The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
在分析了 887 条经验证的评价后,Mews 用户最看重其 ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility,而 Modotel 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
Modotel |
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
入职和支持
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
报告和分析
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
Modotel |
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #3 329 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #1 397 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #3 45 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #3 49 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
Modotel |
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #1 483 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #5 220 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #2 170 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #1 130 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
Modotel |
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #8 106 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #1 660 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 ▾ | #10 17 条评价 | — |
| 中东 ▾ | #28 8 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Mews PMS and Modotel PMS hinges on your hotel’s operational needs, scale, and strategic goals. Mews, with its extensive features and proven track record, addresses a broad spectrum of hotel types, from boutique to large chains, by automating core operations and offering a vast integration ecosystem. Modotel, with fewer reviews and limited market presence, lacks publicly available supporting data, making Mews the more reliable option for hotels aiming for growth and efficiency.
Given the significant difference in review volume, recent feedback, and overall ratings, Mews clearly dominates in performance, support, and user satisfaction. Are you ready to prioritize a platform with a proven track record, or are you considering an untested alternative?
Mews and Modotel serve the same overarching goal: streamlining hotel operations. Mews excels with a high overall rating of 4.62/5 from 758 reviews—98 of which are recent—indicating strong and current user confidence. In contrast, Modotel’s ratings are unavailable or unverified, with no recent reviews or user feedback, making it impossible to assess its reliability or effectiveness.
While Mews offers an array of functionalities like automated reservations, guest communications, revenue management, and over 336 verified integrations, Modotel’s feature set remains undisclosed. Mews’s cloud-based approach and extensive third-party marketplace make it adaptable across diverse hotel types, whereas Modotel provides no publicly documented features or real-world performance data. Do you want your hotel’s PMS to be backed by verified reviews and proven features?
If your hotel needs a mature, scalable system with a broad array of features, Mews is the clear choice. Its target segments include boutique hotels, hostels, city-center properties, and large chains, with a review count nearly 760 and recent feedback from nearly 100 users—most praising its usability, automation, and support.
If your hotel’s requirements are minimal or experimental, and you’re willing to take a risk on an unverified solution, Modotel might be worth exploring. However, without concrete reviews or documented features, it’s unlikely to match Mews’s reliability, support, or ecosystem. For hotels aiming for growth, Mews’s proven track record makes it the safer, smarter investment.
Mews’s UI and onboarding are highly rated, with a 4.7/5 ease of use score from 758 reviews, and a 4.39/5 onboarding rating. Reviewers highlight its modern, intuitive interface and quick setup, often remarking that staff adoption is smooth and minimal training is needed. Multiple reviews describe Mews as “user-friendly,” “thoughtful,” and “easy to navigate.”
Modotel’s user experience is undocumented in the available reviews, with no recent user feedback or ratings to assess its accessibility or ease of implementation. The absence of detailed support or onboarding data suggests that Mews has a clear advantage here. Edge: Mews.
Mews offers an extensive array of 59 features exclusive to its platform, including multi-lingual and multi-currency support, revenue management, guest CRM, booking engine, integrated CRS, digital registration, automated night audit, task management, and over 336 verified integrations. These capabilities allow for deep customization and operational control.
Modotel’s feature set remains undisclosed and unverified, with no publicly documented functionalities or integrations. The lack of detailed feature data makes it impossible to compare their capabilities directly, but given Mews’s proven extensive feature list, Mews is the clear leader. Edge: Mews.
Mews is rated 4.27/5 across 758 reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing its responsive, helpful support team and quick issue resolution. Users often mention that Mews support is “supportive,” “professional,” and “available 24/7,” especially with its premium support packages.
In contrast, Modotel has no available review data or support ratings, leaving its customer service quality unknown. Without verified support feedback, Mews’s strong support reputation makes it the better choice. Edge: Mews.
Mews’s 4.62/5 rating from 758 reviews, with 93% likelihood to recommend, reflects broad, positive sentiment from hotels of various sizes and segments, especially boutique, city-center, and hostel properties. Recent reviews praise its ease of use, automation, and support, indicating consistent satisfaction across segments.
Modotel’s absence of reviews and ratings means no comparable data exists. Based on available information, hotelier confidence strongly favors Mews. Edge: Mews.
Mews’s pricing starts at $900 per month, with no freemium or free trial options publicly listed. Its structured pricing indicates a mid-to-high investment, justified by extensive features and support.
Modotel’s pricing details are unavailable, with no public pricing or trial offers shared. This lack of transparency complicates comparison, but the absence of verifiable value proposition makes Mews’s pricing more predictable and justified.
Not ideal if you prefer a minimal or unverified system, or are exploring a solution without documented features, reviews, or regional presence.
Not ideal if you need a reliable, well-supported system with proven features, integrations, and extensive hotel segment experience.
Mews is a mature, feature-rich platform with a proven track record of high user satisfaction and recent growth in reviews. Its extensive ecosystem, automation capabilities, and support make it suitable for hotels of all sizes committed to operational excellence.
Modotel remains an unverified contender with no available reviews or documented features, making it a risky choice for hotels seeking reliability and growth. If your hotel prioritizes stability, proven performance, and support, Mews is the clear winner.
For hotels aiming to streamline operations, improve guest experience, and scale confidently, Mews offers the most compelling, validated solution. Only consider Modotel if you’re experimenting with minimal operational needs and are prepared for an untested platform.
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
虽然 Mews 提供了可靠的报表和分析功能,但一些评论指出,它需要更多可定制和灵活的报表功能。用户希望获得更细致的数据洞察,尤其是在预订和收入分析方面。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Mews PMS 和 Modotel PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Mews PMS 提供 335 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Modotel PMS 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Mews PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Mews PMS:否。Modotel PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Mews 的 HT Score 为 100,Modotel 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问