项目面板是一款免费工具,仅向已认证的酒店从业者开放。它通过简化调研流程和沟通环节,让采用新技术变得更轻松。
在分析了 339 条经验证的评价后,Preno 用户最看重其 易用性和员工接受度, 客户支持和响应能力, 与会计和其他系统的集成,而 RMS 用户则强调 支持团队, 用户界面, operational streamlining。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
易用性和员工接受度
▾
|
+
支持团队
▾
|
|
+
客户支持和响应能力
▾
|
+
用户界面
▾
|
|
+
与会计和其他系统的集成
▾
|
+
Operational Streamlining
▾
|
|
+
节省成本,物有所值
▾
|
+
OTA和渠道管理
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
定制化和产品灵活性
▾
|
−
定制功能
▾
|
|
−
UI/网格视图限制
▾
|
−
报表定制
▾
|
|
−
付款处理和预订付款规则
▾
|
−
账单和发票
▾
|
各产品在不同酒店规模、类型和区域的 酒店管理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店经营者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #15 50 条评价 | #6 126 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #24 6 条评价 | #7 80 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #12 8 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #2 8 条评价 |
按酒店类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #18 35 条评价 | #6 80 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #16 22 条评价 | #8 40 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #17 13 条评价 | #8 37 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #13 13 条评价 | #5 52 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #21 6 条评价 | #9 56 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #14 16 条评价 | #13 16 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #19 1 条评价 | #11 6 条评价 |
| 中东 | #13 2 条评价 | #10 2 条评价 |
Preno and RMS address hotel management but diverge sharply in target property size and complexity. Preno is tailored exclusively for independent properties such as boutique hotels, motels, B&Bs, and pubs with rooms. Its design prioritizes simplicity and ease of use to get small teams operational quickly, supporting properties typically under 20 rooms with straightforward workflows. RMS, by contrast, serves a broader market including multi-property groups and branded hotels, offering an extensive feature set suited to larger and more complex operations.
Both products solve core problems of connecting reservations, payments, housekeeping, and reporting. Preno emphasizes reducing admin burden with a simplified interface and native Xero integration, ideal for smaller teams. RMS provides a wide-ranging platform integrating channel management, revenue management, guest CRM, and EPoS, aiming to enhance operational control and revenue optimization at scale.
If you run a boutique hotel, motel, or B&B with fewer than 20 rooms and prioritize ease of use and quick staff adoption, Preno is the better choice. This fits the 92 reviews from small independent properties showing a 4.8 overall rating and specific praise for its Xero accounting integration and responsive support. Preno’s simpler feature set reflects these users’ needs, as it lacks advanced rate management and channel integration compared to RMS.
If your property is medium to large, a branded hotel, or part of a multi-property group needing advanced features like integrated channel management, comprehensive revenue management, or guest CRM, RMS suits your needs better. RMS has 247 reviews across diverse segments with a 4.3 average rating, supported by 118 verified integrations and modules like EPoS and automated night audit. However, note that RMS’s review volume dropped 60% in the last six months, which may indicate recent challenges.
The data for very small independent hotels strongly favors Preno for its operational simplicity and cost-effectiveness. RMS’s strength lies in scale and feature depth, though its recent decline in review activity suggests caution.
Preno leads ease of use with a 4.8 rating versus RMS’s 4.3, supported by onboarding scores of 4.6 against 4.1. Reviewers repeatedly highlight Preno’s simple, intuitive interface and quick learning curve for front desk and housekeeping staff. One Preno user noted that new team members familiar with other systems quickly adopt Preno, speeding daily tasks like reservations and check-in.
RMS users appreciate the system’s user-friendly interface, but some mention complexity in rate entry and refund processing. Training times tend to be longer due to the breadth of features. While RMS provides customization to fit specific workflows, this adds complexity for frontline staff.
Edge: Preno.
RMS offers 47 unique hotel-relevant features beyond the 27 shared with Preno, including integrated channel management, revenue management module, guest CRM, booking engine, EPoS, guest messaging, and housekeeping mobile app. These features enable larger properties to automate revenue optimization, streamline OTA connections, and manage guest communications across multiple channels, reducing manual work and improving operational insight.
Preno’s unique features are limited to website development and a drag-and-drop tape chart, which aid smaller properties in managing availability visually and building a basic web presence. Preno lacks RMS’s advanced modules such as group booking functionality, automated night audit, multi-currency support, and integrated payment terminals.
The operational impact is significant: RMS’s broad feature set supports complex workflows and multi-department coordination, while Preno keeps operations lean and straightforward for small teams.
Edge: RMS.
Preno scores 4.8 for customer support and 4.6 for onboarding, compared to RMS’s 4.5 support and 4.1 onboarding ratings. Preno reviewers frequently praise prompt, reliable, and personalized support from real people, noting quick issue resolution and ongoing improvements based on user feedback. Some mention limited weekend coverage as a drawback.
RMS users acknowledge the support team’s responsiveness and problem-solving skills, valuing their proactive communication. However, a few reviews criticize slower responses from account managers and delayed updates on system upgrades.
Edge: Preno.
RMS offers 118 verified partner integrations against Preno’s 17, with 10 shared partners including major names like SiteMinder, TrustYou, and Revinate. RMS’s unique integrations cover critical systems such as Sage accounting, STR analytics, Event Temple, HiJiffy guest messaging, and more, supporting complex multi-department and multi-property workflows.
Preno’s exclusive integrations include Xero accounting, Bookboost, and HelloShift, focusing on essential connections for small independents to maintain efficient accounting and basic messaging workflows.
Hotels requiring extensive OTA connectivity, advanced revenue tools, or complex accounting benefit from RMS’s broad integration ecosystem. Smaller independent hotels with simpler needs generally find Preno’s integrations sufficient.
Edge: RMS.
Preno holds a higher overall rating of 4.8/5 from 92 reviews compared to RMS’s 4.3/5 from 247 reviews. In the last six months, Preno maintains a strong 4.6 average from 11 reviews, while RMS’s 5 recent reviews are too few for a reliable current rating. RMS’s review activity dropped 60% in recent months, suggesting its historical ratings may not reflect current performance.
Segment-specific ratings confirm Preno’s strength with small properties: Bed & Breakfasts have 4.8 vs RMS’s 4.3, Motels 4.8 vs 4.4, Boutique Hotels 4.7 vs 4.2, and Extended Stay 4.8 vs 4.1. RMS outperforms slightly or is competitive in large segments like Resorts (4.8 Preno vs 4.2 RMS) but has fewer reviews there.
Edge: Preno.
Preno charges a base price of $400 with no implementation fee or per-room charges and offers a 30-day trial. RMS’s base price is $700 with no publicly available trial or implementation fee, and no per-room pricing published. Neither vendor has freemium or flat monthly pricing models.
Preno’s transparent pricing suits smaller properties seeking predictable costs without hidden fees. RMS’s higher base price reflects its enterprise-grade features and broader market but lacks transparent trial access for evaluation.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Preno and RMS differ primarily in scope and complexity. Preno focuses on simplicity and cost-effectiveness for small independents, offering essential hotel management functions with excellent ease of use and support. RMS targets larger and more complex operations with a broad feature set that supports multi-department coordination, advanced revenue management, and extensive integrations.
Choose Preno if you operate a small hotel or motel and want a system that your team will adopt quickly, with native Xero accounting integration and responsive support that reduces daily admin. Choose RMS if your property or group requires integrated channel management, guest CRM, and modules like EPoS and automated night audits to scale operations and optimize revenue.
Be aware that RMS’s review activity has dropped sharply, with only 5 reviews in the last six months compared to an average of 12.5 previously, so its historical ratings may not fully reflect recent user experience. Preno maintains steady recent review volume and consistently high ratings, making it a safer choice for small properties prioritizing operational simplicity.
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
会计与金融
|
|
|
| 多币种 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、账单等) | ||
| 自动化夜间审计 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
|
▾
营销与电子商务
|
|
|
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 团体预订引擎 | ||
| 网站开发 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、账单等) | ||
| 宾客沟通(短信) | ||
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 宾客资料 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
|
▾
管理和配置
|
|
|
| 多种语言 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 集中用户和角色管理 | ||
|
▾
用户管理
|
|
|
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 客人反馈管理 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、账单等) | ||
| 宾客资料 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
|
▾
前台
|
|
|
| 客人反馈管理 | ||
| 家政 | ||
| 物业管理系统 | ||
| 自动化夜间审计 | ||
| 移动设备笔记和任务(语音转文本) | ||
| 移动应用程序 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 任务管理 | ||
| 自动提醒 | ||
| 宾客资料 | ||
| 平板电脑/自助值机 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
群组管理
|
|
|
| 组功能 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
宾客体验
|
|
|
| 客人反馈管理 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 集成身份证和护照扫描仪 | ||
| 数字注册 | ||
| 访客应用程序 | ||
| 网上值机 | ||
| 网上结账 | ||
| 宾客留言 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、账单等) | ||
| 平板电脑/自助值机 | ||
|
▾
家政
|
|
|
| 家政 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
| 客房服务手机应用程序 | ||
| 实时状态更新 | ||
| 自动分配 | ||
| 实时报告 | ||
| 轮班规划 | ||
| 员工信息 | ||
| 网上结账 | ||
|
▾
付款
|
|
|
| 多币种 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 自动提醒 | ||
| 集成支付终端和读卡器 | ||
|
▾
预订管理
|
|
|
| 评分购物模块 | ||
| 物业管理系统 | ||
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 综合 CRS | ||
| 拖放式磁带图 | ||
| 费率管理 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
| 自动分配 | ||
| 基于规则的房间分配 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、账单等) | ||
|
▾
收入管理
|
|
|
| 评分购物模块 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 定价情报 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 自定义费率 | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 | ||
| 基本定价 | ||
|
▾
税务与合规
|
|
|
| 符合 PCI 标准 | ||
| 符合 GDPR 规定 | ||
| SOC2投诉 | ||
| 税务配置 | ||
|
▾
支持与培训
|
|
|
| 全天候在线支持 | ||
|
▾
食品与饮料
|
|
|
| 销售点 |
我们分析了 4 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"RMS has changed how we think about growth. For the first time, we could see exactly which districts were most profitable and where we should be focusing our energy — and our invest..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"When you manage 26 properties, speed and control are everything. With RMS, I can update rates, policies, or form letters instantly across the group. That kind of centralization let..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"RMS has helped us strengthen what makes The Nare special: our connection with guests. It gives our team the knowledge they need to offer a genuinely personal experience, and we see..."
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
用户一致认为 Preno 简单易学,一线员工也能轻松上手,这有助于新团队快速掌握使用方法。评论者认为这种简便性有助于加快日常运营速度,并减轻培训负担。
支持质量是用户反复提及的话题,许多用户称赞 Preno 的服务及时、周到且响应迅速。但也有人担心,周末和节假日的服务覆盖范围仍然有限,这可能会导致酒店在工作... 支持质量是用户反复提及的话题,许多用户称赞 Preno 的服务及时、周到且响应迅速。但也有人担心,周末和节假日的服务覆盖范围仍然有限,这可能会导致酒店在工作日以外的时间段无法获得帮助。
Preno 与 Xero、Lightspeed、发票工具和其他关键系统的集成是用户选择它的主要原因。评论称,这些集成有助于保持工作流程的顺畅衔接并降低成本,但一些用户希望... Preno 与 Xero、Lightspeed、发票工具和其他关键系统的集成是用户选择它的主要原因。评论称,这些集成有助于保持工作流程的顺畅衔接并降低成本,但一些用户希望数据映射更加灵活,并且能够更流畅地将预订详情导入发票。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
评论者喜欢Preno的可靠性,但也有一些用户希望能够更灵活地自定义屏幕、字段、颜色、按钮和发票数据。总的来说,核心工作流程运行良好,但高级用户希望拥有更多... 评论者喜欢Preno的可靠性,但也有一些用户希望能够更灵活地自定义屏幕、字段、颜色、按钮和发票数据。总的来说,核心工作流程运行良好,但高级用户希望拥有更多控制权,以更好地匹配其所在机构的流程。
网格状界面经常受到诟病,用户反映它会影响工作效率,或者不如其他界面直观。虽然有些用户认为它简洁易用,但也有人认为这是一个亟待改进的方面。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
支持团队的响应速度和问题解决能力备受好评。客户高度赞赏他们积极主动地解决问题以及在系统操作方面提供的帮助。
RMS Cloud 以其用户友好的界面而著称,简化了操作流程,缩短了员工培训时间。这种简化对于高效运营至关重要,尤其是在快节奏的工作环境中。
RMS Cloud significantly streamlines hotel operations by integrating multiple aspects such as reservations, housekeeping, and maintenance. Users apprec... RMS Cloud significantly streamlines hotel operations by integrating multiple aspects such as reservations, housekeeping, and maintenance. Users appreciate its role in enabling real-time coordination among various departments, thereby enhancing efficiency and guest experience.
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
许多用户称赞该平台的自定义功能,允许他们调整入住流程和其他操作,以更好地满足自身需求。然而,一些评论指出,自定义报告功能需要改进。
尽管 RMS Cloud 提供多种报告,但用户反映报告自定义和访问某些设置方面存在困难。如果能改进这方面,就能简化生成可用于决策的实用信息的过程。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Preno HMS 和 RMS 共享许多核心 Hotel Management Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Preno HMS 提供 17 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 RMS 提供 118 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速上手。Preno HMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 4.3/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按酒店规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Preno HMS:否。RMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Management Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店经营者客观比较酒店科技产品。Preno 的 HT Score 为 81,RMS 的为 86。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您酒店的情况量身定制的推荐