The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
在分析了 316 条经验证的评价后,Preno 用户最看重其 用户友好界面, 支持和服务质量, 自动化和效率,而 RMS 用户则强调 支持团队, 用户界面, operational streamlining。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
用户友好界面
▾
|
+
支持团队
▾
|
|
+
支持和服务质量
▾
|
+
用户界面
▾
|
|
+
自动化和效率
▾
|
+
Operational Streamlining
▾
|
|
+
无缝渠道管理
▾
|
+
OTA和渠道管理
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
功能增强空间
▾
|
−
定制功能
▾
|
|
−
报表定制
▾
|
|
|
−
账单和发票
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店管理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #15 32 条评价 | #6 124 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #22 6 条评价 | #6 83 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #12 6 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #20 0 条评价 | #2 7 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #16 29 条评价 | #6 79 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #15 18 条评价 | #8 39 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #17 9 条评价 | #7 38 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #13 9 条评价 | #5 52 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #19 6 条评价 | #9 56 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #15 10 条评价 | #13 16 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #22 0 条评价 | #11 6 条评价 |
| 中东 | #8 2 条评价 | #13 1 条评价 |
Choosing between Preno HMS and RMS can seem daunting—both are designed to streamline hotel operations and improve guest experiences. Preno focuses on simplicity and ease of use, while RMS offers a broader suite of features tailored for larger or multi-property hotels. Your decision hinges on whether you prioritize intuitive design or extensive functionality.
Both products aim to reduce manual workload, but RMS’s larger feature set and broader market presence make it more suitable for complex operations. Are you ready to dig into the specifics to see which aligns better with your hotel’s needs?
Preno and RMS both serve hotel management needs but diverge significantly in scope and depth. Preno is a straightforward, cloud-based PMS best suited for small to medium hotels that prioritize simplicity, quick onboarding, and responsive support. RMS, on the other hand, provides a comprehensive platform with advanced features like revenue management, integrated CRS, and guest CRM, appealing to larger or multi-property hotels.
While Preno’s recent reviews focus on ease of use and customer service, RMS’s more recent reviews highlight its robust reservation and channel management capabilities. Which features matter more for your property’s growth and operations?
If your hotel operates multiple properties or needs a broad array of features—such as revenue management, integrated POS, or advanced reporting—RMS is the logical choice. It’s favored by hotels managing 26+ properties, with a user base of over 7,000 businesses globally and recent reviews praising its scalability and automation.
Conversely, if your hotel needs a straightforward, easy-to-learn PMS with strong customer support and a focus on daily operations, Preno is better. Its high ease-of-use rating (4.86/5) and recent customer praise for quick onboarding and reliable service make it a compelling option for smaller hotels or boutique properties.
Preno’s user interface and onboarding are highly rated at 4.86/5 and 4.64/5 respectively, with many reviewers praising its intuitive design and straightforward setup. The system is built for hoteliers who want minimal training and quick ramp-up times, with comments like, “It’s very easy to learn and pick up quickly,” and “Staff find it very easy to use, even those with limited tech skills.”
RMS’s ease-of-use ratings are slightly lower at 4.3/5, but its extensive features can introduce complexity for new users. Reviews cite performance lag and a steeper learning curve, especially with advanced modules like revenue management and multi-property settings.
Edge: Preno.
RMS boasts a larger feature set with 47 unique functionalities, including channel management, booking engine, guest CRM, revenue management, and integrated CRS, making it suitable for hotels seeking an all-in-one platform. It also offers tools like automated night audits, group functionality, and multi-lingual support that Preno lacks.
Preno has only two features exclusive to it: website development and a drag-and-drop tapechart, which are simpler but more limited. If your hotel needs advanced revenue tools, integrated CRS, or multi-currency support, RMS clearly leads.
Edge: RMS.
Preno’s customer support is highly rated at 4.69/5, with reviewers emphasizing quick, reliable help and staff care. Many describe Preno’s support as “amazing,” especially during onboarding, though some note a desire for more 24/7 availability.
RMS’s support rating is slightly lower at 4.52/5, but recent reviews highlight its responsiveness and helpfulness, especially during complex setup and upgrades. Users mention that RMS’s support is generally good but can be inconsistent during rollouts.
Edge: Preno.
RMS offers significantly more integrations, with 112 verified partners, including critical ones like OTAs, payment processors, and analytics tools. Shared integrations include major platforms like SiteMinder, TrustYou, and Goki, with RMS adding niche partners such as Criton and Sage.
Preno has 17 verified partners, with notable integrations like Xero, Bookboost, and Zingle, but it lacks the extensive network RMS provides. For hotels relying heavily on third-party integrations, RMS is the clear leader.
Edge: RMS.
RMS’s overall rating is 4.56/5 based on 224 reviews, with recent reviews in the last 6 months praising its reservation management, automation, and scalability. Hotels of all sizes, especially those with multiple properties, find RMS’s features vital for growth, with comments like “It was the easiest onboarding process I’ve had.”
Preno’s ratings are lower at 0/5 overall, but this likely reflects its smaller user base rather than dissatisfaction. The recent reviews focus on its simplicity and excellent support but note limitations in advanced features.
Edge: RMS.
Preno costs $600 per month with no setup or trial fees, offering a straightforward flat rate. RMS charges $700 per month, also without setup or trial options, but with more features included.
Pricing differences are minimal, but RMS’s additional features may justify the slightly higher cost for hotels needing those capabilities. Both vendors do not offer freemium models or tiered pricing, so compare based on features rather than price.
Hotels that should consider Preno include:
Not ideal if:
Hotels that are suitable for RMS include:
Not ideal if:
RMS offers a broader feature set and superior integration capabilities, making it more suitable for larger, multi-property hotels that need detailed reporting, revenue management, and extensive channel management. Its recent reviews emphasize its scalability and automation as key benefits.
Preno excels in simplicity and customer support, ideal for small to medium hotels that value ease of use over complexity. Its highly rated onboarding process and responsive service are excellent for properties looking for a straightforward management system.
If your hotel prioritizes a simple, reliable, and fast-to-implement PMS, Preno is the better choice. However, for hotels seeking a comprehensive system that can grow with your business and handle complex operations, RMS is the superior option.
This detailed comparison should help you confidently decide which platform aligns best with your hotel’s current needs and future growth plans.
我们分析了 3 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"When you manage 26 properties, speed and control are everything. With RMS, I can update rates, policies, or form letters instantly across the group. That kind of centralization let..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"RMS has helped us strengthen what makes The Nare special: our connection with guests. It gives our team the knowledge they need to offer a genuinely personal experience, and we see..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Preno 的用户友好界面受到用户的高度赞扬。许多人注意到该系统的简单性和直观性,这大大降低了学习难度。这使得员工(即使是技术技能有限的员工)也能快速上手,... Preno 的用户友好界面受到用户的高度赞扬。许多人注意到该系统的简单性和直观性,这大大降低了学习难度。这使得员工(即使是技术技能有限的员工)也能快速上手,从而加快了运营速度。
客户普遍看重 Preno 的响应式客户支持,实时聊天和全面的帮助资源被强调是其一大优势。不过,一些评论提到需要更持续的全天候服务。
用户经常提到 Preno 的自动化功能,该功能简化了开票和报告等管理任务。这种自动化功能可节省大量时间并减少人工错误,使员工能够更加专注于客人体验。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
尽管反馈积极,但用户指出仍有改进空间。建议的改进包括高级报告、更好的移动应用功能和增强的客户互动工具。这些更新被视为满足不断变化的行业需求的必要条件。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
支持团队的响应速度和问题解决能力备受好评。客户高度赞赏他们积极主动地解决问题以及在系统操作方面提供的帮助。
RMS Cloud 以其用户友好的界面而著称,简化了操作流程,缩短了员工培训时间。这种简化对于高效运营至关重要,尤其是在快节奏的工作环境中。
RMS Cloud significantly streamlines hotel operations by integrating multiple aspects such as reservations, housekeeping, and maintenance. Users apprec... RMS Cloud significantly streamlines hotel operations by integrating multiple aspects such as reservations, housekeeping, and maintenance. Users appreciate its role in enabling real-time coordination among various departments, thereby enhancing efficiency and guest experience.
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
许多用户称赞该平台的自定义功能,允许他们调整入住流程和其他操作,以更好地满足自身需求。然而,一些评论指出,自定义报告功能需要改进。
尽管 RMS Cloud 提供多种报告,但用户反映报告自定义和访问某些设置方面存在困难。如果能改进这方面,就能简化生成可用于决策的实用信息的过程。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Preno HMS 和 RMS 共享许多核心 Hotel Management Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Preno HMS 提供 17 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 RMS 提供 112 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Preno HMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 4.3/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Preno HMS:否。RMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Management Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Preno 的 HT Score 为 76,RMS 的为 86。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问