The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
在分析了 228 条经验证的评价后,Cendyn 用户最看重其 支持团队响应能力, 预订引擎的易用性, 费率计划管理,而 SHR Group 用户则强调 个性化的客户成功支持, 用户友好界面, 与第三方系统集成。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
支持团队响应能力
▾
|
+
个性化的客户成功支持
▾
|
|
+
预订引擎的易用性
▾
|
+
用户友好界面
▾
|
|
+
费率计划管理
▾
|
+
与第三方系统集成
▾
|
|
+
实时报告
▾
|
+
人工智能驱动的预订引擎
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
自定义限制
▾
|
−
广泛的报告选项
▾
|
|
−
界面问题
▾
|
−
基于云的系统
▾
|
|
−
预订通知延迟
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店预订软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #2 28 条评价 | #6 9 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #1 66 条评价 | #4 28 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #1 36 条评价 | #4 11 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #1 33 条评价 | #5 3 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #1 96 条评价 | #3 34 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #1 67 条评价 | #5 25 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #1 53 条评价 | #5 18 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #1 13 条评价 | #7 4 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #1 115 条评价 | #3 34 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #3 26 条评价 | #4 18 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #1 9 条评价 | #7 1 条评价 |
| 中东 | #5 4 条评价 | #6 2 条评价 |
Choosing between Cendyn CRS by Cendyn and SHR Central Reservation System by SHR Group hinges on your hotel’s unique needs and priorities. Both serve to streamline reservations, distribution, and revenue management, but they diverge in their approach, feature set, and user experience. Cendyn focuses more on advanced rate control and broad integration, while SHR emphasizes ease of distribution and exceptional support.
Your team must consider whether your primary goal is robust rate management or seamless distribution and support. Do you want a scalable, feature-rich platform or a system praised for support and simplicity? Let’s compare both solutions directly.
Cendyn CRS, founded in 1996, offers a comprehensive cloud-based reservation system designed for scalability, security, and global reach. It boasts over 1000 distribution partners, dynamic pricing, and support for complex rate plans, making it ideal for hotels that need advanced revenue strategies. Its recent reviews highlight its stability and extensive integration capabilities but note some interface issues and support delays.
SHR Group, established in 1987, provides a reservation system centered on distribution control, real-time updates, and excellent customer service. Its platform is lauded for its ease of use, strong partner integrations, and AI-driven booking engine. Recent reviews praise SHR’s support responsiveness and user-friendliness but point out room for improvement in reporting and back-end navigation.
Both products aim to optimize bookings and revenue but diverge in their core strengths. Which aligns more with your hotel’s operational focus?
If your hotel needs a flexible, scalable platform with advanced revenue management features, go with Cendyn CRS. Its support for complex rate plans like weekly and monthly rates, geotargeted pricing, and dynamic pricing rules suits properties that prioritize sophisticated rate strategies—particularly in competitive markets or with large portfolios.
Choose SHR CRS if your focus is on distribution efficiency, ease of use, and superior support. It is ideal for hotels that want a straightforward system with excellent third-party integration, real-time updates, and a strong customer success team. Its intuitive interface and AI-driven booking engine help small to mid-sized hotels maximize distribution without steep learning curves.
In summary, Cendyn is better for data-driven, complex revenue management, while SHR excels in distribution and user support. Your choice depends on whether your hotel values detailed rate control or distribution simplicity.
Cendyn CRS has an overall ease of use rating of 4.34/5, with some reviews mentioning interface challenges and a learning curve related to its feature depth. Onboarding scores are 4.26/5, and users appreciate its stability once mastered, but some note that navigating complex rate plans can be cumbersome. Support is rated 4.54/5, though recent reviews mention delays and difficulty in resolving issues.
SHR CRS scores higher in ease of use at 4.61/5 and onboarding at 4.61/5. Users consistently praise its intuitive interface and straightforward navigation, with many remarking it’s easier than other systems like iHotelier. Support is slightly better rated at 4.76/5, with reviews highlighting prompt and personalized assistance.
Edge: SHR CRS.
Cendyn offers 21 unique features, including dynamic pricing, geotargeted pricing, and support for weekly and monthly rates—features only available in its platform. Its advanced rate management capabilities appeal to properties seeking granular control over pricing strategies.
SHR Group has 20 features, including robust distribution controls, real-time updates, and a highly customizable booking engine. Its features emphasize ease of distribution, automation, and user experience, with unique strengths in reporting dashboards and a centralized control interface.
While both systems share 18 common features, Cendyn’s specific tools for complex rate plans and geotargeting give it an edge for revenue strategists. SHR’s strength lies in distribution and usability.
Edge: Cendyn CRS.
Cendyn support is rated 4.54/5; reviews commend its support team’s professionalism but note recent delays and occasional responsiveness issues. Some users mention that support can be inconsistent, especially during busy periods, impacting operational efficiency.
SHR’s support scores 4.76/5, with reviews consistently praising their proactive, personalized approach. Users describe SHR’s team as highly responsive and dependable, often citing their exceptional support as a key reason for choosing SHR.
Given the recent reviews and higher support ratings, SHR Group’s customer service currently has the advantage.
Edge: SHR CRS.
Cendyn boasts 116 verified partners, including key integrations with Swayy, RoomRaccoon, and Hotello, alongside shared partners like GuestRevu and TrustYou. Its extensive network facilitates seamless connection to various property management, PMS, and channel management tools.
SHR Group offers 81 verified partners, including Criton, Profitroom, and Umi Digital. It shares 53 partners with Cendyn, with strong integrations supporting distribution, revenue management, and CRM systems.
While Cendyn has more verified integrations overall, SHR’s partner network covers the essential tools for most hotels. If extensive third-party connectivity is your priority, Cendyn’s broader network might be advantageous.
Edge: Cendyn CRS.
Cendyn, with 136 reviews and a recent review count of just 2, has an overall rating of 4.47/5. Hotels in the boutique and independent segments rate it 4.75/5, praising its stability and revenue features but noting interface issues.
SHR has fewer reviews (49), with a higher overall rating of 4.77/5. Its latest reviews are recent and highly positive, especially from boutique and branded hotels, emphasizing user-friendliness and support.
Since SHR has more recent reviews and a higher overall rating, it is currently the better-rated product among hoteliers.
Edge: SHR CRS.
Cendyn’s pricing starts at $700 per month, with no free trial or implementation fee, making it a significant investment suited for larger operations or those needing advanced features.
SHR does not publish explicit pricing details publicly. Its model typically involves tiered fees based on hotel size and feature needs, often negotiated directly with clients.
Based on available data, Cendyn’s transparent pricing provides clarity, but SHR’s flexible pricing may better suit smaller hotels or those seeking tailored plans.
Not ideal if your hotel seeks a simple, easy-to-use system or has a limited budget, as Cendyn’s advanced features come with a steeper learning curve.
Not ideal if your hotel requires in-depth revenue management tools or complex rate strategies, as SHR’s strengths are distribution and usability.
Cendyn is a comprehensive, scalable reservation system with advanced rate management and extensive integrations. It suits large, data-driven properties that want to maximize revenue through sophisticated strategies.
SHR stands out for its ease of use, excellent support, and distribution focus, making it ideal for smaller or mid-sized hotels prioritizing simplicity and customer service. Its recent reviews and higher ratings confirm its appeal.
If your hotel needs detailed revenue control and global reach, choose Cendyn. If distribution, support, and usability are more critical, SHR is the more suitable option.
In Conclusion:
Your decision should align with your hotel’s operational focus, growth plans, and technological comfort level. Both systems deliver value but cater to different hotel profiles and strategic priorities.
我们分析了 1 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"Pegasus CRS has ensured that our direct booking channels remain competitive at all times. We create and update all our rate plans first in the CRS and then we distribute these to o..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
支持团队的及时性和有效性经常受到称赞。用户对快速的响应时间和解决问题的专业帮助表示赞赏,这提高了他们对系统的整体体验。
Pegasus 的预订引擎因其简单性和用户友好性而备受赞誉,无论是对酒店员工还是客人而言都是如此。用户非常欣赏它创建价格计划、管理预订和浏览系统是多么简单,这... Pegasus 的预订引擎因其简单性和用户友好性而备受赞誉,无论是对酒店员工还是客人而言都是如此。用户非常欣赏它创建价格计划、管理预订和浏览系统是多么简单,这大大简化了预订流程。
许多评论都指出,Pegasus 在处理价格方案配置方面非常有效,它提供了广泛的可定制性,以满足不同酒店的需求。这包括从现有方案中得出价格并进行批量更新,从而改... 许多评论都指出,Pegasus 在处理价格方案配置方面非常有效,它提供了广泛的可定制性,以满足不同酒店的需求。这包括从现有方案中得出价格并进行批量更新,从而改善收益管理。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些用户认为,预订引擎和价格管理功能的某些方面可以通过进一步定制来改善。建议包括布局设计更加灵活,以及无需大量支持干预即可集成个性化修改的能力。
一些评论强调了界面问题,尤其是像 SiteMinder 这样的集成系统。用户提到需要定期刷新,偶尔会出现连接中断,这会导致费率和库存管理不一致。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
SHR 的客户成功团队经常被称赞为杰出,提供主动和定制的支持。这种级别的服务有助于处理日常咨询和重大项目,大大简化了酒店运营的管理。
SHR 的系统(尤其是 CRS 和 CRO)经常被描述为用户友好且易于操作。这种易用性有助于提高运营效率并加快新用户的入门速度。
无缝集成第三方系统(如 PMS 和其他酒店管理工具)是 SHR 的一大优势。用户认为这对于顺畅运营和高效管理至关重要。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些评论提到,SHR 系统需要提供更广泛、更方便用户使用的报告选项。这包括临时分析功能和对关键指标的更详细洞察。
一些用户表示希望获得更全面的基于云的体验,以最大限度地减少升级期间的停机时间。这将使 SHR 符合现代技术趋势并提高系统可用性。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Cendyn CRS 和 SHR Central Reservation System (CRS) 共享许多核心 Hotel Reservations Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Cendyn CRS 提供 116 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 SHR Central Reservation System (CRS) 提供 81 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。SHR Central Reservation System (CRS) 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 4.4/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Cendyn CRS:否。SHR Central Reservation System (CRS):否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Reservations Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Cendyn 的 HT Score 为 88,SHR Group 的为 49。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问