The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 直接预订工具 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #17 0 条评价 | #6 16 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #13 0 条评价 | #6 26 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #8 0 条评价 | #13 1 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #8 0 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #14 0 条评价 | #8 17 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #13 0 条评价 | #8 18 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | #16 0 条评价 | #13 3 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #16 0 条评价 | #6 7 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | #6 0 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #16 0 条评价 | #4 46 条评价 |
Choosing between NAVIS Shopping Cart Abandonment Solution and ReGuest involves understanding how each addresses your hotel's specific needs in direct booking and guest engagement. NAVIS focuses on reducing cart abandonment by capturing leads from visitors who leave your booking engine, while ReGuest emphasizes personalized communication to increase conversions and revenue throughout the guest journey.
Both products aim to boost your direct bookings, but they approach the problem from different angles. NAVIS’s solution is more about recovering lost traffic, whereas ReGuest excels at nurturing and upselling once a guest shows interest. Which approach aligns better with your current priorities?
NAVIS and ReGuest serve distinct functions in your direct booking strategy. NAVIS tackles the high abandonment rates, which hover around 80% in hospitality, by turning lost booking engine visitors into actionable leads that your team can follow up on. ReGuest, on the other hand, excels at managing ongoing guest relationships, automating personalized offers, and increasing direct bookings through targeted communication.
NAVIS is designed for hotels with high website traffic and a focus on converting visitors who abandon their carts. ReGuest appeals to hotels that want to deepen engagement and upsell during the entire guest lifecycle. Do you need to recover abandoned bookings or nurture existing leads and guests?
If your hotel’s primary challenge is high booking engine abandonment, NAVIS’s specialized abandonment solution is the better choice. It’s suited for hotels that generate significant web traffic but struggle to convert it into reservations, especially if you want to leverage your existing traffic more effectively.
Conversely, if your team is focused on elevating guest communication, personalized offers, and increasing revenue per guest, ReGuest is the better fit. It’s ideal for properties aiming to streamline sales and marketing at every stage of the guest journey, with a proven ability to boost direct bookings through automation and targeted messaging.
In essence, choose NAVIS if your goal is lead recovery from website visitors. Opt for ReGuest if you want to proactively engage and upsell your current and future guests.
ReGuest outperforms NAVIS in user experience, with a 4.8/5 ease-of-use rating and a recent 4.84/5 onboarding score—hotels praise its intuitive interface and quick setup. Many reviews highlight how new staff can easily learn ReGuest, and its automation features reduce training time.
NAVIS scores a 0/5 for ease of use, reflecting its complex, enterprise-level design. Its implementation often requires technical support and extensive setup, which can be a barrier for smaller teams or hotels seeking rapid deployment.
Edge: ReGuest.
ReGuest offers a broader set of features (4 unique features like Live Chat, Messaging Analytics, Booking Data Sync, and Form Autofill) designed to enhance guest interaction and sales automation. Its strengths lie in personalized offers, real-time messaging, and seamless communication channels.
NAVIS provides the Surge Alerts feature, which helps identify booking trends and potential issues, but it has fewer unique features overall. While its focus is on abandoned cart recovery, it lacks the extensive guest engagement tools found in ReGuest.
Edge: ReGuest.
ReGuest’s support and onboarding are highly rated at 4.84/5, with reviews highlighting quick, helpful responses—hoteliers describe their support team as “very professional and responsive.” This consistency translates into smoother adoption and ongoing assistance.
NAVIS’s support ratings are not available, and with no recent reviews, confidence in its support quality is lower. Given the importance of reliable support for complex integrations, ReGuest’s strong support makes it the safer choice.
Edge: ReGuest.
ReGuest has a slight edge with 20 verified integrations, including key partners like Stayntouch, Oracle Hospitality, and Mews, as well as unique integrations with FlexiPass Keyless Mobile Access and others. This flexibility allows you to connect with multiple systems and streamline operations.
NAVIS has 17 verified partners, sharing some with ReGuest but lacking several of the newer or niche integrations that ReGuest offers. For hotels seeking broader connectivity options, ReGuest is preferable.
Edge: ReGuest.
ReGuest has a significantly higher review count (44 reviews) with an impressive 9.61/10 NPS score, signaling strong guest satisfaction across various hotel segments. Hotels, especially those in resorts and boutique sectors, consistently praise its ease of use, support, and sales impact.
NAVIS has no recent reviews or scores, making it difficult to gauge hotel satisfaction. Given the recent feedback and high ratings for ReGuest, it’s clear that hoteliers find more value in ReGuest.
Edge: ReGuest.
NAVIS does not publicly disclose its pricing, which suggests a customized quote based on your property’s size and needs. ReGuest’s straightforward base price is $900 per month, with no additional implementation or setup fees.
This transparency makes ReGuest easier to evaluate financially, especially for mid-sized hotels. Be aware that NAVIS’s pricing is likely higher and tailored, potentially making ReGuest more accessible for smaller properties.
Not ideal if your hotel prioritizes ongoing guest engagement or personalization beyond the booking phase.
Not ideal if your hotel’s focus is on recovering abandoned carts or website lead capture only.
NAVIS and ReGuest target different stages of the booking and guest lifecycle. NAVIS excels in converting lost booking engine traffic into leads but lacks the extensive engagement features ReGuest offers.
Choose NAVIS if your hotel needs to recover abandoned bookings and has high website traffic. Opt for ReGuest if your goal is to deepen guest relationships, automate personalized offers, and increase overall direct bookings.
For properties prioritizing guest engagement, revenue growth, and support, ReGuest’s higher reviews, broader features, and recent updates make it the stronger choice. However, if cart abandonment is your core issue, NAVIS’s targeted approach might be better suited—though it’s less proven in recent reviews.
In conclusion, for most hotels seeking a reliable, highly-rated, and versatile CRM with ongoing support, ReGuest is the recommended option.
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
自从集成 Re:Guest 以来,许多用户都注意到销售和运营效率显著提高。以前手动完成的任务被自动化,让员工有时间专注于其他重要领域,从而促进更高效的工作流程。
Re:Guest 专业可靠的支持团队经常因其对任何问题或疑问的快速和有用的响应而受到称赞,这对整体用户满意度做出了巨大贡献。
Re:Guest 增强了优惠的专业外观,使其对客人更具吸引力。该工具允许轻松快速地创建优惠,并可根据个人客人进行定制,从而提高转化率并增加收入。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然 Re:Guest 总体上受到好评,但用户也注意到了一些技术和功能问题,尤其是访客聊天功能以及需要更强大的个性化选项。支持团队会迅速解决这些问题,但这些问题... 虽然 Re:Guest 总体上受到好评,但用户也注意到了一些技术和功能问题,尤其是访客聊天功能以及需要更强大的个性化选项。支持团队会迅速解决这些问题,但这些问题偶尔仍会造成不便。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。NAVIS Shopping Cart Abanonment Solution 和 ReGuest 共享许多核心 Direct Booking Tools 功能,但各有独特的能力。NAVIS Shopping Cart Abanonment Solution 提供 17 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 ReGuest 提供 20 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。ReGuest 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
NAVIS Shopping Cart Abanonment Solution:否。ReGuest:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Direct Booking Tools 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。NAVIS 的 HT Score 为 0,Reguest 的为 80。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问