The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 1,484 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Cloudbeds 表现出色 在 intuitiveness and ease of use 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (4.5/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Mobile optimized/responsive and Revenue management module.
Preno 表现出色 在 customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Native Email Marketing and Native Email Marketing.
在分析了 1,484 条经验证的评价后,Cloudbeds 用户最看重其 intuitiveness and ease of use, automation and efficiency, reservations and channel management,而 Preno 用户则强调 用户友好界面, 支持和服务质量, 自动化和效率。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Intuitiveness and Ease of Use
▾
|
+
用户友好界面
▾
|
|
+
Automation and Efficiency
▾
|
+
支持和服务质量
▾
|
|
+
Reservations and Channel Management
▾
|
+
自动化和效率
▾
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
+
无缝渠道管理
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
Reservation Flexibility and Editing
▾
|
−
功能增强空间
▾
|
|
−
货币兑换和金融业务
▾
|
|
|
−
移动功能
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店管理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #2 675 条评价 | #15 32 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #1 235 条评价 | #22 6 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #1 51 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #4 5 条评价 | #20 0 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #1 546 条评价 | #16 29 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #3 245 条评价 | #15 18 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #2 145 条评价 | #17 9 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #2 96 条评价 | #13 9 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #2 532 条评价 | #19 6 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #4 166 条评价 | #15 10 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #3 201 条评价 | #22 0 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | #3 13 条评价 | #8 2 条评价 |
Choosing between Cloudbeds HMS and Preno HMS hinges on your hotel's specific needs and growth ambitions. Cloudbeds, with its extensive feature set and broad market presence, is tailored for properties seeking scalability and comprehensive integration. Preno appeals to hoteliers prioritizing simplicity, user-friendliness, and cost-effective operations. Your decision should reflect whether you need a powerful, all-in-one platform or a straightforward, efficient management system.
Both products aim to streamline hotel operations, but Cloudbeds offers a more mature, globally proven solution. Consider whether your team values a system with deeper integrations and extensive features or prefers a more lightweight, easy-to-learn platform.
Cloudbeds and Preno both address core hotel management challenges—booking, billing, and guest communication—but they diverge significantly in scope. Cloudbeds, founded in 2012, provides a full-service platform with 65 exclusive features and over 190 verified integrations, backed by more than 1,200 recent reviews. Preno, established in 2015, offers a more streamlined system with only four unique features and 17 verified integrations, supported by 58 reviews—none within the last six months.
Cloudbeds’s broad feature set enables complex operations, automation, and scalability, making it suitable for diverse property types. Preno’s simplicity favors smaller hotels or those seeking to optimize existing workflows without the burden of extensive features. Which aligns better with your property’s growth plans and operational complexity?
If your hotel needs a comprehensive, scalable platform with extensive integrations—especially if you're managing multiple properties or require advanced revenue management—Cloudbeds is the clear choice. Its review score of 4.62/5 from over 1,200 recent reviews confirms strong user satisfaction, especially among boutique hotels, hostels, and resorts.
Conversely, if your team values ease of use, quick onboarding, and cost-effectiveness, Preno’s simple interface and high ease-of-use rating (4.86/5) make it the better fit. Preno's focus on core functionalities with fewer features suits small to medium-sized hotels prioritizing operational efficiency over extensive customization. If your goal is growth without complexity, Preno is the pragmatic pick.
Cloudbeds’s UI scores 4.58/5, praised for its intuitiveness and quick onboarding, but some users note that advanced features can present a learning curve. Its onboarding process is rated 4.41/5, and support reviews highlight responsiveness, though response times during peak periods can slow down.
Preno outperforms slightly in ease of use with a rating of 4.86/5, supported by positive reviews emphasizing its straightforward interface and quick staff adoption. Support support is rated 4.69/5, with users describing their experience as "quick and reliable," and onboarding as "easy to learn."
Edge: Preno.
Cloudbeds offers 65 exclusive features, including PMS connectivity, revenue management, multi-channel distribution, group management, automated night audits, and integrated payment processing—features that significantly enhance operational control. Its extensive feature suite supports larger or more complex properties.
Preno provides only four features unique to its platform: native email marketing, guest CRM, POS, and basic automation. While sufficient for small hotels, it lacks the depth of automation and operational tools Cloudbeds offers.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’s support is rated 4.38/5, with reviews highlighting fast, attentive responses and overall helpfulness. Users appreciate its 24/7 online support, though some mention occasional slower responses during busy times.
Preno’s customer support surpasses with a rating of 4.69/5, praised for quick, reliable assistance and ongoing support that clients say "continues to impress." Reviewers note that Preno’s support team is highly responsive and personable, making onboarding and troubleshooting straightforward.
Edge: Preno.
Cloudbeds boasts 190 verified partners, including major OTAs and integrations like SiteMinder, TrustYou, and Lightspeed, facilitating comprehensive connectivity. Shared integrations—like GuestTraction and Revinate—are complemented by many exclusive to Cloudbeds, supporting diverse operational needs.
Preno's 17 verified partners include essential platforms like Xero, Bookboost, and Zingle, but its smaller integration network limits flexibility for complex multi-system setups. Its fewer integrations are sufficient for small hotels but less adaptable for larger operations.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’s overall rating is 4.62/5, based on over 1,200 recent reviews, with 91% likelihood to recommend. It receives high marks across segments, especially among boutique hotels and hostels, with some users praising its ability to streamline operations and increase bookings.
Preno’s rating is 76.2/100, with 95% of users recommending it, but the lack of recent reviews limits confidence in current performance. Its simplicity is praised by small-hotel operators, but larger properties may find it lacking.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’s pricing starts at $500/month, with no free tier or trial, reflecting its enterprise-grade features. Preno charges $600/month, also without a trial, positioning it as a slightly more expensive but equally streamlined option for small properties.
Cost considerations should align with your hotel’s size and complexity. Cloudbeds’s broader capabilities justify the price for larger or growing properties, while Preno’s straightforward pricing appeals to smaller hotels seeking efficiency.
Not ideal if your property prefers a lightweight solution with minimal features or has a very tight budget.
Not ideal if your hotel requires advanced revenue management, multiple integrations, or extensive automation.
Cloudbeds is a comprehensive, feature-rich system designed for hotels seeking growth and operational complexity. Its extensive integrations, automation, and proven market presence make it ideal for medium to large properties or growing boutique hotels.
Preno excels as a simple, user-friendly solution suited for small and mid-sized hotels that focus on core management tasks and rapid staff onboarding. It’s best for properties that want an efficient, straightforward system without the need for extensive customization.
If your hotel needs a flexible, scalable platform, Cloudbeds is the superior choice, offering a proven track record and extensive features. For smaller properties prioritizing ease of use and reliable support, Preno provides a streamlined, effective alternative.
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Cloudbeds is consistently praised for its user-friendly interface, which helps quick onboarding and reduces training times. Even users new to hotel ma... Cloudbeds is consistently praised for its user-friendly interface, which helps quick onboarding and reduces training times. Even users new to hotel management software find it intuitive, making operations smoother and more consistent for staff across the board.
The platform's automation tools significantly enhance daily operations, automating repetitive tasks like rate updates and payment processing. This not... The platform's automation tools significantly enhance daily operations, automating repetitive tasks like rate updates and payment processing. This not only saves time but also minimizes human errors, resulting in increased productivity and a focus on improving guest experiences.
Cloudbeds excels in integrating reservations and channel management, centralizing OTA distributions while reducing overbookings and errors. Users appr... Cloudbeds excels in integrating reservations and channel management, centralizing OTA distributions while reducing overbookings and errors. Users appreciate the streamlined handling of bookings and distribution, which boosts operational efficiency and helps in maintaining optimal occupancy rates.
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
The ability to edit and restructure reservations is seen as area for improvement, with users desiring more flexibility. Suggestions include splitting... The ability to edit and restructure reservations is seen as area for improvement, with users desiring more flexibility. Suggestions include splitting bookings or rearranging stays, which would better accommodate real-time changes such as guest extensions or cancellations.
人们注意到货币转换的准确性存在问题,尤其是在多币种交易中。用户反映存在一些差异,影响了对账流程。改进货币转换配置可以简化财务管理。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Preno 的用户友好界面受到用户的高度赞扬。许多人注意到该系统的简单性和直观性,这大大降低了学习难度。这使得员工(即使是技术技能有限的员工)也能快速上手,... Preno 的用户友好界面受到用户的高度赞扬。许多人注意到该系统的简单性和直观性,这大大降低了学习难度。这使得员工(即使是技术技能有限的员工)也能快速上手,从而加快了运营速度。
客户普遍看重 Preno 的响应式客户支持,实时聊天和全面的帮助资源被强调是其一大优势。不过,一些评论提到需要更持续的全天候服务。
用户经常提到 Preno 的自动化功能,该功能简化了开票和报告等管理任务。这种自动化功能可节省大量时间并减少人工错误,使员工能够更加专注于客人体验。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
尽管反馈积极,但用户指出仍有改进空间。建议的改进包括高级报告、更好的移动应用功能和增强的客户互动工具。这些更新被视为满足不断变化的行业需求的必要条件。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Cloudbeds HMS 和 Preno HMS 共享许多核心 Hotel Management Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Cloudbeds HMS 提供 189 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Preno HMS 提供 17 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Preno HMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 4.6/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Cloudbeds HMS:否。Preno HMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Management Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Cloudbeds 的 HT Score 为 100,Preno 的为 76。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问