The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 预订引擎 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 | Pegipegi |
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #29 8 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #22 18 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #14 9 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #10 6 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 | Pegipegi |
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #24 15 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #23 15 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #18 13 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | — | #19 4 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 | Pegipegi |
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | — | #18 4 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #20 12 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | — | #10 14 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #14 3 条评价 |
Choosing between Pegipegi by Pegipegi and Roiback | Booking Engine involves weighing two fundamentally different solutions. Pegipegi primarily operates as a travel platform integrating flights, hotels, and train tickets, while Roiback offers a dedicated booking engine tailored for hotels to boost direct bookings. Your hotel’s needs determine which platform aligns better with your goals—are you seeking an all-in-one travel marketplace or a hotel-focused booking tool?
Both products aim to improve your booking process, but their approaches differ sharply. Pegipegi’s limited review presence and status as a travel portal make it less suited for hotels solely focused on direct sales, whereas Roiback’s extensive feature set and broad adoption highlight its specialization for hotel booking optimization. Are you ready to prioritize a dedicated hotel booking engine over a travel platform?
Pegipegi is a travel booking portal with zero recent reviews, offering little insight into its suitability for hotel-specific needs. Roiback, with 43 reviews from hotels across multiple regions and a 4.72/5 customer support rating, provides a clearer picture of how hotels benefit from its platform. The lack of recent feedback for Pegipegi suggests it isn’t actively serving hotel clients or focusing on hotel-specific features, unlike Roiback, which has current, positive hotel reviews.
If your hotel needs a comprehensive, flexible booking engine with detailed analytics, Roiback clearly outperforms Pegipegi. Conversely, if you’re looking for a travel portal that aggregates multiple travel services for general tourism, Pegipegi might seem appealing—though its review silence makes that a risky choice. Given the recent reviews and high recommendation rate, Roiback is the stronger option for hotel-specific booking needs.
Pegipegi’s user experience is essentially undocumented, with no ratings or reviews to evaluate its interface or onboarding process—indicating it’s likely not designed for hotel staff or specialized hotel use. Roiback, on the other hand, scores a 4.49/5 in ease of use, supported by positive feedback about its intuitive interface, quick onboarding, and supportive staff. Reviewers praise Roiback’s user-friendly platform for simplifying complex bookings and managing multiple channels.
Edge: Roiback.
Pegipegi offers no features tailored specifically for hotels, functioning mainly as a travel booking portal for flights, trains, and hotels. Roiback delivers 36 distinct features catering directly to hoteliers, including multi-lingual support, booking abandonment recapture, loyalty programs, Google Hotel Ads, payment integrations, and website integration—features that significantly impact hotel revenue and guest experience.
Roiback’s extensive feature set (36 features) outstrips Pegipegi’s non-existent hotel-specific capabilities. This makes Roiback the clear choice if your hotel needs advanced tools for direct booking growth and operational control.
Edge: Roiback.
Pegipegi’s support ratings are unavailable, and there are no recent reviews commenting on its customer service. Roiback, with a 4.72/5 support rating and recent feedback praising its responsive, knowledgeable team, offers a proven support experience. Review quotes highlight that Roiback’s customer service and personalized consulting have been instrumental for hotels in achieving their direct sales goals.
Given the recent reviews and high support ratings, Roiback’s customer support is notably superior. Edge: Roiback.
Pegipegi’s partner count is zero, suggesting limited or no verified integrations with hotel tech systems. Roiback integrates with 27 verified partners, including major channel managers, PMS, and hotel tech providers like RoomRaccoon, Triptease, and Cendyn. This broad integration ecosystem ensures smoother operations and more efficient distribution management for your hotel.
The extensive integration network makes Roiback the better choice for hotels seeking a connected, efficient booking system. Edge: Roiback.
Pegipegi’s review count is zero, so no ratings or property segment feedback is available. Roiback, with 43 recent reviews, is rated highly across segments, especially by city center, resort, and branded hotels, which appreciate its detailed analytics, support, and feature updates. Hotels in luxury and boutique segments rate Roiback highly, with an overall customer support rating of 4.72/5.
Given the recent, positive reviews and clear user satisfaction, Roiback holds the higher ratings overall. Edge: Roiback.
Pegipegi’s pricing details are unavailable, and it appears to operate as a travel portal rather than a dedicated hotel booking engine. Roiback charges a base fee of $500 per month, with no freemium or pay-per-room models, indicating a straightforward subscription for hotels willing to invest in a dedicated platform.
If budget flexibility and transparent pricing are priorities, Roiback’s model offers predictability. Pegipegi’s lack of pricing info makes it less suitable for hotels seeking clear ROI.
Pegipegi’s platform is best for companies that prioritize broad travel listings over tailored hotel booking tools.
Roiback suits hotels focused on revenue growth through direct channels and sophisticated analytics.
The core difference between Pegipegi and Roiback is their focus: Pegipegi acts as a travel portal aggregating various travel services, while Roiback specializes in providing hotels with a feature-rich booking engine designed to maximize direct sales. Roiback has a significant advantage with 43 recent reviews, a 4.72/5 support score, and 36 dedicated features that directly impact hotel revenue.
If your hotel’s primary goal is to boost direct bookings, reduce OTA commissions, and gain actionable insights, Roiback is the clear choice—especially given its recent review momentum and high user ratings. Pegipegi may serve broader travel needs but lacks the specialized tools and recent hotel-focused feedback you need for strategic growth.
In conclusion, for hotels seeking a proven, feature-packed booking engine that integrates with your existing systems and supports your growth, Roiback is the recommended option. If, however, your focus is on a travel portal for multiple travel services without hotel-specific features, Pegipegi might be worth exploring—but only with caution.
我们分析了 1 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Partnering with Roiback has been a game-changer, as their innovative solutions and close support by our Direct Channel Specialist have empowered Jasmine City Group to reach new h..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Roiback 的专业支持团队(包括客户经理和直接渠道专家)获得了高度赞誉。用户对他们的响应能力、专业知识和个性化咨询表示赞赏,这些都对实现业务目标起到了重要... Roiback 的专业支持团队(包括客户经理和直接渠道专家)获得了高度赞誉。用户对他们的响应能力、专业知识和个性化咨询表示赞赏,这些都对实现业务目标起到了重要作用。
Roiback 通过用户友好的预订引擎、创新的直销策略以及忠诚度计划和促销套餐等工具来提高直接预订量。酒店运营商报告称,在线销售量大幅增长,直接渠道可见度也有... Roiback 通过用户友好的预订引擎、创新的直销策略以及忠诚度计划和促销套餐等工具来提高直接预订量。酒店运营商报告称,在线销售量大幅增长,直接渠道可见度也有所提高。
关键反馈包括要求加快系统响应速度、减少重复和 404 错误等技术故障以及统一平台以简化流程。这些技术改进对于实现无缝用户体验至关重要。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
该平台的用户友好型和直观预订引擎受到好评,并提到其流畅的多语言支持和易用性。然而,一些用户要求改进默认语言设置和界面设计,以提供更好的用户体验。
虽然该平台支持多种支付网关,但用户建议需要扩展支付选项,特别是整合更多的本地和国际网关,以避免连接问题。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Pegipegi 和 Roiback | Booking Engine 共享许多核心 Booking Engine 功能,但各有独特的能力。Pegipegi 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Roiback | Booking Engine 提供 27 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Roiback | Booking Engine 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.5/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Pegipegi:否。Roiback | Booking Engine:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Booking Engine 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Pegipegi 的 HT Score 为 0,ROIBACK 的为 72。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问