项目面板是一款免费工具,仅向已认证的酒店从业者开放。它通过简化调研流程和沟通环节,让采用新技术变得更轻松。
各产品在不同酒店规模、类型和区域的 支付处理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店经营者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) | #3 1 条评价 | #4 2 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #5 5 条评价 | #4 15 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #6 0 条评价 | #2 26 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #2 25 条评价 |
按酒店类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #5 1 条评价 | #1 36 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #5 1 条评价 | #2 37 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #7 0 条评价 | #2 35 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | #4 1 条评价 | #3 4 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #8 0 条评价 | #2 68 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #1 6 条评价 | #3 1 条评价 |
Planet Payments and ROH target hotel payments processing but diverge sharply in focus and operational fit. Planet Payments excels at multi-currency, omnichannel payment acceptance with 150+ currency support and broad global acquirer integration across 196 verified partners. It suits hotels that prioritize guest convenience in payment options and global currency handling. ROH centers on automating payment workflows, contracts, and invoicing with intelligent scheduling and reminders, streamlining sales-to-cash processes. It fits hotels needing tighter control of receivables and cash flow through automated financial infrastructure.
Both solve the fundamental problem of integrating payments into hotel operations, but Planet emphasizes front-end payment acceptance breadth while ROH automates back-office payment management. The choice depends on whether your hotel’s primary challenge is guest payment flexibility or internal payment workflow efficiency.
If you operate a hotel with frequent international guests requiring multiple payment methods and currencies, choose Planet Payments. Its 150+ currency support, contactless, mobile wallets, and alternative payment methods like WeChat Pay and AliPay address diverse guest payment preferences. This is supported by Planet’s integrations to 196 partners, covering broad geographic markets including South America, Europe, and Asia Pacific.
If your hotel needs to accelerate invoicing, automate payment reminders, and integrate contracts and e-signatures to reduce manual follow-up, ROH is the better choice. ROH’s 88 reviews with 4.9/5 overall rating highlight its efficiency in saving time for sales and finance teams. The case study from Le Méridien St. Louis Clayton shows 90% recovery of outstanding invoices in 60 days, proving ROH’s impact on cash flow.
Limited data exists on Planet’s fit for smaller or budget hotels due to only six reviews, while ROH’s 88 reviews cover diverse hotel types with consistently high ratings, making ROH a safer bet for general operational improvements.
Planet Payments scores 4/5 for ease of use and 2.8/5 for onboarding from six reviews. Users cite a well-structured interface but describe it as overly complex with too many clicks. One reviewer called the interface unintuitive and criticized slow support response. ROH scores 4.9/5 ease of use and 4.9/5 onboarding across 88 reviews. Reviewers praise ROH’s simplicity for both staff and clients, reducing training time and speeding contract and payment processing.
Despite Planet’s lower onboarding rating, the gap in ease of use combined with ROH’s superior onboarding score is insufficiently large to call a definitive edge. Both systems require some familiarization but ROH’s modern workflows and automation likely translate to faster adoption.
Edge: Even.
Planet Payments offers seven unique hotel-relevant features, including contactless payments, multi-currency settlements, dynamic currency conversion (DCC), and acceptance of WeChatPay, AliPay, and Mail Order Telephone Order (MOTO) payments. These features enhance guest experience by supporting diverse payment preferences and revenue generation via currency conversion fees.
ROH provides five unique features focused on payment management: refund management, partial capture, recurring payments, installment plans, and chargeback management. These capabilities significantly improve hotel cash flow control, enable flexible billing arrangements, and reduce revenue leakage.
The 14 shared features cover basic payment processing needs. Planet’s unique features shape front-desk and point-of-sale workflows, while ROH’s features transform finance and sales workflows around receivables and chargebacks.
Edge: Planet Payments.
Planet Payments scores 2.7/5 for customer support from six reviews. Some reviewers praised individual support reps for competence and kindness, but multiple reviews criticize slow responses and lack of issue resolution over months. ROH scores 4.9/5 support across 88 reviews. Users describe prompt, helpful responses that improve issue resolution speed and confidence.
Despite the marked difference in raw scores, both products fall short of the 10-review threshold for a formal edge call. Review volume heavily favors ROH’s scores as more representative, suggesting ROH’s support is more consistently reliable.
Edge: Even.
Planet Payments integrates with 196 verified partners, including major hotel platforms like Oracle Hospitality, Innspire, Right Revenue, and Omnibees. These extensive integrations enable seamless payment data flows into PMS and revenue management systems, benefiting hotels with complex tech stacks.
ROH integrates with only 2 verified partners including Oracle Hospitality and Stayntouch. This limited integration breadth restricts ROH’s fit for hotels reliant on multiple systems.
For hotels needing wide ecosystem connectivity, especially global or multi-property operations, Planet Payments offers a clear advantage. ROH’s limited integrations may constrain deployment flexibility.
Edge: Planet Payments.
Planet Payments holds a 3.6/5 overall rating from six reviews, with no recent rating (fewer than 10 recent reviews). ROH maintains a 4.9/5 overall from 88 reviews, with a strong recent rating of 4.7/5 across 21 reviews in the last six months. ROH’s review volume is 5.25 times higher recently than Planet’s, making its ratings more current and robust.
Segment-specific ratings show Planet has high scores (4.3 to 5/5) in luxury hotels and resorts but very low (1/5) in limited service hotels from a single review. ROH consistently scores near 5/5 across boutique, luxury, resorts, city center, branded, airport/conference, and budget hotels, supported by dozens of reviews per segment.
ROH is rated higher by a wide margin across all hotel types supported by sufficient reviews.
Edge: ROH.
Planet Payments does not publish pricing. It has no base price, no monthly flat fee, no per-room pricing, and no implementation fee publicly available. ROH publishes a base price of $100.00 with no monthly flat fee, per-room fee, or implementation fee. Neither offers a freemium or trial.
ROH’s transparent pricing at a $100 base cost provides a clearer budgeting baseline, while Planet’s pricing model requires direct inquiry.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Planet Payments focuses on providing a comprehensive multi-currency and multi-channel payment acceptance platform with global acquirer flexibility and extensive integrations. ROH specializes in automating the back-office financial processes around payments, contracts, and invoicing to improve cash flow and organizational efficiency.
Choose Planet Payments if you need to serve international guests with a variety of payment options, require dynamic currency conversion, and depend on a large network of integrations to your hotel technology stack. Planet’s seven unique front-end payment features and 196 integrations support this use case.
Choose ROH if your hotel struggles with manual invoicing, payment reminders, contract management, and needs to accelerate collections. ROH’s five unique financial workflow features, combined with a 4.9/5 rating from 88 reviews and a proven case study showing 90% invoice recovery in 60 days, make it the superior choice for hotels prioritizing payment workflow automation and cash flow improvement.
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
工作流程自动化
|
|
|
| 退款管理 | ||
| 预授权 | ||
| 付款拆分 | ||
|
▾
支付方式
|
|
|
| 链接支付 | ||
| 小费功能 | ||
| 部分捕获 | ||
| 定期付款 | ||
| Klarna 分期付款计划 | ||
| 接受苹果支付 | ||
| 邮购电话订单 (MOTO) 付款 | ||
| 接受谷歌支付 | ||
| 分期付款计划 | ||
| 接受贝宝 | ||
| 接受支付宝 | ||
| 接受微信支付 | ||
| 接受签证 | ||
| 接受美国运通 | ||
| 非接触式支付 | ||
| 接受发现 | ||
| 接受万事达卡 | ||
| 接受大来俱乐部 | ||
|
▾
安全与欺诈预防
|
|
|
| 退款管理 | ||
| 支付标记化 | ||
| 预授权 | ||
| 3-D 安全支付 | ||
| PCI合规性 | ||
|
▾
$
多币种
|
|
|
| 多币种结算 | ||
| 动态货币转换 (DCC) | ||
|
▾
调整
|
|
|
| 授权调整 | ||
| 退款管理 | ||
|
▾
硬件
|
|
|
| Elavon(信用卡处理) | ||
| TSYS(信用卡处理) | ||
| GlobalPayments(信用卡处理) | ||
| Vantiv(信用卡处理) | ||
| 第一数据(信用卡处理) | ||
| Heartland(信用卡处理) | ||
| 大通(信用卡处理) | ||
| 多处理器网关 |
我们分析了 2 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"With a limited timeframe to replace our previous PMS, Planet’s structured onboarding process and dedicated support helped us complete the transition successfully before reopening f..."
"When we were new to ROH, a change in my finance team left our accounts receivable a mess—over a million dollars past due. I reached out to the ROH team in a panic, and they immedia..."
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
评论者反复描述ROH对员工和客户来说都直观且易于使用,几乎不需要培训。他们表示,客户进行付款、签署文件和查看预订信息都很简单,这提升了采用率,有助于打造... 评论者反复描述ROH对员工和客户来说都直观且易于使用,几乎不需要培训。他们表示,客户进行付款、签署文件和查看预订信息都很简单,这提升了采用率,有助于打造更顺畅的宾客体验。
一个共同的主题是ROH将合同、发票、笔记、签名和付款集中在一个系统中,而不是使用多个工具或共享驱动器。用户表示,这提升了销售和服务团队之间的协调,保持了... 一个共同的主题是ROH将合同、发票、笔记、签名和付款集中在一个系统中,而不是使用多个工具或共享驱动器。用户表示,这提升了销售和服务团队之间的协调,保持了预订细节的有序,并降低了信息丢失的风险。
用户经常提到ROH的自动提醒功能以及安排未来付款通知的能力是节省大量时间的关键。评论者表示,这减少了人工催收押金的工作,帮助客户按时付款,并使酒店在减少... 用户经常提到ROH的自动提醒功能以及安排未来付款通知的能力是节省大量时间的关键。评论者表示,这减少了人工催收押金的工作,帮助客户按时付款,并使酒店在减少员工投入的情况下更好地维护现金流。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
大量评论指出集成缺失或不完整,特别是与Delphi、Salesforce、Opera、PMS工具和FDC的集成。用户希望减少重复数据输入,实现实时同步,以便ROH能更好地融入现有酒... 大量评论指出集成缺失或不完整,特别是与Delphi、Salesforce、Opera、PMS工具和FDC的集成。用户希望减少重复数据输入,实现实时同步,以便ROH能更好地融入现有酒店工作流程。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
这取决于您的需求。Planet Payments 和 ROH 共享许多核心 Payments Processing Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Planet Payments 提供 196 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 ROH 提供 2 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速上手。ROH 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 4.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按酒店规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Planet Payments:否。ROH:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Payments Processing Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店经营者客观比较酒店科技产品。Planet 的 HT Score 为 0,ROH 的为 100。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您酒店的情况量身定制的推荐