The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 1,272 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Cloudbeds 表现出色 在 用户友好界面 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的物业 (4.6/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Integrated Payment Terminal & Card Reader and Centralized Messaging.
MISTER BOOKING 表现出色 在 customer support and ROI 方面 .
基于 HTR 上 1,272 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $600/mo | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 1,242 | 30 |
在分析了 1,272 条经验证的评价后,Cloudbeds 用户最看重其 用户友好界面, 实施与支持, 一体化生态系统,而 MISTER BOOKING 用户则强调 支持质量, 可定制的功能, 人体工程学和设计。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
用户友好界面
▾
|
+
支持质量
▾
|
|
+
实施与支持
▾
|
+
可定制的功能
▾
|
|
+
一体化生态系统
▾
|
+
人体工程学和设计
▾
|
|
+
渠道管理
▾
|
+
运营效率
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
预订管理
▾
|
−
报告生成
▾
|
|
−
报表定制
▾
|
−
预订引擎
▾
|
|
−
系统速度
▾
|
−
连接问题
▾
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #1 592 条评价 | #33 14 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #4 212 条评价 | #45 4 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #5 42 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #13 4 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #2 473 条评价 | #40 10 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #4 228 条评价 | #35 7 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #6 116 条评价 | #46 3 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #2 93 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #2 435 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #7 163 条评价 | #19 25 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #3 226 条评价 | #36 1 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | #7 11 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Cloudbeds PMS and Misterbooking hinges on your hotel's specific needs and scale. Both systems aim to simplify operations, improve distribution, and enhance guest experience, but they do so with different strengths and target markets. Cloudbeds, with its extensive features and large user base, is often seen as the more comprehensive option, especially for hotels seeking scalability. Meanwhile, Misterbooking offers a flexible, cost-effective solution for independent hotels and smaller chains. So, which system aligns better with your property’s goals?
Both Cloudbeds and Misterbooking serve the core function of property management, centralizing reservations, distribution, and guest information. Cloudbeds, with over 1,071 reviews and a recent surge of 81 reviews in the last six months, demonstrates strong, current customer confidence. Misterbooking, with only 29 reviews but consistently high satisfaction ratings, caters more to niche or smaller-scale properties. Given the volume and recency of Cloudbeds reviews, it indicates a broader adoption and ongoing product improvements. Are you leaning toward a more established, feature-rich platform, or a leaner, budget-conscious solution?
If your hotel needs an all-in-one platform with extensive integrations, advanced automation, and scalability—especially if you operate multiple properties—Cloudbeds is the clear choice. Its in-depth feature set (33 unique features) and broad market presence across 101 countries make it ideal for ambitious hotels, boutique properties, and hostels seeking growth. Conversely, if your focus is on independent, small-scale operations that value customization, affordability, and straightforward management, Misterbooking’s core strengths in flexible pricing and integration might serve you better. Do you prioritize growth and extensive functionality or simplicity and cost?
Cloudbeds’ user-friendly interface (rated 4.61/5 and supported by a 4.45/5 onboarding score) makes it accessible for staff of varying tech skills. Its mobile app and centralized dashboard streamline daily tasks, though some users find setup complex initially. Misterbooking scores slightly higher in ease of use (4.71/5) and onboarding (4.67/5), with praise for its intuitive interface and quick implementation. Support responsiveness also leans in Misterbooking’s favor, often rated higher at 4.79/5. Edge: Misterbooking.
Cloudbeds offers 33 features, including a PMS connectivity, analytics dashboard, inventory management, digital registration, guest CRM, and a Spa & Wellness module—features Misterbooking does not provide. Misterbooking’s primary offerings include integrated channel management, a responsive booking engine, pre-check-in, and payment automation, but it lacks the breadth of additional modules seen in Cloudbeds. If specialized features like a guest app or ePOS are critical, Cloudbeds has a clear edge. For core property management and distribution, both are capable, but Cloudbeds’s extensive toolkit makes it the more comprehensive option. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’ support scores 4.41/5, with reviews citing promptness and helpfulness, but some mention challenges during initial setup. Misterbooking surpasses with a 4.79/5 rating, with customers describing their support as quick, responsive, and helpful, even in complex cases. Given the recent review data and dedicated support ratings, Misterbooking’s support offers a slight advantage for properties requiring intensive onboarding or ongoing assistance. Edge: Misterbooking.
Cloudbeds boasts 190 verified partners, including major OTAs and industry tools such as SiteMinder, Lightspeed, and Oaky. Its extensive marketplace and over 15 shared integrations provide high flexibility. Misterbooking, with 26 verified partners, connects efficiently with top OTAs and GDS but has fewer options for third-party integrations. For properties seeking broad connectivity and future growth potential, Cloudbeds’s ecosystem is superior. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds enjoys a high overall rating of 4.63/5, with a slightly lower NPS of 8.94/5, and mainly caters to boutique hotels, hostels, and B&Bs. Misterbooking, with a rating of 4.78/5 and an NPS of 9.31/5, has a smaller but very satisfied customer base, mainly in Europe. Recent reviews from Cloudbeds users highlight its reliability and ease of use, but Misterbooking’s support and simplicity resonate well with smaller, independent properties. Since Cloudbeds has more reviews and recent feedback, it’s clearly the more trusted option for larger or growth-minded hotels.
Cloudbeds’s pricing starts at $600 per month, with no free tier or trial data available, reflecting its enterprise-grade features. Misterbooking’s pricing is not publicly listed, but it is positioned as a more affordable, scalable solution. For properties with limited budgets or seeking a straightforward system, Misterbooking’s flexible, potentially lower-cost model might be appealing. Larger hotels or those planning to scale should consider the value of Cloudbeds’s extensive integrations and features versus the cost.
Cloudbeds offers a comprehensive, scalable platform designed for ambitious properties that want to streamline operations and grow. Its extensive features, integrations, and global presence make it ideal for hotel groups, boutique hotels, and hostels looking to optimize revenue and guest experience at scale. If your property needs an all-in-one solution with advanced automation and broad connectivity, Cloudbeds will serve you well.
Misterbooking is best suited for small to medium independent hotels, boutique properties, and chains that prioritize affordability, simplicity, and tailored integrations. Its high support quality and ease of use make it appealing for properties that want quick results without the complexity or cost of a larger system.
In conclusion, if your hotel’s growth and operational complexity are priorities, Cloudbeds’s larger ecosystem and recent review strength make it the stronger choice. For smaller hotels seeking a straightforward, budget-friendly PMS with reliable support, Misterbooking is a compelling alternative. Whichever path you choose, aligning the platform’s strengths with your property’s strategic goals is key.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | — |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Cloudbeds PMS 和 Misterbooking (PMS) 共享 33 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 2路实时集成 | ||
| PMS 连接性 | ||
| 分析仪表板 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 库存管理 | ||
| 无限频道(无需额外费用) |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 19 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Cloudbeds 因其直观且布局清晰的界面而备受赞誉,所有员工均可轻松上手,从而减少了对大量培训的需求。这种易用性对于日常运营尤为有利,例如管理预订和执行入住... Cloudbeds 因其直观且布局清晰的界面而备受赞誉,所有员工均可轻松上手,从而减少了对大量培训的需求。这种易用性对于日常运营尤为有利,例如管理预订和执行入住/退房流程。
Cloudbeds 的实施流程和后续支持褒贬不一。虽然其客户服务通常因其响应速度和协助性而获得高分,但要实现移动端和集成功能的完全一致,还需要更全面的支持才能更... Cloudbeds 的实施流程和后续支持褒贬不一。虽然其客户服务通常因其响应速度和协助性而获得高分,但要实现移动端和集成功能的完全一致,还需要更全面的支持才能更顺利地过渡。
Cloudbeds 通过将酒店管理系统 (PMS)、渠道管理和预订引擎集成于同一平台,提供了一套全面的解决方案。这减少了对多个系统的需求,最大限度地减少了人工操作,并... Cloudbeds 通过将酒店管理系统 (PMS)、渠道管理和预订引擎集成于同一平台,提供了一套全面的解决方案。这减少了对多个系统的需求,最大限度地减少了人工操作,并实现了实时同步运营。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Cloudbeds的预订流程简单高效,尤其是在入住和退房方面。这一特性大大减轻了管理负担,减少了错误,并提高了整体运营效率。系统的拖放功能尤其值得一提,因为它... Cloudbeds的预订流程简单高效,尤其是在入住和退房方面。这一特性大大减轻了管理负担,减少了错误,并提高了整体运营效率。系统的拖放功能尤其值得一提,因为它非常实用。
尽管 Cloudbeds 提供了强大的报表功能,但用户指出,其定制化程度不够高,因为量身定制的管理洞察对于战略决策至关重要。这在寻求更深入的分析和可视化功能的用... 尽管 Cloudbeds 提供了强大的报表功能,但用户指出,其定制化程度不够高,因为量身定制的管理洞察对于战略决策至关重要。这在寻求更深入的分析和可视化功能的用户中是一个普遍存在的问题。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
支持团队的响应能力和效率一再被强调。无论是通过电话还是其他方式,他们的可用性和快速解决问题的能力对用户来说都是一大优势。
用户看重的是能够根据特定需求定制自己的账户。这种灵活性使 Misterbooking 能够很好地适应各种酒店运营,并提高了用户满意度。
虽然该软件功能强大、效率高,但用户指出其设计和人体工程学方面还有待改进。建议包括让布局更加人性化,以及更新一些过时的页面。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
提到需要更高效、更详细的统计工具或报告。用户认为改进这些功能可以带来更好的运营洞察力和决策能力。
预订引擎存在一些批评,例如照片上传选项不足和限制管理。用户建议在这些方面进行改进,以进一步完善系统。
排名更高的方面
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Cloudbeds PMS 和 Misterbooking (PMS) 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Cloudbeds PMS 提供 189 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Misterbooking (PMS) 提供 26 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Misterbooking (PMS) 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 4.6/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Cloudbeds PMS:否。Misterbooking (PMS):否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Cloudbeds 的 HT Score 为 100,MISTER BOOKING 的为 14。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问