The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 | Modotel |
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #22 36 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #48 3 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | — | #46 1 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #27 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 | Modotel |
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #29 21 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #37 7 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | — | #42 4 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | — | #35 3 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 | Modotel |
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #23 16 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #16 31 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | — | #13 6 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #27 0 条评价 |
Choosing between Modotel PMS by Modotel and Sirvoy for your hotel hinges on your specific needs and priorities. Both systems aim to streamline property management, but they diverge sharply in maturity, feature set, user experience, and market presence. Modotel’s offering is essentially nonexistent in reviews and features, while Sirvoy boasts a substantial review base, high user ratings, and a broad feature set. Is your hotel better served by a proven, feature-rich system or a less established, yet simpler alternative?
Your team must assess whether you need a comprehensive management solution or a straightforward booking platform. With Modotel's lack of recent reviews and zero ratings, it’s difficult to evaluate its real-world performance. Conversely, Sirvoy’s recent, highly-rated reviews make it a more reliable choice. Are you ready to prioritize proven support and extensive features over unverified claims?
Modotel PMS’s current standing is almost nonexistent in terms of reviews, features, and market presence, making it nearly impossible to gauge its viability for your hotel. It offers no recent reviews, no user ratings, and no demonstrable support or integration data. Sirvoy, however, has 95 reviews, with 32 in the last six months, and a near-perfect rating of 9.41 out of 10, reflecting consistent user satisfaction.
While Modotel claims to be a property management system, the absence of recent feedback or features makes it an uncertain choice. Sirvoy’s platform is designed for small to medium-sized properties and provides an all-in-one solution, including booking management, channel management, and customer support. Given the full spectrum of reviews and recent activity, Sirvoy’s credibility far surpasses Modotel’s. Would you prefer to invest in a system with proven adoption and support, or gamble on an untested product?
If your hotel needs a reliable, feature-rich PMS with active support, go with Sirvoy. Its extensive feature list (over 43 unique features), positive recent reviews, and broad market presence make it the clear choice for hotels aiming to streamline operations and improve guest satisfaction. Sirvoy is particularly well-suited for properties that require multi-channel booking, online check-in, CRM, and integrated payments.
If, on the other hand, you are a hotel or property contemplating an unknown, with no current reviews, features, or proven track record, Modotel might seem like an option. However, without recent validation, it’s more of a placeholder than a functional tool. For hotels that value proven performance, ease of use, and support, Sirvoy is the evident pick. Would your hotel prioritize stability and proven support or be willing to explore an unverified alternative?
Sirvoy’s user interface boasts a 4.64 out of 5 ease of use rating, backed by recent reviews emphasizing its intuitive design and straightforward navigation. Customers praise its quick onboarding process, with a 4.6 out of 5 onboarding rating, and highlight how even new users find it simple to operate. Multiple review quotes describe the system as "super easy to use," with exceptional customer support making setup smoother.
Modotel’s ease of use rating is 0 out of 5, with no recent reviews or feedback, indicating a lack of user experience data. Its absence from the review landscape suggests it has either no active users or no recent updates, making it impossible to ascertain how user-friendly or effective it is. Given the critical importance of UI and onboarding, Edge: Sirvoy.
Sirvoy offers over 43 distinct features, ranging from multi-lingual and multi-currency support to online check-in, channel management, and integrated payment processing. It includes tools like guest CRM, automated reminders, real-time reporting, and a booking engine, making it a full-fledged property management suite. These capabilities are validated by consistent user praise and active integrations with major channels and payment providers.
Modotel, by contrast, provides no listed features or integrations, and its website offers no detailed functionality overview. The absence of features makes it impossible to evaluate its capabilities. Sirvoy’s rich feature set and active development clearly make it the superior choice. Edge: Sirvoy.
Sirvoy’s customer support is rated 4.85 out of 5, with recent reviews consistently praising the team’s responsiveness, helpfulness, and quick resolution times. Customers describe their support as "excellent," with one reviewer noting, “When we needed help, they responded super quick and clear.” The system’s onboarding process is also rated 4.6 out of 5, indicating solid support during initial setup.
Modotel’s support rating is 0 out of 5, with no recent reviews or evidence of active support channels. Without recent user feedback, it’s impossible to assess the quality of support or onboarding. Given the importance of reliable assistance in hotel management, Edge: Sirvoy.
Sirvoy connects with 21 verified partners, including major industry players like Bookboost, RevControl, TrustYou, SiteMinder, and Cloudbeds. These integrations allow seamless connection with booking channels, revenue management tools, and guest communication platforms, offering scalable options as your hotel grows.
Modotel has no verified partners or integrations listed, suggesting it may not support third-party connections or may lack active integrations altogether. This significantly limits its utility for hotels relying on multi-channel distribution and automated workflows. Edge: Sirvoy.
There are no recent reviews or ratings for Modotel, and no evidence of active user feedback, making it impossible to determine how hoteliers perceive it. Conversely, Sirvoy has 95 reviews, with 32 in the last six months, and a NPS score of 9.41 out of 10, demonstrating high satisfaction across various property types, from boutique hotels to resorts.
Recent reviews highlight its ease of use, customer support, and feature richness, with many users describing it as a "game-changer" for small properties. Given the substantial recent review volume and high ratings, Edge: Sirvoy.
Modotel’s pricing information is unavailable, with no mention of a trial, subscription, or payment model. Its lack of transparency makes it impossible to evaluate value for money.
Sirvoy charges $200 per month, with no free tier, but offers a 30-day trial. The system is generally considered affordable for small to medium-sized hotels, especially given its feature set and support. The transparent pricing and free trial make Sirvoy a safer investment.
Given the lack of recent reviews and features, Modotel might be suitable only for very small, tech-savvy properties willing to take a risk.
Sirvoy is ideal for properties prioritizing ease of use, support, and reliable functionality.
Modotel offers no recent activity, reviews, or feature data, making it an unreliable choice for any hotel actively managing operations today. Its complete lack of validation suggests it’s either an inactive product or one with minimal relevance to modern hotel management.
Sirvoy, with its extensive recent reviews, high user ratings, and broad feature set, stands out as the practical choice. Its proven support, integrations, and affordability make it suitable for small to medium-sized properties that want dependable, scalable management.
If your hotel needs a trusted, well-supported platform with a track record of customer satisfaction, Sirvoy is the definitive option. Choose Modotel only if you are willing to accept significant risk and limited functionality. For most hoteliers, Sirvoy’s clarity and proven performance justify its investment.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Sirvoy receives high praise for its excellent customer support, noted for being responsive, helpful, and timely. Users appreciate the prompt assistanc... Sirvoy receives high praise for its excellent customer support, noted for being responsive, helpful, and timely. Users appreciate the prompt assistance, which facilitates problem resolution effectively.
Most users find Sirvoy highly intuitive and easy to navigate, which is particularly beneficial for those new to the hospitality industry. This simplic... Most users find Sirvoy highly intuitive and easy to navigate, which is particularly beneficial for those new to the hospitality industry. This simplicity allows for a smooth onboarding process without the need for extensive training.
用户称赞该系统在管理预订和宾客信息方面的高效性。然而,某些功能,例如将房间组合成套房或提供套餐优惠,则被认为需要改进。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
部分用户对 Sirvoy 的报告功能不足表示不满,特别是缺少每日销售报告,以及财务和发票功能亟待改进。此外,还有用户反馈缺乏高级客户关系管理 (CRM) 选项,以及... 部分用户对 Sirvoy 的报告功能不足表示不满,特别是缺少每日销售报告,以及财务和发票功能亟待改进。此外,还有用户反馈缺乏高级客户关系管理 (CRM) 选项,以及集成追加销售功能存在困难。
Sirvoy 提供一定程度的自定义功能,用户认为这有助于根据自身物业的具体需求调整系统。然而,部分用户希望在发票自定义和动态计费选项方面拥有更大的灵活性。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Modotel PMS 和 Sirvoy 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Modotel PMS 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Sirvoy 提供 21 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Sirvoy 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Modotel PMS:否。Sirvoy:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Modotel 的 HT Score 为 0,Sirvoy 的为 85。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问