The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 非接触式办理入住 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #5 15 条评价 | #16 1 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #6 10 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #4 7 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #8 3 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #5 12 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #4 11 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #5 12 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #6 9 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | #7 3 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #4 32 条评价 | #16 1 条评价 |
| 亚太 | #6 2 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #4 2 条评价 | — |
Choosing between MyStay Check-in and Sezam24 hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and operational priorities. Both products aim to streamline contactless check-in, but they approach this goal differently, with distinct features and strengths. Your team must weigh factors like review volume, feature set, regional support, and pricing to make an informed decision.
MyStay, with over 40 recent reviews and a high overall rating, demonstrates proven user satisfaction and ongoing development. Sezam24, though fewer reviews, boasts a perfect 5/5 rating and the highest recent scores, emphasizing ease of use and affordability. Which product aligns better with your hotel’s operational strategy?
Both MyStay and Sezam24 solve the core problem of enabling contactless, self-service check-in, but they diverge in their scope and customization capabilities. MyStay emphasizes comprehensive integrations, automation, and upselling features, making it suitable for hotels seeking advanced guest engagement tools. Sezam24 focuses on straightforward, device-agnostic check-in kiosks ideal for budget-friendly, low-staff hotels.
MyStay’s larger review count and recent feedback suggest it has a more established user base and ongoing support. Sezam24’s niche, with fewer reviews but perfect scores, appeals to budget hotels prioritizing simplicity. Do you need a flexible system with extensive features or a straightforward, cost-effective solution?
If your hotel needs a multi-functional platform that integrates with PMS, offers guest segmentation, and supports upselling, go with MyStay. It’s best for properties aiming to enhance operational efficiency and increase revenue through targeted marketing and automation. Its larger review base affirms its reliability and continuous improvements.
If your hotel prioritizes ease of use, device agnosticism, and lower cost, Sezam24 is the better choice. It’s perfect for small, budget-friendly hotels that want a straightforward, self-service check-in kiosk that supports multiple languages and direct booking integrations. Its high customer support rating and recent reviews highlight its reliability for basic needs.
MyStay’s user rating of 4.91/5 and onboarding score of 4.82/5 reflect a highly intuitive system, praised for its straightforward setup and management. Recent reviews mention its simple interface, which allows staff to quickly adopt and operate the platform with minimal training. However, some users note occasional slowness, indicating room for improvement.
Sezam24 boasts a perfect 5/5 ease-of-use rating, with reviews emphasizing its device-agnostic design and effortless guest interface. Property managers appreciate how guests can check in on their own, with minimal staff intervention, providing a seamless experience. Edge: Sezam24.
MyStay offers 10 exclusive features, including PMS integration, guest segmentation, offer templates, and digital payments—tools that support complex marketing strategies and operational automation. Its capabilities allow for targeted upselling, personalized guest experiences, and comprehensive communication channels.
Sezam24 provides 13 unique features tailored for basic self-service check-ins, such as hotel website portals, document scanning, ID verification, and multi-lingual support. It’s designed for straightforward, self-sufficient operations without the need for extensive marketing tools.
While MyStay’s feature set is more suited for properties seeking advanced marketing and revenue management, Sezam24’s simplicity makes it ideal for hotels prioritizing operational efficiency. Edge: Sezam24.
MyStay is rated 4.93/5 for customer support, with reviewers highlighting its responsiveness and ongoing communication. Comments like "the support team is very helpful" reinforce its commitment to assisting users, especially during onboarding.
Sezam24 also scores a perfect 5/5, with reviews praising its support quality and support team's quick response times. Users note its reliable, helpful assistance, critical for self-service systems that require minimal on-site staff.
Given the recent review counts, Sezam24’s support reputation appears slightly more recent and consistent. Edge: Sezam24.
MyStay integrates with 30 verified partners, including major PMS and channel management systems like HotelTime, Mews, and Clock. This extensive network allows for smooth data flow and operation across numerous hotel management platforms.
Sezam24 has 9 verified partners, with notable integrations like Cloudbeds and Hotek Hospitality Group. Its smaller partner ecosystem simplifies setup but limits options for hotels with complex management systems.
If your hotel relies on extensive PMS and channel integrations, MyStay’s broader connectivity is advantageous. For straightforward operations with minimal integration needs, Sezam24 suffices. Edge: MyStay.
MyStay’s 40 reviews with an overall 5/5 rating, despite fewer recent reviews, indicate high satisfaction across a diverse range of hotel segments, especially serviced apartments and city hotels. Properties appreciate its automation, communication features, and integration capabilities.
Sezam24’s single recent review with a perfect 5/5 rating emphasizes its suitability for small, budget hotels that value simplicity and ease of use. It’s rated highly by properties that need straightforward self-check-in solutions.
While MyStay’s larger review pool suggests broader reliability, Sezam24’s recent perfect scores underscore its appeal for specific hotel types. Edge: MyStay.
MyStay’s pricing starts at $400 per month, with no freemium or trial options. Its higher price reflects its extensive feature set and integration capabilities.
Sezam24 charges $300 per month, also without a free tier or trial, making it the more budget-friendly option. Its lower cost aligns with its focus on basic self-service check-in features.
Your choice may depend on budget and feature needs—MyStay offers more tools for marketing and automation, while Sezam24 provides essential check-in functionality at a lower cost.
Not ideal if: You operate a very small hotel, or if your primary need is a simple, standalone check-in kiosk without marketing features.
Not ideal if: You require advanced guest segmentation, upselling, or PMS integrations beyond basic check-in.
MyStay checks many boxes with its comprehensive features, integrations, and proven user satisfaction, making it ideal if your hotel aims to automate and upscale guest experiences. Its larger review base and ongoing development provide confidence in stability and support.
Sezam24 excels in ease of use, affordability, and simplicity, making it suitable for small hotels or properties seeking a no-fuss, self-service check-in solution. Its perfect recent ratings indicate high reliability in its niche.
If your hotel needs sophisticated automation, marketing, and extensive integrations, choose MyStay. If you prioritize straightforward, budget-conscious self-service check-in with quick setup, Sezam24 is your best fit.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
评论者经常提到 MyStay 的非接触式入住功能是一个至关重要的工具,尤其是在疫情期间。它简化并加快了入住流程,让客人在抵达前完成入住,并减少了身体接触。用户... 评论者经常提到 MyStay 的非接触式入住功能是一个至关重要的工具,尤其是在疫情期间。它简化并加快了入住流程,让客人在抵达前完成入住,并减少了身体接触。用户欣赏它为他们的操作带来的易用性和效率。
评论者经常评论 MyStay 如何显著提升宾客体验。该平台允许在抵达前进行沟通,并在抵达时提供便利,给人一种个性化和周到服务的感觉。酒店经营者注意到直接结果是... 评论者经常评论 MyStay 如何显著提升宾客体验。该平台允许在抵达前进行沟通,并在抵达时提供便利,给人一种个性化和周到服务的感觉。酒店经营者注意到直接结果是宾客满意度更高。
许多评论都强调了 MyStay 如何改善客人沟通。该平台允许酒店经营者通过自动消息在客人入住前、入住期间和入住后与客人进行有效沟通。此功能通过提供及时的信息和... 许多评论都强调了 MyStay 如何改善客人沟通。该平台允许酒店经营者通过自动消息在客人入住前、入住期间和入住后与客人进行有效沟通。此功能通过提供及时的信息和及时解决疑问来提高客人满意度。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户经常建议需要更多自定义选项,特别是在自动消息传递和客户沟通模板方面。他们希望能够更灵活地调整文本、图形和自动消息传递格式,以更好地满足他们的特定需... 用户经常建议需要更多自定义选项,特别是在自动消息传递和客户沟通模板方面。他们希望能够更灵活地调整文本、图形和自动消息传递格式,以更好地满足他们的特定需求。
MyStay 与物业管理系统 (PMS) 的集成是一项有价值的功能,在多篇评论中都得到了积极的评价。这种无缝集成有助于酒店经营者更有效地管理客人数据和运营。然而,一... MyStay 与物业管理系统 (PMS) 的集成是一项有价值的功能,在多篇评论中都得到了积极的评价。这种无缝集成有助于酒店经营者更有效地管理客人数据和运营。然而,一些用户确实偶尔会遇到 MyStay 和 PMS 之间的同步问题。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
这取决于您的需求。MyStay Check in 和 Sezam24 共享许多核心 Contactless Check-in 功能,但各有独特的能力。MyStay Check in 提供 30 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Sezam24 提供 9 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Sezam24 在易用性方面领先,评分为 5.0/5 对比 4.9/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
MyStay Check in:否。Sezam24:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Contactless Check-in 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。MyStay 的 HT Score 为 22,Sezam24 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问