The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 88 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
MISTER BOOKING 表现出色 在 支持质量 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) and Payment Requests.
OpenHotel 表现出色 在 客户支持 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Integrated Payment Terminal & Card Reader.
基于 HTR 上 88 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 30 | 58 |
在分析了 88 条经验证的评价后,MISTER BOOKING 用户最看重其 支持质量, 可定制的功能, 人体工程学和设计,而 OpenHotel 用户则强调 客户支持, 用户友好的pms, 持续更新和改进。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
OpenHotel
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
支持质量
▾
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
|
+
可定制的功能
▾
|
+
用户友好的PMS
▾
|
|
+
人体工程学和设计
▾
|
+
持续更新和改进
▾
|
|
+
运营效率
▾
|
+
直接 OTA 连接
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
报告生成
▾
|
−
报告功能
▾
|
|
−
预订引擎
▾
|
−
财务处理
▾
|
|
−
连接问题
▾
|
−
团体预订工具
▾
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
OpenHotel
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #33 14 条评价 | #25 36 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #45 4 条评价 | #39 11 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | — | #50 0 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #21 2 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
OpenHotel
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #40 10 条评价 | #37 16 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #35 7 条评价 | #45 4 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #46 3 条评价 | #28 9 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | — | #43 2 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
OpenHotel
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #14 54 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #19 25 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #36 1 条评价 | — |
Choosing the right PMS for your hotel is crucial for streamlining operations, increasing revenue, and enhancing guest experiences. Misterbooking (PMS) by MISTER BOOKING and OpenHotel PMS both aim to meet these needs but differ significantly in features, reviews, and market presence. Given the recent data, especially the larger review count and higher recency scores, OpenHotel PMS appears to be the more established and well-regarded option for hotel operators today. But which one truly fits your specific hotel needs?
Both Misterbooking and OpenHotel aim to simplify hotel management by integrating reservations, distribution, and guest communication into a single platform. Misterbooking emphasizes comprehensive operational control, with a focus on automation, pricing, and multi-property management, while OpenHotel highlights user-friendliness, direct OTA connections, and a broad feature set. Where they diverge is in their core strengths: Misterbooking offers a wider range of features and integrations, but OpenHotel has more recent reviews, higher customer satisfaction, and a more modern interface. Do these differences matter most for your property’s size and complexity?
If your hotel needs advanced features like automated guest messaging, real-time reporting, and extensive integration options, Misterbooking is the clear choice, especially if you manage multiple properties or require complex pricing modules. Conversely, if your focus is on ease of use, streamlined operations, and reliable support, OpenHotel would be a better fit, particularly for small to medium-sized hotels seeking straightforward property management. For properties prioritizing integrations with major OTAs and a modern interface, OpenHotel’s larger review base and recent positive feedback make it the safer pick.
Both systems score a 4.71 out of 5 for ease of use, reflecting comparable user experiences in navigation and onboarding. However, Misterbooking's reviews mention some room for ergonomic improvements and outdated pages, while OpenHotel is praised for its intuitive, user-friendly layout and seamless internal workflows. Given the more recent reviews and higher overall ratings, OpenHotel’s interface seems better suited for quick staff adoption and minimal training. Edge: OpenHotel.
Misterbooking boasts 14 unique features, including online check-in, guest messaging, real-time status updates, and GDPR compliance—many of which are absent in OpenHotel. On the other hand, OpenHotel offers 4 exclusive features like EPoS, automated night audit, integrated payment terminals, and digital registration, which are tailored for operational efficiency. Misterbooking’s broader feature set provides more options for advanced management, but OpenHotel’s targeted features are highly effective for everyday hotel operations. Edge: Misterbooking.
Both products enjoy high support ratings: Misterbooking with a 4.79/5 and OpenHotel with 4.82/5, and recent reviews praise their responsiveness. Users frequently mention that OpenHotel’s team is helpful, dependable, and proactive in implementing updates, while Misterbooking’s support is similarly responsive but occasionally calls for improvements in ergonomics. Given the slightly higher current support score and recent positive reviews, OpenHotel’s customer service appears marginally more reliable. Edge: OpenHotel.
Misterbooking offers 26 verified partners, including major channel managers like SiteMinder and RateGain, along with many exclusive integrations such as RevControl and Lybra Tech. OpenHotel provides 12 verified partners, sharing some with Misterbooking but lacking many niche integrations. For hotels that require extensive, specialized connectivity, Misterbooking’s larger ecosystem offers a strategic advantage. Edge: Misterbooking.
OpenHotel’s review count (57) exceeds Misterbooking’s (29), and its recent reviews are more numerous and positive. Hoteliers across segments—including boutique hotels, resorts, and motels—rate OpenHotel slightly higher for overall satisfaction, ease of use, support, and value. Particularly, the 95% likelihood to recommend and recent reviews emphasize a confident user base. For hotel operators valuing larger, more recent feedback, OpenHotel is the preferred choice. Edge: OpenHotel.
Both products lack publicly disclosed pricing models, but neither offers a freemium plan or monthly per-room fees, indicating similar pricing structures or customized quotes. For detailed cost comparison, direct vendor inquiries are recommended, as both are positioned as value-driven solutions without hidden charges.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Misterbooking offers a broad set of features, extensive integrations, and a strong focus on operational automation. It appeals most to larger hotels or chains that need advanced management capabilities and are comfortable with a slightly more complex interface. OpenHotel, by contrast, emphasizes simplicity, recent positive reviews, and excellent support, making it ideal for smaller properties or those new to PMS systems.
If your hotel values detailed features, extensive integrations, and a mature platform, Misterbooking is the better fit. Its strengths lie in managing multiple properties efficiently and automating many back-office functions, which can drive significant operational gains.
However, if your priority is a user-friendly system, top-tier support, and a modern interface, OpenHotel is the proven leader, especially for properties that want a straightforward, reliable solution with a high likelihood of user satisfaction. Its recent reviews and larger review base reinforce its reputation as a trusted partner for today’s hotel operators.
In summary, for hotels seeking feature depth and integration, choose Misterbooking. For those prioritizing ease of use and support, go with OpenHotel. The decision ultimately hinges on your property size, operational complexity, and how much you value recent user feedback.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
OpenHotel
|
|---|
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Misterbooking (PMS) 和 OpenHotel PMS 共享 19 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
OpenHotel
|
|---|---|---|
| EPoS | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
| 实时状态更新 | ||
| 数字注册 | ||
| 来宾消息 | ||
| 网上值机 | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
| 自动提醒 | ||
| 集成支付终端和读卡器 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 6 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
支持团队的响应能力和效率一再被强调。无论是通过电话还是其他方式,他们的可用性和快速解决问题的能力对用户来说都是一大优势。
用户看重的是能够根据特定需求定制自己的账户。这种灵活性使 Misterbooking 能够很好地适应各种酒店运营,并提高了用户满意度。
虽然该软件功能强大、效率高,但用户指出其设计和人体工程学方面还有待改进。建议包括让布局更加人性化,以及更新一些过时的页面。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
提到需要更高效、更详细的统计工具或报告。用户认为改进这些功能可以带来更好的运营洞察力和决策能力。
预订引擎存在一些批评,例如照片上传选项不足和限制管理。用户建议在这些方面进行改进,以进一步完善系统。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
客户支持团队的开放性和响应能力受到用户的高度赞赏。许多人特别提到了团队在紧急情况下的帮助以及无缝过渡到 OpenHotel PMS。这种支持有助于平稳运营,尤其是在... 客户支持团队的开放性和响应能力受到用户的高度赞赏。许多人特别提到了团队在紧急情况下的帮助以及无缝过渡到 OpenHotel PMS。这种支持有助于平稳运营,尤其是在旺季或系统转换期间。
许多用户都对 OpenHotel PMS 的导航和使用非常满意。该系统非常直观,即使是首次担任酒店服务员的人也能轻松上手,并且可以无缝地从其他系统过渡。用户指出,由... 许多用户都对 OpenHotel PMS 的导航和使用非常满意。该系统非常直观,即使是首次担任酒店服务员的人也能轻松上手,并且可以无缝地从其他系统过渡。用户指出,由于其灵活的预订网格和全面的布局,该系统对于中小型酒店尤其有效。
用户赞赏 OpenHotel 不断改进并根据用户反馈添加功能。这种奉献精神确保系统始终与行业标准和不断发展的酒店需求保持同步。有关这些更新的通知通过收件箱通知共... 用户赞赏 OpenHotel 不断改进并根据用户反馈添加功能。这种奉献精神确保系统始终与行业标准和不断发展的酒店需求保持同步。有关这些更新的通知通过收件箱通知共享,方便用户随时了解最新信息。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然许多人都对 OpenHotel 提供的详细而全面的报告选项表示赞赏,但也有用户不断要求提供可自定义的报告和适合特定酒店的改进指标。一些用户发现当前的报告充斥... 虽然许多人都对 OpenHotel 提供的详细而全面的报告选项表示赞赏,但也有用户不断要求提供可自定义的报告和适合特定酒店的改进指标。一些用户发现当前的报告充斥着不必要的信息,并建议进行改进以更好地满足他们的需求。
用户指出,OpenHotel 拥有高效的财务处理模块,包括有序的财务视图、可自定义的财务报告以及与外部财务系统的集成。但是,建议进行改进,特别是在实时税务报告和... 用户指出,OpenHotel 拥有高效的财务处理模块,包括有序的财务视图、可自定义的财务报告以及与外部财务系统的集成。但是,建议进行改进,特别是在实时税务报告和信用卡支付干预方面。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
这取决于您的需求。Misterbooking (PMS) 和 OpenHotel PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Misterbooking (PMS) 提供 26 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 OpenHotel PMS 提供 12 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Misterbooking (PMS) 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 4.7/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Misterbooking (PMS):否。OpenHotel PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。MISTER BOOKING 的 HT Score 为 14,OpenHotel 的为 16。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问