The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
在分析了 240 条经验证的评价后,Exely 用户最看重其 支持响应速度和账户管理, booking engine usability and guest conversion, 直接预订增长,而 p3 Hotels 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
支持响应速度和账户管理
▾
|
|
|
+
Booking engine usability and guest conversion
▾
|
|
|
+
直接预订增长
▾
|
|
|
+
定价、促销和追加销售工具
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
网站和预订设计定制
▾
|
|
|
−
Integrations and connectivity
▾
|
|
|
−
报告和分析的局限性
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 预订引擎 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #15 34 条评价 | #36 3 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #11 64 条评价 | #35 5 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #22 5 条评价 | #20 6 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #8 6 条评价 | #20 2 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #15 35 条评价 | #35 9 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #15 28 条评价 | #36 4 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #16 17 条评价 | #24 9 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #16 9 条评价 | #31 3 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | #24 2 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #25 11 条评价 | #17 14 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #4 79 条评价 | — |
| 中东 ▾ | #2 17 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Exely Booking Engine and p3 Booking Engine hinges on your hotel’s specific needs, operational focus, and growth ambitions. Both platforms aim to boost direct bookings and streamline reservations, but they diverge significantly in features, user experience, and market presence. Your decision should reflect which product aligns better with your hotel’s size, technology maturity, and plans for expansion.
While Exely boasts a larger review base, more recent feedback, and higher overall ratings, p3’s specialized features and flexible design appeal to hotels seeking tailored solutions. So, which booking engine is the better fit for your hotel?
Both platforms serve the core function of converting website visitors into direct bookers, but their approach and maturity differ. Exely, with a score of 92.7 and over 144 reviews—including 63 in the last six months—offers more recent, consistently positive feedback. It’s praised for ease of use, customer support, and its ability to increase direct bookings, making it a trusted choice for hoteliers seeking stability and proven results.
p3, on the other hand, has a smaller review count (16 reviews, no recent ones) and a lower overall rating of 4.67/5. Its reviews focus on user-friendliness and customization, but the lack of recent feedback limits confidence in its current performance and support. Do you want a platform backed by recent, large-scale user validation? Exely clearly has the edge.
If your hotel has a high volume of bookings, demands strong customer support, and values proven, recent feedback, go with Exely. Its extensive review base and recent reviews (63 in the past six months) validate its reliability, especially for independent properties or boutique hotels needing straightforward, effective tools.
If you need a highly customizable platform with advanced features like loyalty programs, corporate booking modules, or A/B testing, p3 might seem appealing. However, with a smaller, older review base and no recent feedback, its current market confidence is less certain. For most hoteliers prioritizing proven performance, Exely is the safer choice.
Exely scores 4.91/5 for ease of use, with reviewers highlighting its intuitive dashboard, straightforward management tools, and smooth reservation flow. Users commend its quick onboarding process, often praising how easily staff adopt its interface. Support responsiveness and interface clarity further bolster confidence among users.
p3 scores slightly lower at 4.5/5, with feedback emphasizing its user-friendly design and back-office efficiency. However, the smaller review count and absence of recent ratings suggest less current validation. Based on recent data and support feedback, Edge: Exely.
Exely offers a comprehensive set of features—29 in total—with no exclusive functionalities mentioned, but its core strength lies in usability and direct booking tools. p3, however, provides 15 unique features not found in Exely, including loyalty program integration, gift vouchers, wedding and corporate modules, urgency messaging, pooled inventory, and ADA compliance.
Both platforms share 29 functionalities, but p3’s added features for specialized marketing and guest engagement give it an edge for hotels seeking advanced customization. Edge: p3 Hotels.
Exely’s customer support is highly rated at 4.96/5, with reviews emphasizing rapid, friendly, and effective assistance. Users mention prompt responses and problem-solving that improve their experience, fostering strong ongoing relationships.
p3’s support scores 4.59/5, with reviews commending the team’s responsiveness and personal approach. However, the smaller and less recent review base limits confidence in its current support quality. Based on recent feedback and higher ratings, Edge: Exely.
Exely offers integrations with 8 verified partners, including major players like Hotellab, IDeaS, and Booking.com. p3, however, supports 13 verified partners, including Cendyn, Triptease, and Adyen, plus a broader range of specialized tools—like loyalty, social media, Google Analytics, and alternative booking options.
If your hotel relies on specific integrations, p3’s larger list may be advantageous. But in terms of proven, reliable partnerships, Exely’s focus on core systems and recent integration stability give it a slight edge.
Exely’s reviews are 63 in the past six months, with a 98% likelihood to recommend and a high NPS score of 9.73/10—indicating strong recent satisfaction. The hotel segments most positively reviewed include boutique, city center, and resort hotels, with consistent praise for booking effectiveness and support.
p3’s reviews are older, with no recent feedback, and a 94% recommendation rate. Its users tend to be larger properties, especially branded hotels, and praise its flexibility but lack recent validation of sustained satisfaction. Given recent reviews, Exely’s scores are more indicative of current performance.
Exely charges a flat base price of $200 per month with no implementation, setup, or per-room fees. p3’s pricing starts at $500 per month, also without additional implementation charges, reflecting its premium feature set.
While Exely offers a more affordable entry point, p3’s higher fee correlates with its advanced features and customization options. Your decision should consider whether you prioritize cost savings or more tailored functionalities.
Not ideal if your hotel requires highly specialized features like loyalty programs or corporate modules, which are limited or absent in Exely.
Not ideal if your hotel prefers a proven, extensively validated platform with recent reviews or has minimal need for advanced features.
The core difference lies in validation and feature focus. Exely stands out with its recent, large review base, high customer support ratings, and overall reliability, making it suitable for hotels prioritizing proven performance and straightforward management.
Choose Exely if you want a platform that’s easy to implement, highly rated, and backed by recent customer feedback—ideal for independent hotels, boutique properties, and those seeking stability. Its lower cost and strong support make it an attractive option for most property types looking to grow direct bookings.
p3, meanwhile, offers a highly customizable and feature-rich platform with unique modules that cater to hotels seeking tailored solutions. If your hotel needs extensive marketing tools, loyalty integration, and flexible design, and you’re comfortable with less recent validation, p3’s higher price and specialized features may justify your investment.
In summary, for most hoteliers aiming for a reliable, well-supported booking engine with recent validation, Exely is the safer, more proven choice. For hotels with complex needs and a focus on customization, p3 provides powerful options—though less recent user feedback warrants caution.
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
商品和包装
|
|
|
| 房间替换 | ||
| 多房间和多费率计划预订 | ||
| 固定费率、浮动费率和折扣率 | ||
| 合并库存 | ||
| 特别优惠和折扣 | ||
| 可定制的附加组件 | ||
| 膳食计划 | ||
| 网站整合 | ||
| 社交媒体整合/预订 | ||
|
▾
追加销售和交叉销售
|
|
|
| 多房间和多费率计划预订 | ||
| 房间替换 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 预订放弃重新获得 | ||
| 可定制的附加组件 | ||
| 特别优惠和折扣 | ||
| 膳食计划 | ||
| 替代住宿建议(没有空房时) | ||
| 忠诚度计划整合 | ||
|
▾
转换
|
|
|
| 移动优化/响应式 | ||
| 特别优惠和折扣 | ||
| 紧急信息 | ||
| 预订放弃重新获得 | ||
| 多房间和多费率计划预订 | ||
| 房间替换 | ||
| 人工智能优化 | ||
| 价格对比 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 转化率报告 | ||
| Facebook 转化跟踪 | ||
| 可定制的退出意图模式 | ||
| 表单自动填充 | ||
| 灵活日期 | ||
| 费率计划比较 | ||
| Google 酒店广告预订 | ||
| Tripadvisor 预订 | ||
|
▾
支付
|
|
|
| 多币种 | ||
| 苹果支付 | ||
| Google Pay | ||
| 贝宝 | ||
| PCI合规性 | ||
| PayU | ||
| 条纹 | ||
|
▾
通知
|
|
|
| 预订放弃重新获得 | ||
| 入住后电子邮件 | ||
| 入住前电子邮件 | ||
| 确认电子邮件 | ||
|
▾
团体预订
|
|
|
| 婚礼和企业预订模块 | ||
| 可用性块 | ||
|
▾
报告与分析
|
|
|
| 自动报告 | ||
| 转化率报告 | ||
| 推荐报告 | ||
| Google Analytics 跟踪 | ||
|
▾
税务合规
|
|
|
| PCI合规性 | ||
| 符合 ADA 标准 | ||
| 关税 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 符合 GDPR 规定 |
我们分析了 3 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"We took a proactive approach and collaborated with Exely, implementing various strategies, such as a loyalty program. The outcome has been outstanding — not only have we been able..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Once we switched to Exely, we immediately noticed a significant increase in reservations from online travel agencies. We discovered that our previous system had blocked some availa..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Exely 的支持团队和指定客户经理的响应速度和专业性是用户普遍称赞的方面。评论者表示,问题能够迅速解决,设置过程指导清晰,而且在客户导入和日常运营过程中,... Exely 的支持团队和指定客户经理的响应速度和专业性是用户普遍称赞的方面。评论者表示,问题能够迅速解决,设置过程指导清晰,而且在客户导入和日常运营过程中,供应商都积极主动、易于合作。
Reviewers consistently describe the booking engine as easy for guests to use, fast, and well structured. They say this simplicity improves completion... Reviewers consistently describe the booking engine as easy for guests to use, fast, and well structured. They say this simplicity improves completion rates, supports mobile booking, and makes it easier to turn website traffic into paid reservations.
许多评论者表示,Exely 可以增加直接预订量,并通过减少酒店对在线旅行社 (OTA) 的依赖,帮助酒店保留更多收入。用户认为,这得益于更流畅的网站预订流程、更高... 许多评论者表示,Exely 可以增加直接预订量,并通过减少酒店对在线旅行社 (OTA) 的依赖,帮助酒店保留更多收入。用户认为,这得益于更流畅的网站预订流程、更高的转化率,以及有助于收入增长和更好地管理客户关系的工具。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
许多评论者希望在预订引擎和网站方面拥有更大的灵活性,以便更好地契合他们的品牌形象。他们要求更好的色彩控制、更现代的模板、更丰富的组件自定义功能以及更少... 许多评论者希望在预订引擎和网站方面拥有更大的灵活性,以便更好地契合他们的品牌形象。他们要求更好的色彩控制、更现代的模板、更丰富的组件自定义功能以及更少的限制性设计选项,从而使他们的网站看起来独一无二,而不是千篇一律的模板。
A recurring request is broader and simpler integration with PMS, CRM, payment gateways, and regional distribution partners. Users generally see integr... A recurring request is broader and simpler integration with PMS, CRM, payment gateways, and regional distribution partners. Users generally see integrations as valuable when they work, but several reviews call for more channels, fewer setup hurdles, and better native connectivity.
排名更高的方面
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Exely Booking Engine 和 p3 Booking Engine (by p3 Hotels) 共享许多核心 Booking Engine 功能,但各有独特的能力。Exely Booking Engine 提供 8 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 p3 Booking Engine (by p3 Hotels) 提供 14 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Exely Booking Engine 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 4.5/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Exely Booking Engine:否。p3 Booking Engine (by p3 Hotels):否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Booking Engine 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Exely 的 HT Score 为 96,p3 Hotels 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您的房产情况量身定制的推荐方案