LIKE MAGIC (Check-in) vs. Self Service Checkin by SmartStay: 哪个更适合您?

更新于 2026年11月13日  ·  已分析 32 条经验证的评价

摘要

我们分析了 32 条经验证的酒店经营者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的酒店类型和优先事项:

LIKE MAGIC 在宾客旅程应用程序方面表现出色,尤其适合长住住宿设施(5.0/5),并拥有酒店网站入住门户以及大堂售货亭等独家功能。

查看下方完整分析 ↓

LIKE MAGIC (Check-in) 与 Self Service Checkin by SmartStay 相比如何?

基于 HTR 上 32 条经验证的酒店经营者评价的并排评分。

HTScore
71
0
推荐可能性
99%
97%
易用性
4.9/5
5.0/5
客户支持
4.8/5
4.0/5
性价比
4.9/5
4.7/5
起始价格 起价 $700/月 联系销售
经验证的评价 29 3

LIKE MAGIC (Check-in) 与 Self Service Checkin by SmartStay 的优缺点是什么?

在分析了 32 条经验证的评价后,LIKE MAGIC 用户最看重其 宾客旅程应用程序, 自动化与集成, 非接触式办理登机手续,而 Liverton 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。

LIKE MAGIC LIKE MAGIC Liverton Liverton
优点
+ 宾客旅程应用程序 ▾
+ 自动化与集成 ▾
+ 非接触式办理登机手续 ▾
+ 设计灵活性 ▾
缺点
− 收入机会 ▾
− 分析与报告 ▾
− 推送通知延迟 ▾

LIKE MAGIC 对比 Liverton:按酒店细分市场排名

各产品在不同酒店规模、类型和区域的 无接触入住 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店经营者的经验证评价。

按酒店规模

细分市场 LIKE MAGIC LIKE MAGIC Liverton Liverton
小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ #7 12 条评价 —
中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ #7 11 条评价 #20 0 条评价
大型(75-199 间客房) #11 3 条评价 #12 2 条评价
超大型(200+ 间客房) — #12 1 条评价

按酒店类型

细分市场 LIKE MAGIC LIKE MAGIC Liverton Liverton
精品酒店 ▾ #9 8 条评价 #21 1 条评价
豪华酒店 #15 2 条评价 #17 1 条评价
品牌/连锁酒店 #16 2 条评价 #14 2 条评价
长住酒店 ▾ #5 12 条评价 —

按区域

细分市场 LIKE MAGIC LIKE MAGIC Liverton Liverton
北美 #18 1 条评价 #10 2 条评价
欧洲 ▾ #5 27 条评价 —

Is LIKE MAGIC or Liverton Better for Hotels?

LIKE MAGIC and Liverton both target the contactless check-in category, aiming to replace traditional front desk queues with self-service technology. They diverge significantly in feature depth and geographic focus. LIKE MAGIC offers a mobile-first, GDPR-compliant platform with integrated digital key and upsell capabilities, targeting Europe and Asia Pacific with a strong presence in serviced apartments and boutique hotels. Liverton emphasizes hardware kiosks and app-less check-in via automated SMS and email, with stronger adoption in branded hotels primarily in North and South America.

Both solve the core problem of reducing front desk congestion and staff load while improving guest convenience. However, LIKE MAGIC’s 17 unique hotel features automate check-in, check-out, payments, and upselling in a single cloud platform, freeing staff for guest interaction beyond check-in. Liverton’s strength lies in flexible kiosk hardware options and a highly customizable guest journey that suits large branded portfolios seeking consistent self-service kiosks with facial recognition and ID scanning.

LIKE MAGIC vs Liverton: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?

If your property is a boutique, extended stay, or serviced apartment in Europe or Asia Pacific, LIKE MAGIC is the stronger choice based on 29 reviews averaging a near-perfect 5/5 overall rating, with particularly high marks (5/5) from serviced apartment operators. Its extensive hotel-specific features like multi-lingual support, document scanning, and door lock integration empower small to medium-sized properties with lean teams to automate operations efficiently.

Conversely, if you manage a branded hotel portfolio, especially in Australia or the Americas, Liverton’s SmartStay platform fits better. Though only three reviews exist, they cite successful rollouts across 11 properties with 70% guest adoption rates, emphasizing kiosk variety and operational flexibility. This suggests Liverton suits larger portfolios prioritizing physical kiosks and customizable guest flows. However, Liverton’s review base is limited, so its suitability for smaller or non-branded hotels remains less clear.

Is LIKE MAGIC or Liverton Easier to Use?

Both products score exceptionally on ease of use, with LIKE MAGIC rated 4.9/5 and Liverton slightly higher at 5/5, though Liverton’s rating is based on only three reviews. Onboarding scores also favor LIKE MAGIC at 4.8/5 compared to Liverton’s 4.3/5. Reviewers for LIKE MAGIC highlight a modern, browser-based platform that guests and staff find intuitive, though some staff mention backend complexity in locating functions quickly. Liverton reviewers praise its customization and simplicity, particularly praising the kiosk's ease for guests.

Staff adoption for LIKE MAGIC benefits from integrations that automate repetitive tasks, reducing training time to as little as 1.5 days per case studies. Liverton customers appreciate the flexibility in kiosk models, helping tailor adoption to property needs. Given the larger and more diverse reviewer base for LIKE MAGIC, its ease of use ratings carry more weight.

Edge: Even.

Which Has Better Features: LIKE MAGIC or Liverton?

LIKE MAGIC outpaces Liverton with 17 unique hotel-relevant features versus zero unique features for Liverton, indicating a broader functional scope. Features exclusive to LIKE MAGIC include a hotel website check-in portal, device-agnostic self-service check-in and checkout, customizable guest questions, terms & conditions signing, document and passport scanning, ID verification, multi-lingual support, payment authorizations, deposit collection, electronic registration cards, door lock integration, and pre-arrival upselling.

These features transform workflows for front desk staff and guests by automating manual processes, reducing check-in friction, and enabling revenue generation through upsells and upgrades before arrival. For instance, door lock integration lets guests unlock rooms digitally without physical keys, eliminating key card distribution and return logistics.

Liverton’s platform focuses on kiosk hardware and automated guest communication via email and SMS but lacks distinct software features beyond core check-in and payment processing. This limits operational impact compared to LIKE MAGIC’s all-in-one system.

Edge: LIKE MAGIC.

Which Has Better Customer Support: LIKE MAGIC or Liverton?

Customer support ratings for LIKE MAGIC stand at 4.8/5, slightly above Liverton’s 4/5, though both have fewer than 30 total reviews. Onboarding also favors LIKE MAGIC (4.8/5) over Liverton (4.3/5). Reviewers praise LIKE MAGIC’s responsiveness and generally good support response times, noting occasional variability in staff familiarity with the platform.

Liverton users report strong and responsive support overall, but some mention gaps in after-hours coverage and the need for more help desk expertise across all modules. This could impact hotels requiring 24/7 operational support.

Given the larger review volume and more consistent feedback, LIKE MAGIC’s support is more reliably rated.

Edge: Even.

Which Has More Integrations: LIKE MAGIC or Liverton?

LIKE MAGIC leads with 11 verified integrations compared to Liverton’s 8. Both share integrations with major PMS providers like Oracle Hospitality and Mews. LIKE MAGIC adds four exclusive partners including 4SUITES, apaleo GmbH, SALTO Systems for door locks, and Adyen for payments. Liverton’s unique integrations include Shiji Group, RMS, Cloudbeds, SIHOT, and Planet.

These integration differences matter operationally. LIKE MAGIC’s door lock integration and payment platform partnerships enable seamless guest room access and flexible payment options, critical for properties seeking full automation. Liverton’s integrations focus more on broad PMS compatibility, supporting branded portfolios with diverse systems.

Edge: LIKE MAGIC.

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: LIKE MAGIC or Liverton?

Both products hold excellent overall ratings: LIKE MAGIC at 5/5 from 29 reviews, Liverton at 4.8/5 from 3 reviews. The volume and recency favor LIKE MAGIC as it has a larger and more segmented review base, including 12 recent reviews from extended stay and serviced apartments scoring 5/5, and strong scores (4.8-4.9/5) from boutique, city center, and limited service hotels. Liverton’s limited review count prevents strong conclusions, though it does receive 4.8-5/5 ratings in branded and airport/conference hotels.

Neither product has recent reviews in the last six months, so ratings reflect the last two years’ experience. LIKE MAGIC’s larger sample size and consistent 99% likelihood to recommend versus Liverton’s 97% slightly favor LIKE MAGIC in current user satisfaction.

Edge: Even.

How Much Do LIKE MAGIC and Liverton Cost?

LIKE MAGIC publishes a base price of $700, with no freemium, monthly flat, or per-room pricing, and no implementation fee or trial. Liverton does not publish any pricing details. Without transparent pricing from Liverton, direct cost comparison is impossible.

Hotels should expect LIKE MAGIC’s model suits properties able to invest a one-time or periodic fee for comprehensive cloud software. Liverton’s kiosk hardware and customization likely imply additional capital and service costs not disclosed.

What Type of Hotel Should Use LIKE MAGIC?

  • Hotels that operate in Europe or Asia Pacific, especially in serviced apartments and extended stay, where LIKE MAGIC has proven adoption and top ratings.

  • Teams seeking an integrated, mobile-first platform combining contactless check-in, payment, digital keys, and upselling in a single system.

  • Properties aiming to reduce front desk staff by automating check-in/out, housekeeping communications, and guest messaging, evidenced by case studies showing up to 80% staff reduction.

  • Hotels requiring multi-lingual support and GDPR-compliant data handling for international guests.

  • Operations wanting seamless integration with PMS, door lock systems, and payment processors to avoid manual workflows.

Not ideal if:

  • Your hotel portfolio relies on physical self-service kiosks as the main guest interface.

  • You require robust offline functionality or extensive design customization beyond current platform limits, as noted by some users.

  • Your property is outside LIKE MAGIC’s main regions, potentially limiting support and integrations.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Liverton?

  • Branded hotel portfolios in North and South America or Australia seeking kiosk-driven self-service check-in solutions.

  • Hotels requiring a variety of kiosk models to fit different property sizes and service levels, with proven 70% adoption in multi-property rollouts.

  • Properties valuing app-less guest check-in via automated SMS and email reminders, enhancing guest convenience without downloads.

  • Operations focused on upselling and guest preference capture through kiosk customization.

Not ideal if:

  • Your property needs a fully integrated digital key solution, as Liverton’s mobile key feature is still in development.

  • You operate small to medium independent hotels or serviced apartments where kiosk investments may not be cost-effective.

  • You want a software platform with extensive hotel-specific features like multi-lingual support, document scanning, or in-app payment authorizations.

LIKE MAGIC vs Liverton: The Bottom Line for Hotels

The core difference between LIKE MAGIC and Liverton lies in software depth versus kiosk hardware focus. LIKE MAGIC delivers a comprehensive, mobile-first contactless check-in and guest management platform with extensive features that automate front desk and operational workflows, integrated with digital keys and payment processing. Liverton provides a highly customizable kiosk-based check-in experience suited for branded hotel portfolios emphasizing physical self-service terminals.

Choose LIKE MAGIC if your property prioritizes operational automation, integrated digital keys, and pre-arrival upselling across a variety of hotel segments in Europe or Asia Pacific. Its 29 reviews averaging 5/5 support its efficiency and guest satisfaction claims, backed by case studies showing significant staff reductions and smooth guest journeys.

Choose Liverton if you manage a branded hotel portfolio in the Americas or Australia requiring flexible kiosk hardware, app-less guest engagement, and strong customization options. Although reviews are fewer, reported 70% guest adoption rates across 11 hotels indicate proven scalability in large portfolios. However, limited features and lack of digital key integration mean Liverton suits hotels focusing primarily on kiosk-enabled check-in rather than full operational integration.

LIKE MAGIC (Check-in) 和 Self Service Checkin by SmartStay 的价格是多少?

无接触入住 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的酒店规模申请定制报价。

LIKE MAGIC LIKE MAGIC Liverton Liverton
起始价格 起价 $700/月 —

功能对比:LIKE MAGIC (Check-in) 与 Self Service Checkin by SmartStay

这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。

功能 LIKE MAGIC LIKE MAGIC Liverton Liverton
▾ 到达前和登记入住
84%
0%
酒店网站入住门户
大堂售货亭
自助结账
自助值机
设备无关
轻松选择房间
▾ 信息收集
100%
0%
自定义问题
条款和条件签署
营销传播选择加入
预注册信息收集
文件和护照扫描
身份验证
▾ 翻译
50%
0%
自动翻译
多种语言
▾ 付款与授权
80%
0%
登记卡电子签名
收取押金
付款和授权
身份验证
符合 PCI 标准
▾ 手机钥匙
100%
0%
门锁集成
▾ 升级和追加销售
50%
0%
到货前追加销售和升级
轻松选择房间

实际成果:LIKE MAGIC 对比 Liverton(按业务目标)

我们分析了 4 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。

提高运营效率
LIKE MAGIC The Zipper Hotel & Apartments 小型
+ 80% fewer staff while maintaining operational efficiency
+ 4.6/5 rating on Google, 8.8+ on Booking.com
+ Easy to understand and use - employees have fun to work with. Fully trained staff in just 1.5 days.

"Like Magic allowed us to operate with just six staff members, without compromising guest experience. The platform is easy to use, fun to work with, and has revolutionized how we ru..."

Liverton Liverton

该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。

改善宾客体验
LIKE MAGIC Stay Kooook 小型
+ Lean operations: Reduced staffing needs to 2.5 FTE for an 85-room property
+ Guest Journey adoption: Enabled 95% of guests to manage their entire stay digitally.
+ Decreased staff training time to under four hours for new employees.

"LIKE MAGIC isn't just a tool for us, it's the backbone of our overall guest experience. If I ever worked somewhere else, I'd bring it with me."

Cedric Maderer
Cedric Maderer
Product Manager
Liverton Liverton

该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。

LIKE MAGIC 对比 Liverton:总结

LIKE MAGIC
LIKE MAGIC
5.0/5 来自 29 条评价

酒店经营者喜爱的方面

宾客旅程应用程序 90% 正面

宾客旅程应用程序 (Guest Journey App) 作为一个集中式枢纽,整合多种沟通渠道,让宾客能够以数字化方式管理服务。其直观的设计显著减少了人员需求,同时提升了... 宾客旅程应用程序 (Guest Journey App) 作为一个集中式枢纽,整合多种沟通渠道,让宾客能够以数字化方式管理服务。其直观的设计显著减少了人员需求,同时提升了宾客体验。

自动化与集成 100% 正面

用户看重 LikeMagic,因为它能够与 PMS 和数字钥匙系统等现有系统无缝集成。客房服务和付款处理等重复性任务的自动化,让酒店员工能够专注于打造卓越的宾客体验... 用户看重 LikeMagic,因为它能够与 PMS 和数字钥匙系统等现有系统无缝集成。客房服务和付款处理等重复性任务的自动化,让酒店员工能够专注于打造卓越的宾客体验。

非接触式办理登机手续 100% 正面

LikeMagic 的非接触式入住服务备受赞誉,提升了宾客的便利性,并减少了前台的拥挤。宾客可以通过手机办理入住,流程快捷卫生,尤其受到国际旅客的青睐。

酒店经营者提出异议的方面

收入机会 50% 负面

LikeMagic 以通过客房升级和套餐附加服务等功能提升增值收入而闻名。该平台整合了延迟退房或客房送餐等附加服务,为提升收入提供了宝贵的机会。

分析与报告 67% 负面

人们经常提到需要更全面的分析和报告功能。用户表示希望拥有能够追踪宾客参与度并提供关键绩效指标的高级模块,从而更好地做出决策并改进服务。

排名更高的方面

中型(25-74 间客房) #7 vs #20
住宿加早餐与客栈 #11 vs #23
精品酒店 #9 vs #21
市中心酒店 #4 vs #15

独特功能

酒店网站入住门户 大堂售货亭 设备无关 自助结账 自助值机
4.9/5 易用性 4.8/5 客户支持 11 个集成
查看资料
Liverton
Liverton
4.8/5 来自 3 条评价

排名更高的方面

品牌/连锁酒店 #14 vs #16
度假酒店 #17 vs #19
US #8 vs #12
北美 #10 vs #18
5.0/5 易用性 4.0/5 客户支持 8 个集成
查看资料

关于 LIKE MAGIC (Check-in) 与 Self Service Checkin by SmartStay 的常见问题

LIKE MAGIC (Check-in) 能否替代 Self Service Checkin by SmartStay?

这取决于您的需求。LIKE MAGIC (Check-in) 和 Self Service Checkin by SmartStay 共享许多核心 Contactless Check-in 功能,但各有独特的能力。LIKE MAGIC (Check-in) 提供 11 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Self Service Checkin by SmartStay 提供 8 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。

哪个更适合小型或独立酒店?

小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速上手。Self Service Checkin by SmartStay 在易用性方面领先,评分为 5.0/5 对比 4.9/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按酒店规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。

LIKE MAGIC (Check-in) 或 Self Service Checkin by SmartStay 是否提供免费方案?

LIKE MAGIC (Check-in):否。Self Service Checkin by SmartStay:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Contactless Check-in 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。

HTR 如何评估和排名 LIKE MAGIC (Check-in) 和 Self Service Checkin by SmartStay?

HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店经营者客观比较酒店科技产品。LIKE MAGIC 的 HT Score 为 71,Liverton 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。

标准组 权重 衡量内容
客户评分与评价

用户对该产品的推荐度如何?

评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾

权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。

合作伙伴生态系统

技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何?

合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾

评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。

以客户为中心

该组织以客户为中心的程度如何?

认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾

评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。

覆盖范围、持久力与资源

该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛?

地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾

衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。

客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →

获取您的免费人工智能分析师报告

根据您酒店的情况量身定制的推荐

Ghostel icon
受到以下企业信赖
footer image 1 footer image 2 footer image 3 footer image 4 footer image 5 footer image 6 footer image 7

让我们查找您的酒店信息