The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 172 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Exely 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (0.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Mobile optimized/responsive and Post-stay emails.
OHRS (Web CRS) 表现出色 .
基于 HTR 上 172 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $200/mo | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 172 | 0 |
在分析了 172 条经验证的评价后,Exely 用户最看重其 支持与响应, 预订引擎效率, 直接预订增强,而 OHRS (Web CRS) 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
OHRS (Web CRS)
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
支持与响应
▾
|
|
|
+
预订引擎效率
▾
|
|
|
+
直接预订增强
▾
|
|
|
+
通道管理器同步
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
定制化和灵活性
▾
|
|
|
−
集成和高级功能
▾
|
|
|
−
宾客体验问题
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 预订引擎 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
OHRS (Web CRS)
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #15 34 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #11 64 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #22 5 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #8 6 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
OHRS (Web CRS)
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #15 35 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #15 28 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #16 17 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #16 9 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
OHRS (Web CRS)
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | #24 2 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #25 11 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 ▾ | #4 79 条评价 | — |
| 中东 ▾ | #2 17 条评价 | — |
Choosing the right booking engine is critical for your hotel’s success. Exely Booking Engine by Exely is a feature-rich, highly-rated solution with over 144 reviews and recent positive feedback. OHRS (Web CRS) by OHRS, on the other hand, has no reviews or recent data, making it nearly impossible to evaluate effectively. Given the data, it’s clear that Exely’s extensive review base positions it as the stronger, more reliable option for hoteliers today. Are you prepared to trust a proven leader?
Exely offers a comprehensive booking engine with a high HTR score (92.67) and over 144 reviews, all recent within the last six months—this recent feedback confirms its current relevance. OHRS, lacking any reviews or user feedback, provides no tangible insights into its performance or customer satisfaction. While OHRS claims to be a simple reservation system, the absence of review data makes it hard to validate its claims. Do you want to base your decision on real user experiences or unverified claims?
If your hotel needs a feature-rich, scalable booking engine that integrates multiple marketing tools and supports various property types, go with Exely. Its user ratings reflect high satisfaction, with 98% of users recommending it, and its diverse functionalities—like multi-lingual support, multi-currency, and automated emails—are tailored for independent hoteliers and chains seeking direct bookings.
If, however, your hotel only requires a straightforward reservation system with minimal features, and you’re comfortable with unverified claims, OHRS might seem appealing. But without reviews or recent user feedback, it’s uncertain whether it delivers on its promises or offers the same level of reliability. Given the available data, Exely’s proven track record makes it the safer choice.
Exely’s impressive ease-of-use rating (4.91/5) stems from a user-friendly interface, simple onboarding, and positive staff feedback. Its intuitive dashboard enables your team to manage rates, availability, and reservations efficiently, reducing training time and errors—an essential factor for busy hotel teams.
OHRS offers a basic reservation system described as simple and user-friendly, but with no reviews or ratings, it’s impossible to gauge actual user satisfaction or onboarding experience. Based on available data, Exely’s ease of use is clearly superior. Edge: Exely.
Exely’s platform includes 29 unique features such as mobile responsiveness, multi-room bookings, multi-lingual support, conversion reports, booking abandonment recapture, and advanced payment integrations like PayPal, Stripe, and Google Hotel Ads. These features are specifically designed to increase direct bookings and improve operational flexibility.
OHRS, with no features listed or reviewed, provides only basic reservation capabilities, offering no insights into advanced functionalities or customization options. For hoteliers seeking a feature-rich platform that can adapt to complex needs, Exely’s comprehensive suite is unmatched. Edge: Exely.
Exely’s customer support stands out with a near-perfect rating of 4.96/5, and reviews emphasize its responsiveness, friendly communication, and proactive problem-solving approach. Customers consistently praise the support team for quick responses and clear explanations, which significantly enhances their experience.
OHRS provides no review data or support ratings, making it impossible to assess its customer service quality. Without user feedback, you risk choosing a system with uncertain support standards. Given the data, Exely clearly leads in support quality. Edge: Exely.
Exely offers integrations with eight verified partners, including Hotellab, Oracle Hospitality, Mews, and Booking.com, providing your hotel with connectivity to major distribution channels and property management systems. These integrations help streamline operations and improve revenue management.
OHRS, with zero verified integrations reported, limits your hotel’s connectivity options, potentially requiring manual processes or additional systems. For hotels aiming for seamless operation and channel management, Exely’s broader integration ecosystem is a decisive advantage. Edge: Exely.
Exely’s reviews, from a diverse range of property types, consistently reflect high satisfaction, with an average rating of 92.67 on the HTR Score and 98% likelihood to recommend. Recent reviews praise its user-friendly interface, robust features, and excellent support, confirming ongoing performance.
OHRS has no reviews or recent feedback, making it impossible for hoteliers to rate or recommend it. Without recent user experiences, Exely’s high ratings and reviews establish it as the preferred option. Edge: Exely.
Exely’s pricing starts at a straightforward $200 monthly fee, with no additional implementation or setup costs, making its pricing transparent. There is no mention of a trial period, but the flat fee provides predictability.
OHRS does not disclose pricing details, leaving potential buyers uncertain about costs. This lack of transparency can hinder decision-making, especially when compared to Exely’s clear, accessible pricing structure. Given the transparent pricing and known value, Exely offers better cost predictability.
Not ideal if your hotel:
Edge: Exely.
Not ideal if your hotel:
Given the lack of reviews and features, OHRS might suit very basic needs but is risky for hotels seeking reliability and growth.
Edge: Exely.
Exely is a comprehensive booking engine with a proven track record, extensive features, and high customer satisfaction. Its 144 reviews and recent positive feedback make it a trusted choice for hotels seeking to maximize direct bookings and operational efficiency.
OHRS offers a simple reservation system, but with no reviews, recent feedback, or verifiable features, it’s a gamble. Hotels that want a reliable, well-supported, feature-rich platform should confidently choose Exely.
For hotels needing a dependable, proven solution with significant capabilities and positive user feedback, Exely is the clear winner. If your priorities include seamless integration, marketing tools, and support, Exely’s data-backed reputation makes it the best choice. Conversely, if your needs are minimal, and you’re willing to risk unverified quality, OHRS may suffice—but at your hotel's peril.
In conclusion, your hotel’s operational success and guest experience hinge on selecting a system that’s been tested and trusted by peers. Based on current data, Exely Booking Engine stands out as the superior option for most hotels today.
预订引擎 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
OHRS (Web CRS)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $200/mo | — |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Exely Booking Engine 和 OHRS (Web CRS) 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
OHRS (Web CRS)
|
|---|---|---|
| 多房间和多费率计划预订 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 房间替换 | ||
| 灵活日期 | ||
| 移动优化/响应式 | ||
| 转化率报告 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 17 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 2 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"We took a proactive approach and collaborated with Exely, implementing various strategies, such as a loyalty program. The outcome has been outstanding — not only have we been able..."
OHRS (Web CRS)
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Once we switched to Exely, we immediately noticed a significant increase in reservations from online travel agencies. We discovered that our previous system had blocked some availa..."
OHRS (Web CRS)
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Exely 的支持团队以其快速响应和以解决方案为导向的服务而备受赞誉,从而显著提升了用户体验。这被视为该产品的一大优势。
Exely的预订引擎因其用户友好性、运行速度快以及显著提升直接预订量的能力而备受赞誉,从而有助于收入增长。它被认为对提升宾客体验和转化率具有强大的积极影响... Exely的预订引擎因其用户友好性、运行速度快以及显著提升直接预订量的能力而备受赞誉,从而有助于收入增长。它被认为对提升宾客体验和转化率具有强大的积极影响。
该软件因增加直接预订量并降低对在线旅行社 (OTA) 的依赖而备受赞誉。这通过降低第三方费用和高效的预订管理带来投资回报,从而对酒店收入产生积极影响。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户反复反映的一个关键问题是自定义选项有限,尤其是在报表和网站设计方面。用户希望能够更灵活地调整模板和报表,以满足自身需求。
用户希望看到与其他酒店管理系统的集成能力得到提升。目前的集成限制被视为一个缺点,制约了平台全部潜力的发挥。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Exely Booking Engine 和 OHRS (Web CRS) 共享许多核心 Booking Engine 功能,但各有独特的能力。Exely Booking Engine 提供 8 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 OHRS (Web CRS) 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Exely Booking Engine 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Exely Booking Engine:否。OHRS (Web CRS):否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Booking Engine 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Exely 的 HT Score 为 93,OHRS (Web CRS) 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问