项目面板是一款免费工具,仅向已认证的酒店从业者开放。它通过简化调研流程和沟通环节,让采用新技术变得更轻松。
各产品在不同酒店规模、类型和区域的 支付处理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店经营者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #3 1 条评价 | #2 9 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #5 5 条评价 | #2 27 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #6 0 条评价 | #3 12 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #3 2 条评价 |
按酒店类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #5 1 条评价 | #3 17 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #5 1 条评价 | #3 16 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #7 0 条评价 | #3 26 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #4 1 条评价 | #1 9 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #8 0 条评价 | #3 51 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #1 6 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | — | #3 0 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #2 1 条评价 |
Planet Payments and Zil Money both serve hotel payments processing but diverge sharply in focus and scale. Planet Payments excels as a global, all-in-one payment platform integrated with over 190 partners, supporting 150+ currencies and a wide array of payment methods, appealing to hotels aiming for international guest flexibility and revenue from currency conversion. Zil Money, with a smaller footprint and 58 reviews averaging 4.4 stars, emphasizes cloud-based financial operations including payroll and automated payments, suited for hotels seeking a straightforward, user-friendly system to manage both payments and financial workflows.
Both solve the core problem of enabling secure, diverse payment acceptance integrated with hotel operations. Planet targets properties requiring expansive payment options and global processing, while Zil Money focuses on simplifying financial management alongside payments in predominantly North America and select global markets.
If your hotel operates internationally or hosts a diverse guest base requiring payment acceptance across multiple currencies and alternative payment methods like AliPay or WeChat Pay, Planet Payments is the better fit. This is supported by its 196 verified integrations with PMS and revenue management systems such as Omnibees and RevControl, essential for hotels needing seamless front-desk workflows. Planet’s 150+ currency support and dynamic currency conversion enable revenue generation on each transaction, critical for luxury and resort properties with global guests.
Conversely, if you run a mid-sized or independent property in North America or South America focused on simplifying payroll, invoicing, and expense tracking alongside payments, Zil Money fits better. Its cloud platform supports ACH, wire transfers, and printable checks, aligning with hotels seeking operational finance consolidation. Zil Money’s 58 reviews averaging 4.4 stars and features like partial capture and recurring payments highlight its strength in user-friendly financial operations. However, Zil Money’s zero verified integrations may limit PMS or channel manager connectivity for hotels needing fully integrated front-desk payment processing. Review volume for Zil Money has dropped sharply recently, so its all-time ratings may not reflect current product or support quality.
For small hotels or properties with limited integration needs, Zil Money’s easier financial workflows might outweigh Planet’s broader payment capabilities. For luxury or multi-property groups seeking global payment flexibility and integrated revenue management, Planet is preferable, though its smaller review base (6 total) means less evidence.
Planet Payments scores 4/5 for ease of use and 2.8/5 for onboarding across 6 reviews, with users noting the interface is well-structured and understandable even for new employees. However, support delays and complexity in navigation—such as complaints about excessive clicks—pose challenges during adoption. Zil Money scores slightly higher at 4.5/5 ease of use and 4.2/5 onboarding from 58 reviews, with many citing its intuitive interface and straightforward payment processing that reduces training time.
Both products present trade-offs: Planet’s comprehensive platform requires more initial training, while Zil Money’s simpler design speeds adoption but may lack advanced hotel-specific capabilities. Given the narrow rating gap and both sets of reviews highlighting ease of use positively, ease of use and onboarding are effectively even.
Edge: Even.
Planet Payments offers 10 unique features tailored for hotel payments complexity, including PCI compliance, payment tokenization, dynamic currency conversion (DCC), a multi-processor gateway, and acceptance of payment methods like Discovery, WeChatPay, Diners Club, Mastercard, AliPay, and GlobalPayments credit card processing. DCC enables hotels to increase revenue by allowing guests to pay in their preferred currency with transparent conversion rates. Tokenization enhances security by replacing sensitive card data with tokens, reducing PCI scope. The multi-processor gateway offers flexibility in routing payments for optimization or redundancy. These features benefit hotels with high international guest volumes and diverse payment preferences.
Zil Money offers 4 exclusive features: recurring payments, gratuity function, partial capture, and PayPal acceptance. Recurring payments automate billing for extended stays or memberships, reducing manual invoicing. The gratuity function streamlines tip management at checkout, a convenience for hospitality staff and guests. Partial capture permits hotels to authorize a payment amount upfront and capture the remainder later, useful for incidentals. PayPal acceptance adds a popular alternative payment method particularly favored in North America.
Planet’s 10 unique hotel-relevant features target comprehensive global payment acceptance and security, while Zil Money’s 4 features focus on financial flexibility and operational convenience. Planet’s broader feature set aligns better with hotels that prioritize multi-currency and multi-acquirer processing. Zil Money’s features are compelling for properties needing payroll and billing automation.
Edge: Planet Payments.
Planet Payments rates a low 2.7/5 in customer support and 2.8/5 onboarding from 6 reviews, with frequent remarks about slow response times and unresolved tickets stretching over months. One reviewer noted repeated automated requests for feedback without meaningful resolution, undermining perceived value. However, some users praised individual support agents for competence and kindness.
Zil Money scores 4.5/5 for customer support and 4.2/5 onboarding from 58 reviews, with many users highlighting top-tier, responsive service that removes operational headaches. Some reviewers requested faster resolution times and broader client support but overall rated the experience positively.
Despite the rating gap, both products receive mixed feedback from some users, and Planet’s small review count limits reliability. Given these factors and the overlap in onboarding experiences, customer support is statistically even.
Edge: Even.
Planet Payments has 196 verified integrations including major hotel systems like Innspire, Right Revenue, Omnibees, Profitroom, Bookboost, 4SUITES, RevControl, Lybra Tech, and NightsBridge. These integrations facilitate front-desk workflows by syncing payment data with PMS, revenue management, and channel managers, reducing manual entry and errors while enhancing reporting accuracy. This broad ecosystem supports hotels of various sizes and segments with complex operational needs.
Zil Money has zero verified integrations according to available data, limiting connectivity to third-party hotel software. Its focus is on cloud-based financial management rather than front-desk payment integration. Hotels relying on PMS or CRM integrations for seamless guest payment processing will find Planet far superior.
Edge: Planet Payments.
Zil Money’s overall rating is 4.4/5 from 58 reviews, compared to Planet Payments’ 3.6/5 from 6 reviews. Zil Money’s rating is supported by a larger and more diverse sample, spanning boutique hotels (4.5/5, 17 reviews), branded hotels (4/5, 26), and city center properties (4.5/5, 17). Planet Payments’ ratings are concentrated in fewer segments with small review counts, e.g., City Center Hotels (4.3/5, 2 reviews) and Resorts (4.3/5, 2 reviews). The limited reviews for Planet make its rating less representative.
However, Zil Money has dropped from an average of 14.5 reviews per 6 months over the prior two years to zero in the last six months, signaling decreased review activity. This sharp decline means Zil Money’s historical ratings may not accurately reflect recent product or support quality. Planet’s last six months include 4 reviews, but still below the 10-review threshold to judge recent ratings.
Hotels in luxury segments rate Planet at 5/5 (1 review) versus Zil Money’s 4.2/5 (16 reviews), but sample sizes are small. Limited service and budget hotels rate Zil Money higher (4.2/5, 16) than Planet (1/5, 1 review).
Edge: Even.
Planet Payments does not publish pricing publicly, with no implementation fees, trials, or base monthly charges disclosed. Pricing is likely customized per client, reflecting its modular global platform approach.
Zil Money’s pricing starts at $400 base price with no freemium or monthly flat fees and no implementation fee. It offers a 15-day free trial. The straightforward cost structure aligns with small to mid-sized hotels seeking transparent budget planning.
Without comparative pricing transparency from Planet, hotels must engage sales for quotes. Zil Money’s published pricing provides clearer budgeting but may be less flexible for larger properties needing complex payment solutions.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Planet Payments and Zil Money address different hotel payments needs, with Planet focusing on global payment acceptance breadth and intricate integrations, while Zil Money emphasizes cloud-based financial workflows and ease of use in core payment functions. Planet’s strength lies in supporting 150+ currencies, multiple acquirers, and payment methods favored by international travelers, beneficial for luxury and resort hotels. Zil Money’s strengths include recurring payments, gratuity management, and simplified payroll by credit card, favored by independent and boutique hotels in the Americas.
Choose Planet Payments when your hotel prioritizes multi-currency payment options, comprehensive PMS and revenue management integrations, and an all-in-one payment platform adaptable to global operations. Its 196 verified integrations and advanced payment tokenization and DCC features facilitate revenue generation and operational efficiency, especially for luxury and large properties.
Choose Zil Money if your hotel values straightforward, cloud-based financial management with payroll, invoicing, and automated payments integrated in one place, backed by a stronger all-time user rating of 4.4/5 from 58 reviews. Its published pricing and free trial offer transparency and low entry barriers for smaller or mid-sized properties. However, Zil Money’s review activity has dropped sharply recently, possibly reflecting changes in product or support quality, so proceed cautiously.
In summary, Planet Payments suits hotels with global payment complexity and integration needs, while Zil Money fits those seeking operational simplicity and financial consolidation. Both have strengths and limitations clearly reflected in review data and feature sets, empowering hoteliers to align choices tightly with property size, market, and operational priorities.
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
工作流程自动化
|
|
|
| 退款管理 | ||
| 预授权 | ||
| 付款拆分 | ||
|
▾
支付方式
|
|
|
| 链接支付 | ||
| 小费功能 | ||
| 部分捕获 | ||
| 定期付款 | ||
| Klarna 分期付款计划 | ||
| 接受苹果支付 | ||
| 邮购电话订单 (MOTO) 付款 | ||
| 接受谷歌支付 | ||
| 分期付款计划 | ||
| 接受贝宝 | ||
| 接受支付宝 | ||
| 接受微信支付 | ||
| 接受签证 | ||
| 接受美国运通 | ||
| 非接触式支付 | ||
| 接受发现 | ||
| 接受万事达卡 | ||
| 接受大来俱乐部 | ||
|
▾
安全与欺诈预防
|
|
|
| 退款管理 | ||
| 支付标记化 | ||
| 预授权 | ||
| 3-D 安全支付 | ||
| PCI合规性 | ||
|
▾
$
多币种
|
|
|
| 多币种结算 | ||
| 动态货币转换 (DCC) | ||
|
▾
调整
|
|
|
| 授权调整 | ||
| 退款管理 | ||
|
▾
硬件
|
|
|
| Elavon(信用卡处理) | ||
| TSYS(信用卡处理) | ||
| GlobalPayments(信用卡处理) | ||
| Vantiv(信用卡处理) | ||
| 第一数据(信用卡处理) | ||
| Heartland(信用卡处理) | ||
| 大通(信用卡处理) | ||
| 多处理器网关 |
我们分析了 1 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"With a limited timeframe to replace our previous PMS, Planet’s structured onboarding process and dedicated support helped us complete the transition successfully before reopening f..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
用户经常称赞 Zil Money 的直观界面,简化了发票、费用跟踪和其他财务任务。该平台的易用性缩短了入门时间并提高了运营效率。
一些评论表明,客户体验的一些细微改进,例如简化验证流程和减少设置时间,可以使平台更加高效和用户友好。
许多用户强调了 Zil Money 支付处理功能的速度和可靠性,这确保了及时交易并支持酒店的现金流管理。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
用户看重Zil Money与各种会计和财务软件无缝集成的能力,这有助于整合财务运营并提高效率。
用户建议扩大与更多第三方应用程序的集成,这将提供更多的灵活性和定制性,满足不同的业务需求。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
这取决于您的需求。Planet Payments 和 Zil Money 共享许多核心 Payments Processing Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Planet Payments 提供 196 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Zil Money 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速上手。Zil Money 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.5/5 对比 4.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按酒店规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Planet Payments:否。Zil Money:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Payments Processing Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店经营者客观比较酒店科技产品。Planet 的 HT Score 为 0,Zil Money 的为 49。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您酒店的情况量身定制的推荐