward SMS-based communication tool. It’s a good fit if your team values ease of use and quick onboarding over extensive automation.
In conclusion, if recent reviews, feature breadth, and integrations matter most, Zingle is the stronger option. For hotels seeking simplicity and rapid deployment, Quore could serve well, but it’s less capable for larger or more complex operations.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
用户发现 Zingle 擅长与客人轻松快速地沟通,可以在问题升级之前解决问题。这种适应性提高了客人满意度并减轻了员工的工作量。同时处理多个客人查询和发送大量消... 用户发现 Zingle 擅长与客人轻松快速地沟通,可以在问题升级之前解决问题。这种适应性提高了客人满意度并减轻了员工的工作量。同时处理多个客人查询和发送大量消息的能力被视为一项重要优势。
Zingle 的用户友好界面广受好评,让酒店员工能够轻松了解并高效处理客人消息。这种易用性既适用于网络平台,也适用于移动应用程序。
自动消息传递功能因处理日常通信和缩短响应时间而受到好评。然而,有人批评自动回复并不总是准确反映当前状态,这可能会让客人感到困惑。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户普遍对 Zingle 的消息和平台本身的自定义选项表示赞赏。然而,一些新用户发现自定义某些功能以满足他们的特定需求具有挑战性,这表明灵活性还有待提高。
虽然大多数用户对 Zingle 感到满意,但也有部分用户指出其存在系统崩溃、消息延迟、与 PMS 同步问题等技术问题,影响了整体效率和用户体验。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Medallia Zingle 和 Quore (Connect) 共享许多核心 Guest Messaging Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Medallia Zingle 提供 16 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Quore (Connect) 提供 8 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Medallia Zingle 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 4.4/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Medallia Zingle:否。Quore (Connect):否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Guest Messaging Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Zingle 的 HT Score 为 19,Quore 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问