项目面板是一款免费工具,仅向已认证的酒店从业者开放。它通过简化调研流程和沟通环节,让采用新技术变得更轻松。
在分析了 341 条经验证的评价后,Exely 用户最看重其 支持团队的响应速度与合作关系, 预订引擎的易用性和宾客体验, 直接预订与收入增长,而 p3 Hotels 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
支持团队的响应速度与合作关系
▾
|
|
|
+
预订引擎的易用性和宾客体验
▾
|
|
|
+
直接预订与收入增长
▾
|
|
|
+
价格、库存和促销管理
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
报告与分析深度
▾
|
|
|
−
定制和品牌灵活性
▾
|
|
|
−
支付、发票和取消流程问题
▾
|
|
各产品在不同酒店规模、类型和区域的 预订引擎 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店经营者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #7 110 条评价 | #40 3 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #7 125 条评价 | #36 5 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #2 68 条评价 | #22 6 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #5 14 条评价 | #20 2 条评价 |
按酒店类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #8 94 条评价 | #32 9 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #10 60 条评价 | #35 6 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #10 48 条评价 | #23 9 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #14 12 条评价 | #31 3 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | #21 3 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #16 24 条评价 | #20 14 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #4 219 条评价 | — |
| 中东 ▾ | #1 73 条评价 | — |
Exely Booking Engine and p3 Booking Engine both target direct booking growth but diverge sharply in scale, feature depth, and hotel segment focus. Exely excels in ease of use, customer support, and broad adoption with 325 reviews averaging 4.9/5 overall, while p3 Hotels has a smaller footprint with 16 reviews at 4.7/5 and focuses on custom integration with Oracle OPERA PMS and advanced booking features.
Both products solve the same core problem: increasing direct online bookings to reduce OTA commission costs and improve revenue control. Exely achieves this with a highly integrated ecosystem and user-friendly interface, while p3 appeals to hotels needing bespoke booking customization, especially those using OPERA PMS and requiring loyalty or corporate booking tools.
If your property is a mid-size to large hotel or chain across diverse global markets, Exely is the stronger choice, supported by 166 recent reviews averaging 4.9/5 and case studies showing direct booking increases up to 72%. Its channel management and promotional tools help branded hotels and resorts with active revenue management. This is based on Exely’s broad regional presence across 34 countries and review volume by segment, including 93 city center hotels and 72 resorts.
If you run a property integrated with Oracle OPERA PMS and require specialized features like wedding and corporate booking modules, loyalty program integration, or advanced booking optimizations such as A/B testing and urgency messaging, p3 Booking Engine fits better. Its 14 unique features cater to these needs, and its user base includes 25% branded hotels and 19% resorts, albeit with fewer recent reviews and limited regional presence in only 3 countries.
For smaller independents or properties outside OPERA PMS environments, Exely’s user-friendly setup and broader support network provide a safer bet. The limited recent review activity for p3 Hotels means its current product standing is less verified.
Exely Booking Engine has an ease of use rating of 4.9/5 across 325 reviews, with 166 recent ones reinforcing consistent usability. Reviewers highlight its intuitive interface, fast booking flow, and minimal guest friction. The onboarding rating of 4.9/5 reflects rapid setup and strong training support, contributing to high staff adoption.
p3 Booking Engine scores 4.5/5 ease of use with just 16 reviews and a slightly lower 4.8/5 onboarding rating. Reviews mention user-friendly back-office operations but note some desired improvements in features like gift voucher sophistication and pricing displays.
The volume and recency of Exely’s reviews provide stronger evidence of sustained ease of use across diverse properties. p3's smaller review pool limits confidence in its usability claims, especially given its more complex feature set.
Edge: Exely.
p3 Booking Engine offers 14 hotel-specific features absent in Exely, including loyalty program integration, wedding and corporate booking modules, urgency messaging, alternative accommodation recommendations, A/B testing, room substitutions, conversion rate reports, ADA compliance, social media booking integration, and multiple advanced payment options (Apple Pay, Google Pay). These features support hotels with complex booking needs and marketing sophistication.
Exely Booking Engine does not list any unique features beyond the 30 shared with p3, focusing instead on a streamlined booking interface embedded into hotel websites with brand customization, channel management synchronization, and a surrounding ecosystem of tools for loyalty and analytics.
Operationally, p3’s feature set enables sales and marketing teams to run targeted campaigns, optimize conversion via A/B testing, and handle specialized group bookings, which is critical for hotels with diversified guest profiles and corporate clients.
Edge: p3 Booking Engine.
Exely Booking Engine’s customer support rating is a perfect 5/5 with 325 reviews, including 166 recent ones, indicating consistently excellent service. Reviewers praise fast, solution-oriented responses, hands-on setup assistance, and a partnership approach that helps hotels fully utilize the platform.
p3 Booking Engine’s support rating is 4.6/5 from 16 reviews, with onboarding at 4.8/5. Reviews commend the personal, honest account management and responsiveness but also request more proactive communication around new product releases and monthly benchmarking reports.
The higher volume and recency of Exely’s support reviews provide stronger evidence of consistent, high-quality service across a broad hotel base.
Edge: Exely.
Exely Booking Engine integrates with 10 verified partners, including Oracle Hospitality, Booking.com, IDeaS, Mews, and Hotelogix. These integrations support channel management, PMS synchronization, and payment processing, important for properties seeking operational efficiency and OTA connectivity.
p3 Booking Engine has 14 verified integrations, also including Oracle Hospitality, plus partners like Triptease, Cendyn, The Hotels Network, Adyen, and Asksuite, which enhance marketing automation, payment options, and guest communication.
The 40% higher integration count and inclusion of advanced sales and payment tools give p3 an edge for hotels needing a broader technology stack and sophisticated marketing integrations.
Edge: p3 Booking Engine.
Exely Booking Engine holds a 4.9/5 overall rating from 325 reviews, including 166 in the last six months also at 4.9/5, showing stable, recent satisfaction. The likelihood to recommend is 98%. Ratings across segments such as city center hotels (4.9/5, 93 reviews), resorts (4.9/5, 72 reviews), and branded hotels (4.9/5, 49 reviews) confirm broad appeal.
p3 Booking Engine has a 4.7/5 rating from 16 reviews, with no recent reviews in the last six months, creating uncertainty about current product performance. Its highest segment rating is 5/5 for extended stay (3 reviews) and resorts (1 review), but the small sample limits reliability.
Given the volume, recency, and segment spread, hotelier ratings favor Exely for large and diverse properties, while p3’s ratings may reflect outdated or limited experiences.
Edge: Even.
Exely Booking Engine charges a base price of $200 with no implementation fee, monthly flat, or per-room pricing. There is no freemium or trial available.
p3 Booking Engine has a base price of $500, also with no implementation fee, monthly flat fee, or per-room charges, and no trial or freemium.
Exely’s lower base price makes it more accessible for smaller and medium hotels, while p3’s higher price may reflect its customization and advanced feature set.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Exely Booking Engine and p3 Booking Engine both aim to increase direct bookings but differ in scale, features, and target users. Exely serves a large, diverse hotel base with a focus on ease of use, integrated channel management, and strong support evidenced by 325 reviews averaging 4.9/5. p3 Hotels caters to properties requiring specialized features and custom OPERA PMS integration, supported by 14 unique booking and marketing features but fewer reviews and a higher price point.
Choose Exely Booking Engine if you value broad market presence, lower cost, fast implementation, and proven ease of use and support across many hotel segments. Its ecosystem supports hotels focused on direct revenue growth through a straightforward, embedded booking flow.
Choose p3 Booking Engine if your hotel relies on Oracle OPERA PMS and needs advanced booking capabilities such as loyalty programs, corporate bookings, A/B testing, and flexible payment options. Despite fewer reviews, its feature depth and integration flexibility benefit hotels with complex booking and marketing strategies.
The evidence supports Exely for most hotels seeking reliable, user-friendly direct booking growth, while p3 fits specialized OPERA PMS users demanding customization and marketing sophistication.
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
商品和包装
|
|
|
| 房间替换 | ||
| 多房间和多费率计划预订 | ||
| 固定费率、浮动费率和折扣率 | ||
| 合并库存 | ||
| 特别优惠和折扣 | ||
| 可定制的附加组件 | ||
| 膳食计划 | ||
| 网站整合 | ||
| 社交媒体整合/预订 | ||
|
▾
追加销售和交叉销售
|
|
|
| 多房间和多费率计划预订 | ||
| 房间替换 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 预订放弃重新获得 | ||
| 可定制的附加组件 | ||
| 特别优惠和折扣 | ||
| 膳食计划 | ||
| 替代住宿建议(没有空房时) | ||
| 忠诚度计划整合 | ||
|
▾
转换
|
|
|
| 移动优化/响应式 | ||
| 特别优惠和折扣 | ||
| 紧急信息 | ||
| 预订放弃重新获得 | ||
| 多房间和多费率计划预订 | ||
| 房间替换 | ||
| 人工智能优化 | ||
| 价格对比 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 转化率报告 | ||
| Facebook 转化跟踪 | ||
| 可定制的退出意图模式 | ||
| 表单自动填充 | ||
| 灵活日期 | ||
| 费率计划比较 | ||
| Google 酒店广告预订 | ||
| Tripadvisor 预订 | ||
|
▾
支付
|
|
|
| 多币种 | ||
| 苹果支付 | ||
| Google Pay | ||
| 贝宝 | ||
| PCI合规性 | ||
| PayU | ||
| 条纹 | ||
|
▾
通知
|
|
|
| 预订放弃重新获得 | ||
| 入住后电子邮件 | ||
| 入住前电子邮件 | ||
| 确认电子邮件 | ||
|
▾
团体预订
|
|
|
| 婚礼和企业预订模块 | ||
| 可用性块 | ||
|
▾
报告与分析
|
|
|
| 自动报告 | ||
| 转化率报告 | ||
| 推荐报告 | ||
| Google Analytics 跟踪 | ||
|
▾
税务合规
|
|
|
| PCI合规性 | ||
| 符合 ADA 标准 | ||
| 关税 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 符合 GDPR 规定 |
我们分析了 3 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"We took a proactive approach and collaborated with Exely, implementing various strategies, such as a loyalty program. The outcome has been outstanding — not only have we been able..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Once we switched to Exely, we immediately noticed a significant increase in reservations from online travel agencies. We discovered that our previous system had blocked some availa..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
大量评论赞扬Exely的支持和客户成功团队,因其快速响应、实操设置帮助和以解决方案为导向的指导。酒店通常将这种关系描述为真正的合作伙伴关系,帮助他们更快上... 大量评论赞扬Exely的支持和客户成功团队,因其快速响应、实操设置帮助和以解决方案为导向的指导。酒店通常将这种关系描述为真正的合作伙伴关系,帮助他们更快上线、迅速解决问题,并更有效地使用平台。
预订引擎被反复描述为直观、快速,宾客可以以最小的摩擦完成预订。评论者表示,简洁的流程、移动端友好的表现和简便的导航改善了宾客体验,有助于提高完成的预订... 预订引擎被反复描述为直观、快速,宾客可以以最小的摩擦完成预订。评论者表示,简洁的流程、移动端友好的表现和简便的导航改善了宾客体验,有助于提高完成的预订数量。
评论者普遍认为 Exely 有助于将销售从 OTA 转移到酒店官网,提升直接预订转化率和整体收入。许多人指出,预订引擎带来更有利润的直销,降低佣金成本,并帮助酒店... 评论者普遍认为 Exely 有助于将销售从 OTA 转移到酒店官网,提升直接预订转化率和整体收入。许多人指出,预订引擎带来更有利润的直销,降低佣金成本,并帮助酒店更好地掌控客人关系。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
许多评测者希望获得更高级的报告功能、更深入的筛选以及更可定制的仪表盘,以更好地跟踪预订、收入、渠道和转化表现。虽然基础报告很有用,但买家明显认为分析功... 许多评测者希望获得更高级的报告功能、更深入的筛选以及更可定制的仪表盘,以更好地跟踪预订、收入、渠道和转化表现。虽然基础报告很有用,但买家明显认为分析功能是 Exely 可以成为收入团队更强决策工具的一个领域。
酒店经常希望对预订小部件、网站设计、配色方案、发票、邮件和确认页面拥有更多控制权,以使体验更好地符合其品牌。这很重要,因为许多评论者希望 Exely 看起来... 酒店经常希望对预订小部件、网站设计、配色方案、发票、邮件和确认页面拥有更多控制权,以使体验更好地符合其品牌。这很重要,因为许多评论者希望 Exely 看起来不那么模板化,而是为每个酒店提供更具差异化的体验。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Exely Booking Engine 和 p3 Booking Engine (by p3 Hotels) 共享许多核心 Booking Engine 功能,但各有独特的能力。Exely Booking Engine 提供 10 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 p3 Booking Engine (by p3 Hotels) 提供 14 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速上手。Exely Booking Engine 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 4.5/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按酒店规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Exely Booking Engine:否。p3 Booking Engine (by p3 Hotels):否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Booking Engine 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店经营者客观比较酒店科技产品。Exely 的 HT Score 为 96,p3 Hotels 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您酒店的情况量身定制的推荐