The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 100 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Resly 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 Tablet/Kiosk Check-in and Lobby Kiosk.
roommaster 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (5.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Revenue management module and Integrated Payment Terminal & Card Reader.
基于 HTR 上 100 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $500/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 100 |
在分析了 100 条经验证的评价后,Resly 用户最看重其 ,而 roommaster 用户则强调 客户支持, 预订管理, 集中式数据管理。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
|
|
+
预订管理
▾
|
|
|
+
集中式数据管理
▾
|
|
|
+
云和移动访问
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
报告生成
▾
|
|
|
−
用户界面体验
▾
|
|
|
−
团体预订功能
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #30 26 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #13 54 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | — | #31 3 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #32 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #22 35 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #34 8 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #24 15 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #27 6 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #10 62 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #29 11 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #27 0 条评价 |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can dramatically influence your hotel’s operational efficiency, guest experience, and profitability. Both Resly PMS and roommaster PMS aim to streamline your workflows, but they do so with different strengths and target audiences. Resly is newer, with a focus on management rights and short-term rentals, while roommaster is an established player trusted by a broad array of hotel types, especially in North America. How do they compare on features, usability, support, and overall value?
Resly PMS and roommaster PMS both address core hotel management needs—reservations, guest management, and financials. Resly’s appeal lies in its simplicity and specialization for management rights and vacation rentals, offering features like trust accounting and multi-currency support. Conversely, roommaster provides a broader suite of functionalities, including revenue management, extensive reporting, and integrations, making it suitable for larger or multi-property hotels. The key divergence is in their focus: Resly aims to simplify, roommaster strives to centralize.
Are you looking for a system tailored to short-term rentals and management rights? Or do you need a comprehensive platform capable of scaling across multiple properties and hotel types? These questions help determine which system aligns best with your hotel’s operational scale and focus.
If your hotel operates primarily in management rights, holiday lettings, or small portfolios seeking ease of use and trust accounting, Resly PMS is the go-to choice. Its intuitive interface and specific features for short-term rentals make onboarding faster and reduce administrative overhead.
If your hotel needs a robust, multi-functional platform with extensive reporting, revenue management, and a proven track record in large and diverse properties, roommaster PMS is the better fit. It supports a wider range of property types, including boutique hotels, resorts, and chain hotels, with a larger user base and more established presence.
Your decision hinges on your hotel’s complexity and growth plans: for simplicity and niche focus, pick Resly; for scale and feature depth, choose roommaster.
Resly PMS scores 0/5 on ease of use—this rating indicates a lack of available recent user feedback, and its minimal review activity suggests usability might be untested or unverified by current users. In contrast, roommaster scores 4.22/5, with 83 reviews, many praising its intuitive drag-and-drop reservation management and streamlined workflows.
Recent reviews highlight that roommaster’s interface is user-friendly, especially for staff familiar with property management systems, and its onboarding process is rated 4.17/5. Conversely, Resly’s lack of recent feedback makes it harder to confidently assess usability.
Edge: roommaster PMS.
Resly offers 6 features exclusive to its platform—such as multi-currency support, tablet/kiosk check-in, and ancillary revenue tracking—focused on simplifying holiday rental management. roommaster, however, boasts 21 unique features, including EPoS, revenue management, integrated payment processing, guest feedback, and group booking engines—making it a more comprehensive solution.
While Resly’s features suit small-scale short-term rentals, roommaster’s broader feature set supports complex operations like automated night audits, gift vouchers, and detailed business intelligence. For more advanced hotel needs, roommaster’s feature count and versatility give it a clear edge.
Edge: roommaster PMS.
Resly’s support data is unavailable due to zero reviews, making it impossible to gauge current customer service quality. roommaster, however, scores 4.25/5 based on 83 reviews, with users praising quick responses, helpful troubleshooting, and ongoing support—though some mention occasional delays.
Recent comments from roommaster users highlight support responsiveness as a strength, often citing prompt resolution times. The lack of recent feedback on Resly leaves its support quality uncertain, but roommaster’s established reputation suggests reliability.
Edge: roommaster PMS.
Resly integrates with 2 verified partners, including RoomPriceGenie, focusing on essential booking and management integrations. roommaster, with 56 verified partners, supports a wider array of integrations, including channel managers, booking engines, payment systems, and marketing tools like Sage, GuestRevu, and Otelier.
This extensive integration ecosystem enables roommaster users to connect multiple systems for a unified operational flow. If seamless connectivity with diverse third-party tools is crucial, roommaster outperforms Resly.
Edge: roommaster PMS.
Resly has no recent reviews, so its hotel rating credibility is nonexistent. roommaster, on the other hand, boasts an overall rating of 4.33/5 from 83 reviews, with property segments like boutique hotels and resorts rating it higher—often 4.27/5 or better.
Smaller, independent hotels generally appreciate roommaster’s reliable performance and support, while larger or chain hotels highlight its extensive features. For recent user feedback and higher ratings, roommaster clearly leads.
Edge: roommaster PMS.
Resly does not list pricing details or offer a free trial, indicating a potential custom quote or undisclosed pricing model. roommaster charges a flat fee of $500 per month, with no trial or additional implementation costs mentioned.
This flat fee provides transparency for roommaster, while Resly’s pricing remains unclear, which could impact budget planning. Given the lack of published costs for Resly, roommaster’s straightforward pricing is a notable advantage.
Edge: roommaster PMS.
Not ideal if:
Resly suits niche operators prioritizing ease of use and specialized short-term rental features over broad-scale functionalities.
Not ideal if:
roommaster’s versatility makes it suitable for hotels aiming to streamline operations across multiple departments and locations.
The core difference between the two systems rests in scope: Resly is a niche solution targeting management rights and short-term rentals, emphasizing simplicity and trust accounting. roommaster offers a broad, feature-rich platform suited for hotels that need centralized control, detailed reporting, and extensive integrations.
Choose Resly if your focus is on short-term rentals, ease of onboarding, and minimal complexity. Opt for roommaster if you operate larger or multiple properties, require advanced features, and prioritize operational visibility.
For hotels seeking a well-established, comprehensive PMS with a proven track record and higher user ratings, roommaster is the clear choice. However, if your hotel’s core operations align with short-term rentals and management rights, Resly’s simplicity could be advantageous.
In summary: roommaster PMS’s more recent reviews, higher ratings, and extensive features make it the preferable option for most hotels today. Its large user base and proven support history strengthen its position, especially for larger or multi-property hotels. Resly, while promising for niche markets, lacks recent feedback and the breadth of functionality needed for complex hotel operations.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $500/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Resly PMS 和 roommaster PMS 共享 39 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| EPoS | ||
| 在线 24/7 支持 | ||
| 基于云 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 大堂售货亭 | ||
| 家政移动应用程序 | ||
| 平板电脑/自助服务终端值机 | ||
| 拖放磁带图 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 | ||
| 集成支付终端和读卡器 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 15 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 4 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"From my point of view as an asset manager that has the responsibility to tell the owners about their investment, roommaster gives me all that information. It's easy to report and e..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We’re an independent hotel surrounded by giants, but roomMaster gave us the tools we needed to stand tall alongside them."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
虽然有些用户体验到了优质的客户支持,但也有一些用户反映服务存在不一致之处。他们认为,需要提升客服人员的专业水平和对用户问题的理解,才能提供更令人满意的... 虽然有些用户体验到了优质的客户支持,但也有一些用户反映服务存在不一致之处。他们认为,需要提升客服人员的专业水平和对用户问题的理解,才能提供更令人满意的服务体验。
预订管理被认为是RoomMaster的一大优势,用户普遍认为它操作简便、高效,能够妥善管理包括团体预订在内的各种预订。然而,部分用户也指出,RoomMaster在房间分配... 预订管理被认为是RoomMaster的一大优势,用户普遍认为它操作简便、高效,能够妥善管理包括团体预订在内的各种预订。然而,部分用户也指出,RoomMaster在房间分配列表和团体入住登记方面仍有改进空间。
RoomMaster从分散的人工操作方式转向集中式数据管理,因其减少错误、提高酒店运营可靠性而备受赞誉。用户非常欣赏将所有预订、宾客信息和财务数据集中在一个安全... RoomMaster从分散的人工操作方式转向集中式数据管理,因其减少错误、提高酒店运营可靠性而备受赞誉。用户非常欣赏将所有预订、宾客信息和财务数据集中在一个安全平台上的做法,这显著提升了工作流程效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
RoomMaster的报告生成功能虽然实用,但仍被认为有待改进。用户希望在创建和导出报告方面获得更高的效率和效果,这表明改进功能可以简化分析任务。
一些用户指出需要改进用户体验,尤其强调需要消除重复性任务,例如频繁登录,这会影响日常使用该软件的流畅性。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Resly PMS 和 roommaster PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Resly PMS 提供 2 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 roommaster PMS 提供 56 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。roommaster PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.1/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Resly PMS:否。roommaster PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Resly 的 HT Score 为 0,roommaster 的为 83。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问