MyStay Check in vs. Self Service Checkin by SmartStay: 哪个更适合您?

更新于 May 16, 2026  ·  已分析 46 条经验证的评价

摘要

我们分析了 46 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:

MyStay 表现出色 在 customer support and onboarding 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Guest Segmentation & Targeting and Multi-Channel Delivery (Email, SMS, WhatsApp, Chat).

Liverton 表现出色 .

查看下方完整分析 ↓

MyStay Check in 与 Self Service Checkin by SmartStay 相比如何?

基于 HTR 上 46 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。

HTScore
22
0
推荐可能性
98%
97%
易用性
4.9/5
5.0/5
客户支持
4.9/5
4.0/5
性价比
4.9/5
4.7/5
起始价格 From $400/mo Contact sales
经验证的评价 43 3

MyStay Check in 与 Self Service Checkin by SmartStay 的优缺点是什么?

在分析了 46 条经验证的评价后,MyStay 用户最看重其 无接触办理入住, 宾客体验, 宾客沟通,而 Liverton 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。

MyStay MyStay Liverton Liverton
优点
+ 无接触办理入住
+ 宾客体验
+ 宾客沟通
+ 支持与持续改进
缺点
定制选项
与 PMS 集成
系统速度和性能

MyStay 对比 Liverton:按酒店细分市场排名

各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 非接触式办理入住 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。

按酒店规模

细分市场 MyStay MyStay Liverton Liverton
小型(10-24 间客房) #5 15 条评价
中型(25-74 间客房) #6 10 条评价 #21 0 条评价
大型(75-199 间客房) #4 7 条评价 #13 1 条评价
超大型(200+ 间客房) #8 3 条评价 #10 2 条评价

按物业类型

细分市场 MyStay MyStay Liverton Liverton
精品酒店 #5 12 条评价 #21 1 条评价
豪华酒店 #4 11 条评价 #24 0 条评价
品牌/连锁酒店 #5 12 条评价 #14 2 条评价
长住酒店 #6 9 条评价

按区域

细分市场 MyStay MyStay Liverton Liverton
北美 #7 3 条评价 #8 2 条评价
欧洲 #4 32 条评价
亚太 #6 2 条评价
中东 #4 2 条评价

The Decision

Choosing between MyStay Check-in by MyStay and Self Service Checkin by Liverton hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and operational priorities. Both solutions aim to reduce front desk workload and enable contactless guest experiences, but they differ significantly in features, user feedback, and market presence. Your team should consider not just core capabilities but also integration, support, and regional availability to inform this decision.

MyStay's comprehensive feature set and strong global presence make it the more established option, especially for hotels seeking advanced customization and automation. Liverton, on the other hand, markets itself as a straightforward, "appless" platform with a focus on self-service kiosks, but the limited review data suggests it’s a less proven solution. Which product aligns better with your operational goals?

Is MyStay Check-in or Liverton Self Service Checkin Better for Hotels?

Both products target contactless check-in and check-out, but MyStay offers a broader suite of features designed for deeper integration and automation. It supports digital forms, online payments, and pre-arrival communication, reducing the need for physical interaction and manual tasks. Liverton emphasizes simplicity through its "appless" system, primarily focusing on self-service kiosks and mobile engagement, promising a quick setup but offering fewer automation options.

MyStay’s 40 reviews, mostly recent, with a 5/5 overall rating and a 4.93/5 customer support score, indicate strong user satisfaction and ongoing development. Liverton's 3 reviews, all rated equally, lack recent feedback, making it harder to gauge current performance. Given the higher review count and recent ratings, MyStay is the more reliable choice for hotels prioritizing proven performance and comprehensive features.

MyStay Check-in vs Liverton: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?

If your hotel needs a robust, feature-rich contactless solution with extensive PMS integration, targeted marketing capabilities, and automation, go with MyStay. It suits properties looking to streamline operations, increase ancillary sales, and customize guest communications across multiple regions.

If your hotel prioritizes quick deployment, minimal setup, and straightforward self-service kiosks—especially if you operate in a region where Liverton’s fewer integrations and limited global presence matter—then Liverton could be sufficient. However, the lack of recent reviews and limited feature set suggests it’s better suited for smaller hotels or properties with simple needs.

Overall, for hotels seeking a mature, well-supported system with proven results, MyStay remains the stronger option. Liverton might serve well for properties new to contactless tech or with minimal automation needs, but its limited market presence and review data are notable drawbacks.

Is MyStay Check-in or Liverton Self Service Checkin Easier to Use?

MyStay’s ease of use is highly rated at 4.91/5, with many users citing its intuitive interface and straightforward onboarding process. Hoteliers report that setup is quick, with minimal staff training needed, and the system is accessible for both staff and guests. Support is praised for responsiveness, and the platform’s automation features simplify complex workflows.

Liverton’s platform scores a perfect 5/5 in ease of use, emphasizing its "appless" approach, which minimizes software downloads and simplifies the user experience. However, the limited review data and the absence of detailed user feedback make it harder to evaluate real-world usability and onboarding ease.

Edge: MyStay.

Which Has Better Features: MyStay or Liverton?

MyStay offers 14 unique features, including PMS integration, guest segmentation, room upgrade merchandising, multi-channel messaging, digital payment capture, and self-service check-in/out. These features allow your hotel to tailor the guest journey, upsell services, and automate communication, providing a full-stack solution.

Liverton’s platform, by contrast, does not list additional features beyond self-service kiosks and mobile check-in/out. Its primary focus is on automating the check-in process and ID scanning, with F&B functionality planned for future updates. For comprehensive automation and marketing tools, MyStay’s feature set is clearly superior.

Edge: MyStay.

Which Has Better Customer Support: MyStay or Liverton?

Based on available reviews, MyStay’s support is rated at 4.93/5, with hoteliers praising its responsiveness and ongoing updates. Reviewers mention that the support team is helpful and that the platform receives regular improvements, reflecting a commitment to customer success.

Liverton’s support scores a slightly lower 4/5, with some reviewers noting room for improvement in after-hours assistance. Since detailed review quotes are limited, it’s harder to gauge the consistency of support, but the available data favors MyStay’s reputation for service quality.

Edge: MyStay.

Which Has More Integrations: MyStay or Liverton?

MyStay integrates with 30 verified partners, including major PMS providers like Oracle Hospitality and Mews, and a broad array of channel managers and property management solutions. This extensive integration network enables seamless data flow and operational efficiency for your hotel.

Liverton offers 8 verified partners, with notable integrations including RMS, Cloudbeds, and SIHOT. While these cover key industry players, the smaller partner list limits flexibility and scope for hotels with diverse tech stacks.

Edge: MyStay.

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: MyStay or Liverton?

MyStay’s reviews are significantly more numerous, with 40 recent reviews and an overall rating of 5/5, reflecting broad satisfaction across various hotel segments. Hoteliers highlight its ease of use, automation, and support as key strengths.

Liverton’s 3 reviews, all rated equally, lack recent feedback and do not provide enough data to determine a clear user preference. The larger review base and recent ratings make MyStay the more trusted choice for hoteliers seeking proven results.

Edge: MyStay.

How Much Do MyStay and Liverton Cost?

MyStay is priced at a flat $400 monthly fee, with no implementation or setup costs, making it predictable and straightforward. Pricing details for Liverton are not publicly available, which could suggest a customized quote model, but also makes direct comparison difficult.

Given the transparent pricing of MyStay, your team can better evaluate ROI and budget accordingly. The absence of clear pricing from Liverton is a notable drawback for decision-making.

What Type of Hotel Should Use MyStay?

  • Hotels that want a feature-rich, customizable contactless check-in system.
  • Properties seeking PMS integration and automation to streamline operations.
  • Hotels looking to upsell services and improve guest communication.
  • Teams prioritizing scalability across multiple regions.
  • Hotels aiming to reduce reception costs significantly.

Not ideal if:

  • Your hotel operates with minimal technology needs.
  • You prefer a very simple, kiosk-only solution.
  • You have a limited budget without the need for advanced features.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Liverton?

  • Hotels that prioritize quick deployment and minimal setup.
  • Properties interested mainly in self-service kiosks and mobile check-in/out.
  • Hotels with straightforward operational requirements.
  • Resorts or boutique hotels that want to test contactless solutions without extensive integration.
  • Hotels in regions where Liverton’s limited local presence isn’t a concern.

Not ideal if:

  • You require deep automation and marketing functionalities.
  • Your property needs extensive PMS integration.
  • You prefer a solution with a larger user base and proven track record.

The Bottom Line for Hotels

MyStay excels with a comprehensive feature set, proven market presence, and a strong track record of customer satisfaction. Its extensive integrations and automation tools make it suitable for mid-sized to large hotels seeking operational efficiency and enhanced guest experiences.

Liverton offers a straightforward, kiosk-focused contactless solution, best suited for properties with simple needs or those experimenting with self-service check-in/out. However, its limited review data and smaller integration network make it less ideal for hotels requiring extensive customization or regional support.

For hotels prioritizing reliability, scalability, and feature depth, MyStay is the clear choice. If your focus is on quick deployment and minimal complexity, Liverton may serve as a starting point—though it’s important to consider its less proven market presence.

MyStay Check in 和 Self Service Checkin by SmartStay 的价格是多少?

非接触式办理入住 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。

MyStay MyStay Liverton Liverton
Starting Price From $400/mo

MyStay Check in 有哪些 Self Service Checkin by SmartStay 没有的功能(反之亦然)?

根据 HTR 的产品数据库,MyStay Check in 和 Self Service Checkin by SmartStay 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。

功能 MyStay MyStay Liverton Liverton
分割
多渠道推送(电子邮件、短信、WhatsApp、聊天)
客户细分与定向
客房升级商品
经前管理系统整合
辅助产品营销

显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 2 项功能存在差异。

MyStay 对比 Liverton:总结

MyStay
MyStay
4.9/5 来自 43 条评价

酒店从业者喜爱的方面

无接触办理入住 100% 正面

评论者经常提到 MyStay 的非接触式入住功能是一个至关重要的工具,尤其是在疫情期间。它简化并加快了入住流程,让客人在抵达前完成入住,并减少了身体接触。用户... 评论者经常提到 MyStay 的非接触式入住功能是一个至关重要的工具,尤其是在疫情期间。它简化并加快了入住流程,让客人在抵达前完成入住,并减少了身体接触。用户欣赏它为他们的操作带来的易用性和效率。

宾客体验 84% 正面

评论者经常评论 MyStay 如何显著提升宾客体验。该平台允许在抵达前进行沟通,并在抵达时提供便利,给人一种个性化和周到服务的感觉。酒店经营者注意到直接结果是... 评论者经常评论 MyStay 如何显著提升宾客体验。该平台允许在抵达前进行沟通,并在抵达时提供便利,给人一种个性化和周到服务的感觉。酒店经营者注意到直接结果是宾客满意度更高。

宾客沟通 97% 正面

许多评论都强调了 MyStay 如何改善客人沟通。该平台允许酒店经营者通过自动消息在客人入住前、入住期间和入住后与客人进行有效沟通。此功能通过提供及时的信息和... 许多评论都强调了 MyStay 如何改善客人沟通。该平台允许酒店经营者通过自动消息在客人入住前、入住期间和入住后与客人进行有效沟通。此功能通过提供及时的信息和及时解决疑问来提高客人满意度。

酒店从业者提出异议的方面

定制选项 55% 负面

用户经常建议需要更多自定义选项,特别是在自动消息传递和客户沟通模板方面。他们希望能够更灵活地调整文本、图形和自动消息传递格式,以更好地满足他们的特定需... 用户经常建议需要更多自定义选项,特别是在自动消息传递和客户沟通模板方面。他们希望能够更灵活地调整文本、图形和自动消息传递格式,以更好地满足他们的特定需求。

与 PMS 集成 43% 负面

MyStay 与物业管理系统 (PMS) 的集成是一项有价值的功能,在多篇评论中都得到了积极的评价。这种无缝集成有助于酒店经营者更有效地管理客人数据和运营。然而,一... MyStay 与物业管理系统 (PMS) 的集成是一项有价值的功能,在多篇评论中都得到了积极的评价。这种无缝集成有助于酒店经营者更有效地管理客人数据和运营。然而,一些用户确实偶尔会遇到 MyStay 和 PMS 之间的同步问题。

排名更高的方面

大型(75-199 间客房) #4 vs #13
中型(25-74 间客房) #6 vs #21
超大型(200+ 间客房) #8 vs #10
住宿加早餐与客栈 #5 vs #22

独特功能

经前管理系统整合 客户细分与定向 客房升级商品 多渠道推送(电子邮件、短信、WhatsApp、聊天) 辅助产品营销
4.9/5 易用性 4.9/5 客户支持 30 个集成
查看资料
Liverton
Liverton
4.9/5 来自 3 条评价

排名更高的方面

US #7 vs #11
5.0/5 易用性 4.0/5 客户支持 8 个集成
查看资料

评分差异最大的方面

综合评分 MyStay 5.0 vs 0.0 (+5)
客户支持 MyStay 4.9 vs 4.0 (+0.9)
入职培训 MyStay 4.8 vs 4.3 (+0.5)

关于 MyStay Check in 与 Self Service Checkin by SmartStay 的常见问题

MyStay Check in 能否替代 Self Service Checkin by SmartStay?

这取决于您的需求。MyStay Check in 和 Self Service Checkin by SmartStay 共享许多核心 Contactless Check-in 功能,但各有独特的能力。MyStay Check in 提供 30 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Self Service Checkin by SmartStay 提供 8 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。

哪个更适合小型或独立酒店?

小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Self Service Checkin by SmartStay 在易用性方面领先,评分为 5.0/5 对比 4.9/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。

MyStay Check in 或 Self Service Checkin by SmartStay 是否提供免费方案?

MyStay Check in:否。Self Service Checkin by SmartStay:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Contactless Check-in 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。

HTR 如何评估和排名 MyStay Check in 和 Self Service Checkin by SmartStay?

HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。MyStay 的 HT Score 为 22,Liverton 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。

标准组 权重 衡量内容
客户评分与评价

用户对该产品的推荐度如何?

评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例

权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。

合作伙伴生态系统

技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何?

合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量

评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。

以客户为中心

该组织以客户为中心的程度如何?

认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性

评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。

覆盖范围、持久力与资源

该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛?

地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分

衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。

客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →

获取个性化的产品推荐

产品推荐顾问

Ghostel icon

让我们查找您的酒店信息