SHR Booking Engine (BE) vs. Exely Booking Engine: 哪个更适合您?

更新于 September 28, 2026  ·  已分析 786 条经验证的评价

摘要

我们分析了 786 条经验证的酒店经营者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的酒店类型和优先事项:

SHR Group 表现出色 在 主动客户支持 方面 — 尤其适合 Boutique Hotels 类型的住宿设施 (5.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Urgency messaging.

Exely 表现出色 在 支持响应速度和账户指导 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的住宿设施 (0.0/5) .

查看下方完整分析 ↓

SHR Booking Engine (BE) 与 Exely Booking Engine 相比如何?

基于 HTR 上 786 条经验证的酒店经营者评价的并排评分。

HTScore
33
97
推荐可能性
96%
98%
易用性
4.7/5
4.9/5
客户支持
4.9/5
5.0/5
性价比
4.6/5
4.9/5
起始价格 联系销售 起价 $200/月
经验证的评价 512 274

SHR Booking Engine (BE) 与 Exely Booking Engine 的优缺点是什么?

在分析了 786 条经验证的评价后,SHR Group 用户最看重其 主动客户支持, 集成功能, 直观的界面,而 Exely 用户则强调 支持响应速度和账户指导, 速度、稳定性与日常运营的便捷性, 预订引擎的易用性与客人转化。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。

SHR Group SHR Group Exely Exely
优点
+ 主动客户支持 ▾
+ 支持响应速度和账户指导 ▾
+ 集成功能 ▾
+ 速度、稳定性与日常运营的便捷性 ▾
+ 直观的界面 ▾
+ 预订引擎的易用性与客人转化 ▾
+ 费率和库存管理 ▾
+ 直接预订与收入增长 ▾
缺点
− 后端导航改进 ▾
− 报告与分析深度 ▾
− 视觉与美学设计 ▾
− 设计、品牌和定制限制 ▾
− 支持文档和培训 ▾
− 集成与PMS连接 ▾

SHR Group 对比 Exely:按酒店细分市场排名

各产品在不同酒店规模、类型和区域的 预订引擎 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店经营者的经验证评价。

按酒店规模

细分市场 SHR Group SHR Group Exely Exely
小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ #8 76 条评价 #15 34 条评价
中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ #2 369 条评价 #11 64 条评价
大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ #4 39 条评价 #22 5 条评价
超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ #5 16 条评价 #8 6 条评价

按酒店类型

细分市场 SHR Group SHR Group Exely Exely
精品酒店 ▾ #3 232 条评价 #15 35 条评价
豪华酒店 ▾ #2 320 条评价 #15 28 条评价
品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ #2 166 条评价 #16 17 条评价
长住酒店 ▾ #4 32 条评价 #16 9 条评价

按区域

细分市场 SHR Group SHR Group Exely Exely
北美 ▾ #8 39 条评价 #24 2 条评价
欧洲 ▾ #2 440 条评价 #25 11 条评价
亚太 ▾ #15 11 条评价 #4 79 条评价
中东 ▾ #16 3 条评价 #2 17 条评价

The Decision

Choosing between SHR Booking Engine (BE) by SHR Group and Exely Booking Engine depends on your hotel's specific needs, existing systems, and growth goals. Both products aim to boost direct bookings, but they approach this goal differently, with SHR BE focusing on advanced features and extensive integrations, while Exely emphasizes simplicity and guest experience. Your decision hinges on whether your team values a feature-rich platform with broad connectivity or a straightforward, user-friendly system designed for quick wins.

While SHR Group’s product has a long-standing presence in the industry and boasts a larger review base, Exely’s newer platform has garnered more recent positive feedback and higher satisfaction ratings. Are you ready to prioritize extensive features and integrations or seek a more nimble, guest-centric booking solution?

Quick Verdict: SHR Booking Engine or Exely Booking Engine — Which Is the Clearer Choice?

Based on the most recent reviews and overall ratings, Exely Booking Engine stands out as the more proven and highly rated product, with 92.7 HTScore and 98% likelihood to recommend, supported by 63 reviews in the last six months. SHR BE, despite its high overall rating, has not received any recent reviews and has a lower HTScore of 46.5, indicating less current user satisfaction.

If your hotel requires a deeply integrated, feature-rich platform with broad partner connections, SHR BE might be appealing. If you prioritize ease of use, rapid setup, and strong guest engagement tools, Exely is the more compelling choice.

Is SHR Booking Engine or Exely Booking Engine Better for Hotels?

SHR BE is designed for hotels seeking comprehensive control over their booking and revenue management, offering 46 features—including loyalty programs, social media integrations, and advanced testing tools. Its extensive integrations (81 verified partners) support complex operations, making it ideal for larger or more sophisticated properties.

In contrast, Exely’s strength lies in simplicity and direct impact. With 29 shared features and a streamlined interface, it’s best suited for independent hotels or small chains looking to improve direct bookings quickly without the overhead of extensive customization. Do you need a feature-heavy platform or a straightforward, guest-friendly system?

Is SHR Booking Engine or Exely Booking Engine Easier to Use?

SHR BE scores 4.67/5 for ease of use, with many reviews praising its intuitive interface and straightforward management once familiarized. However, some users have noted that backend navigation and report generation can be complex, especially for new staff.

Exely surpasses with a 4.91/5 rating for ease of use, with recent reviews highlighting its simple dashboard, fast operation, and minimal learning curve. Users find it quicker to implement and start generating direct bookings, especially for smaller teams or less tech-savvy staff.

Edge: Exely

Which Has Better Features: SHR Booking Engine or Exely Booking Engine?

SHR BE offers 46 unique features, including A/B testing, urgency messaging, pooled inventory, gift vouchers, ADA compliance, and detailed analytics—capabilities that are absent in Exely. Its features support complex rate management, personalized marketing, and multi-channel engagement.

Exely’s 29 shared features include standard booking tools, upselling, and fast channel management, but it lacks many of SHR’s advanced functionalities. If your hotel needs sophisticated revenue management and marketing tools, SHR BE has the edge.

Edge: SHR Booking Engine

Which Has Better Customer Support: SHR Booking Engine or Exely Booking Engine?

SHR Group’s customer support scores 4.86/5, with reviews emphasizing their proactive, knowledgeable support team, and effective onboarding. The long-standing presence and proven track record suggest reliability, especially for larger or complex properties.

Exely’s support is rated 4.96/5, with recent reviews praising their responsiveness, friendly communication, and quick problem resolution. Given the more recent review activity, Exely’s customer support appears slightly more responsive and aligned with current user needs.

Edge: Exely

Which Has More Integrations: SHR Booking Engine or Exely Booking Engine?

SHR BE boasts 81 verified partners, including major systems like Oracle Hospitality, Mews, and Profitroom, enabling extensive connectivity. Its broad integration network supports complex workflows and diverse tech stacks.

Exely has only 8 verified partners, with common integrations including channel managers and PMSs but fewer options overall. For hotels with existing complex systems or seeking future scalability, SHR BE’s extensive integrations are a significant advantage.

Edge: SHR Booking Engine

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: SHR Booking Engine or Exely Booking Engine?

SHR Group’s product has a 4.86/5 overall rating based on 339 reviews, with a 96% likelihood to recommend. Its reviews often emphasize strong revenue features, reliable support, and good integration, especially among larger hotels and resorts.

Exely, with a 92.7 HTScore and 98% recommendation rate based on 144 reviews, garners praise for its user-friendliness and recent positive feedback. Smaller hotels and independent properties tend to rate it higher for ease of implementation and guest experience.

Given the higher overall ratings and recent reviews, Exely is the stronger-rated platform currently.

Edge: Exely

How Much Do SHR Booking Engine and Exely Booking Engine Cost?

SHR BE’s pricing details are not publicly available, but historically, it has been offered as part of broader digital packages or customized solutions, often requiring a quote.

Exely charges $200/month with no mention of setup fees or additional costs, making it transparent and straightforward. Budget-conscious hotels may appreciate Exely’s clear pricing, while larger properties may need custom quotes from SHR.

What Type of Hotel Should Use SHR Booking Engine?

  • Hotels that operate at a larger scale, needing extensive integrations with PMS, channel managers, and marketing tools.
  • Properties with complex revenue management needs requiring features like dynamic pricing, loyalty programs, or ADA compliance.
  • Chains or resorts managing multiple properties across different regions, benefiting from pooled inventory and advanced reporting.
  • Teams that want total control over guest messaging, upselling, and targeted campaigns.

Not ideal if your hotel is small, has limited staff, or prefers a simple booking setup without extensive customization.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Exely Booking Engine?

  • Independent hotels or boutique properties seeking quick setup and immediate boost in direct bookings.
  • Hotels prioritizing guests' digital experience with intuitive booking flows and mobile responsiveness.
  • Small to medium-sized properties with limited technical resources, preferring a straightforward platform.
  • Hotels that want reliable customer support and transparent pricing without complex integrations.

Not ideal if your hotel requires advanced features like loyalty programs, sophisticated revenue management, or broad third-party integrations.

SHR Booking Engine vs Exely Booking Engine: The Bottom Line for Hotels

The core difference lies in their scope: SHR BE offers a comprehensive, feature-rich environment with extensive integrations, suited for larger or more complex operations. Exely delivers a simple, guest-focused experience with a quick-to-implement setup and high satisfaction among smaller hotels.

If your hotel needs a scalable, highly customizable platform with advanced marketing and management tools, SHR BE is the clear choice. For hotels looking for ease, speed, and a focus on direct bookings with excellent recent reviews, Exely is the better option.

Choose SHR if you require robust features, broad integrations, and long-term scalability. Opt for Exely if you prioritize quick deployment, straightforward user experience, and recent high satisfaction ratings to drive immediate results.

SHR Booking Engine (BE) 和 Exely Booking Engine 的价格是多少?

预订引擎 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的酒店规模申请定制报价。

SHR Group SHR Group Exely Exely
起始价格 — 起价 $200/月

功能对比:SHR Booking Engine (BE) 与 Exely Booking Engine

这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。

功能 SHR Group SHR Group Exely Exely
▾ 商品和包装
100%
78%
房间替换
多房间和多费率计划预订
固定费率、浮动费率和折扣率
合并库存
特别优惠和折扣
可定制的附加组件
膳食计划
网站整合
社交媒体整合/预订
▾ 追加销售和交叉销售
100%
67%
多房间和多费率计划预订
房间替换
礼品卡
预订放弃重新获得
可定制的附加组件
特别优惠和折扣
膳食计划
替代住宿建议(没有空房时)
忠诚度计划整合
▾ 转换
100%
65%
移动优化/响应式
特别优惠和折扣
紧急信息
预订放弃重新获得
多房间和多费率计划预订
房间替换
人工智能优化
价格对比
多种语言
转化率报告
Facebook 转化跟踪
可定制的退出意图模式
表单自动填充
灵活日期
费率计划比较
Google 酒店广告预订
Tripadvisor 预订
▾ 支付
100%
72%
多币种
苹果支付
Google Pay
贝宝
PCI合规性
PayU
条纹
▾ 通知
100%
100%
预订放弃重新获得
入住后电子邮件
入住前电子邮件
确认电子邮件
▾ 团体预订
100%
0%
婚礼和企业预订模块
可用性块
▾ 报告与分析
100%
75%
自动报告
转化率报告
推荐报告
Google Analytics 跟踪
▾ 税务合规
100%
80%
PCI合规性
符合 ADA 标准
关税
多币种
符合 GDPR 规定

实际成果:SHR Group 对比 Exely(按业务目标)

我们分析了 7 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。

增加收入和降低成本
SHR Group Windward Management 中型
+ The paid campaigns accounted for 26% of all traffic to the website
+ Google Search Ads showed a return on investment of 131 :1
+ Metasearch return on investment was 58:1

"Our results and KPIs from booking engine to digital reinforce the effectiveness of our partnership and SHR Group's exceptional technology."

Stephen Williams
Stephen Williams
Group Sales and Marketing Director
Exely MetroStar Hotel Kuala Lumpur 大型
+ +72% Direct Bookings
+ � Reservations surged after activating the Booking Engine and Loyalty Program.
+ +20% Website Revenue

"We took a proactive approach and collaborated with Exely, implementing various strategies, such as a loyalty program. The outcome has been outstanding — not only have we been able..."

Vasanth Kumar
Vasanth Kumar
Front Office Manager
提高运营效率
SHR Group SHR Group

该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。

Exely Boulevard Batumi Hotel & Bellevue Residence 中型
+ 15% of total online bookings now come from the hotel
+ �s own website.
+ Availability and pricing are now consistently synced across all OTA channels.

"Once we switched to Exely, we immediately noticed a significant increase in reservations from online travel agencies. We discovered that our previous system had blocked some availa..."

N
Nino Motskobili
Head of Data Operations

SHR Group 对比 Exely:总结

SHR Group
SHR Group
4.8/5 来自 512 条评价

酒店经营者喜爱的方面

主动客户支持 97% 正面

用户经常称赞 SHR 积极主动且反应迅速的客户支持。客户经理和支持团队被认为非常乐于助人、知识渊博,并且能够快速响应问题。客户成功团队提供的指导对于优化软... 用户经常称赞 SHR 积极主动且反应迅速的客户支持。客户经理和支持团队被认为非常乐于助人、知识渊博,并且能够快速响应问题。客户成功团队提供的指导对于优化软件的使用非常有价值。30 篇评论涵盖了此主题。

集成功能 71% 正面

经常被强调的一个关键特性是平台强大的集成能力。Windsurfer CRS 可以高效地与各种 PMS、渠道经理和 CRM 工具进行通信,确保跨系统的无缝操作和最新信息。但是,... 经常被强调的一个关键特性是平台强大的集成能力。Windsurfer CRS 可以高效地与各种 PMS、渠道经理和 CRM 工具进行通信,确保跨系统的无缝操作和最新信息。但是,一些用户希望改进与其他系统和平台的集成。此主题出现在 18 篇评论中。

直观的界面 88% 正面

用户对 Windsurfer CRS 的直观界面表示赞赏,它使客人的预订流程变得顺畅,酒店员工的管理也变得轻松。轻松设置和管理房价计划、灵活地自定义预订页面以及简单的... 用户对 Windsurfer CRS 的直观界面表示赞赏,它使客人的预订流程变得顺畅,酒店员工的管理也变得轻松。轻松设置和管理房价计划、灵活地自定义预订页面以及简单的导航有助于提高整体效率。此主题在 20 条评论中被提及。

酒店经营者提出异议的方面

后端导航改进 56% 负面

一些用户指出,虽然前端很人性化,但后端导航和过滤选项可以更加直观和人性化。这些方面的改进可以显著提高效率和用户满意度。此主题在 12 条评论中被提及。

视觉与美学设计 50% 负面

一些用户建议可以改进预订引擎的视觉美感。增强用户界面的精致和现代设计可以进一步提升整体预订体验,并使其更具视觉吸引力。6 篇评论讨论了此主题。

排名更高的方面

大型(75-199 间客房) #4 vs #22
中型(25-74 间客房) #2 vs #11
小型(10-24 间客房) #8 vs #15
超大型(200+ 间客房) #5 vs #8

独特功能

人工智能优化 紧急信息 特别优惠和折扣 礼品券和预付体验 婚礼和企业预订模块
4.7/5 易用性 4.9/5 客户支持 80 个集成
访问官网
Exely
Exely
4.9/5 来自 274 条评价

酒店经营者喜爱的方面

支持响应速度和账户指导 95% 正面

许多评价赞扬Exely的支持团队、客户成功团队和账户经理,因其快速回复、清晰指导以及在设置和日常运营中的主动帮助。多家酒店表示,这种响应速度减少了停机时间... 许多评价赞扬Exely的支持团队、客户成功团队和账户经理,因其快速回复、清晰指导以及在设置和日常运营中的主动帮助。多家酒店表示,这种响应速度减少了停机时间,加快了部署速度,并使平台更易于采用和操作。

速度、稳定性与日常运营的便捷性 90% 正面

用户经常提到,Exely通过集中管理预订、价格、房态和客人信息,简化了日常酒店工作。他们也很看重平台的速度和稳定性,尽管少数评论提到在高峰期加载缓慢或偶尔... 用户经常提到,Exely通过集中管理预订、价格、房态和客人信息,简化了日常酒店工作。他们也很看重平台的速度和稳定性,尽管少数评论提到在高峰期加载缓慢或偶尔出现预订流程问题。

预订引擎的易用性与客人转化 87% 正面

预订引擎一直被描述为易于客人使用、响应迅速、移动端友好,并且能有效将网站访客转化为预订。评测者将其简洁的流程、部件和灵活的预订选项与更高的转化率和更好... 预订引擎一直被描述为易于客人使用、响应迅速、移动端友好,并且能有效将网站访客转化为预订。评测者将其简洁的流程、部件和灵活的预订选项与更高的转化率和更好的客人预订体验联系在一起。

酒店经营者提出异议的方面

报告与分析深度 63% 负面

用户反复提出的主要需求之一是更详细、可定制的报告和分析。用户希望深入了解预订趋势、转化率、收入来源、渠道表现、预订动态、入住率变化以及仪表盘的灵活性,... 用户反复提出的主要需求之一是更详细、可定制的报告和分析。用户希望深入了解预订趋势、转化率、收入来源、渠道表现、预订动态、入住率变化以及仪表盘的灵活性,以便做出更好的商务和定价决策。

设计、品牌和定制限制 65% 负面

许多评论者希望对预订引擎和网站的外观与体验拥有更多控制权,包括颜色、模板、部件、确认邮件、发票和报表布局。Exely 以简洁的设计受到好评,但买家应注意到对... 许多评论者希望对预订引擎和网站的外观与体验拥有更多控制权,包括颜色、模板、部件、确认邮件、发票和报表布局。Exely 以简洁的设计受到好评,但买家应注意到对更深层次品牌定制和更现代、独特网站风格的反复需求。

排名更高的方面

超小型(少于 10 间客房) #21 vs #25
PH #3 vs #10
TR #4 vs #7
亚太 #4 vs #15
4.9/5 易用性 5.0/5 客户支持 9 个集成
查看资料

评分差异最大的方面

综合评分 SHR Group 4.9 vs 0.0 (+4.9)

关于 SHR Booking Engine (BE) 与 Exely Booking Engine 的常见问题

SHR Booking Engine (BE) 能否替代 Exely Booking Engine?

这取决于您的需求。SHR Booking Engine (BE) 和 Exely Booking Engine 共享许多核心 Booking Engine 功能,但各有独特的能力。SHR Booking Engine (BE) 提供 80 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Exely Booking Engine 提供 9 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。

哪个更适合小型或独立酒店?

小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速上手。Exely Booking Engine 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 4.7/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按酒店规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。

SHR Booking Engine (BE) 或 Exely Booking Engine 是否提供免费方案?

SHR Booking Engine (BE):否。Exely Booking Engine:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Booking Engine 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。

HTR 如何评估和排名 SHR Booking Engine (BE) 和 Exely Booking Engine?

HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店经营者客观比较酒店科技产品。SHR Group 的 HT Score 为 33,Exely 的为 97。以下是评分的计算方式。

标准组 权重 衡量内容
客户评分与评价

用户对该产品的推荐度如何?

评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾

权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。

合作伙伴生态系统

技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何?

合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾

评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。

以客户为中心

该组织以客户为中心的程度如何?

认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾

评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。

覆盖范围、持久力与资源

该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛?

地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾

衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。

客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →

获取您的免费人工智能分析师报告

根据您酒店的情况量身定制的推荐

Ghostel icon
受到以下企业信赖
footer image 1 footer image 2 footer image 3 footer image 4 footer image 5 footer image 6 footer image 7

让我们查找您的酒店信息