The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 预订引擎 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #29 8 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #22 18 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #14 9 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #10 6 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #24 15 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #23 15 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #18 13 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | — | #19 4 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | — | #18 4 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #20 12 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | — | #10 14 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #14 3 条评价 |
Choosing between Olive Booking Engine and Roiback can significantly impact your hotel’s direct booking performance. Both products aim to boost direct sales, but they approach this goal differently. Olive emphasizes AI-driven personalization and embedded e-commerce, while Roiback leans on its extensive integrations, comprehensive features, and global presence. Your decision hinges on your hotel’s specific needs—whether you prioritize guest experience innovations or robust technical integrations.
Olive’s lack of recent reviews and a zero-star rating contrast sharply with Roiback’s active, highly-rated profile. Roiback’s 43 reviews, with five in the last six months, support more current, reliable insights. Are you prepared to rely on a product with no recent feedback, or do you want a platform with proven recent success?
Olive aims to revolutionize the guest experience through embedded e-commerce and AI-powered personalization. Its key features include smart merchandising, real-time guest communications, and AI-driven customization, making it a notable choice for hotels focused on innovative guest engagement.
Roiback, on the other hand, emphasizes increasing direct bookings through its flexible, feature-rich platform with native integrations and extensive partner network. It offers tools like multi-room bookings, multi-lingual support, and detailed analytics, tailored for hotels seeking operational efficiency and better data insights.
Your hotel’s priorities will determine the better fit. If you want a guest-centric experience driven by AI and personalization, Olive might seem promising—though its lack of recent reviews weakens confidence. For hotels that need proven, scalable booking solutions with broad integrations, Roiback’s extensive recent reviews and active community make it the safer, more reliable choice.
If your hotel targets international guests, needs multi-lingual support, or relies heavily on integrations with channel managers and PMS, Roiback is the clear choice. Its 43 reviews, mostly recent, showcase a platform that’s trusted globally with a 4.72/5 customer support rating and a 90% likelihood to recommend.
If your team focuses on innovative guest experiences via AI-driven personalization, and you’re willing to accept the risk of limited recent feedback, Olive’s embedded e-commerce and unique features like wedding modules could appeal. However, with no recent reviews and a 0/5 overall rating, confidence in Olive’s current reliability is difficult to establish.
For most hotels seeking proven results, Roiback’s active, current user base makes it the more trustworthy option. Olive’s focus on AI is intriguing but less substantiated in recent user feedback.
Roiback’s UI enjoys a high user rating of 4.49/5, reflecting its intuitive interface and ease of navigation. Multiple reviews praise its straightforward onboarding process and staff support, with mentions of quick responses and effective assistance.
Olive, by contrast, has a 0/5 rating for ease of use, with no recent reviews or user feedback available. This lack of data suggests uncertainty about its current user-friendliness or onboarding experience.
Edge: Roiback.
Roiback offers 19 features exclusive to its platform, including multi-room bookings, multi-currency support, GDPR compliance, social media integration, and various email marketing tools. Its broad feature set caters to complex hotel needs and international markets.
Olive provides five unique features, such as A/B testing, ADA compliance, automated reporting, and wedding/corporate modules, focusing on guest personalization and niche marketing.
Roiback’s larger feature set and recent updates give it the edge, especially for hotels requiring extensive customization, multi-channel management, and international compatibility.
Edge: Roiback.
Roiback’s 4.72/5 support rating and recent reviews highlight a dedicated team known for responsiveness, expertise, and personalized consulting. Users frequently mention how their support helped optimize strategies and improve results, with some reviews describing the support team as “instrumental” in achieving business goals.
Olive’s support ratings are unavailable, and with no recent reviews, confidence in its customer service quality remains low.
Edge: Roiback.
Roiback boasts 27 verified partners, including major channel managers, PMS, and hotel tech providers like Oracle Hospitality, RoomRaccoon, and Triptease. Its extensive integrations facilitate seamless management of distribution channels and operational systems.
Olive, with only 2 verified partners—one of which is Stayntouch—offers limited connectivity compared to Roiback’s broad ecosystem.
Edge: Roiback.
Roiback’s recent reviews reflect a high satisfaction level, supported by its 4.72/5 customer support rating and 90% likelihood to recommend. Its diverse hotel user base, from luxury to boutique, indicates broad appeal and positive feedback across property types.
Olive, with no recent feedback or ratings, cannot be confidently rated by hotels. Its zero-star overall rating and absence of reviews suggest it’s not currently favored by users.
Edge: Roiback.
Olive offers no publicly disclosed pricing, no free trial, and no indication of a monthly fee, suggesting a custom or undisclosed pricing model. Its lack of transparency makes cost comparison impossible.
Roiback costs $500 per month with no free trial, providing a clear, predictable price point for hotels considering its platform. No additional implementation fees are mentioned.
In terms of transparency and clarity, Roiback’s pricing is straightforward and accessible.
Edge: Roiback.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Roiback and Olive serve different strategic needs—Roiback is a well-established, broad-reaching booking engine with extensive integrations and recent positive reviews, making it ideal for hotels aiming to maximize direct bookings reliably. Olive offers innovative AI-driven personalization and embedded features, but its lack of recent feedback diminishes confidence, especially for larger or international hotels.
Choose Roiback if your hotel values proven performance, comprehensive features, and active support. Opt for Olive if your team seeks to experiment with guest experience innovations and has the internal capacity to manage less proven platforms.
In conclusion, Roiback’s recent reviews and high ratings make it the safer, more reliable choice for most hotels today, especially those aiming for operational efficiency and proven results. Olive’s niche features are intriguing but less supported by current user feedback, limiting its appeal outside experimental or highly innovative hotel brands.
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Olive Booking Engine 和 Roiback | Booking Engine 共享 17 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Facebook 转化跟踪 | ||
| 人工智能优化 | ||
| 价格对比 | ||
| 可定制的退出意图模式 | ||
| 固定费率、浮动费率和折扣率 | ||
| 多房间和多费率计划预订 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 婚礼和企业预订模块 | ||
| 符合 ADA 标准 | ||
| 自动报告 | ||
| 表单自动填充 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 12 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 1 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Partnering with Roiback has been a game-changer, as their innovative solutions and close support by our Direct Channel Specialist have empowered Jasmine City Group to reach new h..."
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Roiback 的专业支持团队(包括客户经理和直接渠道专家)获得了高度赞誉。用户对他们的响应能力、专业知识和个性化咨询表示赞赏,这些都对实现业务目标起到了重要... Roiback 的专业支持团队(包括客户经理和直接渠道专家)获得了高度赞誉。用户对他们的响应能力、专业知识和个性化咨询表示赞赏,这些都对实现业务目标起到了重要作用。
Roiback 通过用户友好的预订引擎、创新的直销策略以及忠诚度计划和促销套餐等工具来提高直接预订量。酒店运营商报告称,在线销售量大幅增长,直接渠道可见度也有... Roiback 通过用户友好的预订引擎、创新的直销策略以及忠诚度计划和促销套餐等工具来提高直接预订量。酒店运营商报告称,在线销售量大幅增长,直接渠道可见度也有所提高。
关键反馈包括要求加快系统响应速度、减少重复和 404 错误等技术故障以及统一平台以简化流程。这些技术改进对于实现无缝用户体验至关重要。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
该平台的用户友好型和直观预订引擎受到好评,并提到其流畅的多语言支持和易用性。然而,一些用户要求改进默认语言设置和界面设计,以提供更好的用户体验。
虽然该平台支持多种支付网关,但用户建议需要扩展支付选项,特别是整合更多的本地和国际网关,以避免连接问题。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Olive Booking Engine 和 Roiback | Booking Engine 共享许多核心 Booking Engine 功能,但各有独特的能力。Olive Booking Engine 提供 2 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Roiback | Booking Engine 提供 27 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Roiback | Booking Engine 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.5/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Olive Booking Engine:否。Roiback | Booking Engine:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Booking Engine 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Olive 的 HT Score 为 0,ROIBACK 的为 72。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问