The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 105 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Passpartout 表现出色 .
Sirvoy 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) and Guest Communication (SMS Messaging).
基于 HTR 上 105 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $200/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 105 |
在分析了 105 条经验证的评价后,Passpartout 用户最看重其 ,而 Sirvoy 用户则强调 customer support, ease of use, 预订管理。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
| Passpartout |
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Customer Support
▾
|
|
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
预订管理
▾
|
|
|
+
用户界面和设计
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
功能限制
▾
|
|
|
−
定制化和适应性
▾
|
|
|
−
性价比
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 | Passpartout |
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #22 36 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #48 3 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | — | #46 1 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #27 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 | Passpartout |
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #29 21 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #37 7 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | — | #42 4 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | — | #35 3 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 | Passpartout |
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #23 16 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #16 31 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | — | #13 6 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #27 0 条评价 |
When choosing a property management system (PMS), your hotel needs a solution that streamlines operations, enhances guest experience, and offers reliable support. Passpartout aims to automate and predict operational needs through AI, but its lack of reviews and recent activity casts doubt on its current viability. Sirvoy, with over 95 recent reviews and a 4.85 support rating, demonstrates strong, current user satisfaction. Which platform aligns better with your hotel’s needs today?
Both products address core PMS functions—reservation management, guest communication, and operational oversight—yet their market presence and feature sets diverge significantly. Passpartout's limited review activity suggests it may not deliver the consistent performance you require, whereas Sirvoy's active user base and recent feedback affirm its reliability. Are you prepared to base your decision on recent, validated user experiences?
Passpartout’s AI-driven approach promises automation that could reduce manual workload and optimize revenue through dynamic pricing. However, with no recent reviews or user ratings, it’s difficult to assess whether it effectively delivers on these promises or if it has real-world usability. Sirvoy, on the other hand, boasts a 4.64/5 ease of use rating and a 4.85/5 customer support score from recent reviews, indicating a user-friendly system backed by current customer satisfaction.
The core difference lies in market validation: Passpartout has no recent reviews, while Sirvoy’s 95 reviews from the last six months reinforce its current performance. If your hotel values proven systems with recent user feedback, Sirvoy is the more dependable choice. Does your hotel prioritize active validation over untested promises?
If your hotel needs an established, well-reviewed PMS that supports small to medium properties with straightforward operations, go with Sirvoy. Its extensive feature set, proven ease of use, and high customer support ratings make it suitable for teams seeking reliability and support at a reasonable price. If your team is looking for an AI-powered system that promises automation and predictive analytics, and you’re willing to take a chance on an unreviewed platform, Passpartout might appeal—but the lack of recent validation is a concern.
For hotels that prioritize current user feedback and ongoing support, Sirvoy clearly outperforms Passpartout. Conversely, if your team is experimenting with AI-driven automation and has the resources to manage a less proven platform, Passpartout might be worth exploring—but with caution.
Sirvoy’s UI scores a 4.64/5, with numerous recent reviews highlighting its intuitive, straightforward design. Support is consistently praised, with users describing it as "responsive," "helpful," and "quick," facilitating smooth onboarding and daily use. Conversely, Passpartout has no recent reviews or ratings, leaving its ease of use unverified. Without user feedback, it’s impossible to confirm whether it offers a user-friendly experience or a steep learning curve.
Edge: Sirvoy.
Sirvoy offers 43 features, including multi-lingual support, channel management, booking engine, guest messaging, online check-in/out, payment processing, and more. It provides extensive tools for daily operations, marketing, and reporting, with features designed for small to medium properties. Passpartout, with zero features listed, appears to lack the breadth of functionalities that underpin effective property management.
Given the broad feature set in Sirvoy, it clearly provides more value for hotels seeking an all-in-one system. Passpartout’s absence of features makes it less suitable for hotels requiring operational depth. Edge: Sirvoy.
Sirvoy’s support team receives a 4.85/5 rating from recent reviews, with users describing their assistance as "excellent," "responsive," and "helpful." Many mention that support staff promptly resolve issues and provide clear guidance, which is critical for smooth operations. Passpartout, with no recent reviews, offers support details that are unverified. Its absence of recent feedback suggests support quality and responsiveness are unknown.
For reliable, current support, Sirvoy is the clear winner. Edge: Sirvoy.
Sirvoy integrates with 21 verified partners, including major channels like Booking.com, Expedia, and GDS systems, along with tools like TrustYou, SiteMinder, and Revinate. These integrations enable seamless reservation updates, marketing, and guest communication. Passpartout reports no verified integrations, limiting its ability to connect with other essential systems.
If your hotel relies on a robust ecosystem of integrations, Sirvoy’s extensive options offer a significant advantage. Edge: Sirvoy.
Sirvoy’s recent reviews reflect an average rating of 4.64/5, driven by positive feedback from hotels of various sizes, including boutique properties, hostels, and resorts. Hotels appreciate its ease of use, support, and feature set. Passpartout has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to gauge current user sentiment. Its past activity suggests low confidence in ongoing support or development.
Given the recent, high ratings, Sirvoy is clearly favored by hoteliers today. Edge: Sirvoy.
Passpartout does not list any pricing details, suggesting it may be a bespoke or non-market-ready product. Sirvoy charges $200 per month, with no free plan but a 30-day trial available. Its transparent pricing makes it accessible for small to medium properties, with the cost justified by its extensive feature set and support.
If budget transparency and predictable costs are priorities, Sirvoy’s model offers clarity. Passpartout’s unknown pricing is a significant drawback.
Passpartout may appeal to innovative teams willing to explore new solutions, but lack of recent validation limits its suitability for mainstream operations.
Sirvoy’s proven platform suits properties that value simplicity, support, and established features.
Passpartout positions itself as an AI-powered platform designed to automate operations and optimize revenue. However, the lack of recent reviews, features, and verified support makes it difficult to recommend confidently for your hotel’s current needs. Sirvoy, by contrast, demonstrates a consistent track record of recent satisfied users, a broad feature set, and strong support.
If your hotel needs a reliable, well-supported PMS with proven usability, Sirvoy is the clear choice. Passpartout may be suitable for early-stage experimentation but lacks the validation to serve as your core system today.
In summary, choose Sirvoy if you want a system with recent validation, extensive features, and top-rated support. Consider Passpartout only if you’re willing to test an unproven platform and can manage potential risks associated with limited recent feedback.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
| Passpartout |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $200/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Passpartout 和 Sirvoy 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 | Passpartout |
|
|---|---|---|
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 集中的用户和角色管理 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 31 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Sirvoy receives high praise for its excellent customer support, noted for being responsive, helpful, and timely. Users appreciate the prompt assistanc... Sirvoy receives high praise for its excellent customer support, noted for being responsive, helpful, and timely. Users appreciate the prompt assistance, which facilitates problem resolution effectively.
Most users find Sirvoy highly intuitive and easy to navigate, which is particularly beneficial for those new to the hospitality industry. This simplic... Most users find Sirvoy highly intuitive and easy to navigate, which is particularly beneficial for those new to the hospitality industry. This simplicity allows for a smooth onboarding process without the need for extensive training.
用户称赞该系统在管理预订和宾客信息方面的高效性。然而,某些功能,例如将房间组合成套房或提供套餐优惠,则被认为需要改进。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
部分用户对 Sirvoy 的报告功能不足表示不满,特别是缺少每日销售报告,以及财务和发票功能亟待改进。此外,还有用户反馈缺乏高级客户关系管理 (CRM) 选项,以及... 部分用户对 Sirvoy 的报告功能不足表示不满,特别是缺少每日销售报告,以及财务和发票功能亟待改进。此外,还有用户反馈缺乏高级客户关系管理 (CRM) 选项,以及集成追加销售功能存在困难。
Sirvoy 提供一定程度的自定义功能,用户认为这有助于根据自身物业的具体需求调整系统。然而,部分用户希望在发票自定义和动态计费选项方面拥有更大的灵活性。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Passpartout 和 Sirvoy 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Passpartout 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Sirvoy 提供 21 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Sirvoy 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Passpartout:否。Sirvoy:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Passpartout 的 HT Score 为 0,Sirvoy 的为 85。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问