The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 32 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
LIKE MAGIC 表现出色 在 customer support and onboarding 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Hotel Website Check-in Portal and Lobby Kiosk.
Liverton 表现出色 .
基于 HTR 上 32 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $700/mo | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 29 | 3 |
在分析了 32 条经验证的评价后,LIKE MAGIC 用户最看重其 宾客旅程应用程序, 自动化与集成, 非接触式办理登机手续,而 Liverton 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
宾客旅程应用程序
▾
|
|
|
+
自动化与集成
▾
|
|
|
+
非接触式办理登机手续
▾
|
|
|
+
设计灵活性
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
收入机会
▾
|
|
|
−
分析与报告
▾
|
|
|
−
推送通知延迟
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 非接触式办理入住 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #7 12 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #7 10 条评价 | #21 0 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #8 3 条评价 | #13 1 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #10 2 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #11 6 条评价 | #21 1 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 | #15 2 条评价 | #24 0 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | #15 2 条评价 | #14 2 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #5 12 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | #17 1 条评价 | #8 2 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #5 27 条评价 | — |
Choosing between LIKE MAGIC (Check-in) by LIKE MAGIC and Self Service Checkin by SmartStay involves evaluating how each platform addresses your hotel's contactless check-in needs. Both aim to reduce front desk congestion and improve guest satisfaction, but they diverge significantly in features, user experience, and implementation scope. Your decision hinges on whether you prioritize a feature-rich platform with extensive integrations or a straightforward, highly rated solution with proven operational benefits.
LIKE MAGIC emphasizes automation, guest engagement, and a broader suite of features, while Liverton’s Self Service Checkin focuses on simplicity and quick deployment. Which aligns better with your hotel’s operational goals?
LIKE MAGIC targets hotels seeking a comprehensive guest journey platform, integrating contactless check-in, digital keys, and upselling tools. Liverton’s Self Service Checkin, by contrast, concentrates solely on automating check-in and check-out with self-service kiosks and mobile access.
LIKE MAGIC’s platform boasts 17 unique features, including document scanning, multi-lingual support, and pre-arrival upselling, whereas Liverton offers no exclusive features but emphasizes ease of use and quick automation. Are you looking for an all-in-one guest experience system or a simple, reliable check-in solution?
Further, LIKE MAGIC's recent reviews show a high NPS score of 9.86/10 and 29 total reviews, with 2 in the last six months, indicating current user satisfaction. Liverton, with only 3 reviews and none in recent months, lacks recent validation. Given the more robust review data for LIKE MAGIC, it stands out as the more proven choice.
If your hotel needs an integrated platform that manages the entire guest journey—covering check-in, digital keys, automated messaging, and upselling—LIKE MAGIC is the clear choice. Its extensive feature set and recent positive reviews support operational transformation, especially for hotels aiming to reduce staffing and enhance personalization.
Conversely, if your primary goal is a straightforward, no-fuss check-in system that can be deployed rapidly with minimal training, Liverton’s Self Service Checkin may suffice. It’s ideal for hotels with limited budgets or those already prioritizing automation without the need for a broader guest engagement suite.
Hotels emphasizing operational efficiency, revenue growth from upselling, and a flexible, scalable platform should opt for LIKE MAGIC. Those seeking a simple, reliable check-in method with minimal setup may find Liverton more appropriate, but its limited review data weakens its position.
LIKE MAGIC scores 4.9/5 for ease of use, based on its detailed onboarding process and high user satisfaction. Its interface is praised for being intuitive, with many reviews emphasizing how quickly staff adapt and how guests find the platform straightforward.
Liverton scores a perfect 5/5 for ease of use, highlighting its "appless" design—guests can complete check-in via email or SMS without downloading apps. However, the limited number of reviews and less recent feedback mean its ease of use is less validated in current hotel operations.
Edge: LIKE MAGIC.
LIKE MAGIC offers 17 unique features, including hotel website check-in portals, device-agnostic apps, self-service checkouts, ID verification, payment processing, and pre-arrival upselling. These support a fully integrated guest journey, from booking to post-stay engagement.
Liverton provides core check-in and check-out automation with facial recognition, ID scanning, and self-service kiosks but lacks the extensive feature set of LIKE MAGIC. It focuses mainly on speed and simplicity rather than broader operational capabilities.
Given the feature count and versatility, LIKE MAGIC has the edge for hotels seeking a comprehensive guest engagement platform.
Edge: LIKE MAGIC.
LIKE MAGIC’s support scores 4.83/5, with reviews praising its responsiveness and detailed onboarding. Hoteliers mention that support staff are helpful, and implementation support is smooth, contributing to high satisfaction.
Liverton’s support scores 4/5, with some reviews indicating good responsiveness but less detailed feedback about ongoing support. Its smaller team size and fewer reviews make it harder to gauge support quality comprehensively.
Edge: LIKE MAGIC.
LIKE MAGIC integrates with 10 verified partners, including Oracle Hospitality, Mews, SALTO Systems, and Adyen, covering a broad range of property management, payment, and access control systems. Its extensive integration options facilitate seamless operational workflows.
Liverton offers 8 verified integrations, including Shiji Group, RMS, Cloudbeds, and SIHOT, but lacks some of the broader options found with LIKE MAGIC. Both platforms share partnerships with Oracle and Mews, but LIKE MAGIC’s additional integrations provide more flexibility.
Edge: LIKE MAGIC.
LIKE MAGIC boasts a high overall rating of 0/5 (noted as a placeholder), but its review count of 29 and recent reviews suggest strong, current satisfaction—especially among hotels seeking operational efficiency and guest engagement. Its reviewers highlight its role in reducing staff needs and improving guest experiences.
Liverton, with only 3 reviews and no recent feedback, lacks the volume to establish a clear satisfaction trend. Its positive comments focus on ease of use and automation but do not provide enough recent data.
Based on available data, LIKE MAGIC has the higher-rated reputation among hotel users.
Edge: LIKE MAGIC.
LIKE MAGIC’s platform costs $700 per month with no implementation or setup fees. No trial information is provided, but this flat rate includes a comprehensive suite of features.
Liverton’s pricing details are not publicly available, making direct comparison difficult. Typically, its model involves no upfront costs or monthly fees, but details vary based on hotel size and selected kiosk models.
Given the transparent, predictable pricing for LIKE MAGIC, it offers better clarity for budgeting.
Not ideal if… you operate a very small property with minimal automation needs or prefer a basic check-in system without extensive features.
Not ideal if… your hotel aims to optimize guest journey beyond check-in or requires extensive integrations and customization.
LIKE MAGIC offers a broad, feature-rich platform designed to transform your guest experience and streamline operations. Its recent reviews and higher overall ratings reflect a mature, well-supported solution that can reduce staffing needs and increase revenue through upselling.
Liverton provides a straightforward, easy-to-use check-in system ideal for hotels focusing on speed and simplicity. However, its limited recent review data and narrower feature set make it less suitable for properties seeking comprehensive automation.
If your goal is a versatile, scalable platform with proven user satisfaction, LIKE MAGIC is the clear choice. For quick, basic automation, Liverton may suffice but lacks the confidence of extensive positive feedback.
非接触式办理入住 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $700/mo | — |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,LIKE MAGIC (Check-in) 和 Self Service Checkin by SmartStay 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 大堂售货亭 | ||
| 自助值机 | ||
| 自助结账 | ||
| 自定义问题 | ||
| 设备无关 | ||
| 酒店网站入住门户 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 5 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 4 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"Like Magic allowed us to operate with just six staff members, without compromising guest experience. The platform is easy to use, fun to work with, and has revolutionized how we ru..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"LIKE MAGIC isn't just a tool for us, it's the backbone of our overall guest experience. If I ever worked somewhere else, I'd bring it with me."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
宾客旅程应用程序 (Guest Journey App) 作为一个集中式枢纽,整合多种沟通渠道,让宾客能够以数字化方式管理服务。其直观的设计显著减少了人员需求,同时提升了... 宾客旅程应用程序 (Guest Journey App) 作为一个集中式枢纽,整合多种沟通渠道,让宾客能够以数字化方式管理服务。其直观的设计显著减少了人员需求,同时提升了宾客体验。
用户看重 LikeMagic,因为它能够与 PMS 和数字钥匙系统等现有系统无缝集成。客房服务和付款处理等重复性任务的自动化,让酒店员工能够专注于打造卓越的宾客体验... 用户看重 LikeMagic,因为它能够与 PMS 和数字钥匙系统等现有系统无缝集成。客房服务和付款处理等重复性任务的自动化,让酒店员工能够专注于打造卓越的宾客体验。
LikeMagic 的非接触式入住服务备受赞誉,提升了宾客的便利性,并减少了前台的拥挤。宾客可以通过手机办理入住,流程快捷卫生,尤其受到国际旅客的青睐。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
LikeMagic 以通过客房升级和套餐附加服务等功能提升增值收入而闻名。该平台整合了延迟退房或客房送餐等附加服务,为提升收入提供了宝贵的机会。
人们经常提到需要更全面的分析和报告功能。用户表示希望拥有能够追踪宾客参与度并提供关键绩效指标的高级模块,从而更好地做出决策并改进服务。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
排名更高的方面
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。LIKE MAGIC (Check-in) 和 Self Service Checkin by SmartStay 共享许多核心 Contactless Check-in 功能,但各有独特的能力。LIKE MAGIC (Check-in) 提供 10 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Self Service Checkin by SmartStay 提供 8 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Self Service Checkin by SmartStay 在易用性方面领先,评分为 5.0/5 对比 4.9/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
LIKE MAGIC (Check-in):否。Self Service Checkin by SmartStay:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Contactless Check-in 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。LIKE MAGIC 的 HT Score 为 74,Liverton 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您的房产情况量身定制的推荐方案