The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 预订引擎 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #36 3 条评价 | #29 8 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #35 5 条评价 | #22 18 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #20 6 条评价 | #14 9 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #20 2 条评价 | #10 6 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #35 9 条评价 | #24 15 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #36 4 条评价 | #23 15 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #24 9 条评价 | #18 13 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | #31 3 条评价 | #19 4 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | — | #18 4 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #17 14 条评价 | #20 12 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | — | #10 14 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #14 3 条评价 |
Choosing the right booking engine can significantly impact your hotel's direct booking rates and overall revenue. Both p3 Booking Engine by p3 Hotels and Roiback offer solutions designed to boost online sales, but they differ greatly in features, market presence, and user feedback. Your decision should hinge on your hotel's size, target market, and specific needs for customization and integration.
While p3 Hotels' platform is highly rated for ease of use and recent reviews, Roiback boasts more reviews and a broader regional footprint. Which platform aligns best with your hotel’s operational goals and guest experience ambitions?
Both p3 Hotels and Roiback aim to optimize direct bookings through their platforms, but their strengths vary. p3 Hotels' platform is praised for its simple, user-friendly interface, with a very high 4.67/5 overall rating from 16 recent reviews, emphasizing conversion improvements and growth. In contrast, Roiback, with 43 reviews and a perfect 72/100 score, is viewed as a more comprehensive solution, especially favored for its extensive features and support.
However, p3 Hotels' reviews are more recent, providing a clearer picture of current performance, whereas Roiback’s older reviews suggest a more established presence but less recent user feedback. Do you prioritize proven broad features or recent user satisfaction? The choice hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and the weight you assign to recent reviews.
Your hotel should consider p3 Hotels' platform if you need a highly customizable, easy-to-use booking engine primarily for properties that value straightforward integration with Oracle OPERA PMS and simple enhancements. Its core strength lies in its flexibility, with features like pooled inventory, automated reporting, and ADA compliance, making it ideal for hotels that prioritize user experience and conversion rates.
Conversely, if your hotel requires a broader set of features—such as web design, loyalty programs, and extensive analytics—and aims to increase profitability through detailed insights, Roiback is the better fit. With a larger partner network and a focus on international markets, Roiback is suited for hotels seeking a holistic, scalable direct sales strategy.
In summary, choose p3 Hotels if your focus is ease and customization; pick Roiback for a more comprehensive, multi-channel approach. The decision depends on your hotel’s size, market scope, and feature needs.
p3 Hotels' platform scores 4.5/5 for ease of use, with reviews highlighting its intuitive design that enhances staff adoption and customer experience. Reviewers frequently mention the straightforward back-office interface and quick onboarding process, with an average 4.79/5 onboarding rating. Its recent reviews emphasize ongoing improvements and user-friendly customization.
Roiback also scores 4.49/5 on ease of use, with users praising its clear rate grid, multi-language support, and simple booking flow. However, some reviews suggest that speed and UI consistency could improve, especially as the platform expands. Edge: p3 Hotels.
p3 Hotels offers 36 shared features plus 8 unique features, including wedding and corporate modules, pooled inventory, automated reporting, and ADA compliance. These specialized functionalities position it as a feature-rich platform, especially for hotels seeking targeted modules and custom rate management.
Roiback provides all shared features plus a broader partner network, but no unique features listed. Its strength lies in its comprehensive analytics, multi-channel connectivity, and extensive integrations, but it lacks some of the specialized modules p3 offers. Edge: p3 Hotels.
p3 Hotels earns a 4.59/5 support rating, with reviewers praising its availability, responsiveness, and friendly staff. Multiple reviews mention personal support and ongoing communication as key benefits, with some requesting more frequent updates on new features.
Roiback scores slightly higher at 4.72/5, with frequent praise for its dedicated account managers and tailored consulting. Users appreciate their proactive advice and problem-solving approach, though some mention delays in technical improvements. Edge: Roiback.
Roiback boasts 27 verified partner integrations, including major channel managers and PMS systems, making it highly compatible for larger or more complex hotel operations. It supports native connections with systems like RoomRaccoon, Winhotel, and SiteMinder, offering extensive flexibility.
p3 Hotels has 13 verified integrations, including key partners like OPERA PMS and Stripe, and offers several exclusive integrations such as LaaSie.ai and Adyen. While slightly fewer, its integrations are well-suited for properties focused on specific systems.
Edge: Roiback.
p3 Hotels has a higher average rating of 4.67/5 based on 16 recent reviews, with hoteliers emphasizing increased conversion and continuous platform improvements. Recent reviews from independent hotels praise user-friendly design and effective support, reflecting current positive sentiment.
Roiback, with 43 reviews and a 0/5 rating in some older reviews, shows mixed feedback, though recent comments highlight its extensive features and strategic support. Given the recency and volume of reviews, p3 Hotels’ platform is rated more favorably by current users.
Edge: p3 Hotels.
Both platforms are priced at a base fee of $500, with no indication of additional implementation or monthly charges, and no free trial available. This parity simplifies the comparison, but your hotel should confirm the total cost based on your specific needs and potential add-ons.
Not ideal if your hotel needs extensive multi-channel distribution or advanced marketing tools beyond core booking functions.
Not ideal if your hotel prefers a highly simplified platform without extensive third-party integrations or advanced promotional modules.
The core difference is that p3 Hotels offers a more niche, highly customizable booking engine designed to maximize conversions with essential features. Roiback provides a broader, more scalable solution with extensive integrations and advanced marketing capabilities.
If your hotel needs a simple, reliable, and easy-to-adopt engine that enhances direct bookings, p3 Hotels is the clear winner. Its recent reviews and higher ratings indicate current user satisfaction and ongoing platform improvements.
Choose p3 Hotels if you seek a streamlined, user-friendly system with targeted features. Opt for Roiback if you require a comprehensive suite of tools, extensive integrations, and a global reach, and are prepared for a slightly steeper learning curve.
我们分析了 1 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Partnering with Roiback has been a game-changer, as their innovative solutions and close support by our Direct Channel Specialist have empowered Jasmine City Group to reach new h..."
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Roiback 的专业支持团队(包括客户经理和直接渠道专家)获得了高度赞誉。用户对他们的响应能力、专业知识和个性化咨询表示赞赏,这些都对实现业务目标起到了重要... Roiback 的专业支持团队(包括客户经理和直接渠道专家)获得了高度赞誉。用户对他们的响应能力、专业知识和个性化咨询表示赞赏,这些都对实现业务目标起到了重要作用。
Roiback 通过用户友好的预订引擎、创新的直销策略以及忠诚度计划和促销套餐等工具来提高直接预订量。酒店运营商报告称,在线销售量大幅增长,直接渠道可见度也有... Roiback 通过用户友好的预订引擎、创新的直销策略以及忠诚度计划和促销套餐等工具来提高直接预订量。酒店运营商报告称,在线销售量大幅增长,直接渠道可见度也有所提高。
关键反馈包括要求加快系统响应速度、减少重复和 404 错误等技术故障以及统一平台以简化流程。这些技术改进对于实现无缝用户体验至关重要。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
该平台的用户友好型和直观预订引擎受到好评,并提到其流畅的多语言支持和易用性。然而,一些用户要求改进默认语言设置和界面设计,以提供更好的用户体验。
虽然该平台支持多种支付网关,但用户建议需要扩展支付选项,特别是整合更多的本地和国际网关,以避免连接问题。
排名更高的方面
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。p3 Booking Engine (by p3 Hotels) 和 Roiback | Booking Engine 共享许多核心 Booking Engine 功能,但各有独特的能力。p3 Booking Engine (by p3 Hotels) 提供 13 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Roiback | Booking Engine 提供 27 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。p3 Booking Engine (by p3 Hotels) 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.5/5 对比 4.5/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
p3 Booking Engine (by p3 Hotels):否。Roiback | Booking Engine:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Booking Engine 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。p3 Hotels 的 HT Score 为 0,ROIBACK 的为 72。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问