The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 预订引擎 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) | #32 2 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #18 17 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #17 2 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #15 2 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #23 9 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #22 8 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #19 7 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 | #26 2 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | #38 1 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 | #47 0 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 ▾ | #9 15 条评价 | — |
| 中东 ▾ | #5 6 条评价 | — |
Choosing between RateGain’s Hotel Booking Engine and VISIT’s booking platform hinges on your hotel’s specific needs. RateGain offers a well-established, feature-rich solution with a global reach, while VISIT provides a more customizable, integrated experience tailored for diverse property types. Both aim to boost direct bookings, but their approaches differ significantly.
RateGain’s solution is more mature with extensive integrations and a larger review base, making it the more tested and reliable choice. VISIT, on the other hand, emphasizes flexibility and guest experience but has fewer recent reviews and a smaller global footprint. Which will align better with your hotel’s priorities?
RateGain’s platform is designed to serve hotels seeking a proven, broad-reaching booking engine with extensive integration options. Its 21 reviews, though not the newest, still reflect a sense of stability and reliability, with a 0/5 HTR score indicating more data is needed but with a high recommendation rate of 93%. VISIT, with 28 recent reviews and a 25.13 HTR score, shows more current hotel feedback, emphasizing ease of use and guest experience.
While RateGain’s features are comprehensive, covering 28 shared features, it lacks some exclusive functionalities found in VISIT, such as wedding modules, social media integration, and loyalty programs. VISIT’s recent surge in reviews suggests a more dynamic platform, but its smaller international presence may influence support and integration options. Are you prioritizing proven scale or newer features?
If your hotel operates in Asia or the Middle East and values extensive integrations with global partners, RateGain’s established presence and 97 verified partners make it a stronger fit. Its primary customer base is luxury and branded hotels, highlighting its suitability for high-end properties needing reliable, scalable solutions.
Conversely, VISIT excels if your hotel is in Europe or North America, especially if you value customizable packaging, guest-centric features, and a more modern interface. Its 19 verified partners include key players like SiteMinder and Cloudbeds, but its smaller regional footprint could limit global support. For properties prioritizing innovation and flexibility, VISIT is the better choice.
RateGain’s user rating of 4.71 out of 5 underscores its user-friendly design, supported by high onboarding scores (4.65/5). However, some reviews mention occasional challenges with booking updates and inventory management. VISIT scores slightly higher, at 4.89/5, with recent reviews praising its intuitive interface, ease of navigation, and excellent customer support (4.93/5).
VISIT’s mobile adaptability also receives positive comments, making it easier for staff on the go. Overall, VISIT’s interface appears more polished and adaptable for daily hotel operations. Edge: VISIT.
RateGain offers a comprehensive set of 28 shared features but lacks additional functionalities exclusive to VISIT. VISIT provides 12 unique features, including wedding and corporate modules, automated reporting, and social media integrations, which can greatly enhance marketing and guest engagement.
If your hotel relies on specialized packages, loyalty programs, or multi-channel marketing, VISIT’s features are more aligned. RateGain covers core booking needs but may fall short if you require advanced upselling, custom packages, or social media booking integrations. Edge: VISIT.
RateGain’s support team scores 4.76/5, with reviews citing timely problem-solving and helpful support staff. Still, recent reviews note that support could be quicker during high-demand periods. VISIT’s customer support is rated even higher at 4.93/5, with hotel reviews emphasizing prompt, friendly assistance and ongoing development.
VISIT’s recent reviews mention “support that feels personal and attentive,” which is crucial during busy seasons. If support quality is your top priority, especially for onboarding and troubleshooting, Edge: VISIT.
RateGain boasts 97 verified partners, including major industry players like Lighthouse, Cendyn, and Cloudbeds, broadening its connectivity options. Shared integrations with VISIT include RateGain, Lighthouse, and Cloudbeds, but it has only 19 verified partners.
VISIT’s narrower partner base might limit some integration options but still covers key systems like SiteMinder and Price My Hotel Room. If extensive third-party integrations are essential, RateGain holds the advantage. Edge: RateGain.
VISIT’s 28 recent reviews have an average rating of 5/5, reflecting high satisfaction across various hotel segments, especially resorts and boutique hotels. Hotels in North America and Europe appreciate its ease of use and guest experience features.
RateGain’s reviews, though fewer and older, suggest a mixed perception — some praise its stability, but others highlight booking quirks. Given more recent feedback, VISIT currently enjoys higher hotel ratings. Edge: VISIT.
RateGain’s booking engine is priced at $400 per month, with no free trial or implementation fees, making it a predictable investment. VISIT’s platform costs $800 per month, also without a trial, but its higher price reflects its broader feature set and customization options.
Both pricing models are monthly flat fees, but VISIT’s higher cost may be justified if you need its advanced features. Budget-conscious hotels might lean toward RateGain, but for more extensive capabilities, VISIT’s price aligns with its offering.
RateGain offers a mature, extensively integrated booking engine suited for hotels that need a reliable, large-scale solution. Its feature set and global presence make it ideal for luxury brands and properties in Asia or the Middle East, but it’s less flexible for customization and modern marketing features.
VISIT, with a smaller but highly rated platform, excels in guest experience, ease of use, and flexible packaging. It is best suited for boutique hotels, resorts, or properties in Europe and North America that prioritize marketing, guest engagement, and customizable workflows.
If your property values proven reliability and wide integrations, go with RateGain. If you prefer a more modern, flexible user experience and tailored features, VISIT is the better choice. Make your decision based on regional support, feature needs, and your target guest experience.
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
商品和包装
|
|
|
| 房间替换 | ||
| 多房间和多费率计划预订 | ||
| 固定费率、浮动费率和折扣率 | ||
| 合并库存 | ||
| 特别优惠和折扣 | ||
| 可定制的附加组件 | ||
| 膳食计划 | ||
| 网站整合 | ||
| 社交媒体整合/预订 | ||
|
▾
追加销售和交叉销售
|
|
|
| 多房间和多费率计划预订 | ||
| 房间替换 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 预订放弃重新获得 | ||
| 可定制的附加组件 | ||
| 特别优惠和折扣 | ||
| 膳食计划 | ||
| 替代住宿建议(没有空房时) | ||
| 忠诚度计划整合 | ||
|
▾
转换
|
|
|
| 移动优化/响应式 | ||
| 特别优惠和折扣 | ||
| 紧急信息 | ||
| 预订放弃重新获得 | ||
| 多房间和多费率计划预订 | ||
| 房间替换 | ||
| 人工智能优化 | ||
| 价格对比 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 转化率报告 | ||
| Facebook 转化跟踪 | ||
| 可定制的退出意图模式 | ||
| 表单自动填充 | ||
| 灵活日期 | ||
| 费率计划比较 | ||
| Google 酒店广告预订 | ||
| Tripadvisor 预订 | ||
|
▾
支付
|
|
|
| 多币种 | ||
| 苹果支付 | ||
| Google Pay | ||
| 贝宝 | ||
| PCI合规性 | ||
| PayU | ||
| 条纹 | ||
|
▾
通知
|
|
|
| 预订放弃重新获得 | ||
| 入住后电子邮件 | ||
| 入住前电子邮件 | ||
| 确认电子邮件 | ||
|
▾
团体预订
|
|
|
| 婚礼和企业预订模块 | ||
| 可用性块 | ||
|
▾
报告与分析
|
|
|
| 自动报告 | ||
| 转化率报告 | ||
| 推荐报告 | ||
| Google Analytics 跟踪 | ||
|
▾
税务合规
|
|
|
| PCI合规性 | ||
| 符合 ADA 标准 | ||
| 关税 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 符合 GDPR 规定 |
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
BookVisit 的支持团队经常因响应迅速和乐于助人而受到称赞。用户对持续的开发和更新表示赞赏,但有些人认为,响应速度更快和指南更完善还有待改进。
该平台的易用性显著提升了客人体验,从而提高了转化率。其用户友好的界面受到客人和管理员的一致好评。不过,有些人认为移动界面和票务管理还有改进空间。
与 PMS 系统和各种 OTA 渠道的集成备受推崇,可简化操作。关键是,一些用户希望更好地与特定系统集成,例如餐桌预订和 SPA 管理。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
BookVisit 提供了良好的统计和收入管理工具,但用户建议实施更多动态定价功能以简化房间类型和入住率管理。
用户对后台预订管理和分析功能表示赞赏,认为这些功能有助于日常运营。但是,他们呼吁改进价格管理系统,并简化复杂预订变更的导航。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。RateGain Hotel Booking Engine 和 VISIT 共享许多核心 Booking Engine 功能,但各有独特的能力。RateGain Hotel Booking Engine 提供 97 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 VISIT 提供 19 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。VISIT 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 4.7/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
RateGain Hotel Booking Engine:否。VISIT:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Booking Engine 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。RateGain 的 HT Score 为 0,VISIT 的为 25。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您的房产情况量身定制的推荐方案